Example of Physical Review C format
Recent searches

Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format Example of Physical Review C format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Physical Review C — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Nuclear and High Energy Physics #9 of 75 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 3985 Published Papers | 23360 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 07/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.5
SJR: 0.537
SNIP: 1.338
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

IOP Publishing

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.8
SJR: 1.774
SNIP: 1.626
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 12.2
SJR: 3.099
SNIP: 7.624
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.779
SNIP: 0.693

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

5.9

CiteRatio for Physical Review C from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.9
2019 5.9
2018 6.1
2017 6.3
2016 6.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.679

32% from 2019

SJR for Physical Review C from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.679
2019 1.27
2018 1.502
2017 1.443
2016 1.936
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.327

6% from 2019

SNIP for Physical Review C from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.327
2019 1.257
2018 1.461
2017 1.557
2016 1.731
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 32% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Physical Review C

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

American Physical Society

Physical Review C

Physical Review C (PRC) is a leading journal in theoretical and experimental nuclear physics, publishing more than two-thirds of the research literature in the field. Established in 1970, PRC is a trusted, essential resource for nuclear physics researchers, nuclear data aggreg...... Read More

i
Last updated on
07 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
2469-9985
i
Acceptance Rate
24%
i
Frequency
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Numbered
(25)
i
Bibliography Example
G. E Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVC.4.1889
Precision Measurement of Half-Lives and Specific Activities of U 235 and U 238
A.H. Jaffey1, K. F. Flynn1, L.E. Glendenin1, W.C. Bentley1, A.M. Essling1
01 Nov 1971 - Physical Review C

Abstract:

New determinations of the half-lives of $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ and $^{238}\mathrm{U}$ have been made Improved techniques have allowed the half-life values to be measured with greater accuracy than has been heretofore achieved Samples were prepared by molecular plating and counted in a intermediate-geometry $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-p... New determinations of the half-lives of $^{235}\mathrm{U}$ and $^{238}\mathrm{U}$ have been made Improved techniques have allowed the half-life values to be measured with greater accuracy than has been heretofore achieved Samples were prepared by molecular plating and counted in a intermediate-geometry $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-proportional counter with an extremely flat pulse-height plateau The small amount of residual nonplated uranium was counted in a $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ counter Energy analysis with a silicon-junction detector was used to measure the presence of "foreign" activities For $^{235}\mathrm{U}$, the measured specific activity was (47981\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}33) (dis/min)/(mg $^{235}\mathrm{U}$), corresponding to a half-life of (70381\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}00048) \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} ${10}^{8}$ yr For $^{238}\mathrm{U}$, the specific activity was measured as (74619\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}041) (dis/min)/(mg $^{238}\mathrm{U}$), corresponding to a half-life of (44683\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}00024) \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} ${10}^{9}$ yr Errors quoted are statistical (standard error of the mean), based upon the observed scatter of the data This scatter exceeds that expected from counting statistics alone We believe that systematic errors, if present, will no more than double the quoted errors read more read less
2,543 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVC.51.38
Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking
Robert B. Wiringa1, V. G. J. Stoks2, Rocco Schiavilla3
01 Jan 1995 - Physical Review C

Abstract:

The authors present a new high-quality nucleon-nucleon potential with explicit charge dependence and charge asymmetry, which they designate Argonne {upsilon}{sub 18}. The model has a charge-independent part with fourteen operator components that is an updated version of the Argonne {upsilon}{sub 14} potential. Three additiona... The authors present a new high-quality nucleon-nucleon potential with explicit charge dependence and charge asymmetry, which they designate Argonne {upsilon}{sub 18}. The model has a charge-independent part with fourteen operator components that is an updated version of the Argonne {upsilon}{sub 14} potential. Three additional charge-dependent and one charge-asymmetric operators are added, along with a complete electromagnetic interaction. The potential has been fit directly to the Nijmegen pp and np scattering data base, low-energy nn scattering parameters, and deuteron binding energy. With 40 adjustable parameters it gives a {chi}{sup 2} per datum of 1.09 for 4,301 pp and np data in the range 0--350 MeV. read more read less

Topics:

Charge (physics) (52%)52% related to the paper, Base (group theory) (52%)52% related to the paper, Nucleon (52%)52% related to the paper, Energy (signal processing) (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
2,409 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVC.58.1804
Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure
A. Akmal1, V. R. Pandharipande1, D. G. Ravenhall1
01 Sep 1998 - Physical Review C

Abstract:

Properties of dense nucleon matter and the structure of neutron stars are studied using variational chain summation methods and the new Argonne ${v}_{18}$ two-nucleon interaction, which provides an excellent fit to all of the nucleon-nucleon scattering data in the Nijmegen database. The neutron star gravitational mass limit o... Properties of dense nucleon matter and the structure of neutron stars are studied using variational chain summation methods and the new Argonne ${v}_{18}$ two-nucleon interaction, which provides an excellent fit to all of the nucleon-nucleon scattering data in the Nijmegen database. The neutron star gravitational mass limit obtained with this interaction is 1.67${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}.$ Boost corrections to the two-nucleon interaction, which give the leading relativistic effect of order ${(v/c)}^{2},$ as well as three-nucleon interactions, are also included in the nuclear Hamiltonian. Their successive addition increases the mass limit to 1.80 and 2.20 ${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}.$ Hamiltonians including a three-nucleon interaction predict a transition in neutron star matter to a phase with neutral pion condensation at a baryon number density of $\ensuremath{\sim}0.2 {\mathrm{fm}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}.$ Neutron stars predicted by these Hamiltonians have a layer with a thickness on the order of tens of meters, over which the density changes rapidly from that of the normal to the condensed phase. The material in this thin layer is a mixture of the two phases. We also investigate the possibility of dense nucleon matter having an admixture of quark matter, described using the bag model equation of state. Neutron stars of 1.4${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ do not appear to have quark matter admixtures in their cores. However, the heaviest stars are predicted to have cores consisting of a quark and nucleon matter mixture. These admixtures reduce the maximum mass of neutron stars from 2.20 to 2.02 (1.91) ${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ for bag constant $B=200 (122) {\mathrm{M}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{f}\mathrm{m}}^{3}.$ Stars with pure quark matter in their cores are found to be unstable. We also consider the possibility that matter is maximally incompressible above an assumed density, and show that realistic models of nuclear forces limit the maximum mass of neutron stars to be below 2.5${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}.$ The effects of the phase transitions on the composition of neutron star matter and its adiabatic index $\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Strange matter (53%)53% related to the paper, Nuclear matter (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
2,079 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVC.63.024001
The High precision, charge dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential (CD-Bonn)
Ruprecht Machleidt1
11 Jan 2001 - Physical Review C

Abstract:

We present a charge-dependent one-boson-exchange nucleon-nucleon $(\mathrm{NN})$ potential that fits the world proton-proton data below 350 MeV available in the year 2000 with a ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$ per datum of 1.01 for 2932 data and the corresponding neutron-proton data with ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}/\mathrm{datum}$ $=1... We present a charge-dependent one-boson-exchange nucleon-nucleon $(\mathrm{NN})$ potential that fits the world proton-proton data below 350 MeV available in the year 2000 with a ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}$ per datum of 1.01 for 2932 data and the corresponding neutron-proton data with ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{2}/\mathrm{datum}$ $=1.02$ for 3058 data. This reproduction of the $\mathrm{NN}$ data is more accurate than by any phase-shift analysis and any other $\mathrm{NN}$ potential. This is achieved by the introduction of two effective $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ mesons the parameters of which are partial-wave dependent. The charge dependence of the present potential (which we call ``CD-Bonn'') is based upon the predictions by the Bonn full model for charge symmetry and charge-independence breaking in all partial waves with $Jl~4.$ The potential is represented in terms of the covariant Feynman amplitudes for one-boson exchange which are nonlocal. Therefore, the off-shell behavior of the CD-Bonn potential differs in a characteristic way from commonly used local potentials and leads to larger binding energies in nuclear few- and many-body systems, where underbinding is a persistent problem. read more read less
View PDF
1,368 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVC.5.626
Hartree-Fock Calculations with Skyrme's Interaction. I. Spherical Nuclei
D. Vautherin1, David M. Brink2
01 Mar 1972 - Physical Review C

Abstract:

Hartree-Fock calculations for spherical nuclei using Skyrme's density-dependent effective nucleon-nucleon interaction are discussed systematically. Skyrme's interaction is described and the general formula for the mean energy of a spherical nucleus derived. Hartree-Fock equations are obtained by varying the mean energy with r... Hartree-Fock calculations for spherical nuclei using Skyrme's density-dependent effective nucleon-nucleon interaction are discussed systematically. Skyrme's interaction is described and the general formula for the mean energy of a spherical nucleus derived. Hartree-Fock equations are obtained by varying the mean energy with respect to the single-particle wave functions of occupied states. Relations between the parameters of the Skyrme force and various general properties of nuclear matter and finite nuclei are analyzed. Calculations have been made for closed-shell nuclei using two rather different sets of parameters, both of which give good binding energies and radii for $^{16}\mathrm{O}$ and $^{208}\mathrm{Pb}$. Both interactions give good binding energies and charge radii for all closed-shell nuclei. Calculated electron scattering angular distributions agree qualitatively with experiment, and for one interaction there is good quantitative agreement. The single-particle energies calculated with the two interactions are somewhat different owing to a different nonlocality of the Hartree-Fock potentials, but both interactions give the correct order and density of single-particle levels near the Fermi level. They differ most strongly in their predictions for the energies of $1s$ single-particle states. read more read less

Topics:

Hartree–Fock method (51%)51% related to the paper, Wave function (50%)50% related to the paper, Binding energy (50%)50% related to the paper, Elastic scattering (50%)50% related to the paper, Nuclear matter (50%)50% related to the paper
1,340 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Physical Review C.

It automatically formats your research paper to American Physical Society formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Physical Review C in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Physical Review C guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Physical Review C guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Physical Review C guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Physical Review C?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Physical Review C citation style.

4. Can I use the Physical Review C templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Physical Review C.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Physical Review C that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Physical Review C that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Physical Review C?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Physical Review C.

7. Where can I find the template for the Physical Review C?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Physical Review C's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Physical Review C's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Physical Review C an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Physical Review C is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Physical Review C?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Physical Review C?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Physical Review C?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Physical Review C, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Physical Review C's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Physical Review C?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Physical Review C. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Physical Review C?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Physical Review C are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Physical Review C?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Physical Review C's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Physical Review C in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Physical Review C Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Physical Review C formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template