Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format
Recent searches

Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format Example of European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Pharmacy #15 of 35 down down by None rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 262 Published Papers | 428 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 17/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.7
SJR: 0.538
SNIP: 0.974
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.3
SJR: 0.786
SNIP: 1.529

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.892

24% from 2018

Impact factor for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.892
2018 0.717
2017 0.538
2016 0.718
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.6

33% from 2019

CiteRatio for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.6
2019 1.2
2018 1.2
2017 1.0
2016 1.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 24% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 33% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.313

11% from 2019

SJR for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.313
2019 0.283
2018 0.275
2017 0.213
2016 0.312
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.594

13% from 2019

SNIP for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.594
2019 0.526
2018 0.552
2017 0.355
2016 0.534
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

BMJ Publishing Group

European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy

European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) and is committed to advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. As the premier communication platform for European hosp...... Read More

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

i
Last updated on
17 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
2047-9956
i
Impact Factor
Low - 0.183
i
Acceptance Rate
59%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EJHPHARM-2012-000074.356
STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) as a pharmacy service

Abstract:

Background In 2009 National Quality Standards for Residential Care Settings for Older people in Ireland were written into Irish legislation by the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). Standard 15 specifically states that each resident on long-term medication in the Residential Care Setting should be reviewed by hi... Background In 2009 National Quality Standards for Residential Care Settings for Older people in Ireland were written into Irish legislation by the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). Standard 15 specifically states that each resident on long-term medication in the Residential Care Setting should be reviewed by his/her medical practitioner on a three monthly basis, in conjunction with nursing staff and the pharmacist. Purpose Implementation of STOPP and START 1 as a clinical pharmacy service to facilitate three monthly medication reviews in an older residential care setting. Qualitative evaluation of the acceptability of the service to General Practitioners. Materials and methods A total of 103 residents ≥65 years from two residential care units were eligible for inclusion (exclusion criteria included terminally ill or respite patients) in the study and six General Practitioners participated in the study. Each General Practitioner completed a qualitative post service evaluation interview to determine the acceptability of STOPP and START 1 as a clinical pharmacy service. Results Of the residents reviewed (n=103), 75 (72.8%) were female; the median age was 86 years (IQR: 66-103). 884 regular medicines were prescribed (Median 9). 75.7% (78) residents had at least one potentially inappropriate medicine (PIM) or prescribing omission identified by STOPP and START criteria 1 . 65% of potentially inappropriate prescribing involved use of medicines that had unfavourable risk benefit ratio according to STOPP and 34.8% were instances of PIM through omission of potentially beneficial medicine according to START. 46.6% (95) of recommendations were accepted and implemented by General Practitioners. Of all recommendations declined a valid reason was provided in 93.5% (102) of cases. All General Practitioners interviewed found STOPP/START 1 to be acceptable as a clinical pharmacy service. Conclusions Implementation of STOPP and START 1 as a clinical pharmacy service reduces inappropriate prescribing, facilitates the three monthly medication reviews required to meet HIQA9s medication monitoring and review standard and is acceptable to General Practitioners. read more read less

Topics:

Pharmacist (59%)59% related to the paper, Clinical pharmacy (59%)59% related to the paper, Pharmacy (52%)52% related to the paper, Medical prescription (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
58 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EJHPHARM-2016-000967
Deprescribing: a primary care perspective
Polly Duncan1, Martin Duerden2, Rupert Payne1

Abstract:

Polypharmacy is an increasing and global issue affecting primary care. Although sometimes appropriate, polypharmacy can also be problematic, leading to a range of adverse consequences. Deprescribing is the process of supervised withdrawal of an inappropriate medication and has the potential to reduce some of the problems asso... Polypharmacy is an increasing and global issue affecting primary care. Although sometimes appropriate, polypharmacy can also be problematic, leading to a range of adverse consequences. Deprescribing is the process of supervised withdrawal of an inappropriate medication and has the potential to reduce some of the problems associated with polypharmacy. It is a complex and sensitive process. We examine the issue of deprescribing from the perspective of primary care. Key steps in the deprescribing process are a review of medications and corresponding indications, consideration of harms, assessment of eligibility for discontinuation, prioritisation of medications and implementation of a stopping plan with appropriate monitoring. Patient involvement is a key feature of this process. Deprescribing should be considered in the context of end-of-life care and medication safety, but approaches are also required to identify other situations where deprescribing is appropriate. General practitioners are well positioned to facilitate deprescribing, usually through formal medication review, with decisions informed by a range of other healthcare professionals. Guidelines are available that help guide these processes. A range of studies have explored attitudes towards deprescribing; patients are generally supportive of the concept, although clinician views are varied. The successful implementation of deprescribing strategies still requires important patient and clinician barriers to be overcome, and clinical trial evidence of effectiveness and safety is essential. read more read less

Topics:

Deprescribing (85%)85% related to the paper, Beers Criteria (63%)63% related to the paper, Polypharmacy (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
55 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EJHPHARM-2018-001624
Incidence and prevalence of intravenous medication errors in the UK: a systematic review.
Adam Sutherland1, Michela Canobbio2, Janine Clarke, Michelle Randall3, Tom Skelland4, Emma Weston5

Abstract:

Objectives Medication error is the most common type of medical error, and intravenous medicines are at a higher risk as they are complex to prepare and administer. The WHO advocates a 50% reduction of harmful medication errors by 2022, but there is a lack of data in the UK that accurately estimates the true rate of intravenou... Objectives Medication error is the most common type of medical error, and intravenous medicines are at a higher risk as they are complex to prepare and administer. The WHO advocates a 50% reduction of harmful medication errors by 2022, but there is a lack of data in the UK that accurately estimates the true rate of intravenous medication errors. This study aimed to estimate the number of intravenous medication errors per 1000 administrations in the UK National Health Service and their associated economic costs. The rate of errors in prescribing, preparation and administration, and rate of different types of errors were also extracted. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane central register of clinical trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and the Health Technology Appraisals Database were searched from inception to July 2017. Epidemiological studies to determine the incidence of intravenous medication errors set wholly or in part in the UK were included. 228 studies were identified, and after screening, eight papers were included, presenting 2576 infusions. Data were reviewed and extracted by a team of five reviewers with discrepancies in data extraction agreed by consensus. Results Five of eight studies used a comparable denominator, and these data were pooled to determine a weighted mean incidence of 101 intravenous medication errors per 1000 administrations (95% CI 84 to 121). Three studies presented prevalence data but these were based on spontaneous reports only; therefore it did not support a true estimate. 32.1% (95% CI 30.6% to 33.7%) of intravenous medication errors were administration errors and ‘wrong rate’ errors accounted for 57.9% (95% CI 54.7% to 61.1%) of these. Conclusion Intravenous medication errors in the UK are common, with half these of errors related to medication administration. National strategies are aimed at mitigating errors in prescribing and preparation. It is now time to focus on reducing administration error, particularly wrong rate errors. read more read less
View PDF
52 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EJHPHARM-2018-001725
Medication adherence interventions and outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews.
Nina C Wilhelmsen1, Tommy Eriksson

Abstract:

Objective To present evidence for healthcare-provided medication adherence interventions on clinical, economic and humanistic outcomes among patients. Methods Literature search of systematic reviews in Medline, Embase and CINAHL (2007–2017), validation of quality using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) ... Objective To present evidence for healthcare-provided medication adherence interventions on clinical, economic and humanistic outcomes among patients. Methods Literature search of systematic reviews in Medline, Embase and CINAHL (2007–2017), validation of quality using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses questionnaires and, finally, extraction, combination and tabulation of results for included studies. Results From eight systematic reviews with medium to high AMSTAR 2 score, 37 randomised controlled studies involving 28 600 participants were extracted. Patient education and counselling showed some positive effects on medication adherence. Patient education also showed some positive effects on morbidity, healthcare utilities and patient satisfaction. Counselling had some benefit on mortality and healthcare utilisation. Simplifying doses was shown to have some benefit on morbidity and patient satisfaction. Interventions delivered by pharmacists and nurses showed a better result in improving adherence and outcomes than interventions delivered by general practitioners. Conclusions Some interventions were found to have positive effect on adherence and outcomes, but no single strategy showed improvement in all settings. For future research patients should be screened for non-adherence to reveal both if they are non-adherent and type of non-adherence, as well as bigger sample sizes and longer duration of follow-up. read more read less

Topics:

Systematic review (58%)58% related to the paper, Patient satisfaction (54%)54% related to the paper, Psychological intervention (51%)51% related to the paper, Patient education (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
49 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EJHPHARM-2014-000486
Pharmacist prescribing within a UK NHS hospital trust: nature and extent of prescribing, and prevalence of errors
Wasim Baqir1, Olga Crehan1, Richard Murray1, David Campbell1, Richard Copeland1

Abstract:

Objectives Suitably qualified pharmacists in the UK are able to prescribe all medicines. While doctors’ prescribing errors are well documented, there is little information on the rate and nature of pharmacists’ prescribing errors. Our aim was to measure the prevalence of prescribing errors by pharmacists. Methods Prescribing ... Objectives Suitably qualified pharmacists in the UK are able to prescribe all medicines. While doctors’ prescribing errors are well documented, there is little information on the rate and nature of pharmacists’ prescribing errors. Our aim was to measure the prevalence of prescribing errors by pharmacists. Methods Prescribing by pharmacists, for inpatients admitted to three hospitals in North East England was studied. Part one measured the extent of prescribing by pharmacists as a proportion of all prescribing on a single day. The number of medication orders, reason for prescribing and therapeutic category were collected by the researcher (OC). In part two, pharmacist prescribing was reviewed for safety and accuracy by ward-based clinical pharmacists over 10 days; errors were documented and categorised as per EQUIP study. Results Part 1: Pharmacists prescribed one or more medication orders for 182 (39.8%) of 457 patients, accounting for 12.9% (680 from 5274) of all medication orders prescribed on a single census day. Pharmacists prescribed medicines from 12 out of 15 British National Formulary categories (no prescribing of drugs used in malignancy, immunology and anaesthetics). Part 2: 1415 pharmacist-prescribed medication orders were checked by clinical pharmacists, with four errors (0.3%) reported. Conclusions This study suggests that prescribing pharmacists can provide a valuable role in safely prescribing for a broad range of inpatients in UK general hospitals. read more read less

Topics:

Clinical pharmacy (60%)60% related to the paper, Formulary (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
48 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy.

It automatically formats your research paper to BMJ Publishing Group formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy citation style.

4. Can I use the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy.

5. Can I use a manuscript in European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy.

7. Where can I find the template for the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

After writing your paper autoformatting in European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template