Example of Modern Intellectual History format
Recent searches

Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format Example of Modern Intellectual History format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Modern Intellectual History — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
History #348 of 1328 down down by 107 ranks
Cultural Studies #349 of 1037 down down by 106 ranks
Philosophy #221 of 644 down down by 54 ranks
Sociology and Political Science #829 of 1269 down down by 221 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 147 Published Papers | 82 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.544
SNIP: 1.47
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.1
SJR: 0.285
SNIP: 0.73
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.346
SNIP: 1.243
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.424
SNIP: 1.153

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.6

14% from 2019

CiteRatio for Modern Intellectual History from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.6
2019 0.7
2018 0.7
2017 0.7
2016 0.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.154

22% from 2019

SJR for Modern Intellectual History from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.154
2019 0.198
2018 0.221
2017 0.218
2016 0.188
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.835

17% from 2019

SNIP for Modern Intellectual History from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.835
2019 1.007
2018 1.52
2017 1.244
2016 0.714
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 22% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Modern Intellectual History

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Cambridge University Press

Modern Intellectual History

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Modern Intellectual History formatting guidelines as mentioned in Cambridge University Press author instructions. The current version was created on 11 Jul 2020 and has been used by 311 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

History

Cultural Studies

Philosophy

Sociology and Political Science

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
11 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1479-2443
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.128
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G E Blonder, M Tinkham, and T M Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1479244307001540
Historiography and enlightenment: a view of their history
J. G. A. Pocock1

Abstract:

This essay is written on the following premises and argues for them. “Enlightenment” is a word or signifier, and not a single or unifiable phenomenon which it consistently signifies. There is no single or unifiable phenomenon describable as “the Enlightenment,” but it is the definite article rather than the noun which is to b... This essay is written on the following premises and argues for them. “Enlightenment” is a word or signifier, and not a single or unifiable phenomenon which it consistently signifies. There is no single or unifiable phenomenon describable as “the Enlightenment,” but it is the definite article rather than the noun which is to be avoided. In studying the intellectual history of the late seventeenth century and the eighteenth, we encounter a variety of statements made, and assumptions proposed, to which the term “Enlightenment” may usefully be applied, but the meanings of the term shift as we apply it. The things are connected, but not continuous; they cannot be reduced to a single narrative; and we find ourselves using the word “Enlightenment” in a family of ways and talking about a family of phenomena, resembling and related to one another in a variety of ways that permit of various generalizations about them. We are not, however, committed to a single root meaning of the word “Enlightenment,” and we do not need to reduce the phenomena of which we treat to a single process or entity to be termed “the” Enlightenment. It is a reification that we wish to avoid, but the structure of our language is such that this is difficult, and we will find ourselves talking of “the French” or “the Scottish,” “the Newtonian” or the “the Arminian” Enlightenments, and hoping that by employing qualifying adjectives we may constantly remind ourselves that the keyword “Enlightenment” is ours to use and should not master us. read more read less

Topics:

Enlightenment (53%)53% related to the paper, Intellectual history (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
100 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1479244307001370
"What is the History of Books?" Revisited
Robert Darnton1

Abstract:

Having accepted the invitation to revisit my essay of 1982, “What Is the History of Books?”, I find that I can do it only in the first person singular and therefore must ask to be excused for indulging in some autobiographical detail. I would also like to make a disclaimer: in proposing a model for studying the history of boo... Having accepted the invitation to revisit my essay of 1982, “What Is the History of Books?”, I find that I can do it only in the first person singular and therefore must ask to be excused for indulging in some autobiographical detail. I would also like to make a disclaimer: in proposing a model for studying the history of books twenty-four years ago, I did not mean to tell book historians how they ought to do their jobs. I hoped that the model might be useful in a heuristic way and never thought of it as comparable to the models favored by economists, the kind in which you insert data, work it over, and arrive at a bottom line. (I do not believe that bottom lines exist in history.) It seemed to me in 1982 that the history of books was suffering from fissiparousness: experts were pursuing such specialized studies that they were losing contact with one another. The esoteric elements of book history needed to be integrated into an overview that would show how the parts could connect to form a whole—or what I characterized as a communications circuit. The tendency toward fragmentation and specialization still exists. read more read less
View PDF
95 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1479244306001028
Rammohan roy and the advent of constitutional liberalism in india, 1800–30
C. A. Bayly1

Abstract:

This paper concerns the reformulation by British expatriates and the first generation of English-speaking Indian intellectuals of the key ideas of European constitutional liberalism between 1810 and 1835. The central figure is Rammohan Roy, usually seen as a “reformer” of Hinduism. Here Rammohan's thought is set in the contex... This paper concerns the reformulation by British expatriates and the first generation of English-speaking Indian intellectuals of the key ideas of European constitutional liberalism between 1810 and 1835. The central figure is Rammohan Roy, usually seen as a “reformer” of Hinduism. Here Rammohan's thought is set in the context of the Iberian and Latin American constitutional revolutions and the movement for free trade and parliamentary reform in Britain. Rammohan and his coevals created a constitutional history for India that centred on the institution of the panchayat, a local judicial body. While some expatriates and Indian radicals discussed “independence” or “separation” for the country as early as the 1830s, Rammohan himself argued for constitutional limitations on the Company's power and Indian representation in Parliament. Under liberal British government, he believed, an Indian public would emerge, empowered by service on juries and the operations of a free press. read more read less

Topics:

Constitutional liberalism (58%)58% related to the paper, Parliament (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
75 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1479244309990175
Liberalism without humanism: michel foucault and the free-market creed, 1976–1979*
Michael C. Behrent1

Abstract:

This article challenges conventional readings of Michel Foucault by examining his fascination with neoliberalism in the late 1970s. Foucault did not critique neoliberalism during this period; rather, he strategically endorsed it. The necessary cause for this approval lies in the broader rehabilitation of economic liberalism i... This article challenges conventional readings of Michel Foucault by examining his fascination with neoliberalism in the late 1970s. Foucault did not critique neoliberalism during this period; rather, he strategically endorsed it. The necessary cause for this approval lies in the broader rehabilitation of economic liberalism in France during the 1970s. The sufficient cause lies in Foucault's own intellectual development: drawing on his long-standing critique of the state as a model for conceptualizing power, Foucault concluded, during the 1970s, that economic liberalism, rather than “discipline,” was modernity's paradigmatic power form. Moreover, this article seeks to clarify the relationship between Foucault's philosophical antihumanism and his assessment of liberalism. Rather than arguing (as others have) that Foucault's antihumanism precluded a positive appraisal of liberalism, or that the apparent reorientation of his politics in a more liberal direction in the late 1970s entailed a partial retreat from antihumanism, this article contends that Foucault's brief, strategic, and contingent endorsement of liberalism was possible precisely because he saw no incompatibility between antihumanism and liberalism—but only liberalism of the economic variety. Economic liberalism alone, and not its political iteration, was compatible with the philosophical antihumanism that is the hallmark of Foucault's thought. read more read less

Topics:

Economic liberalism (62%)62% related to the paper, Antihumanism (62%)62% related to the paper, Liberalism (56%)56% related to the paper, Neoliberalism (53%)53% related to the paper, Humanism (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
70 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1479244306000746
What is “national identity”? definitions and applications in modern british historiography
Peter Mandler1

Abstract:

“National identity” is one of those concepts, like “political culture”, which historians have somewhat casually borrowed from the social sciences and then used promiscuously for their own purposes. Over twenty years ago Philip Gleason wrote a wise and prescient (yet sadly underappreciated) essay on the origins of the concept ... “National identity” is one of those concepts, like “political culture”, which historians have somewhat casually borrowed from the social sciences and then used promiscuously for their own purposes. Over twenty years ago Philip Gleason wrote a wise and prescient (yet sadly underappreciated) essay on the origins of the concept of “identity” in the 1950s, warning historians that already then it had two quite distinct—psychological and sociological—meanings that needed to be distinguished to retain any conceptual clarity. Since then our own use of it has proliferated uncontrollably, and the original confusion identified by Gleason has been compounded by many others. The chain of communication between the concept's progenitors and its present-day users is now so long and so fragmentary that our usage may bear little or no relation to the discourse that Gleason described. There may be nothing wrong with this state of affairs; historians may have found their own value in the term, which need not necessarily be validated by social science. Yet social scientists have continued to work with “identity”, and have puzzled much further over its possible meaning and utility with a degree of conceptual rigour that historians do not usually share. And we continue to validate our own use of the term by reference to an increasingly shadowy and distant social science whence it came. Accordingly it may be useful to look more closely at what social scientists think “national identity” is, and how it operates in human minds and societies. This essay attempts a brief exploration of that kind and then applies its findings to the recent historiography of “national identity” in modern Britain. read more read less

Topics:

Identity (social science) (58%)58% related to the paper, National identity (58%)58% related to the paper, Historiography (54%)54% related to the paper, Nation-building (53%)53% related to the paper
56 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Modern Intellectual History.

It automatically formats your research paper to Cambridge University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Modern Intellectual History format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Modern Intellectual History in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Modern Intellectual History guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Modern Intellectual History guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Modern Intellectual History guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Modern Intellectual History?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Modern Intellectual History citation style.

4. Can I use the Modern Intellectual History templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Modern Intellectual History.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Modern Intellectual History that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Modern Intellectual History that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Modern Intellectual History?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Modern Intellectual History.

7. Where can I find the template for the Modern Intellectual History?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Modern Intellectual History's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Modern Intellectual History's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Modern Intellectual History an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Modern Intellectual History is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Modern Intellectual History?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Modern Intellectual History?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Modern Intellectual History?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Modern Intellectual History, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Modern Intellectual History's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Modern Intellectual History?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Modern Intellectual History. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Modern Intellectual History?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Modern Intellectual History are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Modern Intellectual History?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Modern Intellectual History's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Modern Intellectual History in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Modern Intellectual History Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Modern Intellectual History formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template