Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format
Recent searches

Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format Example of Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Agronomy and Crop Science #62 of 347 up up by 7 ranks
Food Science #77 of 310 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 224 Published Papers | 973 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 17/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.8
SJR: 0.875
SNIP: 1.734
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.4
SJR: 0.989
SNIP: 1.29
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 1.023
SNIP: 1.583
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.9
SJR: 1.397
SNIP: 1.885

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.188

24% from 2018

Impact factor for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.188
2018 1.771
2017 1.701
2016 1.333
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.3

16% from 2019

CiteRatio for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.3
2019 3.7
2018 3.7
2017 3.1
2016 3.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 24% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 16% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.709

11% from 2019

SJR for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.709
2019 0.637
2018 0.581
2017 0.593
2016 0.675
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.141

8% from 2019

SNIP for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.141
2019 1.058
2018 0.929
2017 1.013
2016 1.027
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Cambridge University Press

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems publishes original research on biological, physical, or social science aspects of alternative and renewable agriculture and food systems. We particularly welcome multidisciplinary studies, but papers from a specific discipline are also in...... Read More

Agronomy and Crop Science

Food Science

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
17 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1742-1705
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.008
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G E Blonder, M Tinkham, and T M Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S1742170507001640
Organic agriculture and the global food supply

Abstract:

The principal objections to the proposition that organic agriculture can contribute significantly to the global food supply are low yields and insufficient quantities of organically acceptable fertilizers. We evaluated the universality of both claims. For the first claim, we compared yields of organic versus conventional or l... The principal objections to the proposition that organic agriculture can contribute significantly to the global food supply are low yields and insufficient quantities of organically acceptable fertilizers. We evaluated the universality of both claims. For the first claim, we compared yields of organic versus conventional or low-intensive food production for a global dataset of 293 examples and estimated the average yield ratio (organic:non-organic) of different food categories for the developed and the developing world. For most food categories, the average yield ratio was slightly 1.0 for studies in the developing world. With the average yield ratios, we modeled the global food supply that could be grown organically on the current agricultural land base. Model estimates indicate that organic methods could produce enough food on a global per capita basis to sustain the current human population, and potentially an even larger population, without increasing the agricultural land base. We also evaluated the amount of nitrogen potentially available from fixation by leguminous cover crops used as fertilizer. Data from temperate and tropical agroecosystems suggest that leguminous cover crops could fix enough nitrogen to replace the amount of synthetic fertilizer currently in use. These results indicate that organic agriculture has the potential to contribute quite substantially to the global food supply, while reducing the detrimental environmental impacts of conventional agriculture. Evaluation and review of this paper have raised important issues about crop rotations under organic versus conventional agriculture and the reliability of grey-literature sources. An ongoing dialogue on these subjects can be found in the Forum editorial of this issue. read more read less

Topics:

Food systems (64%)64% related to the paper, Agriculture (59%)59% related to the paper, Organic farming (58%)58% related to the paper, Food processing (55%)55% related to the paper, Agricultural land (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
895 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1079/AJAA200228
Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use
Ray R. Weil, Kandikar R. Islam, Melissa A. Stine1, Joel B. Gruver1, Susan Samson-Liebig2

Abstract:

A simple method of estimating changes in biologically active soil carbon (C) could help evaluate soil quality impacts of alternative management practices. Most reports of permanganate for active C determination use highly concentrated solutions (0.333 M) that are difficult to work with and tend to react with a large fraction ... A simple method of estimating changes in biologically active soil carbon (C) could help evaluate soil quality impacts of alternative management practices. Most reports of permanganate for active C determination use highly concentrated solutions (0.333 M) that are difficult to work with and tend to react with a large fraction of soil C that is not well distinguished from total organic C. We report on a highly simplified method in which dilute, slightly alkaline KMnO4 reacts with the most readily oxidizable (active) forms of soil C, converting Mn(VII) to Mn(II), and proportionally lowering absorbance of 550 nm light. The amount of soil C that reacted increased with concentration of KMnO4 used (0.01 to 0.1 M), degree of soil drying (moist fresh soil to air-dried for 24 hour) and time of shaking (1-15 minutes). Shaking of air-dry soil in a 0.02 M KMnO4 solution for 2 minutes produced consistent and management- sensitive results, both in the laboratory and with a field kit that used a hand-held colorimeter. Addition of 0.1 M CaCl2 to the permanganate reagent enhanced settling of the soil after shaking, eliminating the need for centrifugation in the field kit. Results from the laboratory and field-kit protocols were nearly identical (R 2 = 0.98), as were those from an inter-laboratory sample exchange (R 2 = 0.91). The active soil C measured by the new procedure was more sensitive to management effects than total organic C, and more closely related to biologically mediated soil properties, such as respiration, microbial biomass and aggregation, than several other measures of soil organic C. read more read less

Topics:

Soil organic matter (65%)65% related to the paper, Soil test (61%)61% related to the paper, Soil management (61%)61% related to the paper, Soil quality (58%)58% related to the paper, Soil carbon (57%)57% related to the paper
837 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1079/RAF2005113
Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature
Emmanuel K. Yiridoe1, Samuel Bonti-Ankomah2, Ralph C. Martin1

Abstract:

Growing interest in organic agriculture has prompted numerous studies that compare various aspects of organic and conventionally produced foods. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of empirical studies comparing organic products and conventionally grown alternatives. The emphasis is on key organic consumer demand a... Growing interest in organic agriculture has prompted numerous studies that compare various aspects of organic and conventionally produced foods. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of empirical studies comparing organic products and conventionally grown alternatives. The emphasis is on key organic consumer demand and marketing issues, including: (1) the implications of an economic definition of organically grown food for consumer demand; (2) attributes that shoppers consider most when comparing organic with conventionally grown products; (3) level and characteristics of consumer knowledge and awareness about organic food; (4) assessment methods and characteristics of organic consumer attitudes and preferences; (5) size of price premium and characteristics of consumers’ willingness-to-pay for organic products; and (6) profile of organic consumers. Overall, although there is some knowledge and awareness about organic products, consumers are not consistent in their interpretation of what is organic. Secondly, while consumers typically understand the broad issues about organic foods, many tend not to understand the complexities and niceties of organic farming practices and organic food quality attributes. Uncertainty regarding the true attributes of organic, and skepticism about organic labels, part of which stems from reported cases of (inadvertent) mislabeling, and product misrepresentation, and partly because of nonuniform organic standards and certification procedures, may hold some consumers back from purchasing organic. Thirdly, concern for human health and safety, which is a key factor that influences consumer preference for organic food, is consistent with observed deterioration in human health over time and, therefore, motivates consumers to buy organic food as insurance and/or investment in health. Fourthly, the proportion of consumers who are willing to pay a price premium for organic food decreases with premium level. On the other hand, premiums tend to increase with (combinations of) preferred attributes. In addition, demand tends to depend more on the price differential with respect to conventionally grown products, than on actual price. In contrast to sensitivity of demand to changes in price, income elasticity of demand for organic foods is generally small. Finally, it is important for policy analysts and researchers to note that organic fresh fruits and vegetables currently dominate the organic consumer's food basket. Furthermore, it is not clear whether frequent buyers consider particular organic products (e.g., organic meat) as normal goods, or if consumers consider such products as luxury goods. read more read less

Topics:

Organic product (73%)73% related to the paper, Price premium (56%)56% related to the paper, Willingness to pay (52%)52% related to the paper, Organic farming (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
702 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0889189300007165
Local food systems and sustainable communities
Gail Feenstra1

Abstract:

The long-term health of a community's food system is an important indicator of its vitality and sustainability. A logical and appropriate way to revitalize a community is by the development of a local food economy. People throughout the United States are designing and implementing sustainable, local food systems that are root... The long-term health of a community's food system is an important indicator of its vitality and sustainability. A logical and appropriate way to revitalize a community is by the development of a local food economy. People throughout the United States are designing and implementing sustainable, local food systems that are rooted in particular places, aim to be economically viable for farmers and consumers, use ecologically sound production and distribution practices, and enhance social equity and democracy for all members of the community. This paper reviews the existing literature on local food systems, examines a variety of strategies and initiatives that are currently underway, and identifies steps that community kaders and citizens can use to develop their own local food systems. Finally, I suggest what research is needed to support these community efforts. read more read less

Topics:

Community food security (71%)71% related to the paper, Food systems (65%)65% related to the paper, Food policy (63%)63% related to the paper, Local community (59%)59% related to the paper, Community economic development (59%)59% related to the paper
View PDF
580 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0889189300000886
Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: Historical perspective and future prospects
Alan H. Goldstein1

Abstract:

Maximum crop yields require sufficient phosphorus fertilization. Only phosphate in a soluble ionic form (Pi) is effective as a mineral nutrient. Current fertilizer technology supplies the soil solution with Pi via the application of large amounts of phosphate salts. Problems with this technology include energy-intensive produ... Maximum crop yields require sufficient phosphorus fertilization. Only phosphate in a soluble ionic form (Pi) is effective as a mineral nutrient. Current fertilizer technology supplies the soil solution with Pi via the application of large amounts of phosphate salts. Problems with this technology include energy-intensive production processes, the need for large scale mechanical application with associated environmental consequences, and reprecipitation of the phosphate into insoluble mineral complexes. It has been estimated that in some soils up to 75% of applied phosphate fertilizer may be lost to the plant because of mineral phase reprecipitation. Many approaches, ranging from cultural practices to biological inoculants such as mycorrhizal fungi, are being employed to enhance P-use efficiency. One area that is currently under-investigated is the ability of certain types of bacteria to solubilize mineral and organic phosphates. A review of the literature in the area of bacterial phosphate solubilization confirms that this trait is displayed by a wide range of bacteria. The phosphate starvation inducible (PSI) organic phosphate-solubilizing capability of E. coli is a component of a coordinately regulated gene system: the pho regulon. It has long been known that bacteria are also capable of solubilizing mineral phosphates such as hydroxyapatite. To date there has been no systematic study of the genetics of this phenomenon. Data from my laboratory indicate that the bacterial mineral phosphate-solubilizing (MPS) trait is regulated by the external level of Pi This conclusion is supported by results obtained from several types of molecular genetic studies. It is proposed that bacteria have mineral phosphate solubilizing (mps) genes. The potential agronomic applications of bacterial mineral and organic P solubilizing systems are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Phosphate (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
422 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

It automatically formats your research paper to Cambridge University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems citation style.

4. Can I use the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

7. Where can I find the template for the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template