Example of Applied Linguistics Review format
Recent searches

Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format Example of Applied Linguistics Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
recommended Recommended

Applied Linguistics Review — Template for authors

Publisher: De Gruyter
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Language and Linguistics #67 of 879 down down by None rank
Linguistics and Language #77 of 935 down down by None rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 95 Published Papers | 271 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 05/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.832
SNIP: 1.154
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.614
SNIP: 2.163
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.269
SNIP: 1.936
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.947
SNIP: 1.603

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.9

16% from 2019

CiteRatio for Applied Linguistics Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.9
2019 2.5
2018 3.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.56

14% from 2019

SJR for Applied Linguistics Review from 2019 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.56
2019 0.651
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.926

28% from 2019

SNIP for Applied Linguistics Review from 2018 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.926
2019 1.278
2018 1.657
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 16% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 28% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Applied Linguistics Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

De Gruyter

Applied Linguistics Review

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Applied Linguistics Review formatting guidelines as mentioned in De Gruyter author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 456 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Linguistics and Semiotics

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
04 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1868-6303
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/APPLIREV-2015-0014
Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics
Ricardo Otheguy1, Ofelia García1, Wallis Reid2

Abstract:

The concept of translanguaging is clarified, establishing it as a particular conception of the mental grammars and linguistic practices of bilinguals. Translanguaging is different from code switching. Under translanguaging, the mental grammars of bilinguals are structured but unitary collections of features, and the practices... The concept of translanguaging is clarified, establishing it as a particular conception of the mental grammars and linguistic practices of bilinguals. Translanguaging is different from code switching. Under translanguaging, the mental grammars of bilinguals are structured but unitary collections of features, and the practices of bilinguals are acts of feature selection, not of grammar switch. A proper understanding of translanguaging requires a return to the well known but often forgotten idea that named languages are social, not linguistic, objects. Whereas the idiolect of a particular individual is a linguistic object defined in terms of lexical and structural features, the named language of a nation or social group is not; its boundaries and membership cannot be established on the basis of lexical and structural features. The two named languages of the bilingual exist only in the outsider's view. From the insider's perspective of the speaker, there is only his or her full idiolect or repertoire, which belongs only to the speaker, not to any named language. Translanguaging is the deployment of a speaker' sf ull linguistic repertoire without regard for watchful adherence to the socially and politically defined boundaries of named (and usually national and state) languages. In schools, the translanguaging of bilinguals tends to be severely restricted. In addition, schools confuse the assessment of general linguistic proficiency, which is best manifested in bilinguals while translanguaging, with the testing of profi- ciency in a named language, which insists on inhibiting translanguaging. The concept of translanguaging is of special relevance to schools interested in the linguistic and intellectual growth of bilingual students as well as to minoritized communities involved in language maintenance and revitalization efforts. read more read less

Topics:

Translanguaging (79%)79% related to the paper, Idiolect (53%)53% related to the paper, Code-switching (52%)52% related to the paper, Grammar (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
964 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/9783110239331.1
Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy

Abstract:

This article attempts to synthesize the scholarship on translanguaging conducted in different academic disciplines and social domains, and raises critical questions on theory, research and pedagogy to take the orientation forward. The literature review highlights the overly cognitive and individualistic focus on translanguagi... This article attempts to synthesize the scholarship on translanguaging conducted in different academic disciplines and social domains, and raises critical questions on theory, research and pedagogy to take the orientation forward. The literature review highlights the overly cognitive and individualistic focus on translanguaging competence, the need to explore this communicative practice in domains other than conversation, and the failure to develop teachable strategies of translanguaging. Findings from a classroom ethnography of a writing course are marshaled to develop teaching strategies for the co-construction of meaning and orientations for assessing effective translanguaging practices. read more read less

Topics:

Translanguaging (79%)79% related to the paper, Applied linguistics (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
589 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/APPLIREV-2018-0020
A translanguaging view of the linguistic system of bilinguals
Ricardo Otheguy1, Ofelia García1, Wallis Reid2

Abstract:

Abstract Two conceptions of the linguistic system of bilinguals are in contention. The translanguaging approach supports what we call a unitary view, arguing that bilingualism and multilingualism, despite their importance as sociocultural concepts, have no correspondence in a dual or multiple linguistic system. In our view, t... Abstract Two conceptions of the linguistic system of bilinguals are in contention. The translanguaging approach supports what we call a unitary view, arguing that bilingualism and multilingualism, despite their importance as sociocultural concepts, have no correspondence in a dual or multiple linguistic system. In our view, the myriad lexical and structural features mastered by bilinguals occupy a cognitive terrain that is not fenced off into anything like the two areas suggested by the two socially named languages. But a strong critique of this view by Jeff MacSwan adopts the familiar position that, while allowing for some overlap, the competence of bilinguals involves language specific internal differentiation. According to this view, which we have called the dual correspondence theory, bilinguals possess two separate linguistic systems whose boundaries coincide with those of the two named languages. Several interdisciplinary considerations point to the lack of initial plausibility of the dual correspondence theory. And the main argument offered by MacSwan in defense of the theory, namely restrictions on code switching, lacks descriptive adequacy and theoretical coherence. The dual correspondence theory has had pernicious effects in educational practices. A much healthier educational climate is created by teachers who adopt the unitary view sponsored by translanguaging. read more read less

Topics:

Translanguaging (77%)77% related to the paper, Applied linguistics (57%)57% related to the paper, Multilingualism (57%)57% related to the paper, Code-switching (51%)51% related to the paper, Linguistic system (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
187 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/9783110222654.171
Family language policy: Core issues of an emerging field*

Abstract:

Researchinthefieldofminoritylanguagemaintenanceandlossregardsthefamily as the central driving force in children’s language socialization within the context of both minority and majority languages. The present review of current literature focuses on the emergingfield of family language policy and addresses the following three ... Researchinthefieldofminoritylanguagemaintenanceandlossregardsthefamily as the central driving force in children’s language socialization within the context of both minority and majority languages. The present review of current literature focuses on the emergingfield of family language policy and addresses the following three components: ideology, management and practice. The integrated survey reviews research on the intra-family factors that can drive family language policy, the manner in which parents (mostly immigrants) and children cope with the minority-majority language reality, and the ways in which parents conduct their language policy at home. read more read less

Topics:

Language policy (66%)66% related to the paper, Language industry (65%)65% related to the paper, Sociology of language (64%)64% related to the paper, Applied linguistics (53%)53% related to the paper, Socialization (51%)51% related to the paper
162 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/APPLIREV-2013-0009
Classroom code-switching: Three decades of research

Abstract:

Abstract In this paper I provide a review of the historical development of different research paradigms and approaches adopted in studies on classroom code-switching. I also discuss the difficulties and problems faced by this field of studies and share some of my own critical reflections on how this field might move forward i... Abstract In this paper I provide a review of the historical development of different research paradigms and approaches adopted in studies on classroom code-switching. I also discuss the difficulties and problems faced by this field of studies and share some of my own critical reflections on how this field might move forward in the future, speaking from the position of a researcher who has been engaged in this area of studies for close to three decades. read more read less

Topics:

Applied linguistics (66%)66% related to the paper, Translanguaging (63%)63% related to the paper, Interactional sociolinguistics (62%)62% related to the paper, Code-switching (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
158 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Applied Linguistics Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to De Gruyter formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Applied Linguistics Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Applied Linguistics Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Applied Linguistics Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Applied Linguistics Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Applied Linguistics Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Applied Linguistics Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Applied Linguistics Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Applied Linguistics Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Applied Linguistics Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Applied Linguistics Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Applied Linguistics Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Applied Linguistics Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Applied Linguistics Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Applied Linguistics Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Applied Linguistics Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Applied Linguistics Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Applied Linguistics Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Applied Linguistics Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Applied Linguistics Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Applied Linguistics Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Applied Linguistics Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Applied Linguistics Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Applied Linguistics Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Applied Linguistics Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Applied Linguistics Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Applied Linguistics Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Applied Linguistics Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Applied Linguistics Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Applied Linguistics Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Applied Linguistics Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Applied Linguistics Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template