Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format
Recent searches

Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format Example of Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research — Template for authors

Publisher: Dove Medical Press
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Medicine (miscellaneous) #110 of 238 down down by 50 ranks
Biomedical Engineering #125 of 229 down down by 66 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 155 Published Papers | 479 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 12/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.8
SJR: 1.436
SNIP: 1.725
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Nature

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 28.0
SJR: 5.961
SNIP: 3.528
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 10.5
SJR: 1.629
SNIP: 1.78
open access Open Access

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.7
SJR: 0.62
SNIP: 1.198

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.1

21% from 2019

CiteRatio for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.1
2019 3.9
2018 4.2
2017 4.4
2016 3.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.482

1% from 2019

SJR for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.482
2019 0.488
2018 0.614
2017 0.586
2016 0.564
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.114

12% from 2019

SNIP for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.114
2019 1.259
2018 1.298
2017 1.288
2016 0.949
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Dove Medical Press

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the evidence, technology, research, and expert opinion supporting the use and application of medical devices in the diagnosis, monitoring, treatment and management of...... Read More

Medicine

i
Last updated on
12 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1179-1470
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Blue faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S47319
Pulse oximetry: fundamentals and technology update
Meir Nitzan1, Ayal Romem2, Robert Koppel3

Abstract:

Oxygen saturation in the arterial blood (SaO2) provides information on the adequacy of respiratory function. SaO2 can be assessed noninvasively by pulse oximetry, which is based on photoplethysmographic pulses in two wavelengths, generally in the red and infrared regions. The calibration of the measured photoplethysmographic ... Oxygen saturation in the arterial blood (SaO2) provides information on the adequacy of respiratory function. SaO2 can be assessed noninvasively by pulse oximetry, which is based on photoplethysmographic pulses in two wavelengths, generally in the red and infrared regions. The calibration of the measured photoplethysmographic signals is performed empirically for each type of commercial pulse-oximeter sensor, utilizing in vitro measurement of SaO2 in extracted arterial blood by means of co-oximetry. Due to the discrepancy between the measurement of SaO2 by pulse oximetry and the invasive technique, the former is denoted as SpO2. Manufacturers of pulse oximeters generally claim an accuracy of 2%, evaluated by the standard deviation (SD) of the differences between SpO2 and SaO2, measured simultaneously in healthy subjects. However, an SD of 2% reflects an expected error of 4% (two SDs) or more in 5% of the examinations, which is in accordance with an error of 3%-4%, reported in clinical studies. This level of accuracy is sufficient for the detection of a significant decline in respiratory function in patients, and pulse oximetry has been accepted as a reliable technique for that purpose. The accuracy of SpO2 measurement is insufficient in several situations, such as critically ill patients receiving supplemental oxygen, and can be hazardous if it leads to elevated values of oxygen partial pressure in blood. In particular, preterm newborns are vulnerable to retinopathy of prematurity induced by high oxygen concentration in the blood. The low accuracy of SpO2 measurement in critically ill patients and newborns can be attributed to the empirical calibration process, which is performed on healthy volunteers. Other limitations of pulse oximetry include the presence of dyshemoglobins, which has been addressed by multiwavelength pulse oximetry, as well as low perfusion and motion artifacts that are partially rectified by sophisticated algorithms and also by reflection pulse oximetry. read more read less

Topics:

Pulse oximetry (67%)67% related to the paper, Respiratory function (56%)56% related to the paper, Photoplethysmogram (54%)54% related to the paper, Oxygen saturation (medicine) (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
280 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S91102
Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review.
P. Geethanjali1

Abstract:

Myoelectric signals (MES) have been used in various applications, in particular, for identification of user intention to potentially control assistive devices for amputees, orthotic devices, and exoskeleton in order to augment capability of the user. MES are also used to estimate force and, hence, torque to actuate the assist... Myoelectric signals (MES) have been used in various applications, in particular, for identification of user intention to potentially control assistive devices for amputees, orthotic devices, and exoskeleton in order to augment capability of the user. MES are also used to estimate force and, hence, torque to actuate the assistive device. The application of MES is not limited to assistive devices, and they also find potential applications in teleoperation of robots, haptic devices, virtual reality, and so on. The myoelectric control-based prosthetic hand aids to restore activities of daily living of amputees in order to improve the self-esteem of the user. All myoelectric control-based prosthetic hands may not have similar operations and exhibit variation in sensing input, deciphering the signals, and actuating prosthetic hand. Researchers are focusing on improving the functionality of prosthetic hand in order to suit the user requirement with the different operating features. The myoelectric control differs in operation to accommodate various external factors. This article reviews the state of the art of myoelectric prosthetic hand, giving description of each control strategy. read more read less

Topics:

Orthotic device (54%)54% related to the paper, Haptic technology (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
228 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S48888
Inhalation drug delivery devices: technology update
Mariam Ibrahim1, Rahul Kumar Verma1, Lucila Garcia-Contreras1

Abstract:

The pulmonary route of administration has proven to be effective in local and systemic delivery of miscellaneous drugs and biopharmaceuticals to treat pulmonary and non-pulmonary diseases. A successful pulmonary administration requires a harmonic interaction between the drug formulation, the inhaler device, and the patient. H... The pulmonary route of administration has proven to be effective in local and systemic delivery of miscellaneous drugs and biopharmaceuticals to treat pulmonary and non-pulmonary diseases. A successful pulmonary administration requires a harmonic interaction between the drug formulation, the inhaler device, and the patient. However, the biggest single problem that accounts for the lack of desired effect or adverse outcomes is the incorrect use of the device due to lack of training in how to use the device or how to coordinate actuation and aerosol inhalation. This review summarizes the structural and mechanical features of aerosol delivery devices with respect to mechanisms of aerosol generation, their use with different formulations, and their advantages and limitations. A technological update of the current state-of-the-art designs proposed to overcome current challenges of existing devices is also provided. read more read less
View PDF
224 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S103102
Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Larry E. Miller, Angela K Zimmermann, William G. Herbert1

Abstract:

Background Powered exoskeletons are designed to safely facilitate ambulation in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We conducted the first meta-analysis of the available published research on the clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeletons in SCI patients. Background Powered exoskeletons are designed to safely facilitate ambulation in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We conducted the first meta-analysis of the available published research on the clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeletons in SCI patients. read more read less

Topics:

Powered exoskeleton (55%)55% related to the paper, Spinal cord injury (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
221 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S59124
Peripheral nerve conduits: technology update
Damla Arslantunali1, T. Dursun1, Deniz Yucel1, Nesrin Hasirci1, Vasif Hasirci1

Abstract:

Peripheral nerve injury is a worldwide clinical problem which could lead to loss of neuronal communication along sensory and motor nerves between the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral organs and impairs the quality of life of a patient. The primary requirement for the treatment of complete lesions is a tension-f... Peripheral nerve injury is a worldwide clinical problem which could lead to loss of neuronal communication along sensory and motor nerves between the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral organs and impairs the quality of life of a patient. The primary requirement for the treatment of complete lesions is a tension-free, end-to-end repair. When end-to-end repair is not possible, peripheral nerve grafts or nerve conduits are used. The limited availability of autografts, and drawbacks of the allografts and xenografts like immunological reactions, forced the researchers to investigate and develop alternative approaches, mainly nerve conduits. In this review, recent information on the various types of conduit materials (made of biological and synthetic polymers) and designs (tubular, fibrous, and matrix type) are being presented. read more read less

Topics:

Peripheral nerve injury (63%)63% related to the paper
View PDF
194 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to Dove Medical Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Medical Devices: Evidence and Research in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research citation style.

4. Can I use the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Medical Devices: Evidence and Research that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Medical Devices: Evidence and Research that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Medical Devices: Evidence and Research.

7. Where can I find the template for the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Medical Devices: Evidence and Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Medical Devices: Evidence and Research is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Medical Devices: Evidence and Research, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Medical Devices: Evidence and Research's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Medical Devices: Evidence and Research are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Medical Devices: Evidence and Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Medical Devices: Evidence and Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Medical Devices: Evidence and Research in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Medical Devices: Evidence and Research Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Medical Devices: Evidence and Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template