Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format
Recent searches

Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format Example of Current Opinion in Structural Biology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Current Opinion in Structural Biology — Template for authors

Publisher: Elsevier
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Structural Biology #4 of 48 up up by 1 rank
Molecular Biology #38 of 382 down down by 7 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 536 Published Papers | 6624 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 07/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.6
SJR: 1.766
SNIP: 1.645
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.5
SJR: 3.189
SNIP: 1.342
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.0
SJR: 2.907
SNIP: 1.268
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.5
SJR: 1.14
SNIP: 1.579

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

6.908

2% from 2018

Impact factor for Current Opinion in Structural Biology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 6.908
2018 7.052
2017 7.179
2016 6.932
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

12.4

6% from 2019

CiteRatio for Current Opinion in Structural Biology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 12.4
2019 11.7
2018 12.4
2017 11.9
2016 12.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 2% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.935

3% from 2019

SJR for Current Opinion in Structural Biology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.935
2019 4.07
2018 4.907
2017 5.382
2016 5.17
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.459

0% from 2019

SNIP for Current Opinion in Structural Biology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.459
2019 1.455
2018 1.638
2017 1.598
2016 1.699
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 0% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Elsevier

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Current Opinion in Structural Biology aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two yea...... Read More

Structural Biology

Molecular Biology

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

i
Last updated on
07 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0959-440X
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.987
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
elsarticle-num
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25 (7) (1982) 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(01)00266-4
The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif
Bostjan Kobe1, Andrey V. Kajava2

Topics:

Subfamily (58%)58% related to the paper, Protein structure (56%)56% related to the paper, Leucine-rich repeat (55%)55% related to the paper, Structural biology (54%)54% related to the paper, Sequence motif (53%)53% related to the paper
1,604 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00289-0
Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins
H. Jane Dyson1, Peter E. Wright1

Topics:

Intrinsically disordered proteins (55%)55% related to the paper, Folding funnel (54%)54% related to the paper, Structural biology (52%)52% related to the paper
1,280 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00167-6
Zinc finger proteins: new insights into structural and functional diversity.
J.H. Laity1, Brian M. Lee1, Peter E. Wright1

Topics:

Zinc finger (73%)73% related to the paper, Zinc finger nuclease (70%)70% related to the paper, LIM domain (66%)66% related to the paper, RING finger domain (65%)65% related to the paper, PHD finger (62%)62% related to the paper
1,271 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/J.SBI.2004.01.009
Theory of protein folding.
José N. Onuchic1, Peter G. Wolynes1

Topics:

Folding funnel (71%)71% related to the paper, Protein folding (59%)59% related to the paper, Folding (chemistry) (59%)59% related to the paper, Energy landscape (55%)55% related to the paper, Protein structure (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
1,242 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Current Opinion in Structural Biology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Elsevier formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Current Opinion in Structural Biology format uses elsarticle-num citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Current Opinion in Structural Biology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Current Opinion in Structural Biology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Current Opinion in Structural Biology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Current Opinion in Structural Biology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Current Opinion in Structural Biology citation style.

4. Can I use the Current Opinion in Structural Biology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Current Opinion in Structural Biology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Current Opinion in Structural Biology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Current Opinion in Structural Biology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Current Opinion in Structural Biology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Opinion in Structural Biology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Current Opinion in Structural Biology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Current Opinion in Structural Biology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Current Opinion in Structural Biology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Current Opinion in Structural Biology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Current Opinion in Structural Biology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Current Opinion in Structural Biology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Current Opinion in Structural Biology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Current Opinion in Structural Biology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Current Opinion in Structural Biology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Opinion in Structural Biology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Current Opinion in Structural Biology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Current Opinion in Structural Biology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Current Opinion in Structural Biology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template