Example of Frontiers in Sociology format
Recent searches

Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format Example of Frontiers in Sociology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Frontiers in Sociology — Template for authors

Publisher: Frontiers Media
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Sciences (all) #95 of 260 down down by None rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 249 Published Papers | 308 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 27/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.243
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.297
SNIP: 0.958
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.0
SJR: 1.844
SNIP: 2.237
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.801
SNIP: 2.155

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.2

CiteRatio for Frontiers in Sociology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.728

Year Value
2020 0.728
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Frontiers in Sociology

Guideline source: View

Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers.

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Frontiers Media

Frontiers in Sociology

Frontiers in Sociology is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal launched in 2016. The journal and its Specialty Sections foster interdisciplinary research by researchers around the world, as well as fairness, transparency, and objectivity in the review process. We welcome a ran...... Read More

Ethnicity and migration

i
Last updated on
27 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2297-7775
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
frontiersinSCNS_ENG_HUMS
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25 (1982) 4515–4532.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.3389/FSOC.2020.00047
Poverty and Covid-19: Rates of Incidence and Deaths in the United States During the First 10 Weeks of the Pandemic
W. Holmes Finch1, Maria E. Hernández Finch1
15 Jun 2020 - Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract:

The Covid-19 pandemic in the winter and spring of 2020 represents a major challenge to the world health care system that has not been seen perhaps since the influenza pandemic in 1918. The virus has spread across the world, claiming lives on all continents with the exception of Antarctica. Since its arrival in the United Stat... The Covid-19 pandemic in the winter and spring of 2020 represents a major challenge to the world health care system that has not been seen perhaps since the influenza pandemic in 1918. The virus has spread across the world, claiming lives on all continents with the exception of Antarctica. Since its arrival in the United States, attention has been paid to how Covid-19 cases and deaths have been distributed across varying socioeconomic and ethnic groups. The goal of this study was to examine this issue during the early weeks of the pandemic, with the hope of shedding some light on how the number of cases and the number of deaths were, or were not related to poverty. Results of this study revealed that during the early weeks of the pandemic more disadvantaged counties in the United States had a larger number of confirmed Covid-19 cases, but that over time this trend changed so that by the beginning of April, 2020 more affluent counties had more confirmed cases of the virus. The number of deaths due to Covid-19 were associated with poorer and more urban counties. Discussion of these results focuses on the possibility that testing for the virus was less available in more disadvantaged counties later in the pandemic than was the case earlier, as the result of an overall lack of adequate testing resources across the nation. read more read less

Topics:

Pandemic (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
161 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.3389/FSOC.2017.00007
Beware Zombies and Unicorns: Toward Critical Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research in a Neoliberal Context
Mary Madden1, Ewen Speed2
02 Jun 2017 - Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract:

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in UK National Health Service (NHS) research has become an imperative in policy and practice However, lack of clarity on what PPI is (or might be) has given rise to a poorly monitored, complex field of activity, variously framed by the expectations of policy makers, funders, host organisat... Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in UK National Health Service (NHS) research has become an imperative in policy and practice However, lack of clarity on what PPI is (or might be) has given rise to a poorly monitored, complex field of activity, variously framed by the expectations of policy makers, funders, host organisations, researchers, health professionals, individual recruits, volunteers, activists and third sector organisations The normative shift towards PPI has taken place within a neoliberal policy context, the implications of which needs to be explicitly considered, particularly after the Brexit referendum which has left policy makers and researchers wondering how to better appeal to a distrustful public subjected to ‘post-truth’ and ‘dog whistle’ politics This commentary examines the prospects for a more critical approach to PPI which addresses context, is evidence-informed and mindful of persistent inequalities in health outcomes, at a time when models of PPI in NHS health research tend to be conceptually vague, derived from limited clinical and managerial settings, and centred on a construction of the abstract, rational, compliant and self-managing patient or lay-person read more read less

Topics:

Context (language use) (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
126 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.3389/FSOC.2019.00057
Power, Privilege and Knowledge: the Untenable Promise of Co-production in Mental "Health".
16 Jul 2019 - Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract:

This paper looks at the historical antecedents of the idea of ‘coproduction’ and gives some concrete examples in the field of mental health. These prior concepts and their concomitant exemplars show that ‘collaboration’ and ‘partnership’ failed because of the continued existence of unspoken power dynamics between professional... This paper looks at the historical antecedents of the idea of ‘coproduction’ and gives some concrete examples in the field of mental health. These prior concepts and their concomitant exemplars show that ‘collaboration’ and ‘partnership’ failed because of the continued existence of unspoken power dynamics between professionals, researchers and policy makers and the service users who had been promised ‘partnership’. We then go onto ask whether coproduction is different and heralds a paradigm shift. We articulate the problems at the level of knowledge, particularly the Enlightenment privileging of reason and the individual cognitive subject. This privileging renders inferior those positioned as lacking these attributes, particularly the mad and the racialized mad. We interrogate modern ‘psy’ science and argue that it instantiates white privilege. We then develop an argument that the survivor movement and the emergence of a survivor, or mad knowledge base duplicates this white privilege epistemically, methodologically and in terms of embodied persons themselves. We offer some solutions and describe how we have grappled with these issues in a project aiming to map knowledge production by users, survivors and persons with psychosocial disabilities. It is an unfinished journey. But we conclude that coproduction between researchers and policy makers and those of us positioned as mad, particularly the racicalised mad, cannot happen when the environment is that of the elite, white academy dependant on the legacies of Enlightenment thinking and a continued Eurocentric lens. We seek not to coproduce but to change thinking and supports for psycho-social suffering local to the contexts of peoples lives. read more read less

Topics:

White privilege (55%)55% related to the paper, Coproduction (52%)52% related to the paper, Privilege (social inequality) (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
90 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.3389/FSOC.2020.613814
Citizen science, education, and learning: challenges and opportunities
02 Dec 2020 - Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract:

Citizen science is a growing field of research and practice, generating new knowledge and understanding through the collaboration of citizens in scientific research. As the field expands, it is becoming increasingly important to consider its potential to foster education and learning opportunities. Although progress has been... Citizen science is a growing field of research and practice, generating new knowledge and understanding through the collaboration of citizens in scientific research. As the field expands, it is becoming increasingly important to consider its potential to foster education and learning opportunities. Although progress has been made to support learning in citizen science projects, as well as to facilitate citizen science in formal and informal learning environments, challenges still arise. This paper identifies a number of dilemmas facing the field—from competing scientific goals and learning outcomes, differing underlying ontologies and epistemologies, diverging communication strategies, to clashing values around advocacy and activism. Although such challenges can become barriers to the successful integration of citizen science into mainstream education systems, they also serve as signposts for possible synergies and opportunities. One of the key emerging recommendations is to align educational learning outcomes with citizen science project goals at the planning stage of the project using co-creation approaches to ensure issues of accessibility and inclusivity are paramount throughout the design and implementation of every project. Only then can citizen science realise its true potential to empower citizens to take ownership of their own science education and learning. read more read less

Topics:

Informal learning (61%)61% related to the paper, Science education (61%)61% related to the paper, Science communication (57%)57% related to the paper, Citizen science (55%)55% related to the paper, Mainstream (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
70 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.3389/FSOC.2018.00041
Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge
Peter Beresford1
01 Jan 2019 - Frontiers in Sociology

Abstract:

Efforts to advance public participation in health and other policies have been associated with the production of many models and how-to-do-it guides for change. While these may have a helpful part to play in improving public and patient/user involvement in research, in this article it will be suggested that they tend to over-... Efforts to advance public participation in health and other policies have been associated with the production of many models and how-to-do-it guides for change. While these may have a helpful part to play in improving public and patient/user involvement in research, in this article it will be suggested that they tend to over-simplify things. Instead it is argued that an essential first step to advancing public participation in health is to put it in the context of developing modern democracy more generally. This article will seek to do this by identifying four key stages in the development of public participation in health and social care. These phases will be headlined as: 1. Working for universal suffrage in representative democracy and the achievement of social rights, like the right to decent housing, education and health; 2. Provisions for participatory democracy and community development; 3. Specific provisions for participation in health and social care; 4. State reaction and service user-led renewal as conflicts and competing agendas develop. While the proposed article will look particularly at UK developments to do this, it will also draw upon international experience and highlight the wider relevance of these phases of development. It will make connections between the extension of representative and participatory democracy, considering the different locations in which efforts to extend participation have helpfully developed, for example, in learning and training, and research and knowledge production. It will also consider how efforts to extend participation have also been undermined by pressures to tokenise and co-opt them; the continuing barriers discriminating against some groups and, ways in which service users and allies have nonetheless sought to overcome these difficulties to take forward more inclusive and diverse participation in health and social care. It will focus on some particularly promising areas of development internationally in order to do this in which co-production and the development of user-led knowledge are key. read more read less

Topics:

Public participation (62%)62% related to the paper, Representative democracy (54%)54% related to the paper, Democracy (53%)53% related to the paper, Community development (52%)52% related to the paper, User Research (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
61 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Frontiers in Sociology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Frontiers Media formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Frontiers in Sociology format uses frontiersinSCNS_ENG_HUMS citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Frontiers in Sociology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Frontiers in Sociology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Frontiers in Sociology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Frontiers in Sociology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Frontiers in Sociology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Frontiers in Sociology citation style.

4. Can I use the Frontiers in Sociology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Frontiers in Sociology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Frontiers in Sociology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Frontiers in Sociology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Frontiers in Sociology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Frontiers in Sociology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Frontiers in Sociology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Frontiers in Sociology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Frontiers in Sociology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Frontiers in Sociology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Frontiers in Sociology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Frontiers in Sociology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Frontiers in Sociology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Frontiers in Sociology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Frontiers in Sociology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Frontiers in Sociology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Frontiers in Sociology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Frontiers in Sociology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Frontiers in Sociology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Frontiers in Sociology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Frontiers in Sociology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Frontiers in Sociology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Frontiers in Sociology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Frontiers in Sociology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Frontiers in Sociology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template