Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format
Recent searches

Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format Example of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication — Template for authors

Publisher: IEEE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Industrial Relations #15 of 54 down down by 8 ranks
Electrical and Electronic Engineering #322 of 693 down down by 157 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 97 Published Papers | 276 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 09/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.4
SJR: 0.786
SNIP: 2.027
open access Open Access

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 0.396
SNIP: 1.133
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.7
SJR: 1.652
SNIP: 1.947

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.98

14% from 2018

Impact factor for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.98
2018 1.143
2017 0.756
2016 2.184
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.8

CiteRatio for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.8
2019 2.8
2018 2.2
2017 3.6
2016 3.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 14% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.422

11% from 2019

SJR for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.422
2019 0.379
2018 0.846
2017 0.845
2016 0.904
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.167

41% from 2019

SNIP for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.167
2019 0.827
2018 1.089
2017 1.529
2016 1.426
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 41% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

IEEE

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

The study, development, improvement, and promotion of techniques for preparing, organizing for use, processing, editing, collecting, conserving, and disseminating any form of information in the electrical and electronics fields.... Read More

Industrial relations

Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Business, Management and Accounting

i
Last updated on
09 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0361-1434
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.153
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
IEEEtran
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker, “Specular andreev reflection in graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 97, no. 6, p.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452
Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory: When to Choose It and How to Use It
Paul Benjamin Lowry1, James Gaskin2

Abstract:

Problem: Partial least squares (PLS), a form of structural equation modeling (SEM), can provide much value for causal inquiry in communication-related and behavioral research fields. Despite the wide availability of technical information on PLS, many behavioral and communication researchers often do not use PLS in situations ... Problem: Partial least squares (PLS), a form of structural equation modeling (SEM), can provide much value for causal inquiry in communication-related and behavioral research fields. Despite the wide availability of technical information on PLS, many behavioral and communication researchers often do not use PLS in situations in which it could provide unique theoretical insights. Moreover, complex models comprising formative (causal) and reflective (consequent) constructs are now common in behavioral research, but they are often misspecified in statistical models, resulting in erroneous tests. Key concepts: First-generation (1G) techniques, such as correlations, regressions, or difference of means tests (such as ANOVA or ${\rm t}$ -tests), offer limited modeling capabilities, particularly in terms of causal modeling. In contrast, second-generation techniques (such as covariance-based SEM or PLS) offer extensive, scalable, and flexible causal-modeling capabilities. Second-generation (2G) techniques do not invalidate the need for 1G techniques however. The key point of 2G techniques is that they are superior for the complex causal modeling that dominates recent communication and behavioral research. Key lessons: For exploratory work, or for studies that include formative constructs, PLS should be selected. For confirmatory work, either covariance-based SEM or PLS may be used. Despite claims that lower sampling requirements exist for PLS, inadequate sample sizes result in the same problems for either technique. Implications: SEM's strength is in modeling. In particular, SEM allows for complex models that include latent (unobserved) variables, formative variables, chains of effects (mediation), and multiple group comparisons of these more complex relationships. read more read less

Topics:

Structural equation modeling (55%)55% related to the paper, Causal model (55%)55% related to the paper, Partial least squares regression (54%)54% related to the paper
1,286 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1109/47.867942
Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice
Ted Boren1, Judith Ramey2

Abstract:

Thinking-aloud protocols may be the most widely used method in usability testing, but the descriptions of this practice in the usability literature and the work habits of practitioners do not conform to the theoretical basis most often cited for it: K.A. Ericsson and H.A. Simon's (1984) seminal work. After reviewing Ericsson ... Thinking-aloud protocols may be the most widely used method in usability testing, but the descriptions of this practice in the usability literature and the work habits of practitioners do not conform to the theoretical basis most often cited for it: K.A. Ericsson and H.A. Simon's (1984) seminal work. After reviewing Ericsson and Simon's theoretical basis for thinking aloud, we review the ways in which actual usability practice diverges from this model. We then explore the concept of speech genre as an alternative theoretical framework. We first consider uses of this new framework that are consistent with Ericsson and Simon's goal of eliciting a verbal report that is as undirected, undisturbed and constant as possible. We then go on to consider how the proposed new approach might handle problems that arise in usability testing that appear to require interventions not supported in the older model. read more read less

Topics:

Think aloud protocol (72%)72% related to the paper, Partial concurrent thinking aloud (66%)66% related to the paper, Usability (59%)59% related to the paper, Professional communication (51%)51% related to the paper
663 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2005.859719
Technology as Experience

Abstract:

Technology permeates all aspects of our lives: the Apple Powerbook I happily use to compose this review, the automated voice on the subway that soothingly announces “next stop Belmont” on my commute, and the climate control system in my office that always leaves me with cold fingers as I type. As John McCarthy and Peter Wrigh... Technology permeates all aspects of our lives: the Apple Powerbook I happily use to compose this review, the automated voice on the subway that soothingly announces “next stop Belmont” on my commute, and the climate control system in my office that always leaves me with cold fingers as I type. As John McCarthy and Peter Wright, the authors of Technology as Experience, explain, “much more deeply than ever before, we are aware that interacting with technology involves us emotionally, intellectually and sensually. . . We don’t just use technology; we live with it” [p. ix]. read more read less

Topics:

User experience design (76%)76% related to the paper, Interactive systems engineering (71%)71% related to the paper, User journey (70%)70% related to the paper, Experience design (54%)54% related to the paper
598 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1109/TPC.1996.544582
Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development [Book Review]
T.M. Duffy, D. Osgood, D. Holyoak, D. Monson

Abstract:

(one notable exception is the Matalene essay), and many claims and arguments seem outmoded and uninformed by recent research and theory, for instance, the authors’ statement that nothing has been written about audiences for written communications in government. However, of greater concern is that with just some exceptions (Ma... (one notable exception is the Matalene essay), and many claims and arguments seem outmoded and uninformed by recent research and theory, for instance, the authors’ statement that nothing has been written about audiences for written communications in government. However, of greater concern is that with just some exceptions (Matalene, Magnotto), the authors tend to present their material as original discoveries even though the same points have been discussed in other publications, for example, the authors’ advice to consider the context of communication and the audience. In general, the points and arguments presented in this collection would have been much more rich, mature, and complex if they had been situated in the context of ongoing discussions and debates in the field. At the very least, more citations are needed throughout the collection. The collection also suffers from a lack of focus and emphasis on key points made in the chapters. There is no attempt to pull together common patterns and themes across the five chapters, for example, in a final summary discussion. The burden is on the reader to synthesize points from the collection. Readers will also discover that the level of sophistication of ideas and discussion is uneven. Although some essays (Reynolds, Samson, Sadler) seem directed at novices in the field, others (Matalene, Magnotto) seem much more advanced and appropriate for veterans. For example, I could envision Reynolds’ chapter as part of an undergraduate introductory course in professional writing, but Matalene’s chapter as part of a graduate course. Matalene’s chapter is a gem, and deserves close attention. She goes beyond providing interesting descriptions of communication processes in state government. She also provides nuggets of wisdom, including a credible critique of recent theories of audience, which she argues are “optimistic, other-worldly, literary” and “ludicrously ethereal and amorphous self-projections” (p. 56). Her concern is that these theories of audience simply do not relate to the reality of the workplace where audiences can often be hostile. Her description of a governor as a “different audience for each of his staffers,” who “has as many response modes as the political contexts in which he appears” (p. 63) is mature and complex. Matalene is also eloquent in discussing ways in which academics can receive lessons in reality (by working or researching off campus and sponsoring student internships). She writes, “If rhetoric teaches us anything, it is surely the overriding importance of local conditions. Learning about and engaging with our own local conditions can improve our citizenship and correct our theories” (p. 56). To her credit, she focuses just as much on ways in which workplace professionals can benefit from exposure to academic perspectives. In addition to taking the time to learn from the originality and insightfulness of Matalene’s piece, I would recommend that both scholars and newcomers to professional communication at least skim through all five “stories” to develop an overall flavor of the realities of workplace communication. Doing so will provide a valuable reality check for scholars, and a useful overview for newcomers. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development-John M. Carroll, Ed. (New York: Wiley, 1995, 408 pp., including index and glossary.) Reviewed by Thomas M. D U B , Dick Osgood, Doug Holyoak, and David Monson read more read less

Topics:

Design education (64%)64% related to the paper, Process design (61%)61% related to the paper, Usability (57%)57% related to the paper, Structured systems analysis and design method (53%)53% related to the paper, Work (electrical) (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
423 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2004.843303
In Defense of Globalization

Topics:

Globalization (59%)59% related to the paper, Remuneration (57%)57% related to the paper, Outsourcing (54%)54% related to the paper, Professional communication (52%)52% related to the paper, Cultural diversity (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
421 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

It automatically formats your research paper to IEEE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication format uses IEEEtran citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication citation style.

4. Can I use the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

5. Can I use a manuscript in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

7. Where can I find the template for the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

After writing your paper autoformatting in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template