Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format
Recent searches

Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format Example of International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Strategy and Management #265 of 440 down down by 26 ranks
Management Science and Operations Research #108 of 166 down down by 3 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 23 Published Papers | 36 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 21/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.2
SJR: 1.331
SNIP: 1.866
open access Open Access

Emerald Publishing

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 0.578
SNIP: 1.562

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.6

45% from 2019

CiteRatio for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.6
2019 1.1
2018 1.3
2017 1.0
2016 1.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.129

26% from 2019

SJR for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.129
2019 0.174
2018 0.311
2017 0.181
2016 0.275
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.243

9% from 2019

SNIP for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.243
2019 0.266
2018 0.396
2017 0.273
2016 0.407
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 45% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 26% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Inderscience Publishers

International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making formatting guidelines as mentioned in Inderscience Publishers author instructions. The current version was created on 21 Jul 2020 and has been used by 138 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
21 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
2040-106X
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
plainnat
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C. W. J. (2006). ‘Specular Andreev Reflection in Graphene’. Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol 97, No 6, pp. 067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2010.033687
Two conceptions of decision aiding
Bernard Roy1

Abstract:

After a brief presentation of three pillars on which decision aiding is founded, the paper describes two clearly different conceptions on which decision aiding can be carried out. The first one (Section 2) is primarily positivist, and the second one (Section 3) is primarily constructivist. These two conceptions are not incomp... After a brief presentation of three pillars on which decision aiding is founded, the paper describes two clearly different conceptions on which decision aiding can be carried out. The first one (Section 2) is primarily positivist, and the second one (Section 3) is primarily constructivist. These two conceptions are not incompatible and do not exhaustively cover all the conceptions conceived and used. Section 4 illustrates the differences between these two conceptions with regard to a specific point. Section 5 schematises on three levels what differentiates these two conceptions. read more read less
View PDF
46 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2010.033689
An AHP-based approach to mutual funds' social performance measurement
Blanca Pérez-Gladish1, Bouchra M’Zali2

Abstract:

Socially responsible investors have both, financial as well as non-financial goals in investment decision-making. Several methods for ranking mutual funds based on financial performance have been developed; nonetheless, ranking based on non-financial performance is rather underdeveloped. The aim of this article is to present ... Socially responsible investors have both, financial as well as non-financial goals in investment decision-making. Several methods for ranking mutual funds based on financial performance have been developed; nonetheless, ranking based on non-financial performance is rather underdeveloped. The aim of this article is to present a ranking method for mutual funds, based on their socially responsible performance. The suggested ranking method could complement financial information and help socially responsible mutual fund managers, individual and institutional investors in their portfolio selection process. The results reveal, after comparing the rank obtained with the proposed method with rankings derived from other socially responsible measurements based on just one decision criterion, that an integrated framework using multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques could help the investor in selecting a suitable socially responsible mutual funds portfolio, because the consideration of several criteria reflect more precisely the multiple dimensions of this decision making problem. read more read less

Topics:

Mutual fund (59%)59% related to the paper, Institutional investor (58%)58% related to the paper, Multiple-criteria decision analysis (54%)54% related to the paper, Portfolio (54%)54% related to the paper, Ranking (53%)53% related to the paper
44 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2013.056654
Integrating modified Delphi method with fuzzy AHP for optimal power substation location selection
Golam Kabir1, M. Ahsan Akhtar Hasin2

Abstract:

Evaluation and selection of power substation location is an important strategic decision-making problem for both public and private sector. The multi-dimensional, multicriteria nature of the power substation location problem limits the usefulness of any particular single objective model. Studies have shown that electromagneti... Evaluation and selection of power substation location is an important strategic decision-making problem for both public and private sector. The multi-dimensional, multicriteria nature of the power substation location problem limits the usefulness of any particular single objective model. Studies have shown that electromagnetic radiations emanating from the high voltage lines and substations, pose serious adverse health consequences to living beings. In this study, social, technological, economical, environmental and site characteristics factors and sub-criteria, have been derived to make the optimal power substation location selection decision more realistic and effectual. In this paper, an improved and more appropriate power substation location evaluation and selection model has been developed by integrating modified Delphi method with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). A numerical example is presented to show applicability and performance of the proposed methodology followed by a sensitivity analysis to discuss and explain the results. read more read less

Topics:

Analytic hierarchy process (52%)52% related to the paper
32 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2013.056781
Some results about rank reversal instances in the PROMETHEE methods
Céline Verly1, Yves De Smet1

Abstract:

The multicriteria methods based on pairwise comparisons suffer from possible rank reversal occurrences when the set of alternatives is modified. We study this distinctive feature in the scope of the PROMETHEE I and II methods. First, empirical tests are conducted on the basis of artificial datasets in order to quantify the li... The multicriteria methods based on pairwise comparisons suffer from possible rank reversal occurrences when the set of alternatives is modified. We study this distinctive feature in the scope of the PROMETHEE I and II methods. First, empirical tests are conducted on the basis of artificial datasets in order to quantify the likelihood of rank reversal instances. Then conditions to avoid this phenomenon are provided. Finally, a comparison with a procedure based on a distillation process is performed. read more read less

Topics:

Rank reversals in decision-making (60%)60% related to the paper, Pairwise comparison (50%)50% related to the paper
28 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2012.047846
Interactive fuzzy programming for multi-level programming problems: a review

Abstract:

Decision-making problems in decentralised organisations are often modelled as Stackelberg games, and they are formulated as two-level mathematical programming problems with two decision-makers. If they do not have any motivation to cooperate mutually and behave rationally, outcomes of the problems can be explained by Stackelb... Decision-making problems in decentralised organisations are often modelled as Stackelberg games, and they are formulated as two-level mathematical programming problems with two decision-makers. If they do not have any motivation to cooperate mutually and behave rationally, outcomes of the problems can be explained by Stackelberg equilibrium which is not always Pareto optimal. From computational aspects, it is known that solving two-level programming problems is NP-hard even if the objective functions and the constraint functions are linear. In contrast, if the decision-makers can select strategies cooperatively, the most important aspect is to derive a Pareto optimal solution favourable to the decision-makers. As a method of this line of approach interactive fuzzy programming has been developed, taking into account fuzziness of human judgements. In this paper, after reviewing the development of solution methods for two- and multi-level programming problems, we focus on cooperative decision-making in decentralised organisations and give interactive fuzzy programming for two-level linear programming problems, which provides satisfactory solutions in accordance with the preference of the decision-makers. Moreover, we present extensions of interactive fuzzy programming for two-level linear programming problems under multi-objective environments and under uncertainty. read more read less

Topics:

Constraint programming (68%)68% related to the paper, Reactive programming (66%)66% related to the paper, Stochastic programming (64%)64% related to the paper, Goal programming (63%)63% related to the paper, Linear-fractional programming (63%)63% related to the paper
24 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making.

It automatically formats your research paper to Inderscience Publishers formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making format uses plainnat citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making citation style.

4. Can I use the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making.

5. Can I use a manuscript in International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making.

7. Where can I find the template for the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

After writing your paper autoformatting in International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template