Example of Comparative Political Studies format
Recent searches

Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format Example of Comparative Political Studies format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Comparative Political Studies — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Sociology and Political Science #45 of 1269 down down by 13 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 259 Published Papers | 1626 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.688
SNIP: 0.981
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.798
SNIP: 1.518
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.573
SNIP: 2.127
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.4
SJR: 1.808
SNIP: 2.216

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.197

0% from 2018

Impact factor for Comparative Political Studies from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.197
2018 3.19
2017 2.919
2016 2.481
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

6.3

3% from 2019

CiteRatio for Comparative Political Studies from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.3
2019 6.1
2018 6.4
2017 6.0
2016 5.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 0% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

4.017

15% from 2019

SJR for Comparative Political Studies from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.017
2019 3.5
2018 4.855
2017 3.772
2016 3.943
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.316

15% from 2019

SNIP for Comparative Political Studies from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.316
2019 2.887
2018 2.519
2017 2.594
2016 2.471
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Comparative Political Studies

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Comparative Political Studies

Comparative Political Studies is a journal of social and political science which publishes scholarly work on comparative politics at both the cross-national and intra-national levels. We are particularly interested in articles which have an innovative theoretical argument and ...... Read More

Sociology and Political Science

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
03 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0010-4140
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.203
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder, Tinkham, & Klapwijk, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G. E., Tinkham, M., & Klapwijk, T. M. (1982). Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7), 4515-4532. Retrieved from 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/001041407901200101
“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe
Markku Laakso1, Rein Taagepera2

Abstract:

The qEffectiveq Number of Parties: qA Measure with Application to West Europeq Laakso, Markku;Taagepera, Rein Comparative Political Studies; Apr 1, 1979; 12, 1; Proouest pg. 3 “EFFECTIVE” NUMBER OF PARTIES A Measure with Application to West Europe MARKKU LAAKSO University of Helsinki REIN TAAGEPERA University of California, I... The qEffectiveq Number of Parties: qA Measure with Application to West Europeq Laakso, Markku;Taagepera, Rein Comparative Political Studies; Apr 1, 1979; 12, 1; Proouest pg. 3 “EFFECTIVE” NUMBER OF PARTIES A Measure with Application to West Europe MARKKU LAAKSO University of Helsinki REIN TAAGEPERA University of California, Irvine I s a large number of parties bound to destabilize a political system (Duverger, 1954) or is it not (e.g., Lijphart, 1968; Nilson, 1974)? Before this question can be answered, the number of parties must be operationally defined in a way that takes into account their relative size. Such a number is also needed if one wants to detect trends toward fewer or more numerous parties over time, or the effects of a proposed change in electoral rules. This article presents ways to calculate this important political variable, calculates it for I42 post-1944 elections in 15 West European countries, and analyzes its possible effect on stability. We often talk of two-party and multiparty systems. We further dis- tinguish three~ or four—party systems in some countries, and even talk (e. g., Blondel, 1969: 535) of a two-and-a-half-party system whenthere is a third party of marginal size. Mexico could be viewed as a one-and-a- half-party system because the PR1 is so much larger than all other parties. Rather than take the number of all existing parties, including even the very smallest, one visibly has a need for a number that takes into account their relative size. We will call this number the “effective number of parties,” using the word “effectiveq somewhat in the sense pressure group literature uses it when talking about “effective access” (Truman, 195]: 506), but even more in the operational sense physicists give it when they talk about effective current (Richards et al., 1960: 594), COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES. Vol. I2 No. I. April 1979 3-27 © I979 Sage Publications. Inc. Copyright (c) 2000 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company Copyright (c) Sage Inc. read more read less

Topics:

Duverger's law (55%)55% related to the paper, Multi-party system (55%)55% related to the paper, Political system (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
2,842 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0010414096029002001
The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis
Paul Pierson1

Abstract:

Observers of the European Community have criticized “intergovernmentalist” accounts for exaggerating the extent of member-state control over European integration. This article grounds these critici... Observers of the European Community have criticized “intergovernmentalist” accounts for exaggerating the extent of member-state control over European integration. This article grounds these critici... read more read less

Topics:

European integration (61%)61% related to the paper, Intergovernmentalism (55%)55% related to the paper, Liberal intergovernmentalism (53%)53% related to the paper
1,378 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/001041402236310
Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?
Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Carole J. Wilson1

Abstract:

How is contestation on European integration structured among national political parties? Are issues arising from European integration assimilated into existing dimensions of domestic contestation? We show that there is a strong relationship between the conventional left/right dimension and party positioning on European integr... How is contestation on European integration structured among national political parties? Are issues arising from European integration assimilated into existing dimensions of domestic contestation? We show that there is a strong relationship between the conventional left/right dimension and party positioning on European integration. However, the most powerful source of variation in party support is the new politics dimension, ranging from Green/alternative/libertarian to Traditional/authoritarian/nationalist. read more read less

Topics:

European integration (59%)59% related to the paper
1,204 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0010414001034001002
What Are the Origins of Political Trust?: Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies
William Mishler, Richard Rose1

Abstract:

Popular trust in political institutions is vital to democracy, but in post-Communist countries, popular distrust for institutions is widespread, and prospects for generating increased political trust are uncertain given disagreements over its origins. Cultural theories emphasizing exogenous determinants of trust compete with ... Popular trust in political institutions is vital to democracy, but in post-Communist countries, popular distrust for institutions is widespread, and prospects for generating increased political trust are uncertain given disagreements over its origins. Cultural theories emphasizing exogenous determinants of trust compete with institutional theories emphasizing endogenous influences, and both can be further differentiated into micro and macro variants. Competing hypotheses drawn from these theories are tested using data from 10 post-Communist countries in Eastern and Central Europe and the former Soviet Union. Aggregate data on economic and political performance are combined with survey data on interpersonal and political trust, political socialization experiences, and individual evaluations of national performance. Results strongly support the superiority of institutional explanations of the origins of political trust, especially micro-level explanations, while providing little support for either micro-cul... read more read less

Topics:

Political socialization (64%)64% related to the paper, Distrust (55%)55% related to the paper, Politics (53%)53% related to the paper, Democracy (52%)52% related to the paper
1,202 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/001041400203500101
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy Evaluating Alternative Indices
Gerardo L. Munck1, Jay Verkuilen1

Abstract:

A comprehensive and integrated framework for the analysis of data is offered and used to assess data sets on democracy. The framework first distinguishes among three challenges that are sequentially addressed: conceptualization, measurement, and aggregation. In turn, it specifies distinct tasks associated with these challenge... A comprehensive and integrated framework for the analysis of data is offered and used to assess data sets on democracy. The framework first distinguishes among three challenges that are sequentially addressed: conceptualization, measurement, and aggregation. In turn, it specifies distinct tasks associated with these challenges and the standards of assessment that pertain to each task. This framework is applied to the data sets on democracy most frequently used in current statistical research, generating a systematic evaluation of these data sets. The authors’ conclusion is that constructors of democracy indices tend to be quite self-conscious about methodological issues but that even the best indices suffer from important weaknesses. More constructively, the article’s assessment of existing data sets on democracy identifies distinct areas in which attempts to improve the quality of data on democracy might fruitfully be focused. read more read less

Topics:

Conceptualization (53%)53% related to the paper, Democracy (52%)52% related to the paper
1,015 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Comparative Political Studies.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Comparative Political Studies format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Comparative Political Studies in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Comparative Political Studies guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Comparative Political Studies guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Comparative Political Studies guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Comparative Political Studies?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Comparative Political Studies citation style.

4. Can I use the Comparative Political Studies templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Comparative Political Studies.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Comparative Political Studies that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Comparative Political Studies that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Comparative Political Studies?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Comparative Political Studies.

7. Where can I find the template for the Comparative Political Studies?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Comparative Political Studies's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Comparative Political Studies's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Comparative Political Studies an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Comparative Political Studies is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Comparative Political Studies?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Comparative Political Studies?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Comparative Political Studies?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Comparative Political Studies, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Comparative Political Studies's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Comparative Political Studies?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Comparative Political Studies. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Comparative Political Studies?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Comparative Political Studies are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Comparative Political Studies?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Comparative Political Studies's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Comparative Political Studies in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Comparative Political Studies Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Comparative Political Studies formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template