Example of Axiomathes format
Recent searches

Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format Example of Axiomathes format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Axiomathes — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #199 of 644 down down by 26 ranks
Mathematics (miscellaneous) #36 of 60 down down by 9 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 158 Published Papers | 108 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.302
SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.699
SNIP: 1.341
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.4
SJR: 0.388
SNIP: 1.091
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.288
SNIP: 0.637

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.7

CiteRatio for Axiomathes from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.7
2019 0.7
2018 0.7
2017 0.7
2016 0.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.205

8% from 2019

SJR for Axiomathes from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.205
2019 0.224
2018 0.258
2017 0.184
2016 0.227
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.544

35% from 2019

SNIP for Axiomathes from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.544
2019 0.832
2018 0.652
2017 0.419
2016 0.445
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 35% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Axiomathes

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Axiomathes

Axiomathes is a peer-reviewed academic journal devoted to the study of ontology and cognitive systems.Axiomathes' topics of interest comprise but are not limited to: How "things" (i.e., relatively stable and countable items) emerge from underlying substrata;How representations...... Read More

Philosophy

Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
11 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1122-1151
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.637
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1015845217681
The Basic Problem of the Theory of Levels of Reality
01 Sep 2001 - Axiomathes

Abstract:

Two essential aspects of Hartmann’s thought are its categorial perspective and the theory of the levels of reality. They are also aspects which have exerted significant influence on Hartmann’s intellectual legacy, however limited that may be. Here I wish to point out their importance for Bertalanffy (see his 1968) and Lorenz ... Two essential aspects of Hartmann’s thought are its categorial perspective and the theory of the levels of reality. They are also aspects which have exerted significant influence on Hartmann’s intellectual legacy, however limited that may be. Here I wish to point out their importance for Bertalanffy (see his 1968) and Lorenz (see his 1978). The latter notes the close similarity between his own ideas and those of Hartmann, and he recalls that for Hartmann the world possesses the unity of a system, but it is a system made up of layers. Some pages earlier he writes that he once asked Roberto Corti, who was closely acquainted with Hartmann, how he thought Hartmann would have reacted to a philogenetic interpretation of his thought. Corti replied that Hartmann would undoubtedly have rejected such an interpretation, but then added “And yet this is the only way to do anything with it”. read more read less
133 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1012758003706
Logic and Ontology
01 Mar 2001 - Axiomathes

Abstract:

A brief review of the historicalrelation between logic and ontologyand of the opposition between the viewsof logic as language and logic as calculusis given. We argue that predication is morefundamental than membership and that differenttheories of predication are based on differenttheories of universals, the three most impor... A brief review of the historicalrelation between logic and ontologyand of the opposition between the viewsof logic as language and logic as calculusis given. We argue that predication is morefundamental than membership and that differenttheories of predication are based on differenttheories of universals, the three most importantbeing nominalism, conceptualism, and realism.These theories can be formulated as formalontologies, each with its own logic, andcompared with one another in terms of theirrespective explanatory powers. After a briefsurvey of such a comparison, we argue that anextended form of conceptual realism provides themost coherent formal ontology and, as such, canbe used to defend the view of logic as language. read more read less

Topics:

Philosophy of logic (70%)70% related to the paper, Description logic (66%)66% related to the paper, Computational logic (65%)65% related to the paper, Predicate logic (65%)65% related to the paper, Dynamic logic (modal logic) (64%)64% related to the paper
131 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10516-004-7680-7
Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics
01 Dec 2005 - Axiomathes

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework of lexical meaning, broadly along the lines of Cognitive Semantics (Langacker 1987a). Within the proposed model, all aspects of meaning are to be explained in terms of properties of ontologies in conceptual space, i.e. properties of content ontologies and schematic ontologie... The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework of lexical meaning, broadly along the lines of Cognitive Semantics (Langacker 1987a). Within the proposed model, all aspects of meaning are to be explained in terms of properties of ontologies in conceptual space, i.e. properties of content ontologies and schematic ontologies and construals which are imposed on the conceptual structures on the occasion of use. It is through the operations of construals on ontological structures that different readings of lexical expressions arise. Lexical meanings are dynamic and sensitive to contextual demands, rather than fixed and stable. In a dynamic, usage-based model like this, polysemy and multiple readings emerge as a natural consequence of the human ability to think flexibly. Another more specific purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the usefulness of ontologies in linguistic research in general and semantic modelling in particular. read more read less

Topics:

Cognitive semantics (58%)58% related to the paper, Lexical semantics (58%)58% related to the paper, Polysemy (55%)55% related to the paper, Lexical definition (54%)54% related to the paper, Construals (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
89 Citations
Book Chapter DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1044-3_3
Ontological Categories in GOL
01 Mar 2004 - Axiomathes

Abstract:

General Ontological Language (GOL) is a formal framework for representing and building ontologies. The purpose of GOL is to provide a system of top-level ontologies which can be used as a basis for building domain-specific ontologies. The present paper gives an overview about the basic categories of the GOL-ontology. GOL is p... General Ontological Language (GOL) is a formal framework for representing and building ontologies. The purpose of GOL is to provide a system of top-level ontologies which can be used as a basis for building domain-specific ontologies. The present paper gives an overview about the basic categories of the GOL-ontology. GOL is part of the work of the research group Ontologies in Medicine (Onto-Med) at the University of Leipzig which is based on collaborative work of the Institute of Medical Informatics(IMISE) and the Institute for Computer Science (IfI). It represents work in progress toward a proposal for an integrated family of top-level ontologies and will be applied to several fields of medicine, in particular to the field of Clinical Trials. read more read less

Topics:

IDEF5 (61%)61% related to the paper, Formal ontology (58%)58% related to the paper, Ontology (information science) (51%)51% related to the paper
80 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10516-010-9128-6
Physicalism, Emergence and Downward Causation
Richard Campbell1, Mark H. Bickhard2
01 Mar 2011 - Axiomathes

Abstract:

The development of a defensible and fecund notion of emergence has been dogged by a number of threshold issues neatly highlighted in a recent paper by Jaegwon Kim. We argue that physicalist assumptions confuse and vitiate the whole project. In particular, his contention that emergence entails supervenience is contradicted by ... The development of a defensible and fecund notion of emergence has been dogged by a number of threshold issues neatly highlighted in a recent paper by Jaegwon Kim. We argue that physicalist assumptions confuse and vitiate the whole project. In particular, his contention that emergence entails supervenience is contradicted by his own argument that the ‘microstructure’ of an object belongs to the whole object, not to its constituents. And his argument against the possibility of downward causation is question-begging and makes false assumptions about causal sufficiency. We argue, on the contrary, for a rejection of the deeply entrenched assumption, shared by physicalists and Cartesians alike, that what basically exists are things (entities, substances). Our best physics tells us that there are no basic particulars, only fields in process. We need an ontology which gives priority to organization, which is inherently relational. Reflection upon the fact that all biological creatures are far-from-equilibrium systems, whose very persistence depend upon their interactions with their environment, reveals incoherence in the notion of an ‘emergence base’. read more read less

Topics:

Downward causation (58%)58% related to the paper, Supervenience (56%)56% related to the paper, Physicalism (53%)53% related to the paper, Emergentism (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
65 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Axiomathes.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Axiomathes format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Axiomathes in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Axiomathes guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Axiomathes guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Axiomathes guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Axiomathes?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Axiomathes citation style.

4. Can I use the Axiomathes templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Axiomathes.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Axiomathes that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Axiomathes that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Axiomathes?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Axiomathes.

7. Where can I find the template for the Axiomathes?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Axiomathes's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Axiomathes's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Axiomathes an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Axiomathes is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Axiomathes?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Axiomathes?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Axiomathes?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Axiomathes, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Axiomathes's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Axiomathes?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Axiomathes. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Axiomathes?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Axiomathes are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Axiomathes?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Axiomathes's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Axiomathes in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Axiomathes Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Axiomathes formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template