Example of Biomedical Microdevices format
Recent searches

Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format Example of Biomedical Microdevices format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Biomedical Microdevices — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Biomedical Engineering #73 of 229 down down by 1 rank
Molecular Biology #185 of 382 up up by 50 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 387 Published Papers | 2018 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 14/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.023
SNIP: 1.108
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 14.0
SJR: 1.944
SNIP: 1.781
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.9
SJR: 0.741
SNIP: 1.215
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 15.1
SJR: 3.934
SNIP: 2.351

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.176

6% from 2018

Impact factor for Biomedical Microdevices from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.176
2018 2.327
2017 2.077
2016 2.062
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.2

18% from 2019

CiteRatio for Biomedical Microdevices from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.2
2019 4.4
2018 4.0
2017 3.7
2016 4.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 6% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 18% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.629

3% from 2019

SJR for Biomedical Microdevices from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.629
2019 0.611
2018 0.646
2017 0.538
2016 0.606
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.694

1% from 2019

SNIP for Biomedical Microdevices from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.694
2019 0.703
2018 0.738
2017 0.7
2016 0.753
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Biomedical Microdevices

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Biomedical Microdevices

Biomedical Microdevices: BioMEMS and Biomedical Nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary periodical devoted to all aspects of research in the medical diagnostic and therapeutic applications of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (BioMEMS) and nanotechnology for medicine and biology...... Read More

Engineering

i
Last updated on
14 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1387-2176
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 1.0
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10544-005-6070-2
Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) properties for biomedical micro/nanosystems.
Alvaro Mata1, Alvaro Mata2, Aaron J. Fleischman1, Shuvo Roy1
01 Dec 2005 - Biomedical Microdevices

Abstract:

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS Sylgard® 184, Dow Corning Corporation) pre-polymer was combined with increasing amounts of cross-linker (5.7, 10.0, 14.3, 21.4, and 42.9 wt.%) and designated PDMS1, PDMS2, PDMS3, PDMS4, and PDMS5, respectively. These materials were processed by spin coating and subjected to common microfabrication, ... Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS Sylgard® 184, Dow Corning Corporation) pre-polymer was combined with increasing amounts of cross-linker (5.7, 10.0, 14.3, 21.4, and 42.9 wt.%) and designated PDMS1, PDMS2, PDMS3, PDMS4, and PDMS5, respectively. These materials were processed by spin coating and subjected to common microfabrication, micromachining, and biomedical processes: chemical immersion, oxygen plasma treatment, sterilization, and exposure to tissue culture media. The PDMS formulations were analyzed by gravimetry, goniometry, tensile testing, nanoindentation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Spin coating of PDMS was formulation dependent with film thickness ranging from 308 μm on PDMS1 to 171 μm on PDMS5 at 200 revolutions per minute (rpm). Ultimate tensile stress (UTS) increased from 3.9 MPa (PDMS1) to 10.8 MPa (PDMS3), and then decreased down to 4.0 MPa (PDMS5). Autoclave sterilization (AS) increased the storage modulus (σ) and UTS in all formulations, with the highest increase in UTS exhibited by PDMS5 (218%). PDMS surface hydrophilicity and micro-textures were generally unaffected when exposed to the different chemicals, except for micro-texture changes after immersion in potassium hydroxide and buffered hydrofluoric, nitric, sulfuric, and hydrofluoric acids; and minimal changes in contact angle after immersion in hexane, hydrochloric acid, photoresist developer, and toluene. Oxygen plasma treatment decreased the contact angle of PDMS2 from 109∘ to 60∘. Exposure to tissue culture media resulted in increased PDMS surface element concentrations of nitrogen and oxygen. read more read less

Topics:

Polydimethylsiloxane (53%)53% related to the paper, Contact angle (51%)51% related to the paper, Spin coating (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
1,127 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1020932105236
Three-Dimensional Photopatterning of Hydrogels Containing Living Cells
Valerie A. Liu1, Sangeeta N. Bhatia1
01 Dec 2002 - Biomedical Microdevices

Abstract:

Recent advances in tissue engineering have leveraged progress in both polymer chemistry and cell biology. For example, photopolymerizable biomaterials have been developed that can be used to photoencapsulate cells in peptide-derivatized hydrogel networks. While these materials have been useful in bone, cartilage and vascular ... Recent advances in tissue engineering have leveraged progress in both polymer chemistry and cell biology. For example, photopolymerizable biomaterials have been developed that can be used to photoencapsulate cells in peptide-derivatized hydrogel networks. While these materials have been useful in bone, cartilage and vascular tissue engineering, they have limited applicability to more complex tissues that are characterized by precise cell and tissue organization (e.g., liver, kidney). Typically, the tissue shape has been defined solely by the container used for photopolymerization. In this paper, we describe the use of photolithographic techniques to broaden the capability of photopolymerizable PEG-based biomaterials by inclusion of structural features within the cell/hydrogel network. Specifically, we describe the development of a photopatterning technique that allows localized photoencapsulation of live mammalian cells to control the tissue architecture. In this study, we optimized the effect of ultraviolet (UV) exposure and photoinitiator concentration on both photopatterning resolution and cell viability. With regard to photopatterning resolution, we found that increased UV exposure broadens feature size, while photoinitiator concentration had no significant effect on patterning resolution. Cell viability was characterized using HepG2 cells, a human hepatoma cell line. We observed that UV exposure itself did not cause cell death over the doses and time scale studied, while the photoinitiator 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenyl-acetophenone was itself cytotoxic in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the combination of UV and photoinitiator was the least biocompatible condition presumably due to formation of toxic free radicals. The utility of this method was demonstrated by photopatterning hydrogels containing live cells in various single layer structures, patterns of multiple cellular domains in a single “hybrid” hydrogel layer, and patterns of multiple cell types in multiple layers simulating use in a tissue engineering application. The combination of microfabrication approaches with photopolymerizable biomaterials will have implications in tissue engineering, elucidating fundamental structure–function relationships of tissues, and formation of immobilized cell arrays for biotechnological applications. read more read less

Topics:

Tissue engineering (56%)56% related to the paper, Self-healing hydrogels (55%)55% related to the paper
452 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10544-010-9485-3
3D microfilter device for viable circulating tumor cell (CTC) enrichment from blood
Siyang Zheng1, Henry K. Lin2, Bo Lu3, Anthony Williams4, Ram H. Datar4, Richard J. Cote4, Yu-Chong Tai3
01 Feb 2011 - Biomedical Microdevices

Abstract:

Detection of circulating tumor cells has emerged as a promising minimally invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for patients with metastatic cancers. We report a novel three dimensional microfilter device that can enrich viable circulating tumor cells from blood. This device consists of two layers of parylene membrane with ... Detection of circulating tumor cells has emerged as a promising minimally invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for patients with metastatic cancers. We report a novel three dimensional microfilter device that can enrich viable circulating tumor cells from blood. This device consists of two layers of parylene membrane with pores and gap precisely defined with photolithography. The positions of the pores are shifted between the top and bottom membranes. The bottom membrane supports captured cells and minimize the stress concentration on cell membrane and sustain cell viability during filtration. Viable cell capture on device was investigated with scanning electron microscopy, confocal microscopy, and immunofluorescent staining using model systems of cultured tumor cells spiked in blood or saline. The paper presents and validates this new 3D microfiltration concept for circulation tumor cell enrichment application. The device provides a highly valuable tool for assessing and characterizing viable enriched circulating tumor cells in both research and clinical settings. read more read less

Topics:

Circulating tumor cell (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
441 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10544-012-9699-7
BBB ON CHIP: microfluidic platform to mechanically and biochemically modulate blood-brain barrier function
01 Feb 2013 - Biomedical Microdevices

Abstract:

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a unique feature of the human body, preserving brain homeostasis and preventing toxic substances to enter the brain. However, in various neurodegenerative diseases, the function of the BBB is disturbed. Mechanisms of the breakdown of the BBB are incompletely understood and therefore a realisti... The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a unique feature of the human body, preserving brain homeostasis and preventing toxic substances to enter the brain. However, in various neurodegenerative diseases, the function of the BBB is disturbed. Mechanisms of the breakdown of the BBB are incompletely understood and therefore a realistic model of the BBB is essential. We present here the smallest model of the BBB yet, using a microfluidic chip, and the immortalized human brain endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3. Barrier function is modulated both mechanically, by exposure to fluid shear stress, and biochemically, by stimulation with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), in one single device. The device has integrated electrodes to analyze barrier tightness by measuring the transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER). We demonstrate that hCMEC/D3 cells could be cultured in the microfluidic device up to 7 days, and that these cultures showed comparable TEER values with the well-established Transwell assay, with an average (± SEM) of 36.9 Ω.cm2 (± 0.9 Ω.cm2) and 28.2 Ω.cm2 (± 1.3 Ω.cm2) respectively. Moreover, hCMEC/D3 cells on chip expressed the tight junction protein Zonula Occludens-1 (ZO-1) at day 4. Furthermore, shear stress positively influenced barrier tightness and increased TEER values with a factor 3, up to 120 Ω.cm2. Subsequent addition of TNF-α decreased the TEER with a factor of 10, down to 12 Ω.cm2. This realistic microfluidic platform of the BBB is very well suited to study barrier function in detail and evaluate drug passage to finally gain more insight into the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. read more read less

Topics:

Barrier function (54%)54% related to the paper, Blood–brain barrier (53%)53% related to the paper
425 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10544-006-0033-0
Combined microfluidic-micromagnetic separation of living cells in continuous flow.
25 Sep 2006 - Biomedical Microdevices

Abstract:

This paper describes a miniaturized, integrated, microfluidic device that can pull molecules and living cells bound to magnetic particles from one laminar flow path to another by applying a local magnetic field gradient, and thus selectively remove them from flowing biological fluids without any wash steps. To accomplish this... This paper describes a miniaturized, integrated, microfluidic device that can pull molecules and living cells bound to magnetic particles from one laminar flow path to another by applying a local magnetic field gradient, and thus selectively remove them from flowing biological fluids without any wash steps. To accomplish this, a microfabricated high-gradient magnetic field concentrator (HGMC) was integrated at one side of a microfluidic channel with two inlets and outlets. When magnetic micro- or nano-particles were introduced into one flow path, they remained limited to that flow stream. In contrast, when the HGMC was magnetized, the magnetic beads were efficiently pulled from the initial flow path into the collection stream, thereby cleansing the original fluid. Using this microdevice, living E. coli bacteria bound to magnetic nanoparticles were efficiently removed from flowing solutions containing densities of red blood cells similar to that found in blood. Because this microdevice allows large numbers of beads and cells to be sorted simultaneously, has no capacity limit, and does not lose separation efficiency as particles are removed, it may be especially useful for separations from blood or other clinical samples. This on-chip HGMC-microfluidic separator technology may potentially allow cell separations to be carried out in the field outside of hospitals and clinical laboratories. read more read less

Topics:

Laminar flow (50%)50% related to the paper
405 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Biomedical Microdevices.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Biomedical Microdevices format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Biomedical Microdevices in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Biomedical Microdevices guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Biomedical Microdevices guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Biomedical Microdevices guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Biomedical Microdevices?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Biomedical Microdevices citation style.

4. Can I use the Biomedical Microdevices templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Biomedical Microdevices.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Biomedical Microdevices that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Biomedical Microdevices that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Biomedical Microdevices?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Biomedical Microdevices.

7. Where can I find the template for the Biomedical Microdevices?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biomedical Microdevices's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Biomedical Microdevices's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Biomedical Microdevices an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Biomedical Microdevices is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Biomedical Microdevices?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Biomedical Microdevices?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Biomedical Microdevices?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Biomedical Microdevices, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Biomedical Microdevices's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Biomedical Microdevices?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Biomedical Microdevices. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Biomedical Microdevices?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Biomedical Microdevices are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Biomedical Microdevices?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biomedical Microdevices's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Biomedical Microdevices in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Biomedical Microdevices Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Biomedical Microdevices formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template