Example of BMC Public Health format
Recent searches

Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format Example of BMC Public Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

BMC Public Health — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health #120 of 526 down down by 54 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 5985 Published Papers | 24622 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 26/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.575
SNIP: 1.117
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.6
SJR: 0.666
SNIP: 1.867
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.7
SJR: 2.392
SNIP: 2.631
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 1.649
SNIP: 2.198

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.521

2% from 2018

Impact factor for BMC Public Health from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.521
2018 2.567
2017 2.42
2016 2.265
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.1

5% from 2019

CiteRatio for BMC Public Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.1
2019 3.9
2018 4.3
2017 4.4
2016 4.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 2% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.23

3% from 2019

SJR for BMC Public Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.23
2019 1.198
2018 1.382
2017 1.337
2016 1.431
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.656

12% from 2019

SNIP for BMC Public Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.656
2019 1.473
2018 1.412
2017 1.353
2016 1.358
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

BMC Public Health

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

BMC Public Health

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for BMC Public Health formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 922 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
26 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1606-8610
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
White faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G.E., Tinkham, M., Klapwijk, T.M.: Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25(7), 4515–4532 (1982)

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-450
External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register
09 Jun 2011 - BMC Public Health

Abstract:

Background: The Swedish National Inpatient Register (IPR), also called the Hospital Discharge Register, is a principal source of data for numerous research projects. The IPR is part of the National Patient Register. The Swedish IPR was launched in 1964 (psychiatric diagnoses from 1973) but complete coverage did not begin unti... Background: The Swedish National Inpatient Register (IPR), also called the Hospital Discharge Register, is a principal source of data for numerous research projects. The IPR is part of the National Patient Register. The Swedish IPR was launched in 1964 (psychiatric diagnoses from 1973) but complete coverage did not begin until 1987. Currently, more than 99% of all somatic (including surgery) and psychiatric hospital discharges are registered in the IPR. A previous validation of the IPR by the National Board of Health and Welfare showed that 85-95% of all diagnoses in the IPR are valid. The current paper describes the history, structure, coverage and quality of the Swedish IPR. Methods and results: In January 2010, we searched the medical databases, Medline and HighWire, using the search algorithm “validat* (inpatient or hospital discharge) Sweden”. We also contacted 218 members of the Swedish Society of Epidemiology and an additional 201 medical researchers to identify papers that had validated the IPR. In total, 132 papers were reviewed. The positive predictive value (PPV) was found to differ between diagnoses in the IPR, but is generally 85-95%. Conclusions: In conclusion, the validity of the Swedish IPR is high for many but not all diagnoses. The long followup makes the register particularly suitable for large-scale population-based research, but for certain research areas the use of other health registers, such as the Swedish Cancer Register, may be more suitable. read more read less

Topics:

Population (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
3,871 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
Health literacy and public health : a systematic review and integration of definitions and models
25 Jan 2012 - BMC Public Health

Abstract:

Health literacy concerns the knowledge and competences of persons to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. Although its importance is increasingly recognised, there is no consensus about the definition of health literacy or about its conceptual dimensions, which limits the possibilities for measurement and com... Health literacy concerns the knowledge and competences of persons to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. Although its importance is increasingly recognised, there is no consensus about the definition of health literacy or about its conceptual dimensions, which limits the possibilities for measurement and comparison. The aim of the study is to review definitions and models on health literacy to develop an integrated definition and conceptual model capturing the most comprehensive evidence-based dimensions of health literacy. A systematic literature review was performed to identify definitions and conceptual frameworks of health literacy. A content analysis of the definitions and conceptual frameworks was carried out to identify the central dimensions of health literacy and develop an integrated model. The review resulted in 17 definitions of health literacy and 12 conceptual models. Based on the content analysis, an integrative conceptual model was developed containing 12 dimensions referring to the knowledge, motivation and competencies of accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health-related information within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion setting, respectively. Based upon this review, a model is proposed integrating medical and public health views of health literacy. The model can serve as a basis for developing health literacy enhancing interventions and provide a conceptual basis for the development and validation of measurement tools, capturing the different dimensions of health literacy within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion settings. read more read less

Topics:

Health literacy (77%)77% related to the paper, Health promotion (63%)63% related to the paper, Health care (60%)60% related to the paper, Public health (57%)57% related to the paper, Conceptual framework (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
3,290 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119
Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
08 Feb 2013 - BMC Public Health

Abstract:

The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problem... The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problems. We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, the Cochrane register, and manual searches. Forty articles, describing 39 studies, totaling 6,139 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome measures used were subjective well-being, psychological well-being and depression. Positive psychology interventions included self-help interventions, group training and individual therapy. The standardized mean difference was 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being and 0.23 for depression indicating small effects for positive psychology interventions. At follow-up from three to six months, effect sizes are small, but still significant for subjective well-being and psychological well-being, indicating that effects are fairly sustainable. Heterogeneity was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the studies included. Several variables moderated the impact on depression: Interventions were more effective if they were of longer duration, if recruitment was conducted via referral or hospital, if interventions were delivered to people with certain psychosocial problems and on an individual basis, and if the study design was of low quality. Moreover, indications for publication bias were found, and the quality of the studies varied considerably. The results of this meta-analysis show that positive psychology interventions can be effective in the enhancement of subjective well-being and psychological well-being, as well as in helping to reduce depressive symptoms. Additional high-quality peer-reviewed studies in diverse (clinical) populations are needed to strengthen the evidence-base for positive psychology interventions. read more read less

Topics:

Psychological intervention (63%)63% related to the paper, Psychosocial (56%)56% related to the paper, Mental health (55%)55% related to the paper, Positive psychotherapy (54%)54% related to the paper, Well-being (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
1,407 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments
Diana E. Bowler1, Lisette M Buyung-Ali1, Teri M. Knight1, Andrew S. Pullin1
04 Aug 2010 - BMC Public Health

Abstract:

There is increasing interest in the potential role of the natural environment in human health and well-being. However, the evidence-base for specific and direct health or well-being benefits of activity within natural compared to more synthetic environments has not been systematically assessed. We conducted a systematic revie... There is increasing interest in the potential role of the natural environment in human health and well-being. However, the evidence-base for specific and direct health or well-being benefits of activity within natural compared to more synthetic environments has not been systematically assessed. We conducted a systematic review to collate and synthesise the findings of studies that compare measurements of health or well-being in natural and synthetic environments. Effect sizes of the differences between environments were calculated and meta-analysis used to synthesise data from studies measuring similar outcomes. Twenty-five studies met the review inclusion criteria. Most of these studies were crossover or controlled trials that investigated the effects of short-term exposure to each environment during a walk or run. This included 'natural' environments, such as public parks and green university campuses, and synthetic environments, such as indoor and outdoor built environments. The most common outcome measures were scores of different self-reported emotions. Based on these data, a meta-analysis provided some evidence of a positive benefit of a walk or run in a natural environment in comparison to a synthetic environment. There was also some support for greater attention after exposure to a natural environment but not after adjusting effect sizes for pretest differences. Meta-analysis of data on blood pressure and cortisol concentrations found less evidence of a consistent difference between environments across studies. Overall, the studies are suggestive that natural environments may have direct and positive impacts on well-being, but support the need for investment in further research on this question to understand the general significance for public health. read more read less

Topics:

Green exercise (57%)57% related to the paper, Systematic review (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
1,391 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for BMC Public Health.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write BMC Public Health in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the BMC Public Health guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the BMC Public Health guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the BMC Public Health guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in BMC Public Health?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the BMC Public Health citation style.

4. Can I use the BMC Public Health templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for BMC Public Health.

5. Can I use a manuscript in BMC Public Health that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper BMC Public Health that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in BMC Public Health?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in BMC Public Health.

7. Where can I find the template for the BMC Public Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per BMC Public Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the BMC Public Health's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. BMC Public Health an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's BMC Public Health is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like BMC Public Health?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like BMC Public Health?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using BMC Public Health?

After writing your paper autoformatting in BMC Public Health, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is BMC Public Health's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for BMC Public Health?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for BMC Public Health. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In BMC Public Health?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for BMC Public Health are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the BMC Public Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per BMC Public Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download BMC Public Health in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in BMC Public Health Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to BMC Public Health formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template