Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format
Recent searches

Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format Example of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Agronomy and Crop Science #38 of 347 up up by 30 ranks
Food Science #47 of 310 up up by 27 ranks
Biotechnology #77 of 282 up up by 26 ranks
Biochemistry #135 of 415 up up by 113 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 114 Published Papers | 662 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.4
SJR: 0.656
SNIP: 1.028
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.5
SJR: 1.387
SNIP: 1.887
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.9
SJR: 0.838
SNIP: 1.381
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 0.782
SNIP: 1.225

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

5.8

32% from 2019

CiteRatio for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.8
2019 4.4
2018 3.3
2017 3.2
2016 1.7
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.875

47% from 2019

SJR for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.875
2019 0.596
2018 0.628
2017 0.505
2016 0.551
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.734

60% from 2019

SNIP for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.734
2019 1.084
2018 1.095
2017 0.952
2016 1.619
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 32% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 47% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 60% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 377 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Chemical and biochemical technologies

i
Last updated on
04 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1606-8610
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
White faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/S40538-016-0085-1
Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview
Fabio Stagnari1, Albino Maggio2, Angelica Galieni1, Michele Pisante1

Abstract:

Food security, lowering the risk of climate change and meeting the increasing demand for energy will increasingly be critical challenges in the years to come. Producing sustainably is therefore becoming central in agriculture and food systems. Legume crops could play an important role in this context by delivering multiple se... Food security, lowering the risk of climate change and meeting the increasing demand for energy will increasingly be critical challenges in the years to come. Producing sustainably is therefore becoming central in agriculture and food systems. Legume crops could play an important role in this context by delivering multiple services in line with sustainability principles. In addition to serving as fundamental, worldwide source of high-quality food and feed, legumes contribute to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, as they release 5–7 times less GHG per unit area compared with other crops; allow the sequestration of carbon in soils with values estimated from 7.21 g kg−1 DM, 23.6 versus 21.8 g C kg−1 year; and induce a saving of fossil energy inputs in the system thanks to N fertilizer reduction, corresponding to 277 kg ha−1 of CO2 per year. Legumes could also be competitive crops and, due to their environmental and socioeconomic benefits, could be introduced in modern cropping systems to increase crop diversity and reduce use of external inputs. They also perform well in conservation systems, intercropping systems, which are very important in developing countries as well as in low-input and low-yield farming systems. Legumes fix the atmospheric nitrogen, release in the soil high-quality organic matter and facilitate soil nutrients’ circulation and water retention. Based on these multiple functions, legume crops have high potential for conservation agriculture, being functional either as growing crop or as crop residue. read more read less

Topics:

Food systems (58%)58% related to the paper, Intercropping (57%)57% related to the paper, Food security (57%)57% related to the paper, Conservation agriculture (56%)56% related to the paper, Agriculture (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
493 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/S40538-017-0089-5
The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants
Michael James Van Oosten1, Olimpia Pepe1, Stefania De Pascale1, Silvia Silletti1, Albino Maggio1

Abstract:

The use of bioeffectors, formally known as plant biostimulants, has become common practice in agriculture and provides a number of benefits in stimulating growth and protecting against stress. A biostimulant is loosely defined as an organic material and/or microorganism that is applied to enhance nutrient uptake, stimulate gr... The use of bioeffectors, formally known as plant biostimulants, has become common practice in agriculture and provides a number of benefits in stimulating growth and protecting against stress. A biostimulant is loosely defined as an organic material and/or microorganism that is applied to enhance nutrient uptake, stimulate growth, enhance stress tolerance or crop quality. This review is intended to provide a broad overview of known effects of biostimulants and their ability to improve tolerance to abiotic stresses. Inoculation or application of extracts from algae or other plants have beneficial effects on growth and stress adaptation. Algal extracts, protein hydrolysates, humic and fulvic acids, and other compounded mixtures have properties beyond basic nutrition, often enhancing growth and stress tolerance. Non-pathogenic bacteria capable of colonizing roots and the rhizosphere also have a number of positive effects. These effects include higher yield, enhanced nutrient uptake and utilization, increased photosynthetic activity, and resistance to both biotic and abiotic stresses. While most biostimulants have numerous and diverse effects on plant growth, this review focuses on the bioprotective effects against abiotic stress. Agricultural biostimulants may contribute to make agriculture more sustainable and resilient and offer an alternative to synthetic protectants which have increasingly falling out of favour with consumers. An extensive review of the literature shows a clear role for a diverse number of biostimulants that have protective effects against abiotic stress but also reveals the urgent need to address the underlying mechanisms responsible for these effects. read more read less

Topics:

Abiotic stress (57%)57% related to the paper, Abiotic component (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
480 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/2196-5641-1-3
Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter

Abstract:

Humic substances (HS) have been widely recognized as a plant growth promoter mainly by changes on root architecture and growth dynamics, which result in increased root size, branching and/or greater density of root hair with larger surface area. Stimulation of the H+-ATPase activity in cell membrane suggests that modification... Humic substances (HS) have been widely recognized as a plant growth promoter mainly by changes on root architecture and growth dynamics, which result in increased root size, branching and/or greater density of root hair with larger surface area. Stimulation of the H+-ATPase activity in cell membrane suggests that modifications brought about by HS are not only restricted to root structure, but are also extended to the major biochemical pathways since the driving force for most nutrient uptake is the electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane. Changes on root exudation profile, as well as primary and secondary metabolism were also observed, though strongly dependent on environment conditions, type of plant and its ontogeny. Proteomics and genomic approaches with diverse plant species subjected to HS treatment had often shown controversial patterns of protein and gene expression. This is a clear indication that HS effects of plants are complex and involve non-linear, cross-interrelated and dynamic processes that need be treated with an interdisciplinary view. Being the humic associations recalcitrant to microbiological attack, their use as vehicle to introduce beneficial selected microorganisms to crops has been proposed. This represents a perspective for a sort of new biofertilizer designed for a sustainable agriculture, whereby plants treated with HS become more susceptible to interact with bioinoculants, while HS may concomitantly modify the structure/activity of the microbial community in the rhizosphere compartment. An enhanced knowledge of the effects on plants physiology and biochemistry and interaction with rhizosphere and endophytic microbes should lead to achieve increased crop productivity through a better use of HS inputs in Agriculture. read more read less

Topics:

Root hair (55%)55% related to the paper, Rhizosphere (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
333 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/S40538-016-0070-8
Carbon nanomaterials: production, impact on plant development, agricultural and environmental applications
Olga Zaytseva1, GĂźnter Neumann1

Abstract:

During the relatively short time since the discovery of fullerenes in 1985, carbon nanotubes in 1991, and graphene in 2004, the unique properties of carbon-based nanomaterials have attracted great interest, which has promoted the development of methods for large-scale industrial production. The continuously increasing commerc... During the relatively short time since the discovery of fullerenes in 1985, carbon nanotubes in 1991, and graphene in 2004, the unique properties of carbon-based nanomaterials have attracted great interest, which has promoted the development of methods for large-scale industrial production. The continuously increasing commercial use of engineered carbon-based nanomaterials includes technical, medical, environmental and agricultural applications. Regardless of the application field, this is also associated with an increasing trend of intentional or unintended release of carbon nanomaterials into the environment, where the effect on living organisms is still difficult to predict. This review describes the different types of carbon-based nanomaterials, major production techniques and important trends for agricultural and environmental applications. The current status of research regarding the impact of carbon nanomaterials on plant growth and development is summarized, also addressing the currently most relevant knowledge gaps. read more read less
View PDF
283 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1186/S40538-018-0122-3
Sewage sludge for sustainable agriculture: contaminants’ contents and potential use as fertilizer
Lucrezia Lamastra1, Nicoleta Suciu1, Marco Trevisan1

Abstract:

Sewage sludge, the inevitable byproduct of municipal wastewater-treatment plant operation, is a key issue in many countries due to its increasing volume and the impacts associated with its disposal. According to the report of European Commission published in 2010, 39% of sewage sludge produced in the European Union is recycle... Sewage sludge, the inevitable byproduct of municipal wastewater-treatment plant operation, is a key issue in many countries due to its increasing volume and the impacts associated with its disposal. According to the report of European Commission published in 2010, 39% of sewage sludge produced in the European Union is recycled into agriculture. Management options require extensive waste characterization, since many of them may contain compounds, which could be harmful to the ecosystem, such as heavy metals, organic pollutants, etc. The present study aims to show the results of 2 years’ sampling of sewage sludge—based on 130 samples collected from 35 wastewater-treatment plants situated in the North of Italy—and to assess its suitability as soil fertilizer regarding contents of nonylphenol (NP), nonylphenolethoxylates (NPnEOs), and phthalates (DEHP). An effective analytic method for organic pollutants detection in the sewage sludge has been developed, showing an excellent repeatability and recoveries. Ecotoxicological risk assessment was evaluated using risk quotients (RQs) for sludge-amended soil. Most of the analyzed samples do not contain NP, NPnEOs, and DEHP at levels higher than the limit established by the draft-working document of the European Commission on Sludge. The assessment using RQs reports that NP and NPnEOs never give values higher than 1, and for DEHP the obtained RQs exceed the value of 1 just three times. Data obtained were compared to the data from other European and Asiatic countries, showing a huge variability for all the compounds considered. Based on the obtained results, it appears that the proposed EU limits for the selected substances on sewage sludge intended to be used as soil fertilizer in agriculture are sufficiently conservative to avoid negative effects on soil fauna. read more read less

Topics:

Sludge (64%)64% related to the paper, European union (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
97 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture citation style.

4. Can I use the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture.

7. Where can I find the template for the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template