Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format
Recent searches

Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format Example of Clinical Oral Investigations format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Clinical Oral Investigations — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Dentistry (all) #12 of 111 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 1513 Published Papers | 7544 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 14/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Dental Investigations Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.5
SJR: 0.625
SNIP: 2.067
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.4
SJR: 1.77
SNIP: 2.073
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.2
SJR: 1.504
SNIP: 2.014
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.4
SJR: 0.952
SNIP: 1.796

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.812

15% from 2018

Impact factor for Clinical Oral Investigations from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.812
2018 2.453
2017 2.386
2016 2.308
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.0

14% from 2019

CiteRatio for Clinical Oral Investigations from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.0
2019 4.4
2018 4.1
2017 4.2
2016 4.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 15% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.088

7% from 2019

SJR for Clinical Oral Investigations from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.088
2019 1.019
2018 0.993
2017 0.986
2016 1.099
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.607

9% from 2019

SNIP for Clinical Oral Investigations from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.607
2019 1.479
2018 1.269
2017 1.246
2016 1.395
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Clinical Oral Investigations

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Clinical Oral Investigations

It is the primary aim of this international journal to be a multidisciplinary forum for publications from all fields of oral medicine. Especially, it is intended to create a connection between basic and clinical sciences and thus promote the exchange of information and the adv...... Read More

Dentistry

i
Last updated on
14 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1432-6981
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.333
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Frequency
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00784-002-0188-X
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
David Moher1, Kenneth F. Schulz2, Douglas G. Altman

Abstract:

To comprehend the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. That goal can be achieved only through total transparency from authors. Despite several decades of educational efforts, the reporting of RCTs needs improvement. Investigators and editors... To comprehend the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. That goal can be achieved only through total transparency from authors. Despite several decades of educational efforts, the reporting of RCTs needs improvement. Investigators and editors developed the original CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to help authors improve reporting by use of a checklist and flow diagram. The revised CONSORT statement presented here incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement. The checklist items pertain to the content of the Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The revised checklist includes 22 items selected because empirical evidence indicates that not reporting this information is associated with biased estimates of treatment effect, or because the information is essential to judge the reliability or relevance of the findings. We intended the flow diagram to depict the passage of participants through an RCT. The revised flow diagram depicts information from four stages of a trial (enrollment, intervention allocation, follow- up, and analysis). The diagram explicitly shows the number of participants, for each intervention group, included in the primary data analysis. Inclusion of these numbers allows the reader to judge whether the authors have done an intention- to-treat analysis. In sum, the CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results. read more read less

Topics:

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (69%)69% related to the paper, Randomized controlled trial (51%)51% related to the paper, Checklist (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
2,011 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00784-020-03248-X
Coronavirus COVID-19 impacts to dentistry and potential salivary diagnosis

Abstract:

A novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is associated with humanto-human transmission. The COVID-19 was recently identified in saliva of infected patients. In this point-of-view article, we discuss the potential of transmission via the saliva of this virus. The COVID-19 transmission via contact with droplets and aerosols generated dur... A novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is associated with humanto-human transmission. The COVID-19 was recently identified in saliva of infected patients. In this point-of-view article, we discuss the potential of transmission via the saliva of this virus. The COVID-19 transmission via contact with droplets and aerosols generated during dental clinical procedures is expected. There is a need to increase investigations to the detection of COVID-19 in oral fluids and its impact on the transmission of this virus, which is crucial to improve effective strategies for prevention, especially for dentists and healthcare professionals that perform aerosol-generating procedures. Saliva can have a pivotal role in the human-to-human transmission, and non-invasive salivary diagnostics may provide a convenient and cost-effective point-of-care platform for the fast and early detection of COVID-19 infection. read more read less

Topics:

Coronavirus (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
431 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00784-007-0181-5
Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs
David Bartlett1, Carolina Ganss2, Adrian Lussi3

Abstract:

A new scoring system, the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE), has been designed to provide a simple tool for use in general practice and to allow comparison to other more discriminative indices. The most severely affected surface in each sextant is recorded with a four level score and the cumulative score classified and ma... A new scoring system, the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE), has been designed to provide a simple tool for use in general practice and to allow comparison to other more discriminative indices. The most severely affected surface in each sextant is recorded with a four level score and the cumulative score classified and matched to risk levels which guide the management of the condition. The BEWE allows re-analysis and integration of results from existing studies and, in time, should initiate a consensus within the scientific community and so avoid continued proliferation of indices. Finally, this process should lead to the development of an internationally accepted, standardised and validated index. The BEWE further aims to increase the awareness of tooth erosion amongst clinicians and general dental practitioners and to provide a guide as to its management. read more read less
View PDF
425 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00784-016-1719-1
Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF

Abstract:

The use of platelet concentrates has gained increasing awareness in recent years for regenerative procedures in modern dentistry. The aim of the present study was to compare growth factor release over time from platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and a modernized protocol for PRF, advanced-PRF (A-PRF). Eig... The use of platelet concentrates has gained increasing awareness in recent years for regenerative procedures in modern dentistry. The aim of the present study was to compare growth factor release over time from platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and a modernized protocol for PRF, advanced-PRF (A-PRF). Eighteen blood samples were collected from six donors (3 samples each for PRP, PRF, and A-PRF). Following preparation, samples were incubated in a plate shaker and assessed for growth factor release at 15 min, 60 min, 8 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 10 days. Thereafter, growth factor release of PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, EGF, and IGF was quantified using ELISA. The highest reported growth factor released from platelet concentrates was PDGF-AA followed by PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, and PDGF-AB. In general, following 15–60 min incubation, PRP released significantly higher growth factors when compared to PRF and A-PRF. At later time points up to 10 days, it was routinely found that A-PRF released the highest total growth factors. Furthermore, A-PRF released significantly higher total protein accumulated over a 10-day period when compared to PRP or PRF. The results from the present study indicate that the various platelet concentrates have quite different release kinetics. The advantage of PRP is the release of significantly higher proteins at earlier time points whereas PRF displayed a continual and steady release of growth factors over a 10-day period. Furthermore, in general, it was observed that the new formulation of PRF (A-PRF) released significantly higher total quantities of growth factors when compared to traditional PRF. Based on these findings, PRP can be recommended for fast delivery of growth factors whereas A-PRF is better-suited for long-term release. read more read less

Topics:

Platelet-rich plasma (54%)54% related to the paper
424 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00784-018-2775-5
Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial.

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 2% articaine and 2% lignocaine in achieving adequate anesthesia in children between the age group of 6–13 years using inferior alveolar nerve block. A triple blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in 180 participants (90 patients- 2% articaine, 90 patients-2... The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 2% articaine and 2% lignocaine in achieving adequate anesthesia in children between the age group of 6–13 years using inferior alveolar nerve block. A triple blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in 180 participants (90 patients- 2% articaine, 90 patients-2% lignocaine). Effectiveness of the anesthetic agent was determined at 3 points determined by subjective evaluation of pain using pain scales (FPS-R). Paired sample t-test and chi square test were performed for statistical significance. Anesthetic success for 2% articaine were 64.4%, 42.2% and 81.8% respectively. The anesthetic success of 2% lignocaine was 66.7%, 48.9% and 85.7% at point one, point two and point three respectively (p > 0.05). This study concludes that 2% articaine in 1:2,00,000 did not demonstrate superior clinical effectiveness in comparison to 2% lignocaine. Lignocaine has always been considered the gold standard. With its unique chemical structure and increased potency, Articaine has been gaining popularity. Its efficacy in 2% concentration had not been compared to 2% lignocaine. 2% articaine did not show clinical superiority but its comparable effectiveness with lignocaine can encourage further research in using articaine in reduced concentrations to improve effectiveness. read more read less

Topics:

Articaine (70%)70% related to the paper
407 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Clinical Oral Investigations.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Clinical Oral Investigations format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Clinical Oral Investigations in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Clinical Oral Investigations guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Clinical Oral Investigations guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Clinical Oral Investigations guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Clinical Oral Investigations?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Clinical Oral Investigations citation style.

4. Can I use the Clinical Oral Investigations templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Clinical Oral Investigations.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Clinical Oral Investigations that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Clinical Oral Investigations that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Clinical Oral Investigations?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Clinical Oral Investigations.

7. Where can I find the template for the Clinical Oral Investigations?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Clinical Oral Investigations's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Clinical Oral Investigations's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Clinical Oral Investigations an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Clinical Oral Investigations is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Clinical Oral Investigations?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Clinical Oral Investigations?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Clinical Oral Investigations?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Clinical Oral Investigations, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Clinical Oral Investigations's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Clinical Oral Investigations?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Clinical Oral Investigations. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Clinical Oral Investigations?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Clinical Oral Investigations are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Clinical Oral Investigations?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Clinical Oral Investigations's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Clinical Oral Investigations in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Clinical Oral Investigations Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Clinical Oral Investigations formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template