Example of Corporate Reputation Review format
Recent searches

Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format Example of Corporate Reputation Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Corporate Reputation Review — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Business and International Management #216 of 399 down down by 69 ranks
Strategy and Management #254 of 440 down down by 61 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 64 Published Papers | 106 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 15/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.4
SJR: 0.372
SNIP: 0.88
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.964
SNIP: 1.77
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.0
SJR: 3.135
SNIP: 1.612
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.8
SJR: 0.819
SNIP: 1.472

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.7

6% from 2019

CiteRatio for Corporate Reputation Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.7
2019 1.6
2018 1.8
2017 1.4
2016 1.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.314

24% from 2019

SJR for Corporate Reputation Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.314
2019 0.415
2018 0.324
2017 0.352
2016 0.433
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.721

1% from 2019

SNIP for Corporate Reputation Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.721
2019 0.711
2018 0.731
2017 0.631
2016 0.695
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 24% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Corporate Reputation Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Corporate Reputation Review

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Corporate Reputation Review formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 769 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
15 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1363-3589
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1057/PALGRAVE.CRR.1550049
Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory
W. Timothy Coombs1

Abstract:

Crisis managers benefit from understanding how crisis communication can be used to protect reputational assets during a crisis. Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) offers a framework for understanding this dynamic. SCCT provides a mechanism for anticipating how stakeholders will react to a crisis in terms of the re... Crisis managers benefit from understanding how crisis communication can be used to protect reputational assets during a crisis. Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) offers a framework for understanding this dynamic. SCCT provides a mechanism for anticipating how stakeholders will react to a crisis in terms of the reputational threat posed by the crisis. Moreover, SCCT projects how people will react to the crisis response strategies used to manage the crisis. From its empirical research emerges a set of evidence-based crisis communication guidelines. The development of SCCT is discussed along with the presentation of its guidelines for crisis communication. read more read less

Topics:

Situational crisis communication theory (87%)87% related to the paper, Crisis communication (76%)76% related to the paper, Crisis management (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
1,771 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1057/PALGRAVE.CRR.1540024
The reputational landscape
Charles J. Fombrun1, Cees B M van Riel2

Abstract:

Welcome to the inaugural double issue of the Corporate Reputation Review. At a time when disciplines are fragmenting into ever-more specialized domains, we are pleased to announce the creation of an integrative medium for research and practice about reputation management. Indeed, the primary purpose of the Review is to provid... Welcome to the inaugural double issue of the Corporate Reputation Review. At a time when disciplines are fragmenting into ever-more specialized domains, we are pleased to announce the creation of an integrative medium for research and practice about reputation management. Indeed, the primary purpose of the Review is to provide a forum for research-based discussions about corporate reputations. We expect these conversations to reflect the diversity of academic disciplines that are actively contributing to knowledge in this area, whether grounded in strategic management, organization theory, economics, marketing, communications, accounting, or finance. As such, the Review will assemble emerging scholarship about an area that is proving to be of considerable interest to scholars with widely divergent orientations. In this way, we hope to encourage a closer examination of corporate reputations and thereby stimulate the growth of knowledge about the complex socially constructed environments in which companies operate. We also intend the Corporate Reputation Review to address the proliferating demands by practitioners for answers to questions about how reputations affect competitive positioning, about how to examine and value corporate reputations, about how to build, maintain, and defend those reputations (Hall, 1992). Many professionals have a vested interest in developing answers to these questions, be they chief executive officers or strategic planners, brand managers or identity specialists, accountants or financiers, heads of public relations, community relations, investor relations, customer relations, or employee relations. In their everyday life, each is deeply involved in managing a company’s reputational assets. Yet all too few can identify and provide well-reasoned and defensible answers to questions about corporate reputation and reputational dynamics. A key purpose of the Corporate Reputation Review, then, is to help remedy that lack. Through conceptual articles, empirical research, case studies of best practice, and occasional book reviews, we hope to draw on the expertise of leading researchers and practitioners concerned with corporate identity and identification, the strategic management of stakeholders, corporate branding, the valuation of intangibles, communication, crisis management, and the socioeconomic analysis of competition. read more read less

Topics:

Corporate branding (62%)62% related to the paper, Investor relations (62%)62% related to the paper, Stakeholder (60%)60% related to the paper, Corporate identity (58%)58% related to the paper, Reputation (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
998 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1057/CRR.2009.26
A Systematic Review of the Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory
Kent Walker1

Abstract:

A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature is conducted. The final sample of 54 articles (and one book) consists of well-cited papers, and papers in journals that have published high quality work in corporate reputation. The sample is then analyzed and the three fundamental problems in the reputation literatur... A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature is conducted. The final sample of 54 articles (and one book) consists of well-cited papers, and papers in journals that have published high quality work in corporate reputation. The sample is then analyzed and the three fundamental problems in the reputation literature are addressed – the need for a comprehensive and well-accepted definition, the difficulty in operationalizing corporate reputation, and the ongoing need for more developed theory. Two main findings evolve from this analysis: (1) reputation may have different dimensions and is issue specific, and (2) different stakeholder groups may have different perceptions of corporate reputations. The implications for future research are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Stakeholder (59%)59% related to the paper, Reputation (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
699 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1057/PALGRAVE.CRR.1550012
Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape
Michael L. Barnett1, John M. Jermier1, Barbara A. Lafferty1

Abstract:

While interest in the concept of corporate reputation has gained momentum in the last few years, a precise and commonly agreed upon definition is still lacking. This paper reviews the many definitions of corporate reputation present in the recent literature and categorizes these definitions based on their similarities and dif... While interest in the concept of corporate reputation has gained momentum in the last few years, a precise and commonly agreed upon definition is still lacking. This paper reviews the many definitions of corporate reputation present in the recent literature and categorizes these definitions based on their similarities and differences. The purpose of the study is to review, analyze and evaluate prior definitional statements of corporate reputation. The analysis led us to conclude that the cluster of meaning that looks most promising for future definitional work uses the language of assessment and specific terms such as judgment, estimation, evaluation or gauge. Based on this review work and a lexicological analysis of the concept of reputation, we propose a new definitional statement that we think adds theoretical clarity to this area of study. The statement defines corporate reputation more explicitly and narrowly and distinguishes this concept from corporate identity, corporate image and corporate reputation capital. It is our hope that this study and the resulting definition will provoke further scholarship devoted to developing one voice when it comes to corporate reputation as a concept. read more read less

Topics:

Reputation capital (60%)60% related to the paper, Corporate identity (57%)57% related to the paper, Reputation (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
680 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1057/PALGRAVE.CRR.1540188
Agenda-setting Effects of Business News on the Public's Images and Opinions about Major Corporations
Craig E. Carroll1, Maxwell McCombs1

Abstract:

Although the agenda-setting effects of the news media on people's attention to, comprehension of, and opinions about topics in the news primarily have been studied in political communication settings, the central theoretical idea — the transfer of salience from the media agenda to the public agenda — fits equally well in the ... Although the agenda-setting effects of the news media on people's attention to, comprehension of, and opinions about topics in the news primarily have been studied in political communication settings, the central theoretical idea — the transfer of salience from the media agenda to the public agenda — fits equally well in the world of business communication. In the case of corporate reputations, only the operational definitions of the objects and attributes on these agendas are changed here to frame five key theoretical propositions about the influence of news coverage on corporate reputations among the public. This presentation of five basic propositions about first and second-level agenda setting effects as well as intermedia agenda-setting effects offers a theoretical roadmap for systematic empirical research into the influence of the mass media on corporate reputations. read more read less

Topics:

News media (62%)62% related to the paper, Political communication (57%)57% related to the paper, Stakeholder (54%)54% related to the paper, Business communication (54%)54% related to the paper, Corporate branding (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
604 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Corporate Reputation Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Corporate Reputation Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Corporate Reputation Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Corporate Reputation Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Corporate Reputation Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Corporate Reputation Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Corporate Reputation Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Corporate Reputation Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Corporate Reputation Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Corporate Reputation Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Corporate Reputation Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Corporate Reputation Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Corporate Reputation Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Corporate Reputation Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Corporate Reputation Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Corporate Reputation Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Corporate Reputation Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Corporate Reputation Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Corporate Reputation Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Corporate Reputation Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Corporate Reputation Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Corporate Reputation Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Corporate Reputation Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Corporate Reputation Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Corporate Reputation Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Corporate Reputation Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Corporate Reputation Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Corporate Reputation Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Corporate Reputation Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Corporate Reputation Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Corporate Reputation Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Corporate Reputation Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template