Example of HEC Forum format
Recent searches

Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format Example of HEC Forum format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

HEC Forum — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects #8 of 37 up up by 15 ranks
Health (social science) #86 of 293 up up by 32 ranks
Health Policy #91 of 242 up up by 36 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 95 Published Papers | 278 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 1.075
SNIP: 1.869
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.537
SNIP: 1.583
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 0.73
SNIP: 1.863
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

BMJ Publishing Group

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.768
SNIP: 1.428

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.9

21% from 2019

CiteRatio for HEC Forum from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.9
2019 2.4
2018 1.8
2017 1.7
2016 1.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.434

9% from 2019

SJR for HEC Forum from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.434
2019 0.399
2018 0.373
2017 0.367
2016 0.269
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.051

8% from 2019

SNIP for HEC Forum from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.051
2019 1.148
2018 0.993
2017 0.75
2016 0.634
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

HEC Forum

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

HEC Forum

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for HEC Forum formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 853 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
16 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1572-8498
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10730-012-9176-Y
Framing the Issues: Moral Distress in Health Care
Bernadette M. Pauly1, Colleen Varcoe2, Jan Storch1
25 Mar 2012 - Hec Forum

Abstract:

Moral distress in health care has been identified as a growing concern and a focus of research in nursing and health care for almost three decades. Researchers and theorists have argued that moral distress has both short and long-term consequences. Moral distress has implications for satisfaction, recruitment and retention of... Moral distress in health care has been identified as a growing concern and a focus of research in nursing and health care for almost three decades. Researchers and theorists have argued that moral distress has both short and long-term consequences. Moral distress has implications for satisfaction, recruitment and retention of health care providers and implications for the delivery of safe and competent quality patient care. In over a decade of research on ethical practice, registered nurses and other health care practitioners have repeatedly identified moral distress as a concern and called for action. However, research and action on moral distress has been constrained by lack of conceptual clarity and theoretical confusion as to the meaning and underpinnings of moral distress. To further examine these issues and foster action on moral distress, three members of the University of Victoria/University of British Columbia (UVIC/UVIC) nursing ethics research team initiated the development and delivery of a multi-faceted and interdisciplinary symposium on Moral Distress with international experts, researchers, and practitioners. The goal of the symposium was to develop an agenda for action on moral distress in health care. We sought to develop a plan of action that would encompass recommendations for education, practice, research and policy. The papers in this special issue of HEC Forum arose from that symposium. In this first paper, we provide an introduction to moral distress; make explicit some of the challenges associated with theoretical and conceptual constructions of moral distress; and discuss the barriers to the development of research, education, and policy that could, if addressed, foster action on moral distress in health care practice. The following three papers were written by key international experts on moral distress, who explore in-depth the issues in three arenas: education, practice, research. In the fifth and last paper in the series, we highlight key insights from the symposium and the papers in the series, propose to redefine moral distress, and outline directions for an agenda for action on moral distress in health care. read more read less

Topics:

Moral disengagement (65%)65% related to the paper, Health care (56%)56% related to the paper, Nursing ethics (54%)54% related to the paper, Health policy (53%)53% related to the paper, Nurse education (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
247 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10730-012-9177-X
Empirical research on moral distress: issues, challenges, and opportunities.
Ann B. Hamric1
04 Apr 2012 - Hec Forum

Abstract:

Studying a concept as complex as moral distress is an ongoing challenge for those engaged in empirical ethics research. Qualitative studies of nurses have illuminated the experience of moral distress and widened the contours of the concept, particularly in the area of root causes. This work has led to the current understandin... Studying a concept as complex as moral distress is an ongoing challenge for those engaged in empirical ethics research. Qualitative studies of nurses have illuminated the experience of moral distress and widened the contours of the concept, particularly in the area of root causes. This work has led to the current understanding that moral distress can arise from clinical situations, factors internal to the individual professional, and factors present in unit cultures, the institution, and the larger health care environment. Corley et al. (2001) was the first to publish a quantitative measure of moral distress, and her scale has been adapted for use by others, including studies of other disciplines (Hamric and Blackhall 2007; Schwenzer and Wang 2006). Other scholars have proposed variations on Jameton’s core definition (Sporrong et al. 2006, 2007), developing measures for related concepts such as moral sensitivity (Lutzen et al. 2006), ethics stress (Raines 2000), and stress of conscience (Glasberg et al. 2006). The lack of consistency and consensus on the definition of moral distress considerably complicates efforts to study it. Increased attention by researchers in disciplines other than nursing has taken different forms, some problematic. Cultural differences in the role of the nurse and understanding of actions that represent threats to moral integrity also challenge efforts to build a cohesive research-based understanding of the concept. In this paper, research efforts to date are reviewed. The importance of capturing root causes of moral distress in instruments, particularly those at unit and system levels, to allow for interventions to be appropriately targeted is highlighted. In addition, the issue of studying moral distress and interaction over time with moral residue is discussed. Promising recent work is described along with the potential these approaches open for research that can lead to interventions to decrease moral distress. Finally, opportunities for future research and study are identified, and recommendations for moving the research agenda forward are offered. read more read less

Topics:

Moral disengagement (67%)67% related to the paper, Social cognitive theory of morality (66%)66% related to the paper, Moral development (63%)63% related to the paper, Research ethics (51%)51% related to the paper, Empirical research (51%)51% related to the paper
201 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10730-012-9197-6
Professional identity formation in medical education: The convergence of multiple domains
Mark D. Holden1, Era Buck1, Mark L. Clark1, Karen Szauter1, Julie M. Trumble1
27 Oct 2012 - Hec Forum

Abstract:

There has been increasing emphasis on professionalism in medical education over the past several decades, initially focusing on bioethical principles, communication skills, and behaviors of medical students and practitioners. Authors have begun to discuss professional identity formation (PIF), distinguishing it as the foundat... There has been increasing emphasis on professionalism in medical education over the past several decades, initially focusing on bioethical principles, communication skills, and behaviors of medical students and practitioners. Authors have begun to discuss professional identity formation (PIF), distinguishing it as the foundational process one experiences during the transformation from lay person to physician. This integrative developmental process involves the establishment of core values, moral principles, and self-awareness. The literature has approached PIF from various paradigms-professionalism, psychological ego development, social interactions, and various learning theories. Similarities have been identified between the formation process of clergy and that of physicians. PIF reflects a very complex process, or series of processes, best understood by applying aspects of overlapping domains: professionalism, psychosocial identity development, and formation. In this study, the authors review essential elements of these three domains, identify features relevant to medical PIF, and describe strategies reported in the medical education literature that may influence PIF. read more read less
162 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10730-005-4949-1
Moral Distress in Healthcare Practice: The Situation of Nurses
Wendy Austin1, Gillian Lemermeyer, Lisa Goldberg, Vangie Bergum, Melissa S. Johnson
01 Mar 2005 - Hec Forum

Topics:

Philosophy of medicine (68%)68% related to the paper, Bioethics (63%)63% related to the paper, Medical law (56%)56% related to the paper
151 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10730-012-9179-8
Moral distress and the contemporary plight of health professionals.
Wendy Austin1
24 Mar 2012 - Hec Forum

Abstract:

Once a term used primarily by moral philosophers, “moral distress” is increasingly used by health professionals to name experiences of frustration and failure in fulfilling moral obligations inherent to their fiduciary relationship with the public. Although such challenges have always been present, as has discord regarding th... Once a term used primarily by moral philosophers, “moral distress” is increasingly used by health professionals to name experiences of frustration and failure in fulfilling moral obligations inherent to their fiduciary relationship with the public. Although such challenges have always been present, as has discord regarding the right thing to do in particular situations, there is a radical change in the degree and intensity of moral distress being expressed. Has the plight of professionals in healthcare practice changed? “Plight” encompasses not only the act of pledging, but that of predicament and peril. The author claims that health professionals are increasingly put in peril by healthcare reform that undermines their efficacy and jeopardizes ethical engagement with those in their care. The re-engineering of healthcare to give precedence to corporate and commercial values and strategies of commodification, service rationing, streamlining, and measuring of “efficiency,” is literally demoralizing health professionals. Healthcare practice needs to be grounded in a capacity for compassion and empathy, as is evident in standards of practice and codes of ethics, and in the understanding of what it means to be a professional. Such grounding allows for humane response to the availability of unprecedented advances in biotechnological treatments, for genuine dialogue and the raising of difficult, necessary ethical questions, and for the mutual support of health professionals themselves. If healthcare environments are not understood as moral communities but rather as simulated marketplaces, then health professionals’ moral agency is diminished and their vulnerability to moral distress is exacerbated. Research in moral distress and relational ethics is used to support this claim. read more read less

Topics:

Moral agency (66%)66% related to the paper, Moral disengagement (64%)64% related to the paper, Normative ethics (58%)58% related to the paper, Ethical code (55%)55% related to the paper, Health care (53%)53% related to the paper
136 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for HEC Forum.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write HEC Forum in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the HEC Forum guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the HEC Forum guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the HEC Forum guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in HEC Forum?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the HEC Forum citation style.

4. Can I use the HEC Forum templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for HEC Forum.

5. Can I use a manuscript in HEC Forum that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper HEC Forum that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in HEC Forum?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in HEC Forum.

7. Where can I find the template for the HEC Forum?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per HEC Forum's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the HEC Forum's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. HEC Forum an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's HEC Forum is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like HEC Forum?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like HEC Forum?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using HEC Forum?

After writing your paper autoformatting in HEC Forum, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is HEC Forum's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for HEC Forum?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for HEC Forum. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In HEC Forum?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for HEC Forum are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the HEC Forum?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per HEC Forum's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download HEC Forum in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in HEC Forum Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to HEC Forum formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template