Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format
Recent searches

Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format Example of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Pharmacy #5 of 35 down down by 1 rank
Pharmaceutical Science #78 of 166 down down by 7 ranks
Pharmacology (medical) #130 of 246 down down by 11 ranks
Pharmacology #181 of 297 down down by 4 ranks
Toxicology #84 of 122 down down by 8 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 627 Published Papers | 1699 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 24/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 1.112
SNIP: 0.926
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.4
SJR: 0.815
SNIP: 1.028
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.2
SJR: 1.783
SNIP: 1.498
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.3
SJR: 0.633
SNIP: 1.433

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.616

4% from 2018

Impact factor for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.616
2018 1.692
2017 1.508
2016 1.555
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.7

10% from 2019

CiteRatio for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.7
2019 3.0
2018 2.6
2017 2.9
2016 2.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 4% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.538

18% from 2019

SJR for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.538
2019 0.654
2018 0.746
2017 0.702
2016 0.693
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.974

13% from 2019

SNIP for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.974
2019 1.117
2018 0.985
2017 0.863
2016 0.987
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 18% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

The aim of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is to provide a medium for the publication of articles on clinical pharmacy and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. The scope of the journal is clinical pharmacy, its research and its applicat...... Read More

Pharmacy

Pharmaceutical Science

Pharmacology (medical)

Toxicology

Health Professions

i
Last updated on
24 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2210-7703
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.944
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11096-016-0257-X
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.
Sara S. McMillan1, Michelle Annette King1, Mary P. Tully2

Abstract:

Introduction The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Delphi Technique are consensus methods used in research that is directed at problem-solving, idea-generation, or determining priorities. While consensus methods are commonly used in health services literature, few studies in pharmacy practice use these methods. This paper pro... Introduction The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Delphi Technique are consensus methods used in research that is directed at problem-solving, idea-generation, or determining priorities. While consensus methods are commonly used in health services literature, few studies in pharmacy practice use these methods. This paper provides an overview of the NGT and Delphi technique, including the steps involved and the types of research questions best suited to each method, with examples from the pharmacy literature. Methodology The NGT entails face-to-face discussion in small groups, and provides a prompt result for researchers. The classic NGT involves four key stages: silent generation, round robin, clarification and voting (ranking). Variations have occurred in relation to generating ideas, and how 'consensus' is obtained from participants. The Delphi technique uses a multistage self-completed questionnaire with individual feedback, to determine consensus from a larger group of 'experts.' Questionnaires have been mailed, or more recently, e-mailed to participants. When to use The NGT has been used to explore consumer and stakeholder views, while the Delphi technique is commonly used to develop guidelines with health professionals. Method choice is influenced by various factors, including the research question, the perception of consensus required, and associated practicalities such as time and geography. Limitations The NGT requires participants to personally attend a meeting. This may prove difficult to organise and geography may limit attendance. The Delphi technique can take weeks or months to conclude, especially if multiple rounds are required, and may be complex for lay people to complete. read more read less

Topics:

Delphi method (59%)59% related to the paper, Nominal group technique (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
826 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11096-013-9865-X
Assessing medication adherence: options to consider

Abstract:

Background Adherence to chronic therapy is a key determinant of patient health outcomes in chronic disease. However, only about 50 % of patients adhere to chronic therapy. One of the challenges in promoting adherence is having an accurate understanding of adherence rates and the factors that contribute to non-adherence. There... Background Adherence to chronic therapy is a key determinant of patient health outcomes in chronic disease. However, only about 50 % of patients adhere to chronic therapy. One of the challenges in promoting adherence is having an accurate understanding of adherence rates and the factors that contribute to non-adherence. There are many measures available to assess patient medication adherence. Aim of the review This review aims to present the commonly used indirect methods available for measuring medication adherence in routine healthcare and research studies. Method A literature review on medication adherence measures in patient populations with chronic conditions taking chronic medications was conducted through Medline (2003–2013). A complementary manual search of references cited in the retrieved studies was performed in order to identify any additional studies. Results Of the 238 initial Medline search results, 57 full texts were retrieved. Forty-seven articles were included as a result of the manual search. Adherence measures identified were: self-report (reported in 50 publications), electronic measures (33), pharmacy refills and claims data (26) and pill counts (25). Patient self-report, electronic measures, pharmacy refill and claims data were the most commonly used measures of adherence in research, routine practice, epidemiological and intervention studies. These methods, and their strengths and limitations have been described in this paper. Conclusion A multitude of indirect measures of adherence exist in the literature, however, there is no “gold” standard for measuring adherence to medications. Triangulation of methods increases the validity and reliability of the adherence data collected. To strengthen the adherence data collected and allow for comparison of data, future research and practice interventions should use an internationally accepted, operational standardized definition of medication adherence and clearly describe the medication adherence methods used. read more read less
249 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11096-011-9582-2
Diabetes knowledge, medication adherence and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Abstract:

Background Most of interventions that have attempted to improve medication adherence in type 2 diabetes have been educational; on the assumption that knowledge regarding diabetes might affect patients’ adherence to their treatment regimen. Objectives The purpose of the study was to investigate any association of knowledge and... Background Most of interventions that have attempted to improve medication adherence in type 2 diabetes have been educational; on the assumption that knowledge regarding diabetes might affect patients’ adherence to their treatment regimen. Objectives The purpose of the study was to investigate any association of knowledge and medication adherence with glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Setting The study was conducted at the Diabetes Outpatients Clinic, Hospital Pulau Penang. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 540 adult patients with type 2 diabetes attending the clinic. A questionnaire including previously validated Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Test and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale was used and the patients’ medical records were reviewed for haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels and other disease-related information. A total of 35 (6.48%) patients were excluded after data collection due to lack of HbA1C results. Results Five hundred and five patients were included in the final analysis, with a mean age of 58.15 years (SD = 9.16), 50.7% males and median HbA1C of 7.6 (IQR was 6.7–8.9). The median total knowledge score was 7.0 (IQR was 5.0–10.0) while the median adherence score was 6.5 (IQR was 4.75–7.75). Significant correlations were found between the three variables (HbA1C, knowledge and adherence). A significantly higher score for knowledge and adherence (P < 0.05) was found in those patients with lower HbA1C. Higher diabetes knowledge, higher medication adherence and using mono-therapy were significant predictors of good glycemic control in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion Patients’ knowledge about diabetes is associated with better medication adherence and better glycemic control. In addition to other factors affecting medication adherence and glycemic control, healthcare providers should pay attention to knowledge about diabetes that the patients carry towards medication adherence. read more read less

Topics:

Glycemic (56%)56% related to the paper, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (53%)53% related to the paper, Type 2 diabetes (53%)53% related to the paper
188 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11096-015-0237-6
Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy.
Muhammad Abdul Hadi1, S. José Closs2

Abstract:

The use of qualitative research methodology is well established for data generation within healthcare research generally and clinical pharmacy research specifically. In the past, qualitative research methodology has been criticized for lacking rigour, transparency, justification of data collection and analysis methods being u... The use of qualitative research methodology is well established for data generation within healthcare research generally and clinical pharmacy research specifically. In the past, qualitative research methodology has been criticized for lacking rigour, transparency, justification of data collection and analysis methods being used, and hence the integrity of findings. Demonstrating rigour in qualitative studies is essential so that the research findings have the “integrity” to make an impact on practice, policy or both. Unlike other healthcare disciplines, the issue of “quality” of qualitative research has not been discussed much in the clinical pharmacy discipline. The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance of rigour in qualitative research, present different philosophical standpoints on the issue of quality in qualitative research and to discuss briefly strategies to ensure rigour in qualitative research. Finally, a mini review of recent research is presented to illustrate the strategies reported by clinical pharmacy researchers to ensure rigour in their qualitative research studies. read more read less

Topics:

Rigour (64%)64% related to the paper, Pharmacy research (60%)60% related to the paper, Qualitative research (55%)55% related to the paper, Research design (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
181 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11096-014-0027-6
The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention.
Ahmad Fayaz-Bakhsh1, Sadun Khezri1

Abstract:

With interest we have read the article by Villamanan et al. [1]. They stated that medication errors (MEs) occur commonly in hospitals, and emphasized that while most such MEs have little potential for harm, they cause substantial extra work in hospitals. A small proportion do have the potential to cause injury, and some cause... With interest we have read the article by Villamanan et al. [1]. They stated that medication errors (MEs) occur commonly in hospitals, and emphasized that while most such MEs have little potential for harm, they cause substantial extra work in hospitals. A small proportion do have the potential to cause injury, and some cause preventable adverse drug events (ADE). It is written that ADEs ‘‘have a major impact on the healthcare system. Several studies over the last few years have shown that they are largely due to failures during the ordering stage of the medication process. About one-third of serious MEs occur in this phase’’ [1]. It is then argued that MEs have resulted in patient deaths each year, and can also cause adverse reactions that range from the minor occasions to major disabilities. Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) is established to ensure that patients do not receive medication that is wrong or dangerous for them. MEs occur in the process of ordering, dispensing, or administering a medication at the wrong time or not at all, regardless of whether an injury occurred or whether the potential for injury was present. Two years ago, a survey was conducted by Kazemi et al. [2] that showed most of the MEs happen at the prescribing stage, and the most common type is dose error. ADEs occur three times more often in newborns than in adults. Result of this Iranian study show that ‘‘Drug dose related errors are usually the most frequent when clinicians prescribe treatments manually’’ [2]. They argue that ‘‘Research in Iran showed dose errors were more often intercepted than frequency errors. Over-dose was the most frequent type of MEs, and curtailed-interval was the least’’ [2]. It is concluded that the neonatal ward CPOE without decision support functionality neither reduces non-intercepted dose, nor frequency of MEs for antibiotics and for anticonvulsants. However, when paired with a dose decision support system, CPOE is capable of reducing these errors. The effects of CPOE on medication errors are also demonstrated in this research, and this is done according to different specialties. However, the new study fails to show the effect of CPOE according to either types of hospitals (public, private, non-profit) or where they are located (metropolis, urban or rural). It therefore could be concluded that use of CPOE minimizes the occurrence of MEs, however, they still occur. Most errors are associated with the CPOE technology. The health industry therefore faces a new challenge in the prevention of ME that require a change in strategy for patient safety. Processing a prescription drug order through a CPOE system decreases the likelihood of errors [3]. Systems such as these have the potential to both fix and cause problems, and require evaluation. As one of us coauthored elsewhere [4] on this matter, the reductions occurred because order entry both structured orders and facilitated the checking of them. Further reductions should be possible with additional decision support. Such refined systems should therefore be used more widely. read more read less

Topics:

Computerized physician order entry (52%)52% related to the paper, Patient safety (50%)50% related to the paper
164 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy citation style.

4. Can I use the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

5. Can I use a manuscript in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

7. Where can I find the template for the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

After writing your paper autoformatting in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template