Example of Journal of Business Economics format
Recent searches

Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format Example of Journal of Business Economics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Journal of Business Economics — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Economics and Econometrics #115 of 661 up up by 120 ranks
Business and International Management #86 of 399 up up by 26 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 148 Published Papers | 611 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 07/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.4
SJR: 0.607
SNIP: 1.436
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.4
SJR: 0.372
SNIP: 0.88
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 1.165
SNIP: 2.018
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.4
SJR: 0.847
SNIP: 1.986

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

4.1

41% from 2019

CiteRatio for Journal of Business Economics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.1
2019 2.9
2018 2.0
2017 1.9
2016 2.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.737

47% from 2019

SJR for Journal of Business Economics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.737
2019 0.502
2018 0.378
2017 0.437
2016 0.35
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.595

59% from 2019

SNIP for Journal of Business Economics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.595
2019 1.005
2018 0.89
2017 0.563
2016 0.503
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 41% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 47% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 59% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Journal of Business Economics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Journal of Business Economics

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Journal of Business Economics formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 549 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
07 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1861-8928
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11573-017-0852-X
Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions
Peter Gomber1, Jascha-Alexander Koch1, Michael Siering1

Abstract:

Since decades, the financial industry has experienced a continuous evolution in service delivery due to digitalization. This evolution is characterized by expanded connectivity and enhanced speed of information processing both at the customer interface and in back-office processes. Recently, there has been a shift in the focu... Since decades, the financial industry has experienced a continuous evolution in service delivery due to digitalization. This evolution is characterized by expanded connectivity and enhanced speed of information processing both at the customer interface and in back-office processes. Recently, there has been a shift in the focus of digitalization from improving the delivery of traditional tasks to introducing fundamentally new business opportunities and models for financial service companies. Digital Finance encompasses a magnitude of new financial products, financial businesses, finance-related software, and novel forms of customer communication and interaction—delivered by FinTech companies and innovative financial service providers. Against this backdrop, the research on finance and information systems has started to analyze these changes and the impact of digital progress on the financial sector. Therefore, this article reviews the current state of research in Digital Finance that deals with these novel and innovative business functions. Moreover, it gives an outlook on potential future research directions. As a conceptual basis for reviewing this field, the Digital Finance Cube, which embraces three key dimensions of Digital Finance and FinTech, i.e., the respective business functions, the technologies and technological concepts applied as well as the institutions concerned, is introduced. This conceptualization supports researchers and practitioners when orientating in the field of Digital Finance, allows for the arrangement of academic research relatively to each other, and enables for the revelation of the gaps in research. read more read less

Topics:

Financial modeling (66%)66% related to the paper, Financial engineering (61%)61% related to the paper, Social studies of finance (61%)61% related to the paper, Financial services (55%)55% related to the paper, Service delivery framework (51%)51% related to the paper
558 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11573-016-0819-3
Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe
Remmer Sassen1, Anne-Kathrin Hinze1, Inga Hardeck2

Abstract:

A huge body of research has addressed the impact of corporate social performance (CSP) on corporate financial performance. However, prior literature provides only limited evidence of the impact of CSP on firm risk. The aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of CSP operationalized by environmental, social, and governan... A huge body of research has addressed the impact of corporate social performance (CSP) on corporate financial performance. However, prior literature provides only limited evidence of the impact of CSP on firm risk. The aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of CSP operationalized by environmental, social, and governance factors on market-based firm risk in Europe. Three risk measures are analyzed: systematic, idiosyncratic, and total risk. On the basis of a large European panel dataset of 8752 firm-year observations covering the period 2002–2014, we find that a higher CSP decreases total and idiosyncratic risk. Looking at the three dimensions of CSP, we show that social performance has a significantly negative effect on all three risk measures. Environmental performance generally decreases idiosyncratic risk, whereas total risk and systematic risk are only affected in environmentally sensitive industries. In contrast, we cannot detect a significant effect of corporate governance performance on firm risk. Our findings suggest that a higher CSP and a higher performance regarding the social dimension in particular have the potential to increase firm value through lower firm risk. Overall, our evidence fosters the assumption that there is a business case to be made for corporate social responsibility. read more read less

Topics:

Financial risk management (68%)68% related to the paper, Risk financing (59%)59% related to the paper, Systematic risk (56%)56% related to the paper, Corporate governance (55%)55% related to the paper, Enterprise value (54%)54% related to the paper
199 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11573-017-0853-9
Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior
Oscar Anselm Stolper1, Andreas Walter2

Abstract:

In this survey, we review the voluminous body of literature on the measurement and the determinants of financial literacy. Wherever possible, we supplement existing findings with recent descriptive evidence of German households’ financial literacy levels based on the novel Panel on Household Finances dataset, a large-scale su... In this survey, we review the voluminous body of literature on the measurement and the determinants of financial literacy. Wherever possible, we supplement existing findings with recent descriptive evidence of German households’ financial literacy levels based on the novel Panel on Household Finances dataset, a large-scale survey administered by the Deutsche Bundesbank and representative of the financial situation of households in Germany. Prior research not only documents generally low levels of financial literacy but also finds large heterogeneity in financial literacy across the population, suggesting that economically vulnerable groups are placed at further disadvantage by their lack of financial knowledge. In addition, we assess the literature evaluating financial education as a means to improve financial literacy and financial behavior. Our survey suggests that the evidence with respect to the effectiveness of the programs is rather disappointing. We also review the role of individuals’ financial literacy for the use of professional financial advice and assess whether expert intervention can serve as a substitute to financial literacy. We conclude by discussing several directions for future research. read more read less

Topics:

Financial literacy (77%)77% related to the paper, Financial analysis (69%)69% related to the paper, Financial plan (63%)63% related to the paper, Accounting management (62%)62% related to the paper, Statement of changes in financial position (62%)62% related to the paper
View PDF
191 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11573-018-0916-6
What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature
Robert Rybnicek1, Roland Königsgruber2

Abstract:

Industry–university collaborations (IUCs) have received increased attention in management practice and research. The need for innovation in today’s business environment and the ambition of policymakers to commercialize academic knowledge intensify this trend. However, although research has devoted considerable effort to findi... Industry–university collaborations (IUCs) have received increased attention in management practice and research. The need for innovation in today’s business environment and the ambition of policymakers to commercialize academic knowledge intensify this trend. However, although research has devoted considerable effort to finding the determinants of success for interfirm collaboration, much less is known about IUCs. This article presents the results of a systematic review of the literature on the collaboration between industry and universities. We perform an extensive analysis of research published on industry–university collaboration projects with the objective of distilling factors that influence the success of such collaborations. We propose a novel conceptual model, which synthesizes our empirical results, and use it to organize and categorize influencing factors and their interrelationship within the collaboration process. Based on our review of existing literature, we identify an agenda for future research in this domain. read more read less

Topics:

Conceptual model (computer science) (56%)56% related to the paper, Systematic review (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
164 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11573-018-0902-Z
Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: a review
Samira El Gibari1, Trinidad Gómez1, Francisco Ruiz1

Abstract:

Composite indicators are increasingly recognised as a useful tool in policy analysis and public communication. They provide simple comparisons of units that can be used to illustrate the complexity of our dynamic environment in wide-ranging fields, such as competitiveness, governance, environment, press, development, peaceful... Composite indicators are increasingly recognised as a useful tool in policy analysis and public communication. They provide simple comparisons of units that can be used to illustrate the complexity of our dynamic environment in wide-ranging fields, such as competitiveness, governance, environment, press, development, peacefulness, tourism, economy, universities, etc. Their construction has been dealt with from several angles. Some authors claim that MCDM techniques are highly suitable in multidimensional frameworks when aggregating single indicators into a composite one, since this process involves making choices when combining criteria of different natures, and it requires a number of steps in which decisions must be made. In this paper, we conduct a literature review of papers published after 2002 in leading international journals indexed in a recognised database (JCR), in order to identify the different MCDM methods used for aggregating single indicators into composite ones. They have been classified in five categories: the elementary methods, the value and utility based methods, the outranking relation approach, the data envelopment analysis based methods and the distance functions based methods. In general, our review has shown a clear tendency towards an increasing number of papers that use MCDM methods to construct composite indicators since 2014. read more read less

Topics:

Multiple-criteria decision analysis (53%)53% related to the paper
135 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Journal of Business Economics.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Journal of Business Economics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Journal of Business Economics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Journal of Business Economics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Journal of Business Economics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Journal of Business Economics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Journal of Business Economics citation style.

4. Can I use the Journal of Business Economics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Journal of Business Economics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Journal of Business Economics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Journal of Business Economics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Journal of Business Economics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Journal of Business Economics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Journal of Business Economics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Business Economics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Journal of Business Economics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Journal of Business Economics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Journal of Business Economics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Journal of Business Economics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Journal of Business Economics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Journal of Business Economics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Journal of Business Economics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Journal of Business Economics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Journal of Business Economics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Journal of Business Economics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Journal of Business Economics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Journal of Business Economics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Journal of Business Economics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Business Economics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Journal of Business Economics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Journal of Business Economics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Journal of Business Economics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template