Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format
Recent searches

Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format Example of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Education #266 of 1319 down down by 99 ranks
Health (social science) #81 of 293 down down by 21 ranks
Health Policy #90 of 242 down down by 14 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 229 Published Papers | 687 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 1.216
SNIP: 3.119
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.964
SNIP: 1.77
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.9
SJR: 1.635
SNIP: 1.771
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.723
SNIP: 1.269

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.708

18% from 2018

Impact factor for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.708
2018 1.45
2017 1.407
2016 1.067
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.0

3% from 2019

CiteRatio for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.0
2019 3.1
2018 2.7
2017 2.8
2016 2.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 18% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.517

10% from 2019

SJR for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.517
2019 0.577
2018 0.53
2017 0.479
2016 0.464
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.332

17% from 2019

SNIP for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.332
2019 1.141
2018 0.921
2017 0.981
2016 0.914
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 927 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
11 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1572-8633
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11019-014-9560-2
Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysis
Havi Carel, Ian James Kidd1

Abstract:

In this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by Fricker (Epistemic injustice. Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007). Ill persons are vulnerable to testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution of characteristic... In this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by Fricker (Epistemic injustice. Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007). Ill persons are vulnerable to testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution of characteristics like cognitive unreliability and emotional instability that downgrade the credibility of their testimonies. Ill persons are also vulnerable to hermeneutical injustice because many aspects of the experience of illness are difficult to understand and communicate and this often owes to gaps in collective hermeneutical resources. We then argue that epistemic injustice arises in part owing to the epistemic privilege enjoyed by the practitioners and institutions of contemporary healthcare services—the former owing to their training, expertise, and third-person psychology, and the latter owing to their implicit privileging of certain styles of articulating and evidencing testimonies in ways that marginalise ill persons. We suggest that a phenomenological toolkit may be part of an effort to ameliorate epistemic injustice. read more read less

Topics:

Injustice (61%)61% related to the paper
View PDF
300 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11019-008-9174-7
Lifeworld-led healthcare is more than patient-led care: an existential view of well-being
Karin Dahlberg, Les Todres1, Kathleen Galvin1

Abstract:

In this paper we offer an appreciation and critique of patient-led care as expressed in current policy and practice. We argue that current patient-led approaches hinder a focus on a deeper understanding of what patient-led care could be. Our critique focuses on how the consumerist/citizenship emphasis in current patient-led c... In this paper we offer an appreciation and critique of patient-led care as expressed in current policy and practice. We argue that current patient-led approaches hinder a focus on a deeper understanding of what patient-led care could be. Our critique focuses on how the consumerist/citizenship emphasis in current patient-led care obscures attention from a more fundamental challenge to conceptualise an alternative philosophically informed framework from where care can be led. We thus present an alternative interpretation of patient-led care that we call ‘lifeworld-led care’, and argue that such lifeworld-led care is more than the general understanding of patient-led care. Although the philosophical roots of our alternative conceptualisation are not new, we believe that it is timely to re-consider some of the implications of these perspectives within current discourses of patient-centred policies and practice. The conceptualisation of lifeworld-led care that we develop includes an articulation of three dimensions: a philosophy of the person, a view of well-being and not just illness, and a philosophy of care that is consistent with this. We conclude that the existential view of well-being that we offer is pivotal to lifeworld-led care in that it provides a direction for care and practice that is intrinsically and positively health focused in its broadest and most substantial sense. read more read less

Topics:

Lifeworld (57%)57% related to the paper, Health care (55%)55% related to the paper, Philosophy of medicine (52%)52% related to the paper
281 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11019-006-9012-8
Lifeworld-led healthcare: revisiting a humanising philosophy that integrates emerging trends.
Les Todres1, Kathleen Galvin1, Karin Dahlberg

Abstract:

In this paper, we describe the value and philosophy of lifeworld-led care. Our purpose is to give a philosophically coherent foundation for lifeworld-led care and its core value as a humanising force that moderates technological progress. We begin by indicating the timeliness of these concerns within the current context of ci... In this paper, we describe the value and philosophy of lifeworld-led care. Our purpose is to give a philosophically coherent foundation for lifeworld-led care and its core value as a humanising force that moderates technological progress. We begin by indicating the timeliness of these concerns within the current context of citizen-oriented, participative approaches to healthcare. We believe that this context is in need of a deepening philosophy if it is not to succumb to the discourses of mere consumerism. We thus revisit the potential of Husserl’s notion of the lifeworld and how lifeworld-led care could provide important ideas and values that are central to the humanisation of healthcare practice. This framework provides a synthesis of the main arguments of the paper and is finally expressed in a model of lifeworld-led care that includes its core value, core perspectives, relevant indicative methodologies and main benefits. The model is offered as a potentially broad-based approach for integrating many existing practices and trends. In the spirit of Husserl’s interest in both commonality and variation, we highlight the central, less contestable foundations of lifeworld-led care, without constraining the possible varieties of confluent practices. read more read less

Topics:

Lifeworld (65%)65% related to the paper, Philosophy of medicine (52%)52% related to the paper
258 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11019-005-0538-Y
Towards a Dynamic Definition of Health and Disease
Johannes Bircher1

Abstract:

A multifactorial and growing crisis of health care systems in the developed world has affected medicine. In order to provide rational responses, some central concepts of the past, such as the definitions of health and disease, need to be updated. For this purpose physicians should initiate a new debate. As a point of departur... A multifactorial and growing crisis of health care systems in the developed world has affected medicine. In order to provide rational responses, some central concepts of the past, such as the definitions of health and disease, need to be updated. For this purpose physicians should initiate a new debate. As a point of departure the following definitions are proposed: Health is a dynamic state of wellbeing characterized by a physical, mental and social potential, which satisfies the demands of a life commensurate with age, culture, and personal responsibility. If the potential is insufficient to satisfy these demands the state is disease. This term includes sickness, illness, ill health, and malady. The described potential is divided into a biologically given and a personally acquired partial potential. Their proportions vary throughout the life cycle. The proposed definitions render it empirically possible to diagnose persons as healthy or diseased and to apportion some of the responsibility for their state of health to individuals themselves. Treatment strategies should always consider three therapeutic routes: improvements of the biologically given and of the personally acquired partial potentials and adaptations of the demands of life. These consequences favourably contrast with those resulting from the WHO-definition of health. read more read less

Topics:

Health care (58%)58% related to the paper, Health policy (56%)56% related to the paper, Health education (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
255 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11019-006-9017-3
The concepts of health and illness revisited
Lennart Nordenfelt1

Abstract:

Contemporary philosophy of health has been quite focused on the problem of determining the nature of the concepts of health, illness and disease from a scientific point of view. Some theorists claim and argue that these concepts are value-free and descriptive in the same sense as the concepts of atom, metal and rain are value... Contemporary philosophy of health has been quite focused on the problem of determining the nature of the concepts of health, illness and disease from a scientific point of view. Some theorists claim and argue that these concepts are value-free and descriptive in the same sense as the concepts of atom, metal and rain are value-free and descriptive. To say that a person has a certain disease or that he or she is unhealthy is thus to objectively describe this person. On the other hand it certainly does not preclude an additional evaluation of the state of affairs as undesirable or bad. The basic scientific description and the evaluation are, however, two independent matters, according to this kind of theory. Other philosophers claim that the concept of health, together with the other medical concepts, is essentially value-laden. To establish that a person is healthy does not just entail some objective inspection and measurement. It presupposes also an evaluation of the general state of the person. A statement that he or she is healthy does not merely imply certain scientific facts regarding the person's body or mind but implies also a (positive) evaluation of the person's bodily and mental state. My task in this paper will be, first, to present the two principal rival types of theories and present what I take to be the main kind of reasoning by which we could assess these theories, and second, to present a deeper characterization of the principal rival theories of health and illness. read more read less

Topics:

State of affairs (53%)53% related to the paper, Sociology of health and illness (51%)51% related to the paper
241 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy citation style.

4. Can I use the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

7. Where can I find the template for the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template