Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format
Recent searches

Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format Example of MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Surgery #78 of 422 up up by 67 ranks
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine #60 of 262 up up by 36 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 188 Published Papers | 742 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 30/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.811
SNIP: 1.877
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 1.33
SNIP: 1.557
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.3
SJR: 1.26
SNIP: 1.503
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.6
SJR: 1.806
SNIP: 1.85

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.9

18% from 2019

CiteRatio for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.9
2019 3.3
2018 3.0
2017 2.4
2016 2.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.692

6% from 2019

SJR for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.692
2019 0.737
2018 0.47
2017 0.668
2016 0.683
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.124

4% from 2019

SNIP for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.124
2019 1.081
2018 0.902
2017 0.689
2016 1.082
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 18% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Musculoskeletal Surgery ? Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publicat...... Read More

Medicine

i
Last updated on
29 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2035-5106
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.84
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12306-011-0175-Y
Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review
Pietro Randelli1, Pietro Spennacchio1, Vincenza Ragone1, Paolo Arrigoni1, A. Casella1, Paolo Cabitza1
01 Jun 2012 - Musculoskeletal Surgery

Abstract:

The aim of this literature review was to report complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). A computerized search of articles published between 200 and 2009 was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed. We included clinical studies (Level 1–4): (a) investigating patients with rotator cuff tears, managed by... The aim of this literature review was to report complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). A computerized search of articles published between 200 and 2009 was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed. We included clinical studies (Level 1–4): (a) investigating patients with rotator cuff tears, managed by a completely arthroscopic RCR technique; (b) reported data about complications. Data about arthroscopic-assisted techniques were excluded. Articles that meet criteria inclusion were analytically examined. Complications were classified into general complications and specific complications related to arthroscopic RCR. We found 414 complications in 2,890 patients; most of them were specific complications related to arthroscopic RCR. Re-rupture was the most frequently encountered complication: re-tear rate ranged between 11.4 and 94%. Stiffness and hardware-related complications were observed in 74 and 12 patients, respectively. Eleven less common complications were also reported: 5 neurovascular, 3 septic, 2 thromboembolic events, and 1 anesthesiological complication. This review stated that arthroscopic RCR is a low-risk surgical procedure. Anatomical failure of the repair is the most common complication encountered in the literature. read more read less

Topics:

Rotator cuff injury (56%)56% related to the paper
131 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12306-017-0474-Z
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review
Stefano Petrillo1, U. G. Longo1, Rocco Papalia1, Vincenzo Denaro1
25 Apr 2017 - Musculoskeletal Surgery

Abstract:

To report the outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). A systematic review of the literature contained in Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases was conducted on May 1, 2016, according to PRISMA gu... To report the outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). A systematic review of the literature contained in Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases was conducted on May 1, 2016, according to PRISMA guidelines. The key words “reverse total shoulder arthroplasty” or “reverse total shoulder prostheses” with “rotator cuff tears”; “failed rotator cuff surgery”; “massive rotator cuff tears”; “irreparable rotator cuff tears”; “cuff tear arthropathy”; “outcomes”; “complications” were matched. All articles reporting outcomes and complications of RSA for the management of MIRCT or CTA were included. The comparison between preoperative and postoperative clinical scores, as well as range of motion (ROM), was performed using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. P values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Seven articles were included in our qualitative synthesis. A statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores and ROM was found comparing the preoperative value with the postoperative value. The degrees of retroversion of the humeral stem of the RSA do not influence the functional outcomes in a statistically significant fashion. There were 17.4% of complications. The most frequent was heterotopic ossification, occurring in 6.6% of patients. Revision surgery was necessary in 7.3% of patients. RSA restores pain-free ROM and improves function of the shoulder in patients with MIRCT or CTA. However, complications occur in a high percentage of patients. The lack of level I studies limits the real understanding of the potentials and limitations of RSA for the management of MIRCT and CTA. read more read less

Topics:

Rotator cuff injury (68%)68% related to the paper, Rotator cuff (59%)59% related to the paper, Shoulder Prosthesis (52%)52% related to the paper
106 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12306-012-0181-8
Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly--outcome and complications after locking plate fixation.
28 Jan 2012 - Musculoskeletal Surgery

Abstract:

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates or primary arthroplasty remains a controversial issue in the management of complex proximal humerus fractures. Aim of this study was to evaluate the surgeon- and patient-based outcome of patients older than 65 years who underwent ORIF using locking plate fixation... Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates or primary arthroplasty remains a controversial issue in the management of complex proximal humerus fractures. Aim of this study was to evaluate the surgeon- and patient-based outcome of patients older than 65 years who underwent ORIF using locking plate fixation of a 3- or 4-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Twenty-seven patients older than 65 years were treated with locking plate fixation (PHILOS, Fa. Synthes, Umkirch, Germany). At an average follow-up of 44 months, the clinical and the subjective outcome were evaluated, and complications were analyzed. The mean age- and gender-related Constant score was 70% (30–100%) compared with 92% (47–108%) of the contralateral non-injured shoulder. The mean DASH score was 29 points (0–71). Five patients (18.5%) showed clinical signs of an impingement, which was related to malpositioning of the plate in 3 cases. Screw cutout was seen in 22.2% (6 patients). Avascular necrosis of the head or the tubercula was found in 8 patients (29.6%). The revision rate was 29.6%. However, the patients considered the functional status of their shoulder as “good” or “satisfactory.” The functional and patient-orientated results of the locking plate fixation of complex displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are comparable to those of primary arthroplasty and minimally invasive treatment. Proper surgical technique (screw length, plate position) is mandatory for reducing the revision rate. read more read less

Topics:

Fracture fixation (59%)59% related to the paper, Internal fixation (59%)59% related to the paper, Bone plate (58%)58% related to the paper, Arthroplasty (51%)51% related to the paper
104 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12306-014-0340-1
Platelet-rich plasma: evidence for the treatment of patellar and Achilles tendinopathy--a systematic review.
01 Apr 2015 - Musculoskeletal Surgery

Abstract:

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been introduced in the clinical practice to treat a growing number of different musculoskeletal pathologies It is currently applied in the treatment of Achilles and patellar tendinopathies, which are common sport-related injuries very challenging to manage Aim of the present paper was to review ... Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been introduced in the clinical practice to treat a growing number of different musculoskeletal pathologies It is currently applied in the treatment of Achilles and patellar tendinopathies, which are common sport-related injuries very challenging to manage Aim of the present paper was to review systematically the available clinical evidence concerning the application of PRP in the treatment of patellar and Achilles tendinopathy A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the following inclusion criteria for relevant articles: (1) clinical reports of any level of evidence, (2) written in the English language, (3) with no time limitation and (4) on the use of PRP to treat conservatively Achilles and patellar tendinopathy Twenty-two studies were included and analyzed Two studies on patellar tendinopathy were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas just one RCT was published on Achilles tendon All the papers concerning patellar tendon reported positive outcome for PRP, which proved to be superior to other traditional approaches such as shock-wave therapy and dry needling In the case of Achilles tendon, despite the encouraging findings reported by case series, the only RCT available showed no significant clinical difference between PRP and saline solution The main finding of this study was the paucity of high-level literature regarding the application of PRP in the management of patellar and Achilles tendinopathy However, the clinical data currently available, although not univocal, suggest considering PRP as a therapeutic option for recalcitrant patellar and Achilles tendinopathies read more read less

Topics:

Achilles tendon (60%)60% related to the paper, Tendinopathy (59%)59% related to the paper
96 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12306-013-0293-9
Acrylic bone cement: current concept review
Bruno Magnan1, Manuel Bondi, Tommaso Maluta1, Elena Manuela Samaila1, L. Schirru1, Carlo Dall'Oca1
27 Jul 2013 - Musculoskeletal Surgery

Abstract:

Acrylic bone cement has had for years an important role in orthopedic surgery. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been extended from the ophthalmological and dental fields to orthopedics, as acrylic cement used for fixation of prosthetic implants, for remodeling osteoporotic, neoplastic and vertebral fractures repair. The PMMA... Acrylic bone cement has had for years an important role in orthopedic surgery. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been extended from the ophthalmological and dental fields to orthopedics, as acrylic cement used for fixation of prosthetic implants, for remodeling osteoporotic, neoplastic and vertebral fractures repair. The PMMA bone cement is a good carrier for sustained antibiotic release in the site of infection. Joint prostheses chronic infection requires surgical removal of the implant, in order to eradicate the infection process. This can be performed in the same surgical time (one-stage procedure) or in two separate steps (two-stage procedure, which involves the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer). The mechanical and functional characteristics of the spacers allow a good joint range of motion, weight-bearing in selected cases and a sustained release of antibiotic at the site of infection. The improvement of fixation devices in recent years was not accompanied by the improvement of elderly bone quality. Some studies have tested the use of PMMA bone cement or calcium phosphate as augmentation support of internal fixation of these fractures. Over the past 20 years, experimental study of acrylic biomaterials (bone cement, bioglass ceramic, cement additives, absorbable cement, antibiotic spacers) has been of particular importance, offering numerous models and projects. read more read less

Topics:

Bone cement (70%)70% related to the paper, Internal fixation (53%)53% related to the paper
81 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY citation style.

4. Can I use the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY.

5. Can I use a manuscript in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY.

7. Where can I find the template for the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

After writing your paper autoformatting in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template