Example of Neuropsychology Review format
Recent searches

Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format Example of Neuropsychology Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Neuropsychology Review — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology #3 of 60 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 98 Published Papers | 1042 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Frontiers Media

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.1
SJR: 1.128
SNIP: 1.221
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 25.5
SJR: 6.857
SNIP: 5.733
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.7
SJR: 2.223
SNIP: 2.098
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 1.363
SNIP: 1.148

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

4.84

16% from 2018

Impact factor for Neuropsychology Review from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 4.84
2018 5.739
2017 4.894
2016 6.352
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

10.6

9% from 2019

CiteRatio for Neuropsychology Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 10.6
2019 9.7
2018 8.1
2017 12.5
2016 11.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 16% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.944

26% from 2019

SJR for Neuropsychology Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.944
2019 2.335
2018 2.16
2017 3.574
2016 3.501
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.106

15% from 2019

SNIP for Neuropsychology Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.106
2019 2.701
2018 1.776
2017 2.422
2016 2.167
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 26% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Neuropsychology Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Neuropsychology Review

Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational resea...... Read More

Psychology

i
Last updated on
15 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1040-7308
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.432
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11065-006-9002-X
Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Julie A. Alvarez1, Eugene K. Emory1
01 Jun 2006 - Neuropsychology Review

Abstract:

Currently, there is debate among scholars regarding how to operationalize and measure executive functions. These functions generally are referred to as “supervisory” cognitive processes because they involve higher level organization and execution of complex thoughts and behavior. Although conceptualizations vary regarding wha... Currently, there is debate among scholars regarding how to operationalize and measure executive functions. These functions generally are referred to as “supervisory” cognitive processes because they involve higher level organization and execution of complex thoughts and behavior. Although conceptualizations vary regarding what mental processes actually constitute the “executive function” construct, there has been a historical linkage of these “higher-level” processes with the frontal lobes. In fact, many investigators have used the term “frontal functions” synonymously with “executive functions” despite evidence that contradicts this synonymous usage. The current review provides a critical analysis of lesion and neuroimaging studies using three popular executive function measures (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Phonemic Verbal Fluency, and Stroop Color Word Interference Test) in order to examine the validity of the executive function construct in terms of its relation to activation and damage to the frontal lobes. Empirical lesion data are examined via meta-analysis procedures along with formula derivatives. Results reveal mixed evidence that does not support a one-to-one relationship between executive functions and frontal lobe activity. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of construing the validity of these neuropsychological tests in anatomical, rather than cognitive and behavioral, terms. read more read less

Topics:

Attentional control (63%)63% related to the paper, Executive functions (58%)58% related to the paper, Stroop effect (54%)54% related to the paper, Verbal fluency test (53%)53% related to the paper, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
1,759 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11065-007-9040-Z
The Elusive Nature of Executive Functions: A Review of our Current Understanding
María Beatriz Jurado1, Monica Rosselli1
05 Sep 2007 - Neuropsychology Review

Abstract:

Executive functions include abilities of goal formation, planning, carrying out goal-directed plans, and effective performance. This article aims at reviewing some of the current knowledge surrounding executive functioning and presenting the contrasting views regarding this concept. The neural substrates of the executive syst... Executive functions include abilities of goal formation, planning, carrying out goal-directed plans, and effective performance. This article aims at reviewing some of the current knowledge surrounding executive functioning and presenting the contrasting views regarding this concept. The neural substrates of the executive system are examined as well as the evolution of executive functioning, from development to decline. There is clear evidence of the vulnerability of executive functions to the effects of age over lifespan. The first executive function to emerge in children is the ability to inhibit overlearned behavior and the last to appear is verbal fluency. Inhibition of irrelevant information seems to decline earlier than set shifting and verbal fluency during senescence. The sequential progression and decline of these functions has been paralleled with the anatomical changes of the frontal lobe and its connections with other brain areas. Generalization of the results presented here are limited due to methodological differences across studies. Analysis of these differences is presented and suggestions for future research are offered. read more read less

Topics:

Attentional control (60%)60% related to the paper, Planning (59%)59% related to the paper, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (55%)55% related to the paper, Executive functions (55%)55% related to the paper, Cognitive flexibility (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
1,504 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11065-010-9148-4
The Basics of Brain Development
Joan Stiles1, Terry L. Jernigan1, Terry L. Jernigan2
03 Nov 2010 - Neuropsychology Review

Abstract:

Over the past several decades, significant advances have been made in our understanding of the basic stages and mechanisms of mammalian brain development. Studies elucidating the neurobiology of brain development span the levels of neural organization from the macroanatomic, to the cellular, to the molecular. Together this la... Over the past several decades, significant advances have been made in our understanding of the basic stages and mechanisms of mammalian brain development. Studies elucidating the neurobiology of brain development span the levels of neural organization from the macroanatomic, to the cellular, to the molecular. Together this large body of work provides a picture of brain development as the product of a complex series of dynamic and adaptive processes operating within a highly constrained, genetically organized but constantly changing context. The view of brain development that has emerged from the developmental neurobiology literature presents both challenges and opportunities to psychologists seeking to understand the fundamental processes that underlie social and cognitive development, and the neural systems that mediate them. This chapter is intended to provide an overview of some very basic principles of brain development, drawn from contemporary developmental neurobiology, that may be of use to investigators from a wide range of disciplines. read more read less

Topics:

Developmental neurobiology (63%)63% related to the paper, Cognitive development (51%)51% related to the paper, Poison control (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
1,386 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/B:NERV.0000009483.91468.FB
The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills.
Naomi Chaytor1, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe1
01 Dec 2003 - Neuropsychology Review

Abstract:

Evaluating the ecological validity of neuropsychological tests has become an increasingly important topic over the past decade. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the research on the ecological validity of neuropsychological tests, as it pertains to everyday cognitive skills. This review is presented in the c... Evaluating the ecological validity of neuropsychological tests has become an increasingly important topic over the past decade. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the research on the ecological validity of neuropsychological tests, as it pertains to everyday cognitive skills. This review is presented in the context of several theoretical issues facing ecological validity research. Overall, the research suggests that many neuropsychological tests have a moderate level of ecological validity when predicting everyday cognitive functioning. The strongest relationships were noted when the outcome measure corresponded to the cognitive domain assessed by the neuropsychological tests. Several other factors that may moderate the degree of ecological validity established for neuropsychological tests are in need of further exploration. These factors include the effects of the population being tested, the approach utilized (verisimilitude vs. veridicality), the person completing the outcome measure (significant other vs. clinician), illness severity, and time from injury until evaluation. In addition, a standard measurement of outcome for each cognitive domain is greatly needed to allow for comparison across studies. read more read less

Topics:

Ecological validity (68%)68% related to the paper, Neuropsychological assessment (63%)63% related to the paper, Cognitive skill (51%)51% related to the paper, Population (51%)51% related to the paper
871 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11065-010-9138-6
Facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: a review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies.
Madeline B. Harms, Alex Martin1, Gregory L. Wallace1
01 Sep 2010 - Neuropsychology Review

Abstract:

Behavioral studies of facial emotion recognition (FER) in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have yielded mixed results. Here we address demographic and experiment-related factors that may account for these inconsistent findings. We also discuss the possibility that compensatory mechanisms might enable some individuals with ASD ... Behavioral studies of facial emotion recognition (FER) in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have yielded mixed results. Here we address demographic and experiment-related factors that may account for these inconsistent findings. We also discuss the possibility that compensatory mechanisms might enable some individuals with ASD to perform well on certain types of FER tasks in spite of atypical processing of the stimuli, and difficulties with real-life emotion recognition. Evidence for such mechanisms comes in part from eye-tracking, electrophysiological, and brain imaging studies, which often show abnormal eye gaze patterns, delayed event-related-potential components in response to face stimuli, and anomalous activity in emotion-processing circuitry in ASD, in spite of intact behavioral performance during FER tasks. We suggest that future studies of FER in ASD: 1) incorporate longitudinal (or cross-sectional) designs to examine the developmental trajectory of (or age-related changes in) FER in ASD and 2) employ behavioral and brain imaging paradigms that can identify and characterize compensatory mechanisms or atypical processing styles in these individuals. read more read less

Topics:

Autism (52%)52% related to the paper
840 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Neuropsychology Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Neuropsychology Review format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Neuropsychology Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Neuropsychology Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Neuropsychology Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Neuropsychology Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Neuropsychology Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Neuropsychology Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Neuropsychology Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Neuropsychology Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Neuropsychology Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Neuropsychology Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Neuropsychology Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Neuropsychology Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Neuropsychology Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Neuropsychology Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Neuropsychology Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Neuropsychology Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Neuropsychology Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Neuropsychology Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Neuropsychology Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Neuropsychology Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Neuropsychology Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Neuropsychology Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Neuropsychology Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Neuropsychology Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Neuropsychology Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Neuropsychology Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Neuropsychology Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Neuropsychology Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Neuropsychology Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Neuropsychology Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Neuropsychology Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template