Example of Policy Sciences format
Recent searches

Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format Example of Policy Sciences format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Policy Sciences — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Sciences (all) #8 of 260 up up by 7 ranks
Sociology and Political Science #43 of 1269 up up by 52 ranks
Public Administration #7 of 165 up up by 8 ranks
Development #14 of 257 up up by 5 ranks
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law #45 of 355 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 130 Published Papers | 821 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.798
SNIP: 1.518
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.7
SJR: 2.092
SNIP: 2.401
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.8
SJR: 0.553
SNIP: 0.972
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.297
SNIP: 1.707

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.609

38% from 2018

Impact factor for Policy Sciences from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.609
2018 2.619
2017 3.023
2016 1.75
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

6.3

21% from 2019

CiteRatio for Policy Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.3
2019 5.2
2018 4.0
2017 4.1
2016 3.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 38% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.447

5% from 2019

SJR for Policy Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.447
2019 1.528
2018 1.045
2017 1.479
2016 0.859
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.944

3% from 2019

SNIP for Policy Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.944
2019 2.009
2018 1.388
2017 1.957
2016 1.15
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Policy Sciences

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Policy Sciences

The policy sciences are distinctive within the policy movement in that they embrace the scholarly traditions innovated and elaborated by Harold D. Lasswell and Myres S. McDougal. Within these pages we provide space for approaches that are problem-oriented, contextual, and mult...... Read More

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0032-2687
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.999
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Horst W. J. Rittel1, Melvin M. Webber1
01 Jun 1973 - Policy Sciences

Abstract:

The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems. They are “wicked” problems, whereas science has developed to deal with “tame” problems. Policy problems cannot be definitively described. Moreover, in a pluralistic society there is nothing like... The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems. They are “wicked” problems, whereas science has developed to deal with “tame” problems. Policy problems cannot be definitively described. Moreover, in a pluralistic society there is nothing like the undisputable public good; there is no objective definition of equity; policies that respond to social problems cannot be meaningfully correct or false; and it makes no sense to talk about “optimal solutions” to social problems unless severe qualifications are imposed first. Even worse, there are no “solutions” in the sense of definitive and objective answers. read more read less

Topics:

Wicked problem (54%)54% related to the paper, Issue-Based Information System (52%)52% related to the paper, Social policy (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
13,262 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00136406
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Paul A. Sabatier1
01 Jun 1988 - Policy Sciences

Abstract:

There has been a great deal of research in recent years concerning the use of substantive policy analysis in public policy-making. This paper seeks to integrate those findings - e.g., the ‘enlightenment function’ of policy research - into a more general model of policy-making over periods of a decade or more. The conceptual f... There has been a great deal of research in recent years concerning the use of substantive policy analysis in public policy-making. This paper seeks to integrate those findings - e.g., the ‘enlightenment function’ of policy research - into a more general model of policy-making over periods of a decade or more. The conceptual framework focuses on the belief systems of advocacy coalitions within policy subsystems as the critical vehicle for understanding the role of policy analysis in policy-oriented learning and the effect, in turn, of such learning on changes in governmental programs. read more read less

Topics:

Policy studies (68%)68% related to the paper, Public policy (66%)66% related to the paper, Policy analysis (64%)64% related to the paper, The Conceptual Framework (54%)54% related to the paper
2,855 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00143739
How safe is safe enough? a psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits
Baruch Fischhoff, Paul Slovic, Sarah Lichtenstein, Stephen J. Read1, Barbara Combs2
01 Apr 1978 - Policy Sciences

Abstract:

One of the fundamental questions addressed by risk-benefit analysis is “How safe is safe enough?” Chauncey Starr has proposed that economic data be used to reveal patterns of acceptable risk-benefit tradeoffs. The present study investigates an alternative technique, in which psychometric procedures were used to elicit quantit... One of the fundamental questions addressed by risk-benefit analysis is “How safe is safe enough?” Chauncey Starr has proposed that economic data be used to reveal patterns of acceptable risk-benefit tradeoffs. The present study investigates an alternative technique, in which psychometric procedures were used to elicit quantitative judgments of perceived risk, acceptable risk, and perceived benefit for each of 30 activities and technologies. The participants were seventy-six members of the League of Women Voters. The results indicated little systematic relationship between perceived existing risks and benefits of the 30 risk items. Current risk levels were generally viewed as unacceptably high. When current risk levels were adjusted to what would be considered acceptable risk levels, however, risk was found to correlate with benefit. Nine descriptive attributes of risk were also studied. These nine attributes seemed to tap two basic dimensions of risk. These dimensions proved to be effective predictors of the tradeoff between acceptable risk and perceived benefit. The limitations of the present study and the relationship between this technique and Starr's technique are discussed, along with the implications of the findings for policy decisions. read more read less

Topics:

Risk analysis (66%)66% related to the paper, Risk assessment (60%)60% related to the paper, Risk perception (58%)58% related to the paper, Cultural theory of risk (52%)52% related to the paper, Affect heuristic (50%)50% related to the paper
2,535 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00138786
The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change
Colin J. Bennett1, Michael Howlett2
01 Aug 1992 - Policy Sciences

Abstract:

Several different explanations of policy change based on notions of learning have emerged in the policy literature to challenge conventional conflict-oriented theories. These include notions of ‘political-learning’ developed by Heclo, ‘policy-oriented learning’ developed by Sabatier, ‘lesson-drawing’ analyzed by Rose, ‘social... Several different explanations of policy change based on notions of learning have emerged in the policy literature to challenge conventional conflict-oriented theories. These include notions of ‘political-learning’ developed by Heclo, ‘policy-oriented learning’ developed by Sabatier, ‘lesson-drawing’ analyzed by Rose, ‘social learning’ discussed by Hall and ‘government learning’ identified by Etheredge. These different concepts identify different actors and different effects with each different type of learning. Some elements of these theories are compatible, while others are not. This article examines each approach in terms of who learns, what they learn, and the effects of learning on subsequent policies. The conclusion is that three distinct types of learning have often been incorrectly juxtaposed. Certain conceptual, theoretical and methodological difficulties attend any attempt to attribute policy change to policy learning, but this does not detract from the important reorientation of policy analysis that this approach represents. read more read less

Topics:

Experiential learning (67%)67% related to the paper, Active learning (63%)63% related to the paper, Learning sciences (63%)63% related to the paper, Social learning (61%)61% related to the paper, Cooperative learning (60%)60% related to the paper
1,055 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11077-012-9151-0
Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change
Kelly Levin1, Benjamin Cashore2, Steven Bernstein3, Graeme Auld4
23 May 2012 - Policy Sciences

Abstract:

Most policy-relevant work on climate change in the social sciences either analyzes costs and benefits of particular policy options against important but often narrow sets of objectives or attempts to explain past successes or failures. We argue that an “applied forward reasoning” approach is better suited for social scientist... Most policy-relevant work on climate change in the social sciences either analyzes costs and benefits of particular policy options against important but often narrow sets of objectives or attempts to explain past successes or failures. We argue that an “applied forward reasoning” approach is better suited for social scientists seeking to address climate change, which we characterize as a “super wicked” problem comprising four key features: time is running out; those who cause the problem also seek to provide a solution; the central authority needed to address it is weak or non-existent; and, partly as a result, policy responses discount the future irrationally. These four features combine to create a policy-making “tragedy” where traditional analytical techniques are ill equipped to identify solutions, even when it is well recognized that actions must take place soon to avoid catastrophic future impacts. To overcome this tragedy, greater attention must be given to the generation of path-dependent policy interventions that can “constrain our future collective selves.” Three diagnostic questions result that orient policy analysis toward understanding how to trigger sticky interventions that, through progressive incremental trajectories, entrench support over time while expanding the populations they cover. Drawing especially from the literature on path dependency, but inverting it to develop policy responses going forward, we illustrate the plausibility of our framework for identifying new areas of research and new ways to think about policy interventions to address super wicked problems. read more read less

Topics:

Policy analysis (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
1,013 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Policy Sciences.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Policy Sciences format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Policy Sciences in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Policy Sciences guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Policy Sciences guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Policy Sciences guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Policy Sciences?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Policy Sciences citation style.

4. Can I use the Policy Sciences templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Policy Sciences.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Policy Sciences that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Policy Sciences that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Policy Sciences?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Policy Sciences.

7. Where can I find the template for the Policy Sciences?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Policy Sciences's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Policy Sciences's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Policy Sciences an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Policy Sciences is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Policy Sciences?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Policy Sciences?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Policy Sciences?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Policy Sciences, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Policy Sciences's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Policy Sciences?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Policy Sciences. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Policy Sciences?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Policy Sciences are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Policy Sciences?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Policy Sciences's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Policy Sciences in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Policy Sciences Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Policy Sciences formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template