Example of Argument and Computation format
Recent searches

Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format Example of Argument and Computation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Argument and Computation — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Linguistics and Language #53 of 935 down down by 39 ranks
Computational Mathematics #39 of 152 down down by 28 ranks
Computer Science Applications #267 of 693 down down by 168 ranks
Artificial Intelligence #109 of 227 down down by 70 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 49 Published Papers | 169 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 02/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.614
SNIP: 2.163
open access Open Access

Hindawi

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 0.371
SNIP: 1.169
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 19.8
SJR: 2.882
SNIP: 3.86

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.4

36% from 2019

CiteRatio for Argument and Computation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.4
2019 2.5
2018 2.9
2017 5.0
2016 4.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.38

29% from 2019

SJR for Argument and Computation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.38
2019 0.537
2018 0.433
2017 0.751
2016 0.667
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.727

59% from 2019

SNIP for Argument and Computation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.727
2019 1.084
2018 1.341
2017 2.664
2016 1.79
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 36% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 29% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 59% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Argument and Computation

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Argument and Computation

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Argument and Computation formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 02 Jun 2020 and has been used by 859 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Linguistics and Language

Computational Mathematics

Computer Science Applications

Artificial Intelligence

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
02 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1946-2166
i
Impact Factor
Very High - 3.936
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/19462160903564592
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments
Henry Prakken1
16 Jul 2010 - Argument & Computation

Abstract:

An abstract framework for structured arguments is presented, which instantiates Dung's (‘On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming, and n-Person Games’, Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321–357) abstract argumentation frameworks. Arguments are defined as inference tree... An abstract framework for structured arguments is presented, which instantiates Dung's (‘On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming, and n-Person Games’, Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321–357) abstract argumentation frameworks. Arguments are defined as inference trees formed by applying two kinds of inference rules: strict and defeasible rules. This naturally leads to three ways of attacking an argument: attacking a premise, attacking a conclusion and attacking an inference. To resolve such attacks, preferences may be used, which leads to three corresponding kinds of defeat: undermining, rebutting and undercutting defeats. The nature of the inference rules, the structure of the logical language on which they operate and the origin of the preferences are, apart from some basic assumptions, left unspecified. The resulting framework integrates work of Pollock, Vreeswijk and others on the structure of arguments and the nature of defeat and extends it... read more read less

Topics:

Argument (60%)60% related to the paper, Premise (57%)57% related to the paper, Inference (57%)57% related to the paper, Argumentation theory (56%)56% related to the paper, Non-monotonic logic (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
584 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/19462166.2013.869766
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial
Sanjay Modgil1, Hendrik Prakken2
11 Feb 2014 - Argument & Computation

Abstract:

This article gives a tutorial introduction to the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. The philosophical and conceptual underpinnings of ASPIC+ are discussed, the main definitions are illustrated with examples and several ways are discussed to instantiate the framework and to reconstruct other approaches as special ... This article gives a tutorial introduction to the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. The philosophical and conceptual underpinnings of ASPIC+ are discussed, the main definitions are illustrated with examples and several ways are discussed to instantiate the framework and to reconstruct other approaches as special cases of the framework. The ASPIC+ framework is based on two ideas: the first is that conflicts between arguments are often resolved with explicit preferences, and the second is that arguments are built with two kinds of inference rules: strict, or deductive rules, whose premises guarantee their conclusion, and defeasible rules, whose premises only create a presumption in favour of their conclusion. Accordingly, arguments can in ASPIC+ be attacked in three ways: on their uncertain premises, or on their defeasible inferences, or on the conclusions of their defeasible inferences. ASPIC+ is not a system but a framework for specifying systems. A main objective of the study of the ASPIC+ f... read more read less

Topics:

Defeasible estate (58%)58% related to the paper
View PDF
266 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/19462166.2010.486479
Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks
Uwe Egly1, Sarah Alice Gaggl1, Stefan Woltran1
16 Jul 2010 - Argument & Computation

Abstract:

Answer-set programming (ASP) has emerged as a declarative programming paradigm where problems are encoded as logic programs, such that the so-called answer sets of theses programs represent the solutions of the encoded problem. The efficiency of the latest ASP solvers reached a state that makes them applicable for problems of... Answer-set programming (ASP) has emerged as a declarative programming paradigm where problems are encoded as logic programs, such that the so-called answer sets of theses programs represent the solutions of the encoded problem. The efficiency of the latest ASP solvers reached a state that makes them applicable for problems of practical importance. Consequently, problems from many different areas, including diagnosis, data integration, and graph theory, have been successfully tackled via ASP. In this work, we present such ASP-encodings for problems associated to abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) and generalisations thereof. Our encodings are formulated as fixed queries, such that the input is the only part depending on the actual AF to process. We illustrate the functioning of this approach, which is underlying a new argumentation system called ASPARTIX in detail and show its adequacy in terms of computational complexity. read more read less

Topics:

Answer set programming (64%)64% related to the paper, Inductive programming (58%)58% related to the paper, Declarative programming (58%)58% related to the paper, Argumentation theory (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
167 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/19462166.2013.869878
A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation
Francesca Toni1
11 Feb 2014 - Argument & Computation

Abstract:

We give an introductory tutorial to assumption-based argumentation (referred to as ABA) – a form of argumentation where arguments and attacks are notions derived from primitive notions of rules in a deductive system, assumptions and contraries thereof. ABA is equipped with different semantics for determining ‘winning’ sets of... We give an introductory tutorial to assumption-based argumentation (referred to as ABA) – a form of argumentation where arguments and attacks are notions derived from primitive notions of rules in a deductive system, assumptions and contraries thereof. ABA is equipped with different semantics for determining ‘winning’ sets of assumptions and – interchangeably and equivalently – ‘winning’ sets of arguments. It is also equipped with a catalogue of computational techniques to determine whether given conclusions can be supported by a ‘winning’ set of arguments. These are in the form of disputes between (fictional) proponent and opponent players, provably correct w.r.t. the semantics. Albeit simple, ABA is powerful in that it can be used to represent and reason with a number of problems in AI and beyond: non-monotonic reasoning, preferences, decisions. While doing so, it encompasses the expressive and computational needs of these problems while affording the transparency and explanatory power of argumentation. read more read less

Topics:

Argumentation theory (56%)56% related to the paper
165 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/19462166.2013.869764
Introduction to structured argumentation
11 Feb 2014 - Argument & Computation

Abstract:

In abstract argumentation, each argument is regarded as atomic. There is no internal structure to an argument. Also, there is no specification of what is an argument or an attack. They are assumed to be given. This abstract perspective provides many advantages for studying the nature of argumentation, but it does not cover al... In abstract argumentation, each argument is regarded as atomic. There is no internal structure to an argument. Also, there is no specification of what is an argument or an attack. They are assumed to be given. This abstract perspective provides many advantages for studying the nature of argumentation, but it does not cover all our needs for understanding argumentation or for building tools for supporting or undertaking argumentation. If we want a more detailed formalisation of arguments than is available with abstract argumentation, we can turn to structured argumentation, which is the topic of this special issue of Argument and Computation. In structured argumentation, we assume a formal language for representing knowledge, and specifying how arguments and counterarguments can be constructed from that knowledge. An argument is then said to be structured in the sense that normally the premises and claim of the argument are made explicit, and the relationship between the premises and claim is formally defi... read more read less

Topics:

Argument (64%)64% related to the paper, Argument map (64%)64% related to the paper, Argumentation theory (63%)63% related to the paper, Probabilistic argumentation (62%)62% related to the paper
145 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Argument and Computation.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Argument and Computation format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Argument and Computation in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Argument and Computation guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Argument and Computation guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Argument and Computation guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Argument and Computation?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Argument and Computation citation style.

4. Can I use the Argument and Computation templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Argument and Computation.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Argument and Computation that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Argument and Computation that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Argument and Computation?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Argument and Computation.

7. Where can I find the template for the Argument and Computation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Argument and Computation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Argument and Computation's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Argument and Computation an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Argument and Computation is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Argument and Computation?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Argument and Computation?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Argument and Computation?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Argument and Computation, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Argument and Computation's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Argument and Computation?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Argument and Computation. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Argument and Computation?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Argument and Computation are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Argument and Computation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Argument and Computation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Argument and Computation in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Argument and Computation Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Argument and Computation formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template