Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format
Recent searches

Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format Example of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Water Science and Technology #2 of 225 down down by 1 rank
Environmental Engineering #3 of 146 down down by 2 ranks
Waste Management and Disposal #3 of 108 down down by 2 ranks
Pollution #4 of 132 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 199 Published Papers | 2929 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

IWA Publishing

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 15.6
SJR: 3.099
SNIP: 2.64
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 13.4
SJR: 2.034
SNIP: 2.158
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 10.5
SJR: 1.795
SNIP: 2.015
open access Open Access

IWA Publishing

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.414
SNIP: 0.634

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

8.302

39% from 2018

Impact factor for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 8.302
2018 5.98
2017 7.683
2016 5.79
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

14.7

11% from 2019

CiteRatio for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 14.7
2019 13.3
2018 14.5
2017 12.1
2016 9.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 39% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.321

12% from 2019

SJR for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.321
2019 2.074
2018 1.955
2017 2.212
2016 1.75
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.645

2% from 2019

SNIP for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.645
2019 2.591
2018 2.46
2017 2.76
2016 2.153
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Understanding and assessing the myriad environmental problems that face society today and devising rational strategies and methods for their control are two of the major international challenges of our times. There is a global demand for pollution abatement, but adequate and a...... Read More

Water Science and Technology

Environmental Engineering

Waste Management and Disposal

Pollution

Environmental Science

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1064-3389
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.833
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/10643380500326564
Advanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry
Joseph J. Pignatello1, Esther Oliveros, Allison A. MacKay2

Abstract:

Fenton chemistry encompasses reactions of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of iron to generate highly reactive species such as the hydroxyl radical and possibly others. In this review, the complex mechanisms of Fenton and Fenton-like reactions and the important factors influencing these reactions, from both a fundamental and... Fenton chemistry encompasses reactions of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of iron to generate highly reactive species such as the hydroxyl radical and possibly others. In this review, the complex mechanisms of Fenton and Fenton-like reactions and the important factors influencing these reactions, from both a fundamental and practical perspective, in applications to water and soil treatment, are discussed. The review covers modified versions including the photoassisted Fenton reaction, use of chelated iron, electro-Fenton reactions, and Fenton reactions using heterogeneous catalysts. Sections are devoted to nonclassical pathways, by-products, kinetics and process modeling, experimental design methodology, soil and aquifer treatment, use of Fenton in combination with other advanced oxidation processes or biodegradation, economic comparison with other advanced oxidation processes, and case studies. read more read less

Topics:

Hydroxyl radical (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
3,218 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/10643380290813462
Present and long-term composition of msw landfill leachate: a review

Abstract:

The major potential environmental impacts related to landfill leachate are pollution of groundwater and surface waters. Landfill leachate contains pollutants that can be categorized into four groups (dissolved organic matter, inorganic macrocomponents, heavy metals, and xenobiotic organic compounds). Existing data show high l... The major potential environmental impacts related to landfill leachate are pollution of groundwater and surface waters. Landfill leachate contains pollutants that can be categorized into four groups (dissolved organic matter, inorganic macrocomponents, heavy metals, and xenobiotic organic compounds). Existing data show high leachate concentrations of all components in the early acid phase due to strong decomposition and leaching. In the long methanogenic phase a more stable leachate, with lower concentrations and a low BOD/COD-ratio, is observed. Generally, very low concentrations of heavy metals are observed. In contrast, the concentration of ammonia does not decrease, and often constitutes a major long-term pollutant in leachate. A broad range of xenobiotic organic compounds is observed in landfill leachate. The long-term behavior of landfills with respect to changes in oxidation-reduction status is discussed based on theory and model simulations. It seems that the somewhere postulated enhanced release of accumulated heavy metals would not take place within the time frames of thousands of years. This is supported by a few laboratory investigations. The existing data and model evaluations indicate that the xenobiotic organic compounds in most cases do not constitute a major long-term problem. This may suggest that ammonia will be of most concern in the long run. read more read less

Topics:

Leachate (63%)63% related to the paper, Bioreactor landfill (61%)61% related to the paper, Organic matter (53%)53% related to the paper, Dissolved organic carbon (51%)51% related to the paper, Pollutant (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
2,122 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2013.829765
Advanced Oxidation Processes in Water/Wastewater Treatment: Principles and Applications. A Review

Abstract:

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) constitute important, promising, efficient, and environmental-friendly methods developed to principally remove persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from waters and wastewaters. Generally, AOPs are based on the in situ generation of a powerful oxidizing agent, such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH)... Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) constitute important, promising, efficient, and environmental-friendly methods developed to principally remove persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from waters and wastewaters. Generally, AOPs are based on the in situ generation of a powerful oxidizing agent, such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), obtained at a sufficient concentration to effectively decontaminate waters. This critical review presents a precise and overall description of the recent literature (period 1990–2012) concerning the main types of AOPs, based on chemical, photochemical, sonochemical, and electrochemical reactions. The principles, performances, advantages, drawbacks, and applications of these AOPs to the degradation and destruction of POPs in aquatic media and to the treatment of waters and waste waters have been reported and compared. read more read less
1,550 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/20016491089226
Mercury in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Factors Affecting Methylation

Abstract:

Mercury is one of the most hazardous contaminants that may be present in the aquatic environment, but its ecological and toxicological effects are strongly dependent on the chemical species present. Species distribution and transformation processes in natural aquatic systems are controlled by various physical, chemical, and b... Mercury is one of the most hazardous contaminants that may be present in the aquatic environment, but its ecological and toxicological effects are strongly dependent on the chemical species present. Species distribution and transformation processes in natural aquatic systems are controlled by various physical, chemical, and biological factors. Depending on the prevailing environmental conditions, inorganic mercury species may be converted to many times more toxic methylated forms such as methylmercury, a potent neurotoxin that is readily accumulated by aquatic biota. Despite a considerable amount of literature on the subject, the behavior of mercury and many of the transformation and distribution mechanisms operating in the natural aquatic environment are still poorly understood. This review examines the current state of knowledge on the physicochemical behavior of mercury in the aquatic environment, and in particular the environmental factors influencing its transformation into highly toxic methylated forms. read more read less

Topics:

Mercury (element) (55%)55% related to the paper, Aquatic ecosystem (50%)50% related to the paper
1,481 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/10643380600678112
Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Review on the Status and Stress Effects
S. Ayoob1, Ashok Kumar Gupta1

Abstract:

‘Water is life,’ so central to human life, yet over one billion people across the world have no access to safe drinking water. Of late, there has been increasing global attention focused on resolving water quality problems especially in developing countries, as the lack of access to clean water denies the most essential of al... ‘Water is life,’ so central to human life, yet over one billion people across the world have no access to safe drinking water. Of late, there has been increasing global attention focused on resolving water quality problems especially in developing countries, as the lack of access to clean water denies the most essential of all rights, the right to life. The latest estimates suggest that around 200 million people, from among 25 nations the world over, are under the dreadful fate of fluorosis. India and China, the two most populous countries of the world, are the worst affected. India is plagued with numerous water quality problems due to prolific contaminants mainly of geogenic origin and fluoride stands first among them. The weathering of primary rocks and leaching of fluoride-containing minerals in soils yield fluoride rich groundwater in India which is generally associated with low calcium content and high bicarbonate ions. The unfettered ground water tapping exacerbates the failure of drinking water so... read more read less

Topics:

Water quality (56%)56% related to the paper
1,116 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology citation style.

4. Can I use the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template