Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format
Recent searches

Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format Example of Critical Reviews in Toxicology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Critical Reviews in Toxicology — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Toxicology #16 of 122 down down by 11 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 163 Published Papers | 1163 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 12/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.7
SJR: 0.422
SNIP: 0.671
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 10.2
SJR: 1.176
SNIP: 1.188
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.3
SJR: 0.633
SNIP: 1.433
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.6
SJR: 1.264
SNIP: 1.419

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

4.257

11% from 2018

Impact factor for Critical Reviews in Toxicology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 4.257
2018 4.771
2017 5.313
2016 5.182
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

7.1

11% from 2019

CiteRatio for Critical Reviews in Toxicology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 7.1
2019 8.0
2018 8.8
2017 10.4
2016 10.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 11% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.092

1% from 2019

SJR for Critical Reviews in Toxicology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.092
2019 1.107
2018 1.442
2017 1.828
2016 1.809
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.766

8% from 2019

SNIP for Critical Reviews in Toxicology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.766
2019 1.628
2018 1.779
2017 2.083
2016 1.961
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology an...... Read More

Toxicology

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

i
Last updated on
12 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1040-8444
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.356
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/10408440600845619
The Toxicology of Mercury and Its Chemical Compounds
Thomas W. Clarkson1, Laszlo Magos2

Abstract:

This review covers the toxicology of mercury and its compounds. Special attention is paid to those forms of mercury of current public health concern. Human exposure to the vapor of metallic mercury dates back to antiquity but continues today in occupational settings and from dental amalgam. Health risks from methylmercury in ... This review covers the toxicology of mercury and its compounds. Special attention is paid to those forms of mercury of current public health concern. Human exposure to the vapor of metallic mercury dates back to antiquity but continues today in occupational settings and from dental amalgam. Health risks from methylmercury in edible tissues of fish have been the subject of several large epidemiological investigations and continue to be the subject of intense debate. Ethylmercury in the form of a preservative, thimerosal, added to certain vaccines, is the most recent form of mercury that has become a public health concern. The review leads to general discussion of evolutionary aspects of mercury, protective and toxic mechanisms, and ends on a note that mercury is still an "element of mystery." read more read less

Topics:

Mercury (element) (60%)60% related to the paper
1,953 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.3109/10408449509089885
Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution
Masazumi Harada1

Abstract:

Minamata disease (M. d.) is methylmercury (MeHg) poisoning that occurred in humans who ingested fish and shellfish contaminated by MeHg discharged in waste water from a chemical plant (Chisso Co. L... Minamata disease (M. d.) is methylmercury (MeHg) poisoning that occurred in humans who ingested fish and shellfish contaminated by MeHg discharged in waste water from a chemical plant (Chisso Co. L... read more read less

Topics:

Minamata disease (63%)63% related to the paper, Methylmercury (59%)59% related to the paper, Environmental pollution (58%)58% related to the paper
1,792 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.3109/10408449009089873
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and related compounds: environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs).
Stephen Safe1

Abstract:

Halogenated aromatic compounds, typified by the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), biphenyls (PCBs), and diphenylethers (PCDEs), are industrial compounds or byproducts which have been widely identified in the environment and in chemical-waste dumpsites. Halogenated aromatics are invariably prese... Halogenated aromatic compounds, typified by the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), biphenyls (PCBs), and diphenylethers (PCDEs), are industrial compounds or byproducts which have been widely identified in the environment and in chemical-waste dumpsites. Halogenated aromatics are invariably present in diverse analytes as highly complex mixtures of isomers and congeners and this complicates the hazard and risk assessment of these compounds. Several studies have confirmed the common receptor-mediated mechanism of action of toxic halogenated aromatics and this has resulted in the development of structure-activity relationships for this class of chemicals. The most toxic halogenated aromatic is 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and based on in vivo and in vitro studies the relative toxicities of individual halogenated aromatics have been determined relative to TCDD (i.e., toxic equivalents). The derived toxic equivalents can be used for hazard and risk assessment of halogenated aromatic mixtures; moreover, for more complex mixtures containing congeners for which no standards are available (e.g., bromo/chloro mixtures), several in vitro or in vivo assays can be utilized for hazard or risk assessment. read more read less

Topics:

Toxic equivalency factor (61%)61% related to the paper, Environmental exposure (55%)55% related to the paper
1,756 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.3109/10408449409049308
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs): Environmental Impact, Biochemical and Toxic Responses, and Implications for Risk Assessment
Stephen Safe1

Abstract:

Commercial polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and environmental extracts contain complex mixtures of congeners that can be unequivocally identified and quantitated. Some PCB mixtures elicit a spectrum of biochemical and toxic responses in humans and laboratory animals and many of these effects resemble those caused by 2,3,7,8-t... Commercial polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and environmental extracts contain complex mixtures of congeners that can be unequivocally identified and quantitated. Some PCB mixtures elicit a spectrum of biochemical and toxic responses in humans and laboratory animals and many of these effects resemble those caused by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons, which act through the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah)-receptor signal transduction pathway. Structure-activity relationships developed for PCB congeners and metabolites have demonstrated that several structural classes of compounds exhibit diverse biochemical and toxic responses. Structure-toxicity studies suggest that the coplanar PCBs, namely, 3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl (tetraCB), 3,3',4,4',5-pentaCB, 3,3',4,4',5,5'-hexaCB, and their monoortho analogs are Ah-receptor agonists and contribute significantly to the toxicity of the PCB mixtures. Previous studies with TCDD and structurally related compounds ... read more read less
1,724 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/713611034
Hepatotoxicity and mechanism of action of haloalkanes: carbon tetrachloride as a toxicological model.

Abstract:

(2003). Hepatotoxicity and Mechanism of Action of Haloalkanes: Carbon Tetrachloride as a Toxicological Model. Critical Reviews in Toxicology: Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 105-136.
1,549 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Critical Reviews in Toxicology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Critical Reviews in Toxicology format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Critical Reviews in Toxicology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Critical Reviews in Toxicology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Critical Reviews in Toxicology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Critical Reviews in Toxicology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Critical Reviews in Toxicology citation style.

4. Can I use the Critical Reviews in Toxicology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Critical Reviews in Toxicology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Critical Reviews in Toxicology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Critical Reviews in Toxicology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Critical Reviews in Toxicology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Critical Reviews in Toxicology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Critical Reviews in Toxicology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Critical Reviews in Toxicology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Critical Reviews in Toxicology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Critical Reviews in Toxicology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Critical Reviews in Toxicology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Critical Reviews in Toxicology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Critical Reviews in Toxicology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Critical Reviews in Toxicology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Critical Reviews in Toxicology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Critical Reviews in Toxicology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Critical Reviews in Toxicology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Critical Reviews in Toxicology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Critical Reviews in Toxicology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template