Example of Democratization format
Recent searches

Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format Example of Democratization format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Democratization — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Political Science and International Relations #58 of 556 down down by 27 ranks
Geography, Planning and Development #142 of 704 down down by 76 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 292 Published Papers | 992 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 01/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.3
SJR: 0.538
SNIP: 1.239
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 1.499
SNIP: 2.265
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.724
SNIP: 1.366
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.8
SJR: 0.896
SNIP: 4.163

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.745

6% from 2018

Impact factor for Democratization from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.745
2018 1.85
2017 2.5
2016 1.581
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.4

8% from 2019

CiteRatio for Democratization from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.4
2019 3.7
2018 4.3
2017 4.0
2016 3.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 6% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.289

17% from 2019

SJR for Democratization from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.289
2019 1.546
2018 1.45
2017 1.785
2016 1.038
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.002

3% from 2019

SNIP for Democratization from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.002
2019 2.058
2018 1.608
2017 2.128
2016 1.85
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Democratization

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Democratization

Democratization aims to promote a better understanding of democratization – defined as the way democratic norms, institutions and practices evolve and are disseminated both within and across national and cultural boundaries. While the focus is on democratization viewed as a pr...... Read More

Political Science and International Relations

Geography, Planning and Development

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
01 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1351-0347
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.354
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13510340412331304598
Embedded and defective democracies
01 Dec 2004 - Democratization

Abstract:

In the literature on democratization the mainstream of theoretical and empirical consolidology uses the dichotomy autocracy versus democracy. Democracy is generally conceived of as ‘electoral democ... In the literature on democratization the mainstream of theoretical and empirical consolidology uses the dichotomy autocracy versus democracy. Democracy is generally conceived of as ‘electoral democ... read more read less

Topics:

Embedded democracy (63%)63% related to the paper, Democratization (57%)57% related to the paper, Democracy (57%)57% related to the paper, Autocracy (56%)56% related to the paper
482 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes
Johannes Gerschewski1
29 Jan 2013 - Democratization

Abstract:

Why do some autocracies remain stable while others collapse? This article presents a theoretical framework that seeks to explain the longevity of autocracies by referring to three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation. These three causal factors are derived by distilling and synthesizing the main arg... Why do some autocracies remain stable while others collapse? This article presents a theoretical framework that seeks to explain the longevity of autocracies by referring to three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation. These three causal factors are derived by distilling and synthesizing the main arguments of classic and more recent research efforts. Particular emphasis is paid to re-incorporate legitimation in the explanation of stable autocracies. The article conceptionalizes the three pillars and discusses methods of concrete measurement. It then moves on to explain the stabilization process. How do these pillars develop their stabilizing effect? It is argued that reinforcement processes take place both within and between the pillars. They take the form of exogenous reinforcement, self-reinforcement, and reciprocal reinforcement. To illustrate the inner logic of these processes, I draw on empirical examples. I also state what we would need to observe empirically and how we can... read more read less

Topics:

Legitimation (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
473 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13510340008403683
Informal Institutions and Democracy
Hans-Joachim Lauth1
01 Dec 2000 - Democratization

Abstract:

Informal institutions have grown in relevance for the analysis of new ‘third wave’ democracies. The research strategy receives its impetus from the debate on neo‐institutionalism theory, which offers a productive perspective for structuring the field of analysis. This article explains the distinguishing factors between formal... Informal institutions have grown in relevance for the analysis of new ‘third wave’ democracies. The research strategy receives its impetus from the debate on neo‐institutionalism theory, which offers a productive perspective for structuring the field of analysis. This article explains the distinguishing factors between formal and informal institutions. It addresses five basic types of informal institutions, examines the ways in which they function and discusses their relevance in terms of democracy theory. Each type is characterized by the way in which it enacts its respective means of political influence. The study distinguishes between forms of specific relationship (clientelism), of material exchange (corruption), of violent exertion of influence (putsch threat), of civil resistance (civil disobedience) and of legal practice (custom law), and discusses their relevance to democracy. The central argument maintains that a differentiated study of informal institutions is crucial to addressing this question... read more read less

Topics:

Clientelism (55%)55% related to the paper, Democracy (54%)54% related to the paper, Civil resistance (54%)54% related to the paper, Civil disobedience (53%)53% related to the paper, Corruption (51%)51% related to the paper
442 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13510340600579359
Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jordan
Ellen Lust-Okar1
17 Jul 2006 - Democratization

Abstract:

This study examines the politics of elections in authoritarian regimes, focusing on Jordan. Specifically, it considers (1) what is the role of elections in authoritarian regimes? (2) How can we understand voter behaviour in authoritarian elections? (3) How and why do candidates participate in elections? (4) How do state elite... This study examines the politics of elections in authoritarian regimes, focusing on Jordan. Specifically, it considers (1) what is the role of elections in authoritarian regimes? (2) How can we understand voter behaviour in authoritarian elections? (3) How and why do candidates participate in elections? (4) How do state elites manage electoral competition? The fundamental contention is that elections under authoritarianism are an important arena for competition, but one over patronage, not policy. This has profound effects on electoral politics. Voters generally cast their ballots for those who can, and will, deliver goods; that is, they vote for candidates who maintain good relations with ruling elites, and with whom the voters have personal ties. Elites are similarly more likely to run in elections if they do not oppose the regime. The result is a pro-regime bias in parliaments, even in the absence of regime manipulation. Consequently, in contrast to conventional wisdom, elections are neither pre-determ... read more read less

Topics:

Authoritarianism (52%)52% related to the paper
400 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?
Anna Lührmann1, Staffan I. Lindberg1
01 Mar 2019 - Democratization

Abstract:

Less than 30 years after Fukuyama and others declared liberal democracy’s eternal dominance, a third wave of autocratization is manifest. Gradual declines of democratic regime attributes characteri... Less than 30 years after Fukuyama and others declared liberal democracy’s eternal dominance, a third wave of autocratization is manifest. Gradual declines of democratic regime attributes characteri... read more read less

Topics:

Liberal democracy (55%)55% related to the paper, Democracy (53%)53% related to the paper, Dominance (economics) (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
390 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Democratization.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Democratization format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Democratization in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Democratization guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Democratization guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Democratization guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Democratization?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Democratization citation style.

4. Can I use the Democratization templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Democratization.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Democratization that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Democratization that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Democratization?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Democratization.

7. Where can I find the template for the Democratization?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Democratization's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Democratization's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Democratization an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Democratization is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Democratization?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Democratization?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Democratization?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Democratization, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Democratization's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Democratization?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Democratization. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Democratization?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Democratization are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Democratization?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Democratization's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Democratization in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Democratization Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Democratization formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template