Example of European Review of Social Psychology format
Recent searches

Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format Example of European Review of Social Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

European Review of Social Psychology — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Psychology #15 of 289 down down by 8 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 36 Published Papers | 238 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 22/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.3
SJR: 1.446
SNIP: 1.572
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.4
SJR: 1.758
SNIP: 2.592
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.83
SNIP: 1.437
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.457
SNIP: 1.461

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.333

26% from 2018

Impact factor for European Review of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.333
2018 4.5
2017 3.75
2016 1.389
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

6.6

CiteRatio for European Review of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.6
2019 6.6
2018 6.7
2017 7.0
2016 5.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 26% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.728

14% from 2019

SJR for European Review of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.728
2019 2.403
2018 3.479
2017 3.087
2016 2.449
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.196

19% from 2019

SNIP for European Review of Social Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.196
2019 2.692
2018 2.552
2017 3.088
2016 1.568
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 19% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

European Review of Social Psychology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

European Review of Social Psychology

The European Review of Social Psychology (ERSP) is an e-first journal published under the auspices of the European Association of Social Psychology . ERSP is an international journal which aims to further the international exchange of ideas by providing an outlet for substanti...... Read More

Psychology

i
Last updated on
22 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1046-3283
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.228
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14792772143000003
Intention–Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Paschal Sheeran1

Abstract:

This chapter addresses two questions; how big is the “gap” between intentions and behavior, and what psychological variables might be able to “bridge” the intention–behavior gap? A meta-analysis of meta-analyses is used to quantify the gap and a conceptual analysis of intention–behavior discrepancies is presented. Research is... This chapter addresses two questions; how big is the “gap” between intentions and behavior, and what psychological variables might be able to “bridge” the intention–behavior gap? A meta-analysis of meta-analyses is used to quantify the gap and a conceptual analysis of intention–behavior discrepancies is presented. Research is described on the extent to which four groups of variables—behavior type, intention type, properties of intention, and cognitive and personality variables—moderate intention–behavior relations. Finally, the scope of the intention construct is discussed in the light of recent evidence concerning the role of habits and automaticity in human behavior. read more read less

Topics:

Implementation intention (53%)53% related to the paper
2,996 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14792779343000059
Goal Achievement: The Role of Intentions

Abstract:

The intention-to-behavior process is analyzed with respect to implementation intentions. These intentions link an intended goal-directed behavior to an anticipated situational context. The reported experimental evidence suggests that implementation intentions create a heightened accessibility of the mental representation of t... The intention-to-behavior process is analyzed with respect to implementation intentions. These intentions link an intended goal-directed behavior to an anticipated situational context. The reported experimental evidence suggests that implementation intentions create a heightened accessibility of the mental representation of the specified situational cues and induce direct (automatic) control of the intended behavior through these cues. The formation of implementation intentions promotes goal achievement through both of these processes because they eliminate classic problems associated with the control of goal-directed action. Similarities and differences to other theoretical approaches on intentions, planning, and action control are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Implementation intention (67%)67% related to the paper
1,571 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14792779943000116
Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes
Icek Ajzen1, Martin Fishbein2

Abstract:

The chapter re-examines, in light of recent developments, the reasoned action perspective inherent in the expectancy-value model of attitude and in the theory of planned behavior. According to this perspective, people's attitudes follow spontaneously and consistently from beliefs accessible in memory and then guide correspond... The chapter re-examines, in light of recent developments, the reasoned action perspective inherent in the expectancy-value model of attitude and in the theory of planned behavior. According to this perspective, people's attitudes follow spontaneously and consistently from beliefs accessible in memory and then guide corresponding behavior. The number and types of beliefs that are accessible vary with motivation and ability to process attitude-relevant information and with the context. Based on these considerations, it is shown that the reasoned action perspective is compatible with evidence for automatic processes in the activation of attitudes and behavior, and with the finding that attitudes can vary with the context in which they are expressed. Implications for the attitude-behavior relation and for the role of habit in human behavior are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Theory of planned behavior (66%)66% related to the paper, Theory of reasoned action (65%)65% related to the paper, Behavior management (56%)56% related to the paper, Action (philosophy) (51%)51% related to the paper, Context (language use) (51%)51% related to the paper
1,442 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14792779343000004
The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias
Samuel L. Gaertner1, John F. Dovidio2, Phyllis A. Anastasio1, Betty A. Bachman1, Mary C. Rust1

Abstract:

This chapter introduces the common ingroup identity model as a means of reducing intergroup bias. This model proposes that bias can be reduced by factors that transform members' perceptions of group boundaries from “us” and “them” to a more inclusive “we”. From this perspective, several features specified by the contact hypot... This chapter introduces the common ingroup identity model as a means of reducing intergroup bias. This model proposes that bias can be reduced by factors that transform members' perceptions of group boundaries from “us” and “them” to a more inclusive “we”. From this perspective, several features specified by the contact hypothesis (e.g. co-operative interaction) facilitate more harmonious intergroup interactions, at least in part, because they contribute to the development of a common ingroup identity. In this chapter, we describe laboratory and field studies that are supportive of the model; we also relate the model to earlier work on aversive racism. read more read less

Topics:

Common ingroup identity (81%)81% related to the paper, In-group favoritism (57%)57% related to the paper, Aversive racism (55%)55% related to the paper, Contact hypothesis (51%)51% related to the paper
1,212 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14792779108401856
Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects
Guido Peeters1, Janusz Czapiński2

Abstract:

(1990). Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects. European Review of Social Psychology: Vol. 1, European Review of Social Psychology, pp. 33-60. (1990). Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects. European Review of Social Psychology: Vol. 1, European Review of Social Psychology, pp. 33-60. read more read less

Topics:

Negativity bias (66%)66% related to the paper, Social psychology (sociology) (52%)52% related to the paper
996 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for European Review of Social Psychology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

European Review of Social Psychology format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write European Review of Social Psychology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the European Review of Social Psychology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the European Review of Social Psychology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the European Review of Social Psychology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in European Review of Social Psychology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the European Review of Social Psychology citation style.

4. Can I use the European Review of Social Psychology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for European Review of Social Psychology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in European Review of Social Psychology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper European Review of Social Psychology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in European Review of Social Psychology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in European Review of Social Psychology.

7. Where can I find the template for the European Review of Social Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Review of Social Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the European Review of Social Psychology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. European Review of Social Psychology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's European Review of Social Psychology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like European Review of Social Psychology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like European Review of Social Psychology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using European Review of Social Psychology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in European Review of Social Psychology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is European Review of Social Psychology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for European Review of Social Psychology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for European Review of Social Psychology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In European Review of Social Psychology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for European Review of Social Psychology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the European Review of Social Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Review of Social Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download European Review of Social Psychology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in European Review of Social Psychology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to European Review of Social Psychology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template