Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format
Recent searches

Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format Example of New Review of Academic Librarianship format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

New Review of Academic Librarianship — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Library and Information Sciences #66 of 235 down down by 12 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 89 Published Papers | 174 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 21/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.5
SJR: 1.35
SNIP: 1.744
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.717
SNIP: 1.762
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.2
SJR: 1.3
SNIP: 2.036
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.452
SNIP: 1.193

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.0

5% from 2019

CiteRatio for New Review of Academic Librarianship from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.0
2019 1.9
2018 2.0
2017 1.8
2016 1.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.54

14% from 2019

SJR for New Review of Academic Librarianship from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.54
2019 0.628
2018 0.535
2017 1.05
2016 0.681
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.003

6% from 2019

SNIP for New Review of Academic Librarianship from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.003
2019 0.948
2018 0.927
2017 1.467
2016 1.011
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
New Review of Academic Librarianship

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

New Review of Academic Librarianship

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for New Review of Academic Librarianship formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 20 Jul 2020 and has been used by 424 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Library and Information Sciences

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
20 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1361-4533
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.453
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2013.740961
A Study Exploring Learners' Informal Learning Space Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences
Deborah Harrop1, Beatrice Turpin1

Abstract:

What makes a successful informal learning space is a topic in need of further research. The body of discourse on informal space design is drawn from learning theory, placemaking, and architecture, with a need for understanding of the synergy between the three. Findings from a longitudinal, quantitative, and qualitative study ... What makes a successful informal learning space is a topic in need of further research. The body of discourse on informal space design is drawn from learning theory, placemaking, and architecture, with a need for understanding of the synergy between the three. Findings from a longitudinal, quantitative, and qualitative study at Sheffield Hallam University, explore learners' behaviors, attitudes, and preferences toward informal learning spaces in higher education, within and outside of the context of the academic library. The learning spaces study contributes to the discourse on informal learning spaces design by producing a typology of nine learning space preference attributes which address aspects of learning theory, placemaking, and architecture. The typology can be used to evaluate existing spaces and inform redevelopment of informal learning spaces in higher education institutions. Implementing the typology will be subject to localized conditions, but at Sheffield Hallam University the key conclusions... read more read less

Topics:

Informal learning (72%)72% related to the paper, Informal education (65%)65% related to the paper, Experiential learning (65%)65% related to the paper, Learning sciences (64%)64% related to the paper, Active learning (62%)62% related to the paper
View PDF
124 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2014.911194
Envisioning the Academic Library: A Reflection on Roles, Relevancy and Relationships

Abstract:

The focus of this article is to reflect on current and near future issues and trends concerning academic libraries. This includes an overview of the literature on embedded librarianship and a focus on the need for more participatory and collaborative approaches to library services.The core argument is that academic libraries ... The focus of this article is to reflect on current and near future issues and trends concerning academic libraries. This includes an overview of the literature on embedded librarianship and a focus on the need for more participatory and collaborative approaches to library services.The core argument is that academic libraries need to continue to adapt their roles and develop stronger relationships across the university in order to maintain and promote their relevancy to all stakeholders. Embedded roles in research and teaching, and an embedded existence through collaboration and outreach will strengthen the academic library's presence within its parent institution. read more read less

Topics:

Outreach (53%)53% related to the paper, Professional development (52%)52% related to the paper, Information literacy (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
116 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2010.518851
Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories

Abstract:

This article investigates the awareness of scholarly authors toward open access repositories and the factors that motivate their use of these repositories. The article reports on the findings obtained from a mixed methods approach which involved a questionnaire returned by over 3000 respondents, supplemented by four focus gro... This article investigates the awareness of scholarly authors toward open access repositories and the factors that motivate their use of these repositories. The article reports on the findings obtained from a mixed methods approach which involved a questionnaire returned by over 3000 respondents, supplemented by four focus groups held across Europe in the summer 2009. The research found that although there was a good understanding and appreciation of the ethos of open access in general, there were clear differences between scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds in their understanding of open access repositories and their motivations for depositing articles within them. This research forms the first part of a longitudinal study that will track the changing behaviors and attitudes of authors toward open access repositories. read more read less

Topics:

Self-archiving (58%)58% related to the paper
View PDF
102 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13614530410001692004
Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures

Abstract:

Le monde de la communication scientifique n'est pas uniforme: les chimistes, les physiciens de la haute energie, par exemple, ont des cultures qui leur sont propres. L'auteur analyse l'importance de fait dans l'examen de la crise des periodiques (forte augmentation des prix), et des processus d'evaluation par les pairs, des r... Le monde de la communication scientifique n'est pas uniforme: les chimistes, les physiciens de la haute energie, par exemple, ont des cultures qui leur sont propres. L'auteur analyse l'importance de fait dans l'examen de la crise des periodiques (forte augmentation des prix), et des processus d'evaluation par les pairs, des ressources et supports d'information. read more read less
81 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2013.851609
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Their Impact on Academic Library Services: Exploring the Issues and Challenges
Hannah Gore1

Abstract:

2012 was a year of rapid change for education with the advent of MOOCs—Massive Open Online Courses—available for the world to use to learn for free. But what does this mean for the role of the librarian? How has the landscape in education changed, and what are the issues and challenges that librarians now face? This article r... 2012 was a year of rapid change for education with the advent of MOOCs—Massive Open Online Courses—available for the world to use to learn for free. But what does this mean for the role of the librarian? How has the landscape in education changed, and what are the issues and challenges that librarians now face? This article reviews the position of libraries in the emergence of MOOCs and the role that a librarian could undertake within the research, production, and presentation of MOOCs. read more read less
71 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for New Review of Academic Librarianship.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

New Review of Academic Librarianship format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write New Review of Academic Librarianship in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the New Review of Academic Librarianship guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the New Review of Academic Librarianship guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the New Review of Academic Librarianship guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in New Review of Academic Librarianship?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the New Review of Academic Librarianship citation style.

4. Can I use the New Review of Academic Librarianship templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for New Review of Academic Librarianship.

5. Can I use a manuscript in New Review of Academic Librarianship that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper New Review of Academic Librarianship that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in New Review of Academic Librarianship?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in New Review of Academic Librarianship.

7. Where can I find the template for the New Review of Academic Librarianship?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per New Review of Academic Librarianship's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the New Review of Academic Librarianship's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. New Review of Academic Librarianship an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's New Review of Academic Librarianship is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like New Review of Academic Librarianship?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like New Review of Academic Librarianship?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using New Review of Academic Librarianship?

After writing your paper autoformatting in New Review of Academic Librarianship, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is New Review of Academic Librarianship's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for New Review of Academic Librarianship?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for New Review of Academic Librarianship. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In New Review of Academic Librarianship?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for New Review of Academic Librarianship are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the New Review of Academic Librarianship?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per New Review of Academic Librarianship's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download New Review of Academic Librarianship in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in New Review of Academic Librarianship Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to New Review of Academic Librarianship formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template