Example of Open Review of Educational Research format
Recent searches

Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Open Review of Educational Research — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
History #29 of 1328 down down by None rank
Philosophy #29 of 644 down down by None rank
Education #345 of 1319 down down by None rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 35 Published Papers | 90 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.3
SJR: 0.457
SNIP: 1.306
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Brill

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.0
SJR: 0.158
SNIP: 3.203
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.6
SJR: 0.124
SNIP: 0.558
open access Open Access

Emerald Publishing

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 0.5
SJR: 0.263
SNIP: 0.841

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.6

37% from 2019

CiteRatio for Open Review of Educational Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.6
2019 1.9
2018 0.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.453

48% from 2019

SJR for Open Review of Educational Research from 2019 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.453
2019 0.307
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.748

97% from 2019

SNIP for Open Review of Educational Research from 2018 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.748
2019 1.392
2018 0.552
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 37% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 48% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 97% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Open Review of Educational Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Open Review of Educational Research

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Open Review of Educational Research formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 16 Jun 2020 and has been used by 459 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
16 Jun 2020
i
Open Access
Not provided
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2017.1300068
Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher: a developmental approach to research methodology
Mariam Attia1, Julian Edge2

Abstract:

Our purpose in this article is to achieve a shift of focus away from a view of research methods as objectified procedures to be learnt by researchers, and towards the development of researchers who craft procedures integral to the environments in which they operate – environments of which they are also a functioning constitue... Our purpose in this article is to achieve a shift of focus away from a view of research methods as objectified procedures to be learnt by researchers, and towards the development of researchers who craft procedures integral to the environments in which they operate – environments of which they are also a functioning constituent. A key element in such a perspective is the conceptualisation (and practice) of the relationship between development and reflexivity. Reflexivity involves a process of on-going mutual shaping between researcher and research. Development involves an increase in awareness of such processes of interaction between organism and context. Rather than see development only as a welcome side-effect of reflexive research, we treat development of the researcher as central, with reflexivity in an instrumental relationship to this on-going process. With regard to the pragmatic implementation of these concepts, we emphasise the importance of the researcher consciously stepping back from action in order to theorise what is taking place, and also stepping up to be an active part of that contextualised action. We exemplify the processes involved using research data taken from a doctoral study into the role of technology in the teaching of Arabic. The first section of this article explores the idea of a developmental approach. The second unpacks our sense of reflexivity. The third section exemplifies our discussion through the experiences of a researcher in the field. The concluding section summarises and restates our argument regarding the potential usefulness of adopting a developmental approach to the conduct of research. read more read less

Topics:

Reflexivity (58%)58% related to the paper, Action (philosophy) (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
193 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167
Determinants of education quality: what makes students’ perception different?

Abstract:

In recent decades, the commercialization of education has become more apparent and the need for using marketing tools is greater than before. This study aims to identify the demographic and background information of students that differentiate their perception about quality of higher education. A sample of 432 students was ta... In recent decades, the commercialization of education has become more apparent and the need for using marketing tools is greater than before. This study aims to identify the demographic and background information of students that differentiate their perception about quality of higher education. A sample of 432 students was taken from five top private universities of Bangladesh to evaluate their perception toward dimensions of higher education. Multinomial regression analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of students which make their perception about quality of higher education dissimilar. The findings show that status of students for scholarship, extracurricular activities, parents’ education, age, previous result, and university they study in have a significant influence on perception about quality of higher education. Part-time job status has moderate influence on the students’ perception. This research carries value to education policy-makers and university authorities. They can... read more read less

Topics:

Education policy (59%)59% related to the paper, Business education (59%)59% related to the paper, Higher education (59%)59% related to the paper, Perception (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
166 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2014.998159
Teachers’ Critical Reflective Practice in the Context of Twenty-first Century Learning
Leon Benade1

Abstract:

In the twenty-first century, learning and teaching at school must prepare young people for engaging in a complex and dynamic world deeply influenced by globalisation and the revolution in digital t... In the twenty-first century, learning and teaching at school must prepare young people for engaging in a complex and dynamic world deeply influenced by globalisation and the revolution in digital t... read more read less

Topics:

Reflective practice (58%)58% related to the paper, Education theory (51%)51% related to the paper, Context (language use) (51%)51% related to the paper, Transformative learning (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
81 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2016.1266693
Qatar’s educational reform past and future: challenges in teacher development

Abstract:

Until the late 1990s, Qatar’s educational system used the intrinsic-nationalistic and cultural traditions of Arabic schools. The Qatari leadership and stakeholder was outdated; hence, they approach... Until the late 1990s, Qatar’s educational system used the intrinsic-nationalistic and cultural traditions of Arabic schools. The Qatari leadership and stakeholder was outdated; hence, they approach... read more read less

Topics:

Educational assessment (52%)52% related to the paper, Higher education (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
67 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2014.972439
Social Exclusion/Inclusion: Foucault's analytics of exclusion, the political ecology of social inclusion and the legitimation of inclusive education
Michael A. Peters1, Tina Besley1

Abstract:

This article offers a broad philosophical and historical background to the dyad of social exclusion/inclusion by examining the analytics and politics of exclusion first by reference to Michel Fouca... This article offers a broad philosophical and historical background to the dyad of social exclusion/inclusion by examining the analytics and politics of exclusion first by reference to Michel Fouca... read more read less

Topics:

Social exclusion (56%)56% related to the paper, Analytics (53%)53% related to the paper, Legitimation (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
61 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Open Review of Educational Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Open Review of Educational Research format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Open Review of Educational Research in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Open Review of Educational Research guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Open Review of Educational Research guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Open Review of Educational Research guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Open Review of Educational Research?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Open Review of Educational Research citation style.

4. Can I use the Open Review of Educational Research templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Open Review of Educational Research.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Open Review of Educational Research that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Open Review of Educational Research that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Open Review of Educational Research?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Open Review of Educational Research.

7. Where can I find the template for the Open Review of Educational Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Open Review of Educational Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Open Review of Educational Research's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Open Review of Educational Research an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Open Review of Educational Research is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Open Review of Educational Research?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Open Review of Educational Research?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Open Review of Educational Research?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Open Review of Educational Research, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Open Review of Educational Research's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Open Review of Educational Research?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Open Review of Educational Research. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Open Review of Educational Research?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Open Review of Educational Research are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Open Review of Educational Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Open Review of Educational Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Open Review of Educational Research in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Open Review of Educational Research Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Open Review of Educational Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template