Example of Studies in Higher Education format
Recent searches

Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format Example of Studies in Higher Education format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Studies in Higher Education — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Education #34 of 1319 up up by 34 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 626 Published Papers | 4228 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 08/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.2
SJR: 1.098
SNIP: 1.835
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.5
SJR: 1.299
SNIP: 1.605
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 1.218
SNIP: 1.195
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.9
SJR: 2.212
SNIP: 2.09

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.0

5% from 2018

Impact factor for Studies in Higher Education from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.0
2018 2.854
2017 2.321
2016 1.527
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

6.8

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for Studies in Higher Education from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.8
2019 5.9
2018 4.7
2017 4.2
2016 3.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 5% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.744

5% from 2019

SJR for Studies in Higher Education from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.744
2019 1.836
2018 1.888
2017 1.513
2016 1.41
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.602

13% from 2019

SNIP for Studies in Higher Education from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.602
2019 2.986
2018 2.376
2017 2.202
2016 2.138
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Studies in Higher Education

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Studies in Higher Education

Studies in Higher Education is a leading international journal publishing research-based articles dealing with higher education issues from either a disciplinary or multi-disciplinary perspective. Empirical, theoretical and conceptual articles of significant originality will b...... Read More

Education

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
08 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0307-5079
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.167
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090
Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
David Nicol1, Debra Macfarlane-Dick2

Abstract:

The research on formative assessment and feedback is reinterpreted to show how these processes can help students take control of their own learning, i.e. become self-regulated learners. This reformulation is used to identify seven principles of good feedback practice that support self-regulation. A key argument is that studen... The research on formative assessment and feedback is reinterpreted to show how these processes can help students take control of their own learning, i.e. become self-regulated learners. This reformulation is used to identify seven principles of good feedback practice that support self-regulation. A key argument is that students are already assessing their own work and generating their own feedback, and that higher education should build on this ability. The research underpinning each feedback principle is presented, and some examples of easy-to-implement feedback strategies are briefly described. This shift in focus, whereby students are seen as having a proactive rather than a reactive role in generating and using feedback, has profound implications for the way in which teachers organise assessments and support learning. read more read less

Topics:

Peer feedback (65%)65% related to the paper, Formative assessment (63%)63% related to the paper, Active learning (57%)57% related to the paper, Self-regulated learning (55%)55% related to the paper, Independent study (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
4,204 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03075079812331380364
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Mary R. Lea1, Brian Street2

Abstract:

This article addresses the issue of student writing in higher education. It draws on the findings of an Economic and Social Research Council funded project which examined the contrasting expectations and interpretations of academic staff and students regarding undergraduate students' written assignments. It is suggested that ... This article addresses the issue of student writing in higher education. It draws on the findings of an Economic and Social Research Council funded project which examined the contrasting expectations and interpretations of academic staff and students regarding undergraduate students' written assignments. It is suggested that the implicit models that have generally been used to understand student writing do not adequately take account of the importance of issues of identity and the institutional relationships of power and authority that surround, and are embedded within, diverse student writing practices across the university. A contrasting and therefore complementary perspective is used to present debates about ‘good˚s and ‘poor˚s student writing. The article outlines an ‘academic literacies˚s framework which can take account of the conflicting and contested nature of writing practices, and may therefore be more valuable for understanding student writing in today's higher education than tradition... read more read less

Topics:

Professional writing (66%)66% related to the paper, Higher education (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
1,902 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03075079312331382498
Learning to teach in higher education

Abstract:

(1993). Learning to teach in higher education. Studies in Higher Education: Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 105-111.

Topics:

Higher education (57%)57% related to the paper
1,404 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03075070120099359
University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice

Abstract:

The relationship between university students' perceptions of their academic environment, their approaches to study, and academic outcomes was investigated at both university and faculty levels. The responses of a large, cross-disciplinary sample of undergraduate students were analysed using higher order path and regression an... The relationship between university students' perceptions of their academic environment, their approaches to study, and academic outcomes was investigated at both university and faculty levels. The responses of a large, cross-disciplinary sample of undergraduate students were analysed using higher order path and regression analyses, and the results confirmed students' perceptions as influencing both 'hard' (academic achievement) and 'soft' (satisfaction, development of key skills) learning outcomes, both directly and mediated through their approaches to study. Perceptions of heavy workload and inappropriate assessment influenced students towards surface, and perceptions of good teaching towards deep, approaches to study. Students' perceptions of their current learning environment were a stronger predictor of learning outcomes at university than prior achievement at school. Protocols are proposed to guide more fine-grained analysis of students' perceptions. read more read less

Topics:

Learning development (62%)62% related to the paper, Academic achievement (58%)58% related to the paper, Learning environment (56%)56% related to the paper, Educational psychology (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
1,263 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03075079112331382944
A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire
Paul Ramsden1

Abstract:

Performance indicators (PIs) in higher education have focused chiefly on research outputs. They have largely ignored the teaching function of universities and colleges. This article outlines the development of a student evaluation instrument designed to measure the teaching performance of academic organisational units. The th... Performance indicators (PIs) in higher education have focused chiefly on research outputs. They have largely ignored the teaching function of universities and colleges. This article outlines the development of a student evaluation instrument designed to measure the teaching performance of academic organisational units. The theory of teaching and learning that underlies the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is described. The instrument's statistical qualities and its ability to discriminate intelligibly between different courses are discussed in the context of results from national trials in Australian higher education. The principal conclusion reached is that the CEQ offers a reliable, verifiable and useful means of determining the perceived teaching quality of academic units in systems of higher education that are based on British models. Several technical and political issues remain unresolved in its application as a PI. read more read less

Topics:

Higher education (57%)57% related to the paper
1,237 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Studies in Higher Education.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Studies in Higher Education format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Studies in Higher Education in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Studies in Higher Education guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Studies in Higher Education guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Studies in Higher Education guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Studies in Higher Education?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Studies in Higher Education citation style.

4. Can I use the Studies in Higher Education templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Studies in Higher Education.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Studies in Higher Education that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Studies in Higher Education that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Studies in Higher Education?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Studies in Higher Education.

7. Where can I find the template for the Studies in Higher Education?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Studies in Higher Education's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Studies in Higher Education's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Studies in Higher Education an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Studies in Higher Education is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Studies in Higher Education?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Studies in Higher Education?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Studies in Higher Education?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Studies in Higher Education, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Studies in Higher Education's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Studies in Higher Education?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Studies in Higher Education. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Studies in Higher Education?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Studies in Higher Education are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Studies in Higher Education?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Studies in Higher Education's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Studies in Higher Education in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Studies in Higher Education Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Studies in Higher Education formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template