Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format
Recent searches

Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format Example of Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Human Factors and Ergonomics #16 of 39 up up by 3 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 154 Published Papers | 463 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 12/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.2
SJR: 0.818
SNIP: 2.066
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.3
SJR: 0.511
SNIP: 1.628
open access Open Access

Emerald Publishing

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.6
SJR: 0.461
SNIP: 0.959

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.0

11% from 2019

CiteRatio for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.0
2019 2.7
2018 2.1
2017 2.0
2016 2.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.556

5% from 2019

SJR for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.556
2019 0.53
2018 0.425
2017 0.476
2016 0.449
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.293

7% from 2019

SNIP for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.293
2019 1.204
2018 0.708
2017 0.585
2016 0.671
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 12 Jun 2020 and has been used by 631 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Human Factors and Ergonomics

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
12 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1463-922X
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.383
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14639220210123806
Multiple resources and performance prediction

Abstract:

This paper describes the origins and history of multiple resource theory in accounting for differences in dual task interference. One particular application of the theory, the 4-dimensional multiple resources model, is described in detail, positing that there will be greater interference between two tasks to the extent that t... This paper describes the origins and history of multiple resource theory in accounting for differences in dual task interference. One particular application of the theory, the 4-dimensional multiple resources model, is described in detail, positing that there will be greater interference between two tasks to the extent that they share stages (perceptual/cognitive vs response) sensory modalities (auditory vs visual), codes (visual vs spatial) and channels of visual information (focal vs ambient). A computational rendering of this model is then presented. Examples are given of how the model predicts interference differences in operational environments. Finally, three challenges to the model are outlined regarding task demand coding, task allocation and visual resource competition. read more read less
View PDF
2,130 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/1463922021000054335
The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task
David B. Kaber1, Mica R. Endsley

Abstract:

This paper extends previous research on two approaches to human-centred automation: (1) intermediate levels of automation (LOAs) for maintaining operator involvement in complex systems control and facilitating situation awareness; and (2) adaptive automation (AA) for managing operator workload through dynamic control allocati... This paper extends previous research on two approaches to human-centred automation: (1) intermediate levels of automation (LOAs) for maintaining operator involvement in complex systems control and facilitating situation awareness; and (2) adaptive automation (AA) for managing operator workload through dynamic control allocations between the human and machine over time. Some empirical research has been conducted to examine LOA and AA independently, with the objective of detailing a theory of human-centred automation. Unfortunately, no previous work has studied the interaction of these two approaches, nor has any research attempted to systematically determine which LOAs should be used in adaptive systems and how certain types of dynamic function allocations should be scheduled over time. The present research briefly reviews the theory of human-centred automation and LOA and AA approaches. Building on this background, an initial study was presented that attempts to address the conjuncture of these two approa... read more read less

Topics:

Situation awareness (52%)52% related to the paper, Automation (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
697 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14639220500370105
The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: a synthesis of the literature
Christopher D. Wickens1, Stephen R. Dixon1

Abstract:

This review of the literature examines, in a quantitative fashion, how the level of imperfection or unreliability of diagnostic automation affects the performance of the human operator who is jointly consulting that automation and the raw data itself. The data from 20 different studies were used to generate 35 different data ... This review of the literature examines, in a quantitative fashion, how the level of imperfection or unreliability of diagnostic automation affects the performance of the human operator who is jointly consulting that automation and the raw data itself. The data from 20 different studies were used to generate 35 different data points that compared performance with varying levels of unreliability, with that of a non-automated baseline condition. A regression analysis of benefits/costs relative to baseline was carried out, and revealed a strong linear function of benefits with reliability. The analysis revealed that a reliability of 0.70 was the ‘crossover point’ below which unreliable automation was worse than no automation at all. The analysis also revealed that performance was more strongly affected by reliability in high workload conditions, implicating the role of workload-imposed automation dependence in producing this relationship, and suggesting that humans tend to protect performance of concurrent ta... read more read less

Topics:

Reliability (statistics) (52%)52% related to the paper
353 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14639220210159717
Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction

Abstract:

(2003). Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science: Vol. 4, No. 1-2, pp. 113-131.

Topics:

Human factors and ergonomics (51%)51% related to the paper
343 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/14639220701561775
What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams

Abstract:

The concept of situation awareness (SA) is frequently described in the literature. Theoretically, it remains predominantly an individual construct and the majority of the models presented describe SA from an individual perspective. In comparison, team SA has received less attention. SA in complex, collaborative environments t... The concept of situation awareness (SA) is frequently described in the literature. Theoretically, it remains predominantly an individual construct and the majority of the models presented describe SA from an individual perspective. In comparison, team SA has received less attention. SA in complex, collaborative environments thus remains a challenge for the human factors community, both in relation to the development of theoretical perspectives and of valid measures and to the development of guidelines for system, training and procedure design. This article presents a review and critique of what is currently known about SA and team SA, including a comparison of the most prominent individual and team models presented in the literature. In conclusion, it is argued that recently proposed systems level distributed SA approaches are the most suited to describing and assessing SA in real world, collaborative environments. read more read less
333 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science citation style.

4. Can I use the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

7. Where can I find the template for the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template