Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format
Recent searches

Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format Example of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Nature and Landscape Conservation #36 of 177 down down by 19 ranks
Ecology #82 of 400 down down by 31 ranks
Aquatic Science #52 of 224 down down by 29 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 668 Published Papers | 2704 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 18/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

EDP Sciences

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.584
SNIP: 1.119
open access Open Access

Oxford University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.87
SNIP: 0.911
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.881
SNIP: 0.986
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 0.944
SNIP: 1.144

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.572

12% from 2018

Impact factor for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.572
2018 2.935
2017 2.988
2016 3.13
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.0

13% from 2019

CiteRatio for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.0
2019 4.6
2018 4.7
2017 4.8
2016 4.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 12% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.95

20% from 2019

SJR for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.95
2019 1.188
2018 1.25
2017 1.203
2016 1.189
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.029

7% from 2019

SNIP for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.029
2019 1.105
2018 1.251
2017 1.323
2016 1.106
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 20% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems is an international journal dedicated to publishing original papers that relate specifically to freshwater, brackish or marine habitats and encouraging work that spans these ecosystems. This journal provides a forum in whi...... Read More

Aquatic Science

Nature and Landscape Conservation

Ecology

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1052-7613
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.003
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/AQC.3270050305
Environmental effects of marine fishing
Paul K. Dayton1, Simon F. Thrush, M. Tundi Agardy2, Robert J. Hofman

Abstract:

1Some effects of fisheries on the associated biological systems are reviewed and management options and their inherent risks are considered. 2In addition to the effects on target species, other sensitive groups impacted by fishing are considered including marine mammals, turtles, sea birds, elasmobranchs and some invertebrat... 1Some effects of fisheries on the associated biological systems are reviewed and management options and their inherent risks are considered. 2In addition to the effects on target species, other sensitive groups impacted by fishing are considered including marine mammals, turtles, sea birds, elasmobranchs and some invertebrates with low reproductive rates. 3Other impacts discussed include the destruction of benthic habitat, the provision of unnatural sources of food and the generation of debris. 4Management options are considered including the designation of marine protected areas, risk aversion, and the burden of proof. 5A balanced consideration of the risks and consequences of ‚Type 1’ and ‚Type II’ errors is advocated. read more read less

Topics:

Marine reserve (63%)63% related to the paper, Marine protected area (58%)58% related to the paper, Fishing (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
795 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/AQC.975
You can swim but you can't hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays

Abstract:

1.Fishing spans all oceans and the impact on ocean predators such as sharks and rays is largely unknown. A lack of data and complicated jurisdictional issues present particular challenges for assessing and conserving high seas biodiversity. It is clear, however, that pelagic sharks and rays of the open ocean are subject to hi... 1.Fishing spans all oceans and the impact on ocean predators such as sharks and rays is largely unknown. A lack of data and complicated jurisdictional issues present particular challenges for assessing and conserving high seas biodiversity. It is clear, however, that pelagic sharks and rays of the open ocean are subject to high and often unrestricted levels of mortality from bycatch and targeted fisheries for their meat and valuable fins. 2.These species exhibit a wide range of life-history characteristics, but many have relatively low productivity and consequently relatively high intrinsic vulnerability to over-exploitation. The IUCN — World Conservation Union Red List criteria were used to assess the global status of 21 oceanic pelagic shark and ray species. 3.Three-quarters (16) of these species are classified as Threatened or Near Threatened. Eleven species are globally threatened with higher risk of extinction: the giant devilray is Endangered, ten sharks are Vulnerable and a further five species are Near Threatened. Threat status depends on the interaction between the demographic resilience of the species and intensity of fisheries exploitation. 4.4. Most threatened species, like the shortfin mako shark, have low population increase rates and suffer high fishing mortality throughout their range. Species with a lower risk of extinction have either fast, resilient life histories (e.g. pelagic stingray) or are species with slow, less resilient life histories but subject to fisheries management (e.g. salmon shark). 5.5. Recommendations, including implementing and enforcing finning bans and catch limits, are made to guide effective conservation and management of these sharks and rays. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

Threatened species (63%)63% related to the paper, Shark finning (63%)63% related to the paper, Near-threatened species (59%)59% related to the paper, Shortfin mako shark (57%)57% related to the paper, Endangered species (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
708 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/AQC.583
Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas

Abstract:

While conservationists, resource managers, scientists and coastal planners have recognized the broad applicability of marine protected areas (MPAs), they are often implemented without a firm understanding of the conservation science } both ecological and socio-economic } underlying marine protection. The rush to implement MPA... While conservationists, resource managers, scientists and coastal planners have recognized the broad applicability of marine protected areas (MPAs), they are often implemented without a firm understanding of the conservation science } both ecological and socio-economic } underlying marine protection. The rush to implement MPAs has set the stage for paradoxical differences of opinions in the marine conservation community. 2. The enthusiastic prescription of simplistic solutions to marine conservation problems risks polarization of interests and ultimately threatens bona fide progress in marine conservation. The blanket assignment and advocacy of empirically unsubstantiated rules of thumb in marine protection creates potentially dangerous targets for conservation science. 3. Clarity of definition, systematic testing of assumptions, and adaptive application of diverse MPA management approaches are needed so that the appropriate mix of various management tools can be utilized, depending upon specific goals and conditions. Scientists have a professional and read more read less

Topics:

Marine conservation (64%)64% related to the paper, Marine protected area (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
553 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/AQC.699
The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity
Gabrielle C. Canonico1, Angela Arthington2, Jeffrey K. McCrary3, Michele Thieme4

Abstract:

The common name 'tilapia' refers to a group of tropical freshwater .sh in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and inse... The common name 'tilapia' refers to a group of tropical freshwater .sh in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and insects, as bait.sh for certain capture .sheries, for aquaria, and as a food .sh. They have most recently been promoted as an important source of protein that could provide food security for developing countries without the environmental problems associated with terrestrial agriculture. In addition, market demand for tilapia in developed countries such as the United States is growing rapidly. 2. Tilapias are well-suited to aquaculture because they are highly proli.c and tolerant to a range of environmental conditions. They have come to be known as the 'aquatic chicken' because of their potential as an a.ordable, high-yield source of protein that can be easily raised in a range of environments } from subsistence or 'backyard' units to intensive .sh hatcheries. In some countries, particularly in Asia, nearly all of the introduced tilapias produced are consumed domestically; tilapias have contributed to basic food security for such societies. 3. This review indicates that tilapia species are highly invasive and exist under feral conditions in every nation in which they have been cultured or introduced. Thus, the authors have concluded that, despite potential or observed bene.ts to human society, tilapia aquaculture and open-water introductions cannot continue unchecked without further exacerbating damage to native .sh species and biodiversity. Recommendations include restricting tilapia culture to carefully managed, contained ponds, although exclusion is preferred when it is feasible. Research into culture of indigenous species is also recommended. read more read less

Topics:

Sarotherodon (57%)57% related to the paper, Oreochromis (55%)55% related to the paper, Introduced species (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
444 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/AQC.748
Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology

Abstract:

1. Ponds and pools, broadly defined in this paper to include all small and shallow standing waters that permanently or temporarily contain water, are numerous, diverse and important from a conservation point of view. We here argue that ponds and pools offer powerful potential for studies in ecology, evolutionary biology and c... 1. Ponds and pools, broadly defined in this paper to include all small and shallow standing waters that permanently or temporarily contain water, are numerous, diverse and important from a conservation point of view. We here argue that ponds and pools offer powerful potential for studies in ecology, evolutionary biology and conservation biology. 2. An outline is given of the characteristics of pools and ponds that make them good model systems for large-scale surveys and hypothesis testing through experimental manipulation. Such studies will not only increase understanding of community and genetic structure, as well as of patterns of biodiversity, in small aquatic habitats themselves, but may also contribute significantly to testing general theory. 3. These merits are illustrated by the recent progress on the understanding of the relative importance of local versus regional factors in structuring populations and communities, as well as of the impact of hydroperiod on community and ecosystem functioning. read more read less

Topics:

Ecology (disciplines) (53%)53% related to the paper, Conservation biology (51%)51% related to the paper
404 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems citation style.

4. Can I use the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

7. Where can I find the template for the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template