Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format
Recent searches

Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format Example of British Journal of Clinical Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

British Journal of Clinical Psychology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Clinical Psychology #42 of 283 down down by 17 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 119 Published Papers | 613 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 22/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.4
SJR: 0.438
SNIP: 1.449
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.8
SJR: 2.036
SNIP: 2.066
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.4
SJR: 1.59
SNIP: 1.949
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 0.858
SNIP: 1.482

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.541

5% from 2018

Impact factor for British Journal of Clinical Psychology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.541
2018 2.672
2017 2.593
2016 3.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.2

2% from 2019

CiteRatio for British Journal of Clinical Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.2
2019 5.1
2018 4.6
2017 5.6
2016 4.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 5% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.479

42% from 2019

SJR for British Journal of Clinical Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.479
2019 1.043
2018 1.156
2017 1.456
2016 1.276
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.145

47% from 2019

SNIP for British Journal of Clinical Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.145
2019 1.46
2018 1.28
2017 1.623
2016 1.459
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 42% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 47% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

British Journal of Clinical Psychology

The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology. For specific submission requirements, please view the Author Guidelines. The Journal is all-encompassing with respect to the range of ...... Read More

Psychology

i
Last updated on
22 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0144-6657
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.303
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1348/014466505X29657
The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample
Julie D. Henry1, John Robertson Crawford2

Abstract:

Objectives. To test the construct validity of the short-form version of the Depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21), and in particular, to assess whether stress as indexed by this measure is synonymous with negative affectivity (NA) or whether it represents a related, but distinct, construct. To provide normative data f... Objectives. To test the construct validity of the short-form version of the Depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21), and in particular, to assess whether stress as indexed by this measure is synonymous with negative affectivity (NA) or whether it represents a related, but distinct, construct. To provide normative data for the general adult population. Design. Cross-sectional, correlational and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Methods. The DASS-21 was administered to a non-clinical sample, broadly representative of the general adult UK population (N=1,794). Competing models of the latent structure of the DASS-21 were evaluated using CFA. Results. The model with optimal fit (RCFI = 0.94) had a quadripartite structure, and consisted of a general factor of psychological distress plus orthogonal specific factors of depression, anxiety, and stress. This model was a significantly better fit than a competing model that tested the possibility that the Stress scale simply measures NA. Conclusions. The DASS-21 subscales can validly be used to measure the dimensions of depression, anxiety, and stress. However, each of these subscales also taps a more general dimension of psychological distress or NA. The utility of the measure is enhanced by the provision of normative data based on a large sample. read more read less

Topics:

Confirmatory factor analysis (60%)60% related to the paper, Construct validity (56%)56% related to the paper, Test validity (55%)55% related to the paper, Convergent validity (54%)54% related to the paper, DASS (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
4,037 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1348/014466599162782
Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields.
Robert Elliott1, Constance T. Fischer2, David L. Rennie3

Abstract:

We present a set of evolving guidelines for reviewing qualitative research, to serve four functions: to contribute to the process of legitimizing qualitative research; to ensure more appropriate and valid scientific reviews of qualitative manuscripts, theses, and dissertations; to encourage better quality control in qualitati... We present a set of evolving guidelines for reviewing qualitative research, to serve four functions: to contribute to the process of legitimizing qualitative research; to ensure more appropriate and valid scientific reviews of qualitative manuscripts, theses, and dissertations; to encourage better quality control in qualitative research through better self- and other-monitoring; and to encourage further developments in approach and method. Building on a review of existing principles of good practice in qualitative research, we used an iterative process of revision and feedback from colleagues who engage in qualitative research, resulting in a set of seven guidelines common to both qualitative and quantitative research and seven guidelines especially pertinent to qualitative investigations in psychology and related social sciences. The Evolving Guidelines are subject to continuing revision and should not be used in a rigid manner, in order to avoid stifling creativity in this rapidly evolving, rich research tradition. read more read less

Topics:

Qualitative research (57%)57% related to the paper, Qualitative psychological research (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
2,758 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8260.1992.TB00997.X
The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Theresa M. Marteau1, Hilary L. Bekker1

Abstract:

Two studies are reported describing the development of a short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for use in circumstances where the full-form is inappropriate. Using item-remainder correlations, the most highly correlated anxiety-present and anxiety-absent items were combined, and... Two studies are reported describing the development of a short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for use in circumstances where the full-form is inappropriate. Using item-remainder correlations, the most highly correlated anxiety-present and anxiety-absent items were combined, and correlated with scores obtained using the full-form of the STAI. Correlation coefficients greater than .90 were obtained using four and six items from the STAI. Acceptable reliability and validity were obtained using six items. The use of this six-item short-form produced scores similar to those obtained using the full-form. This was so for several groups of subjects manifesting a range of anxiety levels. This short-form of the STAI is therefore sensitive to fluctuations in state anxiety. When compared with the full-form of the STAI, the six-item version offers a briefer and just as acceptable scale for subjects while maintaining results that are comparable to those obtained using the full-form of the STAI. read more read less

Topics:

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (72%)72% related to the paper
2,538 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1348/0144665031752934
The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample.
John Robertson Crawford1, Julie D. Henry1

Abstract:

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the PANAS (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988b) and provide normative data. Design: Cross-sectional and correlational. Method: The PANAS was administered to a non-clinical sample, broadly representative of the general adult UK population (N = 1,003). Competing models ... Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the PANAS (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988b) and provide normative data. Design: Cross-sectional and correlational. Method: The PANAS was administered to a non-clinical sample, broadly representative of the general adult UK population (N = 1,003). Competing models of the latent structure of the PANAS were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Regression and correlational analysis were used to determine the influence of demographic variables on PANAS scores as well as the relationship between the PANAS with measures of depression and anxiety (the HADS and the DASS). Results: The best-fitting model (robust comparative fit index = .94) of the latent structure of the PANAS consisted of two correlated factors corresponding to the PA and NA scales, and permitted correlated error between items drawn from the same mood subcategories (Zevon & Tellegen, 1982). Demographic variables had only very modest influences on PANAS scores and the PANAS exhibited measurement invariance across demographic subgroups. The reliability of the PANAS was high, and the pattern of relationships between the PANAS and the DASS and HADS were consistent with tripartite theory. Conclusion: The PANAS is a reliable and valid measure of the constructs it was intended to assess, although the hypothesis of complete independence between PA and NA must be rejected. The utility of this measure is enhanced by the provision of large-scale normative data. read more read less

Topics:

Population (51%)51% related to the paper, Confirmatory factor analysis (51%)51% related to the paper
2,537 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8260.1982.TB01421.X
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates
Donald E. Broadbent, P. F. Cooper1, Peter H. Fitzgerald1, Katharine R. Parkes1

Abstract:

This paper describes a questionnaire measure of self-reported failures in perception, memory, and motor function. Responses to all questions tend to be positively correlated, and the whole questionnaire correlates with other recent measures of self-reported deficit in memory, absent-mindedness, or slips of action. The questio... This paper describes a questionnaire measure of self-reported failures in perception, memory, and motor function. Responses to all questions tend to be positively correlated, and the whole questionnaire correlates with other recent measures of self-reported deficit in memory, absent-mindedness, or slips of action. The questionnaire is however only weakly correlated with indices of social desirability set or of neuroticism. It is significantly correlated with ratings of the respondent by his or her spouse, and accordingly does have some external significance rather than purely private opinion of the self. The score is reasonably stable over long periods, to about the same extent as traditional measures of trait rather than state. Furthermore, it has not thus far been found to change in persons exposed to life-stresses. However, it does frequently correlate with the number of current psychiatric symptoms reported by the same person on the MHQ; and in one study it has been found that CFQ predicts subsequent MHQ in persons who work at a stressful job in the interval. It does not do so in those who work in a less stressful environment. The most plausible view is that cognitive failure makes a person vulnerable to showing bad effects of stress, rather than itself resulting from stress. read more read less

Topics:

CFQ (53%)53% related to the paper, Neuroticism (52%)52% related to the paper
2,491 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

British Journal of Clinical Psychology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write British Journal of Clinical Psychology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the British Journal of Clinical Psychology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the British Journal of Clinical Psychology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the British Journal of Clinical Psychology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the British Journal of Clinical Psychology citation style.

4. Can I use the British Journal of Clinical Psychology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in British Journal of Clinical Psychology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper British Journal of Clinical Psychology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

7. Where can I find the template for the British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per British Journal of Clinical Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the British Journal of Clinical Psychology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. British Journal of Clinical Psychology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's British Journal of Clinical Psychology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like British Journal of Clinical Psychology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in British Journal of Clinical Psychology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is British Journal of Clinical Psychology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for British Journal of Clinical Psychology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for British Journal of Clinical Psychology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the British Journal of Clinical Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per British Journal of Clinical Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download British Journal of Clinical Psychology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in British Journal of Clinical Psychology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to British Journal of Clinical Psychology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template