Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format
Recent searches

Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format Example of Clinical Otolaryngology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Clinical Otolaryngology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Otorhinolaryngology #15 of 103 up up by 27 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 455 Published Papers | 1833 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 03/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 1.54
SNIP: 1.54
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.801
SNIP: 2.039
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.907
SNIP: 1.158
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 0.772
SNIP: 1.891

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.197

8% from 2018

Impact factor for Clinical Otolaryngology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.197
2018 2.377
2017 2.696
2016 2.523
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.0

14% from 2019

CiteRatio for Clinical Otolaryngology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.0
2019 3.5
2018 2.9
2017 2.2
2016 2.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 8% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.914

10% from 2019

SJR for Clinical Otolaryngology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.914
2019 1.016
2018 0.969
2017 0.846
2016 0.631
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.348

7% from 2019

SNIP for Clinical Otolaryngology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.348
2019 1.443
2018 1.195
2017 1.063
2016 0.941
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Clinical Otolaryngology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Clinical Otolaryngology

Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice; audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL; head and neck onco...... Read More

Otorhinolaryngology

Medicine

i
Last updated on
02 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1749-4478
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.395
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1749-4486.2009.01995.X
Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test.
Claire Hopkins, Stuart D.S. Gillett1, Slack R2, Valerie J. Lund3, John Browne4
01 Oct 2009 - Clinical Otolaryngology

Abstract:

Objectives: We set out to determine the psychometric validation of a disease-specific health related quality of life instrument for use in chronic rhinosinusitis, the 22 item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), a modification of a pre-existing instrument, the SNOT-20. Design, setting and participants:  The National Comparati... Objectives: We set out to determine the psychometric validation of a disease-specific health related quality of life instrument for use in chronic rhinosinusitis, the 22 item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), a modification of a pre-existing instrument, the SNOT-20. Design, setting and participants:  The National Comparative Audit of Surgery for Nasal Polyposis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis was a prospective cohort study collecting data on 3128 adult patients undergoing sinonasal surgery in 87 NHS hospitals in England and Wales. Data were collected preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery, and analysed to determine validity of the SNOT-22. Test–retest reliability was assessed in a separate cohort of patients in a single centre. Main outcome measures:  The SNOT-22, a derivative of the SNOT-20 was the main outcome measure. Patients were also asked to report whether they felt better, the same or worse following surgery. To evaluate the SNOT-22, the internal consistency, responsiveness, known group differences and validity were analysed. Results:  Preoperative SNOT-22 scores were completed by 2803 patients. 3-month postoperative SNOT-22 scores were available for 2284 patients of all patients who completed a preoperative form (81.5% response rate). The Cronbach’s alpha scores for the SNOT-22 were 0.91 indicating high internal consistency. The test–retest reliability coefficient was 0.93, indicating high reliability of repeated measures. The SNOT-22 was able to discriminate between patients known to suffer with chronic rhinosinusitis and a group of healthy controls (P < 0.0001, t = 85.3). It was also able to identify statistically significant differences in sub-groups of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. There was a statistically significant (P < 0.0001, t = 39.94) decrease in patient reported SNOT-22 scores at 3 months. At 3 months the overall effect size in all patients was 0.81, which is considered large. We found the minimally important difference that is the smallest change in SNOT-22 score that can be detected by a patient, to be 8.9 points. Conclusions:  We have found the SNOT-22 to be valid and easy to use. It can be used to facilitate routine clinical practice to highlight the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on the patient’s quality of life, and may also be used to measure the outcome of surgical intervention. The minimally important difference allows us to interpret scores in a clinical context, and may help to improve patient selection for surgery. read more read less

Topics:

Prospective cohort study (51%)51% related to the paper, Cronbach's alpha (51%)51% related to the paper, Repeated measures design (50%)50% related to the paper
1,105 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1749-4486.2009.01973.X
A controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation in chronic otitis due to antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; a preliminary report of efficacy.
A. Wright1, C.H. Hawkins2, E.E. Änggård2, D.R. Harper2
01 Aug 2009 - Clinical Otolaryngology

Abstract:

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation (Biophage-PA) targeting antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic otitis. Design:  Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial approved by UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency... Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation (Biophage-PA) targeting antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic otitis. Design:  Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial approved by UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) ethical review process. Setting:  A single specialist university hospital. Participants:  24 patients with chronic otitis with a duration of several years (2–58). Each patient had, at the time of entry to the trial, an ear infection because of an antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa strain sensitive to one or more of the six phages present in Biophage-PA. Participants were randomised in two groups of 12 treated with either a single dose of Biophage-PA or placebo and followed up at 7, 21 and 42 days after treatment by the same otologist. Ears were thoroughly cleaned on each occasion and clinical and microbiological indicators measured. Main outcome measures:  Physician assessed erythema/inflammation, ulceration/granulation/polyps, discharge quantity, discharge type and odour using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients reported discomfort, itchiness, wetness and smell also using a VAS. Bacterial levels of P. aeruginosa and phage counts from swabs were measured initially and at follow-up. At each visit patients were asked about side effects using a structured form. Digital otoscopic images were obtained on days 0 and 42 for illustrative purposes only. Results:  Relative to day 0, pooled patient- and physician-reported clinical indicators improved for the phage treated group relative to the placebo group. Variation from baseline levels was statistically significant for combined data from all clinic days only for the phage treated group. Variation from baseline levels was statistically significant for the majority of the patient assessed clinical indicators only for the phage treated group. P. aeruginosa counts were significantly lower only in the phage treated group. No treatment related adverse event was reported. Conclusion:  The first controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation showed efficacy and safety in chronic otitis because of chemo-resistant P. aeruginosa. read more read less

Topics:

Ear infection (51%)51% related to the paper, Clinical trial (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
724 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2273.1982.TB01581.X
Prognostic factors of neck node metastasis.
Gordon B. Snow1, A. A. Annyas1, E. A. van Slooten1, Harry Bartelink1, Augustinus A. M. Hart1
01 Jun 1982 - Clinical Otolaryngology

Abstract:

A retrospective clinico-pathological study has been carried out in a series of 405 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who underwent a total of 484 radical neck dissections. The recurrence rate in the neck in 327 patients who had histological positive nodes was 21.1%. Recurrence in the neck after a stan... A retrospective clinico-pathological study has been carried out in a series of 405 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who underwent a total of 484 radical neck dissections. The recurrence rate in the neck in 327 patients who had histological positive nodes was 21.1%. Recurrence in the neck after a standard radical neck dissection almost invariably proved fatal. A statistical analysis has been carried out to evaluate the clinical and pathological factors which are of importance in regards to recurrence in the neck. Histological factors such as extra-nodal spread and the number of histological positive nodes have been shown to be of much more prognostic importance than clinical parameters. When corrections are made for interdependencies between variables, histological extra-nodal spread proved to be the most important single prognostic factor (P less than 10(-7)). read more read less

Topics:

Neck dissection (68%)68% related to the paper
444 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2273.1991.TB01050.X
Sleep nasendoscopy: a technique of assessment in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea.
C. B. Croft1, M. B. Pringle1
01 Oct 1991 - Clinical Otolaryngology

Abstract:

It appears that uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UVPP) is a reliable procedure for reducing snoring, but much less reliable when used as a treatment for OSAS. This is thought to be because of poor patient selection in that the site of the problem is not always the site of the operation. We present the technique of sleep nasendoscop... It appears that uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UVPP) is a reliable procedure for reducing snoring, but much less reliable when used as a treatment for OSAS. This is thought to be because of poor patient selection in that the site of the problem is not always the site of the operation. We present the technique of sleep nasendoscopy which allows direct visualization of the site or sites of obstruction in a sleeping patient. Our study has shown that there are patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) in whom the only site of pharyngeal obstruction is at the velopharynx. These patients should do well with the relatively simple procedure of UVPP. This is not true for many other OSAS patients in whom we found that obstruction was multisegmental. This helps to explain the frequently poor results of UVPP in OSAS patients. We feel that this form of preoperative assessment will avoid unnecessary surgery. read more read less

Topics:

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (56%)56% related to the paper
416 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1749-4486.2006.01246.X
Human papillomavirus and head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
01 Aug 2006 - Clinical Otolaryngology

Abstract:

Keypoints •It has been suggested that the link between human papillomavirus (HPV) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is specific to carcinoma of the tonsil. • We systematically reviewed studies that tested for HPV16 exposure in anatomically defined sites in the head and neck and a control group. ... Keypoints •It has been suggested that the link between human papillomavirus (HPV) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is specific to carcinoma of the tonsil. • We systematically reviewed studies that tested for HPV16 exposure in anatomically defined sites in the head and neck and a control group. • The association between HPV16 and cancer was strongest for tonsil (OR: 15.1, 95% CI: 6.8–33.7), intermediate for oropharynx (OR: 4.3, 95% CI: 2.1–8.9) and weakest for oral (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2–3.4) and larynx (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0–4.2). • To investigate heterogeneity, further stratification by method of HPV16 detection, suggested that variation in the magnitude of the HPV-cancer association with cancer site was restricted to studies using ELISA: among studies using PCR, the magnitude of the summary odds ratios was similar across the four sites. • The association between HPV16 infection and HNSCC in specific sites suggests the strongest and most consistent association is with tonsil cancer, and the magnitude of this association is consistent with an infectious aetiology. • However, the method of viral detection may be an important source of heterogeneity. Resolution of this issue will require further studies using both methods, examining associations separately in different sites. read more read less

Topics:

Tonsil cancer (58%)58% related to the paper, Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (57%)57% related to the paper, Head and neck cancer (51%)51% related to the paper, Tonsil (51%)51% related to the paper
357 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Clinical Otolaryngology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Clinical Otolaryngology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Clinical Otolaryngology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Clinical Otolaryngology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Clinical Otolaryngology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Clinical Otolaryngology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Clinical Otolaryngology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Clinical Otolaryngology citation style.

4. Can I use the Clinical Otolaryngology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Clinical Otolaryngology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Clinical Otolaryngology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Clinical Otolaryngology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Clinical Otolaryngology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Clinical Otolaryngology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Clinical Otolaryngology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Clinical Otolaryngology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Clinical Otolaryngology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Clinical Otolaryngology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Clinical Otolaryngology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Clinical Otolaryngology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Clinical Otolaryngology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Clinical Otolaryngology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Clinical Otolaryngology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Clinical Otolaryngology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Clinical Otolaryngology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Clinical Otolaryngology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Clinical Otolaryngology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Clinical Otolaryngology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Clinical Otolaryngology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Clinical Otolaryngology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Clinical Otolaryngology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Clinical Otolaryngology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Clinical Otolaryngology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template