Example of Conservation Biology format
Recent searches

Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format Example of Conservation Biology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Conservation Biology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #22 of 647 down down by 2 ranks
Nature and Landscape Conservation #7 of 177 down down by 4 ranks
Ecology #18 of 400 down down by 9 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 570 Published Papers | 5528 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 15/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 1.001
SNIP: 1.212
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.9
SJR: 1.214
SNIP: 1.356
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 17.7
SJR: 3.153
SNIP: 2.776
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

PLOS

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 2.628
SNIP: 1.713

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

5.405

13% from 2018

Impact factor for Conservation Biology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 5.405
2018 6.194
2017 5.89
2016 4.842
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

9.7

1% from 2019

CiteRatio for Conservation Biology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 9.7
2019 9.8
2018 11.4
2017 9.9
2016 8.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 13% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.2

17% from 2019

SJR for Conservation Biology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.2
2019 2.641
2018 2.977
2017 3.081
2016 2.87
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.096

2% from 2019

SNIP for Conservation Biology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.096
2019 2.147
2018 2.337
2017 2.136
2016 1.754
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Conservation Biology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Conservation Biology

Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth's ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses a...... Read More

Nature and Landscape Conservation

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Environmental Science

i
Last updated on
14 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0888-8892
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.953
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G.E., Tinkham, M., and Klapwijk, T.M. (1982) Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25 (7), 4515–4532, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1523-1739.1991.TB00384.X
Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review
Denis A. Saunders1, Richard J. Hobbs1, C. R. Margules1
01 Mar 1991 - Conservation Biology

Abstract:

. Abstract Research on fragmented ecosystems has focused mostly on the biogeograpbic consequences of the creation of habitat “islands” of different sizes and has provided little of practical value to managers. However, ecosystem fragmentation causes large changes in the physical environment as well as biogeograpbic changes. F... . Abstract Research on fragmented ecosystems has focused mostly on the biogeograpbic consequences of the creation of habitat “islands” of different sizes and has provided little of practical value to managers. However, ecosystem fragmentation causes large changes in the physical environment as well as biogeograpbic changes. Fragmentation generally results in a landscape that consists of remnant areas of native vegetation surrounded by a matrix of agricultural or other developed land. As a result fluxes of radiation, momentum (La, wind), water, and nutrients across the landscape are altered significantly. These in turn can have important influences on biota within remnant areas, especially at or near the edge between the remnant and the surrounding matrix. The isolation of remnant areas by clearing also has important consequences for the biota. These consequences vary with the time since isolation distance from other remnants, and degree of connectivity with other remnants. The influences of physical and biogeographic changes are modified by the size, shape, and position in the landscape of individual remnant, with larger remnants being less adversely affected by the fragmentation process. The Dynamics of remnant areas are predominantly driven by factors arising in the surrounding landscape. Management of, and research on, fragmented ecosystems should be directed at understanding and controlling these external influences as much as at the biota of the remnants themselves. There is a strong need to develop an integrated approach to landscape management that places conservation reserves in the context of the overall landscape read more read less

Topics:

Fragmentation (computing) (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
3,715 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1523-1739.1990.TB00309.X
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
Reed F. Noss1
01 Dec 1990 - Conservation Biology

Abstract:

Biodiversity is presently a minor consideration in environmental policy. It has been regarded as too broad and vague a concept to be applied to real-world regulatoy and managernentproblems. This problem can be corrected ifbio- diversity is recognized as an end in itsea and if measurable indicators can be selected to assess th... Biodiversity is presently a minor consideration in environmental policy. It has been regarded as too broad and vague a concept to be applied to real-world regulatoy and managernentproblems. This problem can be corrected ifbio- diversity is recognized as an end in itsea and if measurable indicators can be selected to assess the status of biodiversity over time. Biodiversity, as presently understood, encom- passes multiple levels of biological organization. In thispa- per, I expand the three primay attributes of biodiversity recognized by Jerry Franklin - composition, structure, and function - into a nested hierarcby that incorporates ele- ments of each attribute at four levels of organization: re- gional landscape, community-ecosystem, population- species, andgenetic. Indicators of each attribute in terrestrial ecosystems, at the four levels of organization, are identified for environmental monitoring purposes. Projects to monitor biodiversity will benefit from a direct linkage to long-term ecological research and a commitment to test hypotheses relevant to biodiversity conservation. A general guideline is to proceed from the top down, beginning with a coarse-scale invent0 y of landscape pattern, vegetation, habitat structure, and species distributions, then overlaying data on stress lev- els to identiD biologically significant areas at high risk of impoverishment. Intensive research and monitoring can be directed to high-risk ecosystems and elements of biodiversity, while less intensive monitoring is directed to the total land- scape (or samples thereon. In any monitoringprogram, par- ticular attention should be paid to specifying the questions that monitoring is intended to answer and validating the relationships between indicators and the components of bio- diversity they represent read more read less

Topics:

Measurement of biodiversity (62%)62% related to the paper, Ecosystem diversity (60%)60% related to the paper, Biodiversity (53%)53% related to the paper, Population (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
2,937 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1523-1739.2000.99084.X
Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities.
01 Feb 2000 - Conservation Biology

Abstract:

Roads are a widespread and increasing feature of most landscapes. We reviewed the scientific liter- ature on the ecological effects of roads and found support for the general conclusion that they are associated with negative effects on biotic integrity in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Roads of all kinds have seven ... Roads are a widespread and increasing feature of most landscapes. We reviewed the scientific liter- ature on the ecological effects of roads and found support for the general conclusion that they are associated with negative effects on biotic integrity in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Roads of all kinds have seven general effects: mortality from road construction, mortality from collision with vehicles, modification of animal behavior, alteration of the physical environment, alteration of the chemical environment, spread of exotics, and increased use of areas by humans. Road construction kills sessile and slow-moving organisms, injures organisms adjacent to a road, and alters physical conditions beneath a road. Vehicle collisions affect the demography of many species, both vertebrates and invertebrates; mitigation measures to reduce roadkill have been only partly successful. Roads alter animal behavior by causing changes in home ranges, move- ment, reproductive success, escape response, and physiological state. Roads change soil density, temperature, soil water content, light levels, dust, surface waters, patterns of runoff, and sedimentation, as well as adding heavy metals (especially lead), salts, organic molecules, ozone, and nutrients to roadside environments. Roads promote the dispersal of exotic species by altering habitats, stressing native species, and providing movement corridors. Roads also promote increased hunting, fishing, passive harassment of animals, and landscape modifications. Not all species and ecosystems are equally affected by roads, but overall the pres- ence of roads is highly correlated with changes in species composition, population sizes, and hydrologic and geomorphic processes that shape aquatic and riparian systems. More experimental research is needed to com- plement post-hoc correlative studies. Our review underscores the importance to conservation of avoiding con- struction of new roads in roadless or sparsely roaded areas and of removal or restoration of existing roads to benefit both terrestrial and aquatic biota. read more read less

Topics:

Road ecology (61%)61% related to the paper, Population (54%)54% related to the paper, Riparian zone (53%)53% related to the paper, Poison control (51%)51% related to the paper, Aquatic ecosystem (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
2,506 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1992.06030324.X
Disturbance, Diversity, and Invasion: Implications for Conservation
Richard J. Hobbs1, Laura Foster Huenneke1
01 Sep 1992 - Conservation Biology

Abstract:

Preservation of natural communities has historically consisted of measures protecting them from physical disturbance. Timber harvests and livestock grazing are usually excluded from preserves, and fire suppression has been practiced—within the U.S. system of national parks, for example. Ecologists and conservationists have co... Preservation of natural communities has historically consisted of measures protecting them from physical disturbance. Timber harvests and livestock grazing are usually excluded from preserves, and fire suppression has been practiced—within the U.S. system of national parks, for example. Ecologists and conservationists have come to recognize, however, that many forms of disturbance are important components of natural systems. Many plant communities and species are dependent on disturbance, especially for regeneration (Pickett & White 1985). Preserves should be large enough to allow the natural disturbance regime to operate and to support a mosaic of patches in different stages of disturbance, successional recovery, and community maturation (Pickett & Thompson 1978). read more read less

Topics:

Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (63%)63% related to the paper, Plant community (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
2,370 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1996.10041163.X
A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems
Brian Richter1, Jeffrey V. Baumgartner1, Jennifer Powell1, David P. Braun1
01 Aug 1996 - Conservation Biology

Abstract:

Hydrologic regimes play a major role in determining the biotic composition, structure, and function of aquatic, wetland, and riparian ecosystems. But human land and water uses are substantially altering hydrologic regimes around the world. Improved quantitative evaluations of human-induced hydrologic changes are needed to adv... Hydrologic regimes play a major role in determining the biotic composition, structure, and function of aquatic, wetland, and riparian ecosystems. But human land and water uses are substantially altering hydrologic regimes around the world. Improved quantitative evaluations of human-induced hydrologic changes are needed to advance research on the biotic implications of hydrologic alteration and to support ecosystem management and restoration plans. We propose a method for assessing the degree of hydrologic alteration attributable to human influence within an ecosystem. This method, referred to as the “Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration,” is based upon an analysis of hydrologic data available either from existing measurement points within an ecosystem (such as at stream gauges or wells) or model-generated data. We use 32 parameters, organized into five groups, to statistically characterize hydrologic variation within each year. These 32 parameters provide information on ecologically significant features of surface and ground water regimes influencing aquatic, wetland, and riparian ecosystems. We then assess the hydrologic perturbations associated with activities such as dam operations, flow diversion, groundwater pumping, or intensive land-use conversion by comparing measures of central tendency and dispersion for each parameter between user-defined “pre-impact” and “post-impact” time frames, generating 64 Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration. This method is intended for use with other ecosystem metrics in inventories of ecosystem integrity, in planning ecosystem management activities, and in setting and measuring progress toward conservation or restoration goals. read more read less

Topics:

Ecosystem management (54%)54% related to the paper, Riparian zone (53%)53% related to the paper, Wetland (52%)52% related to the paper
2,204 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Conservation Biology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Conservation Biology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Conservation Biology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Conservation Biology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Conservation Biology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Conservation Biology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Conservation Biology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Conservation Biology citation style.

4. Can I use the Conservation Biology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Conservation Biology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Conservation Biology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Conservation Biology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Conservation Biology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Conservation Biology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Conservation Biology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Conservation Biology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Conservation Biology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Conservation Biology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Conservation Biology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Conservation Biology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Conservation Biology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Conservation Biology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Conservation Biology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Conservation Biology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Conservation Biology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Conservation Biology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Conservation Biology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Conservation Biology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Conservation Biology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Conservation Biology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Conservation Biology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Conservation Biology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Conservation Biology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template