Example of Ecological Entomology format
Recent searches

Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format Example of Ecological Entomology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Ecological Entomology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Insect Science #38 of 153 down down by 12 ranks
Ecology #122 of 400 down down by 26 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 441 Published Papers | 1414 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 08/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.666
SNIP: 0.868
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.65
SNIP: 0.87
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 1.7
SJR: 0.453
SNIP: 1.184
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.542
SNIP: 0.888

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.848

11% from 2018

Impact factor for Ecological Entomology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.848
2018 2.073
2017 2.244
2016 1.771
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.2

6% from 2019

CiteRatio for Ecological Entomology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.2
2019 3.4
2018 3.8
2017 3.4
2016 3.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 11% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.865

4% from 2019

SJR for Ecological Entomology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.865
2019 0.898
2018 1.104
2017 1.138
2016 0.993
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.944

11% from 2019

SNIP for Ecological Entomology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.944
2019 0.847
2018 0.986
2017 0.932
2016 0.752
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Ecological Entomology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Ecological Entomology

Average time from submission to decision: 45 daysAverage time from submission to online publication: 5 months Ecological Entomology publishes top-quality original research on the ecology of insects and related invertebrate taxa. Our aim is to publish papers that will be of con...... Read More

Insect Science

Ecology

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
08 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0307-6946
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.063
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2311.2002.00393.X
Facultative bacterial endosymbionts benefit pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum under heat stress
Clytia B. Montllor1, Amy Maxmen1, Alexander H. Purcell1
01 Apr 2002 - Ecological Entomology

Abstract:

1. Natural populations of pea aphids in California contain at least two facultative bacterial secondary symbionts (pea aphid secondary symbiont, PASS, or pea aphid rickettsia, PAR) in a range of frequencies throughout the state. 2. Two pea aphid clones without either of these facultative associates failed to reproduce ... 1. Natural populations of pea aphids in California contain at least two facultative bacterial secondary symbionts (pea aphid secondary symbiont, PASS, or pea aphid rickettsia, PAR) in a range of frequencies throughout the state. 2. Two pea aphid clones without either of these facultative associates failed to reproduce in the first 8 days after the final moult if they had been heat-stressed for a period of about 4 h at 39 °C as 1-day-old larvae in the laboratory. 3. Aphids infected artificially with PASS, however, were able to produce up to 48% of the normal complement of offspring produced by PASS-positive aphids that had not been heat-stressed. Clones infected artificially with PAR did not have the same advantage as those with PASS after heat stress. 4. In aphids without PASS or PAR, heat stress reduced the number of bacteriocytes (in which the obligate primary symbiont, Buchnera, resides) to 7% of non-heat-stressed aphids, while aphids with only PASS retained 70% of their bacteriocytes. Bacteriocytes in aphids with PAR but not PASS were reduced to 42% of controls. 5. When larvae were heat-stressed as older instars (5 days old), a similar pattern emerged, though the effect of heat stress was less extreme. Clones containing PASS produced the most offspring, three to 14 times as many as aphids without PASS or PAR. Aphids with PAR only, or PASS and PAR together, had reduced or no advantage over aphids without facultative symbionts. 6. Aphids of all clones that had been heat-stressed as later instars gave birth to a variable number of stillborn offspring. Aphids without facultative symbionts produced the most stillborn larvae. 7. Field studies showed a higher incidence of PASS in aphids collected in California in summer compared with aphids from the same sites collected 2–4 months earlier. The difference was significant in two of three widely dispersed locations. read more read less

Topics:

Hamiltonella defensa (59%)59% related to the paper, Buchnera (57%)57% related to the paper, Aphid (57%)57% related to the paper, Bacteriocyte (56%)56% related to the paper, Acyrthosiphon pisum (54%)54% related to the paper
657 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.0307-6946.2005.00662.X
Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape
Simon G. Potts1, Betsy Vulliamy2, Stuart P. M. Roberts1, Chris O'Toole3, Amots Dafni4, Gidi Ne'eman4, Pat Willmer2
01 Feb 2005 - Ecological Entomology

Abstract:

1. The habitat components determining the structure of bee communities are well known when considering foraging resources; however, there is little data with respect to the role of nesting resources. 2. As a model system this study uses 21 diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape comprising a variety of habitats r... 1. The habitat components determining the structure of bee communities are well known when considering foraging resources; however, there is little data with respect to the role of nesting resources. 2. As a model system this study uses 21 diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape comprising a variety of habitats regenerating after fire. The findings clearly demonstrate that a variety of nesting substrates and nest building materials have key roles in organising the composition of bee communities. 3. The availability of bare ground and potential nesting cavities were the two primary factors influencing the structure of the entire bee community, the composition of guilds, and also the relative abundance of the dominant species. Other nesting resources shown to be important include availability of steep and sloping ground, abundance of plant species providing pithy stems, and the occurrence of pre-existing burrows. 4. Nesting resource availability and guild structure varied markedly across habitats in different stages of post-fire regeneration; however, in all cases, nest sites and nesting resources were important determinants of bee community structure. read more read less

Topics:

Guild (52%)52% related to the paper, Nest (52%)52% related to the paper, Foraging (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
462 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2311.2011.01318.X
Bacterial symbionts as mediators of ecologically important traits of insect hosts
Heike Feldhaar1
01 Oct 2011 - Ecological Entomology

Abstract:

1. Bacterial symbionts play a prominent role in insect nutritional ecology by aiding in digestion of food or providing nutrients that are limited or lacking in the diet. Thereby, endosymbionts open niches to their insect host that would otherwise be unavailable. 2. Currently, several other ecologically relevant traits medi... 1. Bacterial symbionts play a prominent role in insect nutritional ecology by aiding in digestion of food or providing nutrients that are limited or lacking in the diet. Thereby, endosymbionts open niches to their insect host that would otherwise be unavailable. 2. Currently, several other ecologically relevant traits mediated by endosymbionts are being investigated, including enhanced parasite resistance, enhanced heat tolerance, and influences on insect–plant interactions such as manipulation of plant physiology to the benefit of the insect. 3. Traits mediated by endosymbionts are often identified by correlative studies where traits are found to be altered in the presence of a particular symbiont. Recent developments in genomic tools offer the opportunity for studying the impact of bacteria–insect symbioses under natural conditions in a population and community ecology context. In vivo experiments specifically testing putative functions of endosymbionts in parallel to population-level studies on the prevalence of endosymbionts allow disentangling host versus symbiont contribution to phenotypic variability observed in individuals. Effects of symbionts on host phenotype are often large and relevant to host fitness, e.g. by significantly enhancing survival or fecundity in a context-dependent manner. 4. Predominantly vertically transmitted endosymbionts contribute to the heritable genetic variation present in a host species. Phenotypic variation on which selection can act may be due to differences either among host genomes, symbiont genomes, or genotype × genotype interactions. Therefore the holobiont, i.e. the host including all symbionts, should be regarded as the unit of selection as the association between host and symbionts may affect the fitness of the holobiont depending on the environment. read more read less

Topics:

Hologenome theory of evolution (57%)57% related to the paper, Holobiont (54%)54% related to the paper, Population (51%)51% related to the paper, Arsenophonus (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
459 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2311.1976.TB01217.X
Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age and mating status
E. Boorman1, G. A. Parker1
01 Aug 1976 - Ecological Entomology

Abstract:

1 In double mating experiments with Drosophila melanogaster in which one male had been irradiated, it was confirmed that sperm displacement is extensive, i.e. the second male to mate displaces most of the previously-stored sperm. 2 The predominance of the second ejaculate over the first increases with the interval betwee... 1 In double mating experiments with Drosophila melanogaster in which one male had been irradiated, it was confirmed that sperm displacement is extensive, i.e. the second male to mate displaces most of the previously-stored sperm. 2 The predominance of the second ejaculate over the first increases with the interval between the two matings, from about P2= 0.83 (second mating on the first day after the first mating) to about P2= 0.99 (interval between mating = 14 days) where P2 is the proportion of offspring fathered by the second male. 3 A more accurate method for calculating P2 values is developed for experiments in which sperm are ‘labelled’ by irradiation treatment (equation 1). 4 Observations of the reducing egg production of the female throughout life were also obtained. A model is examined which incorporates both the sperm competition and egg production data to predict the reproductive value to a male of a mating with a given type of female, varying in age and mating status. The relative value (in terms of probable numbers of progeny gained) of a mating with a virgin or 4 day post-mating female is about twice that of a 14 day post-mating female, mainly because of the fecundity difference. 5 Some evolutionary aspects of sperm competition and multiple mating in insects are reviewed and discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Sperm displacement (70%)70% related to the paper, Sperm competition (68%)68% related to the paper, Sperm precedence (65%)65% related to the paper, Mating (62%)62% related to the paper, Antagonistic Coevolution (58%)58% related to the paper
363 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2311.1998.00135.X
Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands
Peter Dennis1, Mark R. Young2, Iain J. Gordon1
01 Sep 1998 - Ecological Entomology

Abstract:

1. The species composition and spatial distribution of small insects (Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera) and arachnids (Araneae, Opiliones, and Pseudoscorpiones) were investigated in three indigenous, upland grasslands identified as the National Vegetation Classification Festuca–Agrostis–Galium typical subcommunity (code U4a... 1. The species composition and spatial distribution of small insects (Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera) and arachnids (Araneae, Opiliones, and Pseudoscorpiones) were investigated in three indigenous, upland grasslands identified as the National Vegetation Classification Festuca–Agrostis–Galium typical subcommunity (code U4a), Festuca–Agrostis–Galium, Vaccinium–Deschampsia subcommunity (code U4e), and Nardus stricta species-poor sub-community (code U5a), on which grazing management was manipulated experimentally. 2. Two hypotheses were tested that predicted arthropod diversity in upland grasslands. The habitat heterogeneity hypothesis predicts that the species number and abundance of arthropods will have an asymptotic relationship with increasing numbers of plant species and greater structural heterogeneity in the vegetation. The symbiosis between patches hypothesis states that the species number and abundance of arthropods will express a unimodal relationship with the grain size of sward patches created by grazing. The sward patches must be large enough to be apparent to, and support populations of, arthropods, but small enough that interspersed tussocks provide shelter from weather and a deterrent to disturbance by grazers. 3. The hypotheses were tested by sampling arthropods from the geometrical patterns represented by the individual tussocks and intermediate sward components of three indigenous grasslands produced by different grazing treatments. Paired samples of arthropods were taken by motorized suction sampler, the first of the pair from the grazed sward and the second, the accumulated samples from the surrounding triad of tussocks (U4a and U5a grasslands) or hummocks (U4e grassland). The paired samples were taken from six randomly-selected locations across both replicates of each of the grazing treatments. 4. Arthropod species composition and abundance were compared between the paired sward and tussock samples and in turn with measures of the vertical and horizontal components of vegetation structure, i.e. the variance in vegetation height per unit area and the area covered by tussock compared with sward. 5. There were consistently more species and a greater abundance of arthropods associated with tussocks than with swards and the average species number and abundance for the combined pair of samples declined with increased grazing pressure. The relationship between vertical and horizontal components of vegetation structure and the species number and abundance of selected arthropods was asymptotic as opposed to unimodal, supporting the habitat heterogeneity hypothesis, rather than the symbiosis between patches hypothesis. 6. Small and relatively sedentary insects and arachnids are more sensitive to grazing intensity and species of grazer in these upland, indigenous grasslands than are larger Coleoptera and Araneae, which respond less directly to varied grazing management. The overall linear reduction of small herbivorous and predatory arthropods with increased grazing intensity was buffered in grasslands with substantial tussock patches. read more read less

Topics:

Grazing pressure (56%)56% related to the paper, Species diversity (55%)55% related to the paper, Tussock (55%)55% related to the paper, Spatial heterogeneity (54%)54% related to the paper, Abundance (ecology) (54%)54% related to the paper
351 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Ecological Entomology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Ecological Entomology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Ecological Entomology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Ecological Entomology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Ecological Entomology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Ecological Entomology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Ecological Entomology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Ecological Entomology citation style.

4. Can I use the Ecological Entomology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Ecological Entomology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Ecological Entomology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Ecological Entomology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Ecological Entomology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Ecological Entomology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Ecological Entomology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ecological Entomology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Ecological Entomology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Ecological Entomology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Ecological Entomology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Ecological Entomology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Ecological Entomology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Ecological Entomology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Ecological Entomology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Ecological Entomology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Ecological Entomology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Ecological Entomology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Ecological Entomology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Ecological Entomology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Ecological Entomology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ecological Entomology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Ecological Entomology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Ecological Entomology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Ecological Entomology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template