Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format
Recent searches

Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format Example of European Journal of Oral Sciences format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

European Journal of Oral Sciences — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Dentistry (all) #24 of 111 up up by 2 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 270 Published Papers | 1017 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Dental Investigations Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.5
SJR: 0.625
SNIP: 2.067
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 1.088
SNIP: 1.607
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.4
SJR: 1.77
SNIP: 2.073
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.2
SJR: 1.504
SNIP: 2.014

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.22

23% from 2018

Impact factor for European Journal of Oral Sciences from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.22
2018 1.81
2017 1.655
2016 1.54
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.8

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for European Journal of Oral Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.8
2019 3.3
2018 3.0
2017 2.9
2016 2.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 23% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.802

10% from 2019

SJR for European Journal of Oral Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.802
2019 0.729
2018 0.765
2017 0.789
2016 0.798
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.178

8% from 2019

SNIP for European Journal of Oral Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.178
2019 1.09
2018 0.987
2017 0.935
2016 0.934
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

European Journal of Oral Sciences

The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international, non-profit journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well ...... Read More

Dentistry

i
Last updated on
04 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0909-8836
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.133
i
Acceptance Rate
15%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.0909-8836..T01-2-.X
Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology
Marco Esposito1, Jan-Michaél Hirsch2, Ulf Lekholm1, Peter Thomsen1

Abstract:

The aim of this review was to offer a critical evaluation of the literature and to provide the clinician with scientifically-based diagnostic criteria for monitoring the implant condition. The revi ... The aim of this review was to offer a critical evaluation of the literature and to provide the clinician with scientifically-based diagnostic criteria for monitoring the implant condition. The revi ... read more read less
1,334 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.0909-8836..T01-6-.X
Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (II). Etiopathogenesis
Marco Esposito1, Jan-Michaél Hirsch2, Ulf Lekholm1, Peter Thomsen1

Abstract:

The aim of the present review is to evaluate the English language literature regarding factors associated with the loss of oral implants. An evidence-based format in conjunction, when possible, with a meta-analytic approach is used. The review identifies the following factors to be associated with biological failures of oral ... The aim of the present review is to evaluate the English language literature regarding factors associated with the loss of oral implants. An evidence-based format in conjunction, when possible, with a meta-analytic approach is used. The review identifies the following factors to be associated with biological failures of oral implants: medical status of the patient, smoking, bone quality, bone grafting, irradiation therapy, parafunctions, operator experience, degree of surgical trauma, bacterial contamination, lack of preoperative antibiotics, immediate loading, nonsubmerged procedure, number of implants supporting a prosthesis, implant surface characteristics and design. Excessive surgical trauma together with an impaired healing ability, premature loading and infection are likely to be the most common causes of early implant losses. Whereas progressive chronic marginal infection (peri-implantitis) and overload in conjunction with the host characteristics are the major etiological agents causing late failures. Furthermore, it appears that implant surface properties (roughness and type of coating) may influence the failure pattern. Various surface properties may therefore be indicated for different anatomical and host conditions. Finally, the histopathology of implant losses is described and discussed in relation to the clinical findings. read more read less

Topics:

Implant (56%)56% related to the paper, Osseointegration (53%)53% related to the paper
1,222 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-0722.1981.TB01689.X
Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy.
Anders S. Byström1, Göran Sundqvist1

Abstract:

The presence of bacteria in 17 single-rooted teeth, with periapical lesions, was studied throughout a whole period of treatment. The root canals were irrigated with physiologic saline solution during instrumentation. No antibacterial solutions or dressings were used. Bacteria were found in all initial specimens from the teeth... The presence of bacteria in 17 single-rooted teeth, with periapical lesions, was studied throughout a whole period of treatment. The root canals were irrigated with physiologic saline solution during instrumentation. No antibacterial solutions or dressings were used. Bacteria were found in all initial specimens from the teeth (median number of bacterial cells 4 x 10(5), range 10(2) - 10(7)) and the number of strains in the specimens ranged from 1 to 10.88% of the strains were anaerobic. The most commonly isolated species were: Peptostreptococcus micros, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides oralis, Bacteroides melaninogenicus subsp intermedius and Eubacterium alactolyticum. Mechanical instrumentation reduced the number of bacteria considerably. Specimens taken at the beginning of each appointment usually contained 10(4) - 10(6) bacterial cells and at the end 10(2) - 10(3) fewer. Bacteria were eliminated from the root canals of eight teeth during the treatment. In seven root canals bacteria persisted despite treatment on five successive occasions. There was no evidence that specific microorganisms were implicated in these persistent infections. Teeth where the infection persisted despite being treated five times were those with a high number of bacteria in the initial sample. read more read less

Topics:

Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (61%)61% related to the paper, Endodontic therapy (51%)51% related to the paper
956 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-0722.1997.TB00188.X
Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems
Anne Peutzfeldt1

Abstract:

The present review outlines the history of monomers used in resin composites, motivates further development, and highlights recent and ongoing research reported in the field of dental monomer systems. The monomer systems of most present-day resin composites are based on BisGMA, developed some 40 years ago, or derivatives of B... The present review outlines the history of monomers used in resin composites, motivates further development, and highlights recent and ongoing research reported in the field of dental monomer systems. The monomer systems of most present-day resin composites are based on BisGMA, developed some 40 years ago, or derivatives of BisGMA. In the remaining resin composites, urethane monomers or oligomers are used as the basis of the monomer system. The main deficiencies of current resin composites are polymerization shrinkage and insufficient wear resistance under high masticatory forces. Both factors are highly influenced by the monomer system, and considerable efforts are being made around the world to reduce or eliminate these undesirable properties. The use of fluoride-releasing monomer systems, some of which are under investigation, has been suggested to mitigate the negative effects of marginal gaps formed in consequence of polymerization shrinkage. The very crux of the problem has also been approached with the synthesis of potentially low-shrinking/non-shrinking resin composites involving ring opening or cyclopolymerizable monomers. By the use of additives with a supposed chain transfer agent function, monomer systems have been formulated that improve the degree of conversion of methacrylate double bonds and mechanical properties. Many promising monomer systems have been devised, the implementation of which may be expected to improve the longevity of resin composite fillings and expand the indications for resin composites. read more read less

Topics:

Monomer (54%)54% related to the paper
884 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1600-0722.1981.TB01711.X
Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys
Ake J. R. Möller1, Lars Fabricius1, Gunnar Dahlén1, Alf ÖHman1, Guy Heyden1

Abstract:

In nine monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) the pulps of 78 teeth were aseptically necrotized. Twenty-six of the pulp chambers were kept bacteria-free by sealing, while 52 were infected by the indigenous oral flora. The results were recorded clinically, radiographically and microbiologically at the beginning of the experiment and a... In nine monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) the pulps of 78 teeth were aseptically necrotized. Twenty-six of the pulp chambers were kept bacteria-free by sealing, while 52 were infected by the indigenous oral flora. The results were recorded clinically, radiographically and microbiologically at the beginning of the experiment and after 6-7 months. The final examination also included histologic recordings. The initially noninfected root canals were all sterile at the final samplings, indicating that the risk of contamination (including hematogenous) of root canals of this animal is very slight. It was shown that noninfected necrotic pulp tissue did not induce inflammatory reactions in the apical tissues. By contrast, teeth with infected pulp tissue showed inflammatory reactions clinically (12/52 teeth) and radiographically (47/52 teeth). Facultatively anaerobic streptococci, coliform rods and obligately anaerobic bacterial strains were most frequently found. In the final samples the number of obligately anaerobic strains increased. Some microorganisms which were isolated in the initial samples were not detected in the final samples. All infected teeth histologically examined showed strong inflammatory reactions in the periapical region. read more read less

Topics:

Pulp necrosis (56%)56% related to the paper, Pulp (tooth) (53%)53% related to the paper
726 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for European Journal of Oral Sciences.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

European Journal of Oral Sciences format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write European Journal of Oral Sciences in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the European Journal of Oral Sciences guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the European Journal of Oral Sciences guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the European Journal of Oral Sciences guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in European Journal of Oral Sciences?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the European Journal of Oral Sciences citation style.

4. Can I use the European Journal of Oral Sciences templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for European Journal of Oral Sciences.

5. Can I use a manuscript in European Journal of Oral Sciences that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper European Journal of Oral Sciences that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in European Journal of Oral Sciences?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in European Journal of Oral Sciences.

7. Where can I find the template for the European Journal of Oral Sciences?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Journal of Oral Sciences's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the European Journal of Oral Sciences's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. European Journal of Oral Sciences an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's European Journal of Oral Sciences is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like European Journal of Oral Sciences?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like European Journal of Oral Sciences?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using European Journal of Oral Sciences?

After writing your paper autoformatting in European Journal of Oral Sciences, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is European Journal of Oral Sciences's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for European Journal of Oral Sciences?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for European Journal of Oral Sciences. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In European Journal of Oral Sciences?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for European Journal of Oral Sciences are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the European Journal of Oral Sciences?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Journal of Oral Sciences's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download European Journal of Oral Sciences in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in European Journal of Oral Sciences Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to European Journal of Oral Sciences formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template