Example of Fisheries Oceanography format
Recent searches

Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format Example of Fisheries Oceanography format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Fisheries Oceanography — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Aquatic Science #45 of 224 up up by 18 ranks
Oceanography #35 of 128 up up by 2 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 191 Published Papers | 847 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 15/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Frontiers Media

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 1.558
SNIP: 1.437
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 1.13
SNIP: 1.266
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 0.828
SNIP: 1.089
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 0.852
SNIP: 1.135

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.198

17% from 2018

Impact factor for Fisheries Oceanography from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.198
2018 2.66
2017 1.794
2016 1.578
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.4

2% from 2019

CiteRatio for Fisheries Oceanography from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.4
2019 4.3
2018 4.0
2017 3.3
2016 4.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 17% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.016

11% from 2019

SJR for Fisheries Oceanography from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.016
2019 1.136
2018 1.316
2017 0.972
2016 1.156
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.127

7% from 2019

SNIP for Fisheries Oceanography from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.127
2019 1.214
2018 1.122
2017 0.784
2016 1.188
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Fisheries Oceanography

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Fisheries Oceanography

The international journal of the Japanese Society for Fisheries Oceanography, Fisheries Oceanography is designed to present a forum for the exchange of information amongst fisheries scientists worldwide. Fisheries Oceanography... • presents original research articles relating ...... Read More

Aquatic Science

Oceanography

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
15 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1054-6006
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.217
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G. E., Tinkham, M., & Klapwijk, T. M. (1982). Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7), 4515–4532.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2419.1996.TB00118.X
The Bering Sea Green Belt: shelf-edge processes and ecosystem production
Alan M. Springer, C. Peter McRoy1, M. V. Flint2
01 Sep 1996 - Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract:

The concept of a highly productive habitat, or Green Belt, along the edge of the continental shelf in the Bering Sea is based upon compelling but fragmentary and often anecdotal observations of a variety of physical and biological features acquired from many sources over many years. Enhanced production at continental margins ... The concept of a highly productive habitat, or Green Belt, along the edge of the continental shelf in the Bering Sea is based upon compelling but fragmentary and often anecdotal observations of a variety of physical and biological features acquired from many sources over many years. Enhanced production at continental margins is not a novel concept, but in the case of the Bering Sea its importance has been overlooked during studies of the unusually broad continental shelf. The limited data reported from the vicinity of the shelf edge in the Bering Sea indicate that annual primary production can be as high as 175 to 275 g C m˜ year-, or approximately 60% greater than production in the adjacent outer shelf domain and 270% greater than in the oceanic domain. Estimates of annual secondary production at the eastern shelf edge also average approximately 60% higher than estimates for the outer domain and 260% higher than those for the oceanic domain. Physical processes at the shelf edge, such as intensive tidal mixing and transverse circulation and eddies in the Bering Slope Current, bring nutrients into the euphoric zone and contribute to enhanced primary and secondary production and elevated biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton. Fishes and squids concentrate in this narrow corridor because of favourable feeding conditions and because of a thermal refuge from cold shelf-bottom temperatures that can be found at the shelf edge from fall to spring. The abundance of zooplankton, fishes and squids, in turn, attracts large numbers of marine birds and mammals. In aggregate, the observations suggest that sustained primary productivity, intense food web exchange and high transfer efficiency at the shelf edge are important to biomass yield at numerous trophic levels and to ecosystem production of the Bering Sea. read more read less

Topics:

Continental shelf (62%)62% related to the paper, Continental margin (57%)57% related to the paper, Biomass (ecology) (51%)51% related to the paper
514 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2419.1994.TB00105.X
Decadal-scale regime shifts in the large marine ecosystems of the North-east Pacific: a case for historical science
Robert C. Francis1, Steven R. Hare1
01 Dec 1994 - Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract:

There are two fundamental ways of doing science: the experimental-predictive and the historical-descriptive. The experimental-predictive approach uses the techniques of controlled experiment, the reduction of natural complexity to a minimal set of general causes, and presupposes that all times can be treated alike and adequat... There are two fundamental ways of doing science: the experimental-predictive and the historical-descriptive. The experimental-predictive approach uses the techniques of controlled experiment, the reduction of natural complexity to a minimal set of general causes, and presupposes that all times can be treated alike and adequately simulated in the laboratory. The historical-descriptive approach uses a mode of analysis which is rooted in the comparative and observational richness of our data, is holistic in its treatment of systems and events, and assumes that the final result being studied is unique, i.e. dependent or contingent upon everything that came before. We suggest that one of the real difficulties we have in understanding ecosystem properties is our inability to deal with scale, and we show how historical science allows us to approach the issue of scale through the interpretation of pattern in time and space. We then use the techniques of the historical-descriptive approach to doing science in the context of our own and other research on climate change and biological production in the North-east Pacific Ocean. In particular, we examine rapid decadal-scale shifts in the abundance and distribution of two major components–salmon and zooplankton - of the large marine ecosystem of the North-east Pacific, and how they relate to similar shifts in North Pacific atmosphere and ocean climate. We conclude that they are all related, and that climate-driven regime shifts, such as those we have identified in the North-east Pacific, can cause major reorganizations of ecological relationships over vast oceanic regions. read more read less

Topics:

Large marine ecosystem (53%)53% related to the paper, Climate change (53%)53% related to the paper
501 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2419.1998.00052.X
Effects of interdecadal climate variability on the oceanic ecosystems of the NE Pacific
Robert C. Francis1, Steven R. Hare2, Anne B. Hollowed3, Warren S. Wooster1
01 Apr 1998 - Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract:

A major reorganization of the North-east Pacific biotatranspired following a climatic ‘regime shift’ in the mid1970s. In this paper, we characterize the effects ofinterdecadal climate forcing on the oceanic ecosys-tems of the NE Pacific Ocean. We consider the con-cept of scale in terms of both time and space withinthe North Pac... A major reorganization of the North-east Pacific biotatranspired following a climatic ‘regime shift’ in the mid1970s. In this paper, we characterize the effects ofinterdecadal climate forcing on the oceanic ecosys-tems of the NE Pacific Ocean. We consider the con-cept of scale in terms of both time and space withinthe North Pacific ecosystem and develop a conceptualmodel to illustrate how climate variability is linked toecosystem change. Next we describe a number of re-cent studies relating climate to marine ecosystem dy-namics in the NE Pacific Ocean. These studies havefocused on most major components of marine ecosys-tems – primary and secondary producers, forage spe-cies, and several levels of predators. They have beenundertaken at different time and space scales. How-ever, taken together, they reveal a more coherentpicture of how decadal-scale climate forcing may affectthe large oceanic ecosystems of the NE Pacific. Finally,we synthesize the insight gained from interpretingthese studies. Several general conclusions can bedrawn.1 There are large-scale, low-frequency, and some-times very rapid changes in the distribution of atmo-spheric pressure over the North Pacific which are, inturn, reflected in ocean properties and circulation.2 Oceanic ecosystems respond on similar time andspace scales to variations in physical conditions.3 Linkages between the atmosphere/ocean physicsand biological responses are often different across timeand space scales.4 While the cases presented here demonstrateoceanic ecosystem response to climate forcing, theyprovide only hints of the mechanisms of interaction.5 A model whereby ecosystem response to specifiedclimate variation can be successfully predicted will bedifficult to achieve because of scale mismatches andnonlinearities in the atmosphere–ocean–biospheresystem.INTRODUCTIONIn this paper, we characterize the effects of interde-cadal climate forcing on the oceanic ecosystems of theNE Pacific Ocean. Our approach is first to reflect on anumber of recent studies relating climate to marineecosystem dynamics. These studies have focused onmost major components of marine ecosystems – pri-mary and secondary producers; primary, secondary andtop-level predators. They have been undertaken atdifferent time and space scales. However, taken to-gether they begin to reveal a more coherent picture ofhow decadal-scale climate forcing may affect the largeoceanic ecosystems of the NE Pacific. We then syn-thesize the insight gained from these studies with whatwe know about atmospheric and oceanic physics andhow they affect these marine ecosystems.Of particular importance to this paper is the con-cept of scale. Ricklefs (1990) defines scale as thecharacteristic distance or time associated with varia-tion in natural systems. He goes on to make threeimportant points about why the concept of scale is soimportant to developing an understanding of ecosys-tem structure and dynamics.Every process and pattern has a temporal andspatial extent. read more read less

Topics:

Regime shift (53%)53% related to the paper, Marine ecosystem (52%)52% related to the paper
455 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2419.2003.00270.X
Forage and migration habitat of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles in the central North Pacific Ocean
01 Jan 2004 - Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract:

Satellite telemetry from 26 loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and 10 olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles captured and released from pelagic longline fishing gear provided information on the turtles’ position and movement in the central North Pacific. These data together with environmental data from satellite remote se... Satellite telemetry from 26 loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and 10 olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles captured and released from pelagic longline fishing gear provided information on the turtles’ position and movement in the central North Pacific. These data together with environmental data from satellite remote sensing are used to describe the oceanic habitat used by these turtles. The results indicate that loggerheads travel westward, move seasonally north and south primarily through the region 28–40°N, and occupy sea surface temperatures (SST) of 15–25°C. Their dive depth distribution indicated that they spend 40% of their time at the surface and 90% of their time at depths <40 m. Loggerheads are found in association with fronts, eddies, and geostrophic currents. Specifically, the Transition Zone Chlorophyll Front (TZCF) and the southern edge of the Kuroshio Extension Current (KEC) appear to be important forage and migration habitats for loggerheads. In contrast, olive ridleys were found primarily south of loggerhead habitat in the region 8–31°N latitude, occupying warmer water with SSTs of 23–28°C. They have a deeper dive pattern than loggerheads, spending only 20% of their time at the surface and 60% shallower than 40 m. However, the three olive ridleys identified from genetics to be of western Pacific origin spent some time associated with major ocean currents, specifically the southern edge of the KEC, the North Equatorial Current (NEC), and the Equatorial Counter Current (ECC). These habitats were not used by any olive ridleys of eastern Pacific origin suggesting that olive ridleys from different populations may occupy different oceanic habitats. read more read less

Topics:

Lepidochelys olivacea (60%)60% related to the paper, Longline fishing (51%)51% related to the paper, Pelagic zone (50%)50% related to the paper
352 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2419.2001.00157.X
On the temporal variability of the physical environment over the south-eastern Bering Sea
Phyllis J. Stabeno1, Nicholas A. Bond2, Nancy B. Kachel2, Sigrid Salo1, James D. Schumacher
01 Mar 2001 - Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract:

During 1997 and 1998, unusual physical conditions occurred in the Bering Sea: strong May storms and calm conditions in July; record high sea surface temperature; a shallow wind mixed layer; a fresher-than-normal water column; and abnormal cross-shelf currents. Accom- panying these conditions were changes in the dominant phyto... During 1997 and 1998, unusual physical conditions occurred in the Bering Sea: strong May storms and calm conditions in July; record high sea surface temperature; a shallow wind mixed layer; a fresher-than-normal water column; and abnormal cross-shelf currents. Accom- panying these conditions were changes in the dominant phytoplankton, a die-off of seabirds, increased sightings of large whales and diminished returns of salmon. Changes to the physical environment during 1997 and 1998 are placed in context of historical meteorological and oceanographic data sets. Although 1997 had the warmest sea surface temperature ever observed on the south-east Bering Sea shelf, the heat content of the water column was cooler than average. In contrast, during 1998, the sea surface temperature was cooler than in 1997 but the water column had significantly higher heat content. During recent years, the water column has freshened over the middle shelf because of increased sea ice and reduction of on-shelf transport of the saline, high-nutrient water from the slope. The timing of the spring bloom is directly related to the presence of ice. When ice is advected over the south-east shelf during March/April an early, sharp phytoplankton bloom occurs. The absence of ice during this critical time is associated with a May/June bloom. 3 read more read less

Topics:

Arctic ice pack (64%)64% related to the paper, Antarctic sea ice (63%)63% related to the paper, Sea ice (63%)63% related to the paper, Spring bloom (62%)62% related to the paper, Arctic sea ice decline (61%)61% related to the paper
View PDF
349 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Fisheries Oceanography.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Fisheries Oceanography format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Fisheries Oceanography in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Fisheries Oceanography guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Fisheries Oceanography guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Fisheries Oceanography guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Fisheries Oceanography?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Fisheries Oceanography citation style.

4. Can I use the Fisheries Oceanography templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Fisheries Oceanography.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Fisheries Oceanography that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Fisheries Oceanography that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Fisheries Oceanography?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Fisheries Oceanography.

7. Where can I find the template for the Fisheries Oceanography?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Fisheries Oceanography's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Fisheries Oceanography's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Fisheries Oceanography an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Fisheries Oceanography is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Fisheries Oceanography?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Fisheries Oceanography?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Fisheries Oceanography?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Fisheries Oceanography, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Fisheries Oceanography's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Fisheries Oceanography?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Fisheries Oceanography. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Fisheries Oceanography?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Fisheries Oceanography are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Fisheries Oceanography?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Fisheries Oceanography's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Fisheries Oceanography in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Fisheries Oceanography Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Fisheries Oceanography formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template