Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format
Recent searches

Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format Example of Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Geology #37 of 251 down down by 19 ranks
Geochemistry and Petrology #35 of 128 down down by 19 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 177 Published Papers | 1017 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 22/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.759
SNIP: 1.506
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.4
SJR: 2.358
SNIP: 1.589
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.4
SJR: 1.54
SNIP: 1.365
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.6
SJR: 1.236
SNIP: 1.573

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.976

30% from 2018

Impact factor for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.976
2018 4.256
2017 3.929
2016 3.422
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.7

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.7
2019 6.7
2018 6.6
2017 6.1
2016 5.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 30% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.037

15% from 2019

SJR for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.037
2019 1.221
2018 1.605
2017 1.43
2016 1.184
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.302

13% from 2019

SNIP for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.302
2019 1.493
2018 1.63
2017 1.346
2016 1.359
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication fo...... Read More

Geology

Geochemistry and Petrology

Earth and Planetary Sciences

i
Last updated on
22 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1639-4488
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.433
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-908X.1995.TB00147.X
Three natural zircon standards for u‐th‐pb, lu‐hf, trace element and ree analyses
M. Wiedenbeck1, P. Allé1, Fernando Corfu2, William L. Griffin3, M. Meier4, F. Oberli4, A. von Quadt4, J.C. Roddick5, W. Spiegel6

Abstract:

We report here the results of a study to develop natural zircon geochemical standards for calibrating the U-(Th)-Pb geochronometer and Hf isotopic analyses. Additional data were also collected for the major, minor and trace element contents of the three selected sample sets. A total of five large zircon grains (masses between... We report here the results of a study to develop natural zircon geochemical standards for calibrating the U-(Th)-Pb geochronometer and Hf isotopic analyses. Additional data were also collected for the major, minor and trace element contents of the three selected sample sets. A total of five large zircon grains (masses between 0.5 and 238 g) were selected for this study, representing three different suites of zircons with ages of 1065 Ma, 2.5 Ma and 0.9 Ma. Geochemical laboratories can obtain these materials by contacting Geostandards Newsletter. read more read less

Topics:

Zircon (55%)55% related to the paper, Trace element (54%)54% related to the paper
4,845 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-908X.1997.TB00538.X
A Compilation of New and Published Major and Trace Element Data for NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612 Glass Reference Materials

Abstract:

Microanalytical trace element techniques (such as ion probe or laser ablation ICP-MS) are hampered by a lack of well characterized, homogeneous standards. Two silicate glass reference materials produced by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612, have been shown to be homogeneous a... Microanalytical trace element techniques (such as ion probe or laser ablation ICP-MS) are hampered by a lack of well characterized, homogeneous standards. Two silicate glass reference materials produced by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612, have been shown to be homogeneous and are spiked with up to sixty one trace elements at nominal concentrations of 500 μg g-1 and 50 μg g-1 respectively. These samples (supplied as 3 mm wafers) are equivalent to NIST SRM 611 and NIST SRM 613 respectively (which are supplied as 1 mm wafers) and are becoming more widely used as potential microanalytical reference materials. NIST however, only certifies up to eight elements in these glasses. Here we have compiled concentration data from approximately sixty published works for both glasses, and have produced new analyses from our laboratories. Compilations are presented for the matrix composition of these glasses and for fifty eight trace elements. The trace element data includes all available new and published data, and summaries present the overall average and standard deviation, the range, median, geometric mean and a preferred average (which excludes all data outside ± one standard deviation of the overall average). For the elements which have been certified, there is a good agreement between the compiled averages and the NIST data. This compilation is designed to provide useful new working values for these reference materials. read more read less

Topics:

NIST (57%)57% related to the paper
2,487 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-908X.2011.00120.X
Determination of Reference Values for NIST SRM 610–617 Glasses Following ISO Guidelines

Abstract:

We present new reference values for the NIST SRM 610–617 glasses following ISO guidelines and the International Association of Geoanalysts’ protocol. Uncertainties at the 95% confidence level (CL) have been determined for bulk- and micro-analytical purposes. In contrast to former compilation procedures, this approach delivers... We present new reference values for the NIST SRM 610–617 glasses following ISO guidelines and the International Association of Geoanalysts’ protocol. Uncertainties at the 95% confidence level (CL) have been determined for bulk- and micro-analytical purposes. In contrast to former compilation procedures, this approach delivers data that consider present-day requirements of data quality. New analytical data and the nearly complete data set of the GeoReM database were used for this study. Data quality was checked by the application of the Horwitz function and by a careful investigation of analytical procedures. We have determined quantitatively possible element inhomogeneities using different test portion masses of 1, 0.1 and 0.02 μg. Although avoiding the rim region of the glass wafers, we found moderate inhomogeneities of several chalcophile/siderophile elements and gross inhomogeneities of Ni, Se, Pd and Pt at small test portion masses. The extent of inhomogeneity was included in the determination of uncertainties. While the new reference values agree with the NIST certified values with the one exception of Mn in SRM 610, they typically differ by as much as 10% from the Pearce et al. (1997) values in current use. In a few cases (P, S, Cl, Ta, Re) the discrepancies are even higher. Nous presentons des nouvelles valeurs de reference pour les verres NIST SRM 610–617 en suivant les recommandations de l’ISO et le protocole de l’IAG. Les incertitudes au niveau de confiance de 95% ont ete determinees a des fins d’analyse totale et de micro-analyse. Contrairement aux procedures de compilation precedentes, cette approche fournit des donnees qui tiennent compte des exigences actuelles dans la qualite des donnees. De nouvelles donnees analytiques et le jeu de donnees presque complet de la base de donnees GeoReM ont ete utilises pour cette etude. La qualite des donnees a ete verifiee par l’application de la fonction de Horwitz et par un examen minutieux des procedures analytiques. Nous avons determine quantitativement les possibles inhomogeneites d’element en utilisant des prises d’essai de masses differentes correspondant a 1, 0.1 et 0.02 μg. Bien que nous ayons evite les zones de bordure des disques de verre, nous avons trouve des inhomogeneites moderees pour plusieurs elements chalcophiles/siderophiles et des inhomogeneites flagrantes de Ni, Se, Pd et Pt pour les prises d’essai de petites masses. La mesure d’inhomogeneite a ete incluse dans la determination des incertitudes. Alors que les nouvelles valeurs de reference sont en accord avec les valeurs NIST certifiees a la seule exception du Mn dans SRM 610, elles sont generalement differentes, avec des ecarts de pres de 10%, des valeurs de Pearce et al. (1997) qui sont d’un usage courant. Dans quelques cas (P, S, Cl, Ta, Re), les ecarts sont encore plus eleves. read more read less
1,388 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-908X.2004.TB00755.X
Accurate U-Pb Age and Trace Element Determinations of Zircon by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
Honglin Yuan1, Honglin Yuan2, Shan Gao2, Shan Gao3, Xiaoming Liu2, Huiming Li4, Detlef Günther1, Fu-Yuan Wu4

Abstract:

Various zircons of Proterozoic to Oligocene ages (1060-31 Ma) were analysed by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Calibration was performed using Harvard reference zircon 91500 or Australian National University reference zircon TEMORA 1 as external calibrant. The results agree with those obtained by ... Various zircons of Proterozoic to Oligocene ages (1060-31 Ma) were analysed by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Calibration was performed using Harvard reference zircon 91500 or Australian National University reference zircon TEMORA 1 as external calibrant. The results agree with those obtained by SIMS within 2s error. Twenty-four trace and rare earth elements (P, Ti, Cr, Y, Nb, fourteen REE, Hf, Ta, Pb, Th and U) were analysed on four fragments of zircon 91500. NIST SRM 610 was used as the reference material and 29Si was used as internal calibrant. Based on determinations of four fragments, this zircon shows significant intra-and inter-fragment variations in the range from 10% to 85% on a scale of 120 μm, with the variation of REE concentrations up to 38.7%, although the chondrite-normalised REE distributions are very similar. In contrast, the determined age values for zircon 91500 agree with TIMS data and are homogeneous within 8.7 Ma (2s). A two-stage ablation strategy was developed for optimising U-Pb age determinations with satisfactory trace element and REE results. The first cycle of ablation was used to collect data for age determination only, which was followed by continuous ablation on the same spot to determine REE and trace element concentrations. Based on this procedure, it was possible to measure zircon ages as low as 30.37 0.39 Ma (MSWD = 1.4; 2s). Other examples for older zircons are also given. read more read less

Topics:

Zircon (56%)56% related to the paper, Trace element (52%)52% related to the paper
1,206 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-908X.2004.TB01041.X
Further characterisation of the 91500 zircon crystal

Abstract:

This paper reports the results from a second characterisation of the 91500 zircon, including data from electron probe microanalysis, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and laser fluorination analyses. The focus of this initiative was to establish the... This paper reports the results from a second characterisation of the 91500 zircon, including data from electron probe microanalysis, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and laser fluorination analyses. The focus of this initiative was to establish the suitability of this large single zircon crystal for calibrating in situ analyses of the rare earth elements and oxygen isotopes, as well as to provide working values for key geochemical systems. In addition to extensive testing of the chemical and structural homogeneity of this sample, the occurrence of banding in 91500 in both backscattered electron and cathodoluminescence images is described in detail. Blind intercomparison data reported by both LA-ICP-MS and SIMS laboratories indicate that only small systematic differences exist between the data sets provided by these two techniques. Furthermore, the use of NIST SRM 610 glass as the calibrant for SIMS analyses was found to introduce little or no systematic error into the results for zircon. Based on both laser fluorination and SIMS data, zircon 91500 seems to be very well suited for calibrating in situ oxygen isotopic analyses. read more read less

Topics:

Zircon (52%)52% related to the paper, Secondary ion mass spectrometry (51%)51% related to the paper
1,131 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research citation style.

4. Can I use the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research.

7. Where can I find the template for the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template