Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format
Recent searches

Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format Example of Molecular Plant Pathology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Molecular Plant Pathology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Agronomy and Crop Science #10 of 347 down down by 5 ranks
Plant Science #16 of 445 up up by 3 ranks
Soil Science #6 of 135 -
Molecular Biology #64 of 382 up up by 12 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 540 Published Papers | 4848 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.833
SNIP: 0.855
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.6
SJR: 1.684
SNIP: 2.192
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.664
SNIP: 1.002
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.2
SJR: 2.106
SNIP: 1.818

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

4.326

1% from 2018

Impact factor for Molecular Plant Pathology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 4.326
2018 4.379
2017 4.188
2016 4.697
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

9.0

14% from 2019

CiteRatio for Molecular Plant Pathology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 9.0
2019 7.9
2018 7.3
2017 8.0
2016 8.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 1% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.945

4% from 2019

SJR for Molecular Plant Pathology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.945
2019 1.864
2018 1.923
2017 1.932
2016 1.942
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.683

18% from 2019

SNIP for Molecular Plant Pathology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.683
2019 1.421
2018 1.401
2017 1.509
2016 1.619
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 18% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Molecular Plant Pathology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Molecular Plant Pathology

Molecular Plant Pathology is published nine times a year and welcomes submissions from all areas of molecular plant pathology including research on diseases caused by fungi, oomycetes, viruses, nematodes, bacteria, insects, parasitic plants and other organisms. Molecular Plant...... Read More

Agronomy and Crop Science

Soil Science

Plant Science

Molecular Biology

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
18 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1464-6722
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.551
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1364-3703.2011.00783.X
The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology

Abstract:

The aim of this review was to survey all fungal pathologists with an association with the journal Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate which fungal pathogens they would place in a 'Top 10' based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated 495 votes from the international community, and resulted in th... The aim of this review was to survey all fungal pathologists with an association with the journal Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate which fungal pathogens they would place in a 'Top 10' based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated 495 votes from the international community, and resulted in the generation of a Top 10 fungal plant pathogen list for Molecular Plant Pathology. The Top 10 list includes, in rank order, (1) Magnaporthe oryzae; (2) Botrytis cinerea; (3) Puccinia spp.; (4) Fusarium graminearum; (5) Fusarium oxysporum; (6) Blumeria graminis; (7) Mycosphaerella graminicola; (8) Colletotrichum spp.; (9) Ustilago maydis; (10) Melampsora lini, with honourable mentions for fungi just missing out on the Top 10, including Phakopsora pachyrhizi and Rhizoctonia solani. This article presents a short resume of each fungus in the Top 10 list and its importance, with the intent of initiating discussion and debate amongst the plant mycology community, as well as laying down a bench-mark. It will be interesting to see in future years how perceptions change and what fungi will comprise any future Top 10. read more read less

Topics:

Plant Mycology (54%)54% related to the paper, Puccinia (52%)52% related to the paper, Phakopsora pachyrhizi (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
2,807 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1364-3703.2012.00804.X
Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology

Abstract:

Many plant bacteriologists, if not all, feel that their particular microbe should appear in any list of the most important bacterial plant pathogens. However, to our knowledge, no such list exists. The aim of this review was to survey all bacterial pathologists with an association with the journal Molecular Plant Pathology an... Many plant bacteriologists, if not all, feel that their particular microbe should appear in any list of the most important bacterial plant pathogens. However, to our knowledge, no such list exists. The aim of this review was to survey all bacterial pathologists with an association with the journal Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate the bacterial pathogens they would place in a 'Top 10' based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated 458 votes from the international community, and allowed the construction of a Top 10 bacterial plant pathogen list. The list includes, in rank order: (1) Pseudomonas syringae pathovars; (2) Ralstonia solanacearum; (3) Agrobacterium tumefaciens; (4) Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae; (5) Xanthomonas campestris pathovars; (6) Xanthomonas axonopodis pathovars; (7) Erwinia amylovora; (8) Xylella fastidiosa; (9) Dickeya (dadantii and solani); (10) Pectobacterium carotovorum (and Pectobacterium atrosepticum). Bacteria garnering honourable mentions for just missing out on the Top 10 include Clavibacter michiganensis (michiganensis and sepedonicus), Pseudomonas savastanoi and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. This review article presents a short section on each bacterium in the Top 10 list and its importance, with the intention of initiating discussion and debate amongst the plant bacteriology community, as well as laying down a benchmark. It will be interesting to see, in future years, how perceptions change and which bacterial pathogens enter and leave the Top 10. read more read less

Topics:

Xanthomonas oryzae (57%)57% related to the paper, Pectobacterium (55%)55% related to the paper, Pectobacterium atrosepticum (54%)54% related to the paper, Clavibacter michiganensis (53%)53% related to the paper, Pectobacterium carotovorum (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
1,479 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/MPP.12057
Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology

Abstract:

The aim of this review was to undertake a survey of researchers working with plant-parasitic nematodes in order to determine a ‘top 10’ list of these pathogens based on scientific and economic importance. Any such list will not be definitive as economic importance will vary depending on the region of the world in which a rese... The aim of this review was to undertake a survey of researchers working with plant-parasitic nematodes in order to determine a ‘top 10’ list of these pathogens based on scientific and economic importance. Any such list will not be definitive as economic importance will vary depending on the region of the world in which a researcher is based. However, care was taken to include researchers from as many parts of the world as possible when carrying out the survey. The top 10 list emerging from the survey is composed of: (1) root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.); (2) cyst nematodes (Heterodera and Globodera spp.); (3) root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.); (4) the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis; (5) Ditylenchus dipsaci; (6) the pine wilt nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus; (7) the reniform nematode Rotylenchulus reniformis; (8) Xiphinema index (the only virus vector nematode to make the list); (9) Nacobbus aberrans; and (10) Aphelenchoides besseyi. The biology of each nematode (or nematode group) is reviewed briefly. read more read less

Topics:

Pratylenchus (59%)59% related to the paper, Aphelenchoides besseyi (59%)59% related to the paper, Heterodera (56%)56% related to the paper, Nacobbus aberrans (56%)56% related to the paper, Ditylenchus dipsaci (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
1,215 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1364-3703.2007.00417.X
Botrytis cinerea: the cause of grey mould disease
B. Williamson1, Bettina Tudzynski2, Paul Tudzynski2, Jan A. L. van Kan3

Abstract:

Introduction: Botrytis cinerea (teleomorph: Botryotinia fuckeliana) is an airborne plant pathogen with a necrotrophic lifestyle attacking over 200 crop hosts worldwide. Although there are fungicides for its control, many classes of fungicides have failed due to its genetic plasticity. It has become an important model for mole... Introduction: Botrytis cinerea (teleomorph: Botryotinia fuckeliana) is an airborne plant pathogen with a necrotrophic lifestyle attacking over 200 crop hosts worldwide. Although there are fungicides for its control, many classes of fungicides have failed due to its genetic plasticity. It has become an important model for molecular study of necrotrophic fungi. Taxonomy: Kingdom: Fungi, phylum: Ascomycota, subphylum: Pezizomycotina, class: Leotiomycetes, order: Helotiales, family: Sclerotiniaceae, genus: Botryotinia. Host range and symptoms: Over 200 mainly dicotyledonous plant species, including important protein, oil, fibre and horticultural crops, are affected in temperate and subtropical regions. It can cause soft rotting of all aerial plant parts, and rotting of vegetables, fruits and flowers post-harvest to produce prolific grey conidiophores and (macro)conidia typical of the disease. Pathogenicity: B. cinerea produces a range of cell-wall-degrading enzymes, toxins and other low-molecular-weight compounds such as oxalic acid. New evidence suggests that the pathogen triggers the host to induce programmed cell death as an attack strategy. Resistance: There are few examples of robust genetic host resistance, but recent work has identified quantitative trait loci in tomato that offer new approaches for stable polygenic resistance in future. read more read less

Topics:

Botryotinia fuckeliana (59%)59% related to the paper, Botrytis cinerea (59%)59% related to the paper, Botryotinia (57%)57% related to the paper, Sclerotiniaceae (57%)57% related to the paper, Helotiales (55%)55% related to the paper
1,199 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1364-3703.2002.00131.X
The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—a genomics perspective

Abstract:

Summary The functions of phenylpropanoid compounds in plant defence range from preformed or inducible physical and chemical barriers against infection to signal molecules involved in local and systemic signalling for defence gene induction. Defensive functions are not restricted to a particular class of phenylpropanoid compou... Summary The functions of phenylpropanoid compounds in plant defence range from preformed or inducible physical and chemical barriers against infection to signal molecules involved in local and systemic signalling for defence gene induction. Defensive functions are not restricted to a particular class of phenylpropanoid compound, but are found in the simple hydroxycinnamic acids and monolignols through to the more complex flavonoids, isoflavonoids, and stilbenes. The enzymatic steps involved in the biosynthesis of the major classes of phenylpropanoid compounds are now well established, and many of the corresponding genes have been cloned. Less is understood about the regulatory genes that orchestrate rapid, coordinated induction of phenylpropanoid defences in response to microbial attack. Many of the biosynthetic pathway enzymes are encoded by gene families, but the specific functions of individual family members remain to be determined. The availability of the complete genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana, and the extensive expressed sequence tag (EST) resources in other species, such as rice, soybean, barrel medic, and tomato, allow, for the first time, a full appreciation of the comparative genetic complexity of the phenylpropanoid pathway across species. In addition, gene expression array analysis and metabolic profiling approaches make possible comparative parallel analyses of global changes at the genome and metabolome levels, facilitating an understanding of the relationships between changes in specific transcripts and subsequent alterations in metabolism in response to infection. read more read less

Topics:

Phenylpropanoid (56%)56% related to the paper, Gene family (51%)51% related to the paper, Regulator gene (50%)50% related to the paper
1,155 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Molecular Plant Pathology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Molecular Plant Pathology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Molecular Plant Pathology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Molecular Plant Pathology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Molecular Plant Pathology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Molecular Plant Pathology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Molecular Plant Pathology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Molecular Plant Pathology citation style.

4. Can I use the Molecular Plant Pathology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Molecular Plant Pathology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Molecular Plant Pathology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Molecular Plant Pathology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Molecular Plant Pathology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Molecular Plant Pathology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Molecular Plant Pathology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Molecular Plant Pathology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Molecular Plant Pathology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Molecular Plant Pathology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Molecular Plant Pathology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Molecular Plant Pathology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Molecular Plant Pathology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Molecular Plant Pathology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Molecular Plant Pathology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Molecular Plant Pathology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Molecular Plant Pathology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Molecular Plant Pathology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Molecular Plant Pathology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Molecular Plant Pathology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Molecular Plant Pathology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Molecular Plant Pathology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Molecular Plant Pathology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Molecular Plant Pathology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Molecular Plant Pathology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template