Example of New Phytologist format
Recent searches

Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format Example of New Phytologist format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

New Phytologist — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Plant Science #8 of 445 down down by 2 ranks
Physiology #9 of 169 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 2160 Published Papers | 30715 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 03/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 0.919
SNIP: 1.06
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.0
SJR: 1.032
SNIP: 1.124
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.6
SJR: 1.17
SNIP: 1.385

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

8.512

17% from 2018

Impact factor for New Phytologist from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 8.512
2018 7.299
2017 7.433
2016 7.33
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

14.2

9% from 2019

CiteRatio for New Phytologist from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 14.2
2019 13.0
2018 13.7
2017 12.8
2016 13.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 17% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.742

1% from 2019

SJR for New Phytologist from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.742
2019 3.702
2018 3.788
2017 3.787
2016 3.7
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.413

6% from 2019

SNIP for New Phytologist from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.413
2019 2.282
2018 2.279
2017 2.187
2016 2.015
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
New Phytologist

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

New Phytologist

New Phytologist offers rapid publication of high quality, original research in plant science. Falling within four sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction and Evolution - articles cover topics that range from intracellular processes through to global envir...... Read More

Plant Science

Physiology

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
02 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0028-646X
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.914
i
Acceptance Rate
20%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M Klapwijk TM. 1982. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B. 25(7):4515–4532, URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25. 4515

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.1980.TB04556.X
An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots
Manuela Giovannetti1, Barbara Mosse1
01 Mar 1980 - New Phytologist

Abstract:

Summary Assessment of infection is an essential part of many studies involving VA mycorrhiza. A summary is given of the range of techniques that have been used. We calculated the standard error of four methods of assessment based on observations of stained root samples either randomly arranged in a petri dish or mounted on m... Summary Assessment of infection is an essential part of many studies involving VA mycorrhiza. A summary is given of the range of techniques that have been used. We calculated the standard error of four methods of assessment based on observations of stained root samples either randomly arranged in a petri dish or mounted on microscope slides. The methods are based on presence or absence of infection at root/grid intersect points, on a visual estimate of percentage cortex occupied by fungus or on estimates of length, or presence or absence of infection in root pieces mounted on slides. The number of replicate observations required for a given standard error % infection can be read from the curves provided. The advantages of the different methods of assessment are discussed and reasons given why they all probably overestimate the true values. read more read less

Topics:

Arbuscular mycorrhizal association (59%)59% related to the paper
View PDF
5,355 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.1912.TB05611.X
The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone.1
01 Feb 1912 - New Phytologist

Topics:

Flora (63%)63% related to the paper
View PDF
3,698 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.2008.02436.X
Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?
01 Jun 2008 - New Phytologist

Abstract:

Summary Severe droughts have been associated with regional-scale forest mortality worldwide. Climate change is expected to exacerbate regional mortality events; however, pre- diction remains difficult because the physiological mechanisms underlying drought survival and mortality are poorly understood. We developed a hydraulic... Summary Severe droughts have been associated with regional-scale forest mortality worldwide. Climate change is expected to exacerbate regional mortality events; however, pre- diction remains difficult because the physiological mechanisms underlying drought survival and mortality are poorly understood. We developed a hydraulically based theory considering carbon balance and insect resistance that allowed development and examination of hypotheses regarding survival and mortality. Multiple mechanisms may cause mortality during drought. A common mechanism for plants with isohydric read more read less
View PDF
3,302 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.1990.TB00476.X
A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
T. P. McGONIGLE1, M. H. Miller1, D. G. Evans2, G. L. Fairchild3, J. A. Swan4
01 Jul 1990 - New Phytologist

Abstract:

Previously described methods to quantify the proportion of root length colonized by vesicular-arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal fungi are reviewed. It is argued that these methods give observer-dependent measures of colonization which cannot be used to compare, quantitatively, roots examined by different researchers. A modified met... Previously described methods to quantify the proportion of root length colonized by vesicular-arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal fungi are reviewed. It is argued that these methods give observer-dependent measures of colonization which cannot be used to compare, quantitatively, roots examined by different researchers. A modified method is described here to estimate VA mycorrhizal colonization on an objective scale of measurement, involving inspection of intersections between the microscope eyepiece crosshair and roots at magnification × 200; it is referred to as the magnified intersections method. Whether the vertical eyepiece crosshair crosses one or more arbuscules is noted at each intersection. The estimate of colonization is the proportion of root length containing arbuscules, called the arbuscular colonization (AC). The magnified intersections method also determines the proportion of root length containing vesicles, the vesicular colonization (VC), and the proportion of root length containing hyphae, the hyphal colonization (HC). However, VC and HC should be interpreted with caution because vesicles and hyphae, unlike arbuscules, can be produced in roots by non-mycorrhizal fungi. read more read less

Topics:

Mycorrhizal network (53%)53% related to the paper, Glomeraceae (52%)52% related to the paper, Arum type (50%)50% related to the paper, Rhizophagus irregularis (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
3,244 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.2004.01224.X
What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2.
Elizabeth A. Ainsworth1, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth2, Stephen P. Long2
01 Feb 2005 - New Phytologist

Abstract:

Contents  Summary 1 I. What is FACE? 2 II. Materials and methods 2 III. Photosynthetic carbon uptake 3 IV. Acclimation of photosynthesis 6 V. Growth, above-ground production and yield 8 VI. So, what have we learned? 10  Acknowledgements 11  References 11 Appendix 1. References included in the database ... Contents  Summary 1 I. What is FACE? 2 II. Materials and methods 2 III. Photosynthetic carbon uptake 3 IV. Acclimation of photosynthesis 6 V. Growth, above-ground production and yield 8 VI. So, what have we learned? 10  Acknowledgements 11  References 11 Appendix 1. References included in the database for meta-analyses  14  Appendix 2. Results of the meta-analysis of FACE effects 18 Summary Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments allow study of the effects of elevated [CO2] on plants and ecosystems grown under natural conditions without enclosure. Data from 120 primary, peer-reviewed articles describing physiology and production in the 12 large-scale FACE experiments (475–600 ppm) were collected and summarized using meta-analytic techniques. The results confirm some results from previous chamber experiments: light-saturated carbon uptake, diurnal C assimilation, growth and above-ground production increased, while specific leaf area and stomatal conductance decreased in elevated [CO2]. There were differences in FACE. Trees were more responsive than herbaceous species to elevated [CO2]. Grain crop yields increased far less than anticipated from prior enclosure studies. The broad direction of change in photosynthesis and production in elevated [CO2] may be similar in FACE and enclosure studies, but there are major quantitative differences: trees were more responsive than other functional types; C4 species showed little response; and the reduction in plant nitrogen was small and largely accounted for by decreased Rubisco. The results from this review may provide the most plausible estimates of how plants in their native environments and field-grown crops will respond to rising atmospheric [CO2]; but even with FACE there are limitations, which are also discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Stomatal conductance (50%)50% related to the paper
3,140 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for New Phytologist.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

New Phytologist format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write New Phytologist in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the New Phytologist guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the New Phytologist guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the New Phytologist guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in New Phytologist?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the New Phytologist citation style.

4. Can I use the New Phytologist templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for New Phytologist.

5. Can I use a manuscript in New Phytologist that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper New Phytologist that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in New Phytologist?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in New Phytologist.

7. Where can I find the template for the New Phytologist?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per New Phytologist's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the New Phytologist's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. New Phytologist an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's New Phytologist is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like New Phytologist?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like New Phytologist?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using New Phytologist?

After writing your paper autoformatting in New Phytologist, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is New Phytologist's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for New Phytologist?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for New Phytologist. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In New Phytologist?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for New Phytologist are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the New Phytologist?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per New Phytologist's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download New Phytologist in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in New Phytologist Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to New Phytologist formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template