Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format
Recent searches

Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format Example of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Sociology and Political Science #34 of 1269 up up by 34 ranks
Obstetrics and Gynecology #11 of 176 up up by 11 ranks
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health #37 of 526 up up by 15 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 92 Published Papers | 632 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 10/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.4
SJR: 0.644
SNIP: 1.01
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.8
SJR: 1.0
SNIP: 1.155
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.4
SJR: 1.325
SNIP: 1.212
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.688
SNIP: 0.981

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.636

28% from 2018

Impact factor for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.636
2018 5.045
2017 2.45
2016 3.571
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

6.9

28% from 2019

CiteRatio for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.9
2019 5.4
2018 4.1
2017 4.9
2016 3.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 28% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 28% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.818

23% from 2019

SJR for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.818
2019 2.36
2018 2.008
2017 1.363
2016 1.361
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.964

8% from 2019

SNIP for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.964
2019 1.811
2018 1.726
2017 1.119
2016 1.094
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 23% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique ...... Read More

Sociology and Political Science

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
10 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1538-6341
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.744
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
White faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1363/PSRH.38.090.06
Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
Lawrence B. Finer1, Stanley K. Henshaw1

Abstract:

CONTEXT: Many pregnancies are unintended, particularly in certain population groups. Determining whether unintended pregnancy rates and disparities in rates between subgroups are changing may help policymakers target reproductive health services to those women most in need. METHODS: To calculate rates of unintended pregnan... CONTEXT: Many pregnancies are unintended, particularly in certain population groups. Determining whether unintended pregnancy rates and disparities in rates between subgroups are changing may help policymakers target reproductive health services to those women most in need. METHODS: To calculate rates of unintended pregnancy and related outcomes, data on pregnancy intendedness from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth were combined with birth, abortion and population data from federal, state and nongovernmental sources. RESULTS: In 2001, 49% of pregnancies in the United States were unintended. The unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15–44, meaning that 5% of this group had an unintended pregnancy. This level was unchanged from 1994. The rate of unintended pregnancy in 2001 was substantially above average among women aged 18–24, unmarried (particularly cohabiting) women, low-income women, women who had not completed high school and minority women. Between 1994 and 2001, the rate of unintended pregnancy declined among adolescents, college graduates and the wealthiest women, but increased among poor and less educated women. The abortion rate and the proportion of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion among all women declined, while the unintended birth rate increased. Forty-eight percent of unintended conceptions in 2001 occurred during a month when contraceptives were used, compared with 51% in 1994. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to determine the factors underlying the disparities in unintended pregnancy rates by income and other characteristics. The findings may reflect a need for increased and more effective contraceptive use, particularly among high-risk groups. read more read less

Topics:

Unintended pregnancy (69%)69% related to the paper, Reproductive health (57%)57% related to the paper, Abortion (55%)55% related to the paper, Pregnancy (54%)54% related to the paper, Birth rate (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
1,898 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1363/PSRH.36.6.04
Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000.
Hillard Weinstock1, Stuart M. Berman1, Willard Cates1

Abstract:

CONTEXT In the United States, young people aged 15–24 represent 25% of the sexually experienced population. However, the incidence and prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among this age-group are unknown. METHODS Data from a variety of sources were used to estimate the incidence and prevalence of STDs among ... CONTEXT In the United States, young people aged 15–24 represent 25% of the sexually experienced population. However, the incidence and prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among this age-group are unknown. METHODS Data from a variety of sources were used to estimate the incidence and prevalence of STDs among 15–24-year-olds in the United States in 2000. The quality and reliability of the estimates were categorized as good, fair or poor, depending on the quality of the data source. RESULTS Approximately 18.9 million new cases of STD occurred in 2000, of which 9.1 million (48%) were among persons aged 15–24. Three STDs (human papillomavirus, trichomoniasis and chlamydia) accounted for 88% of all new cases of STD among 15–24-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS These estimates emphasize the toll that STDs have on American youth. More representative data are needed to help monitor efforts at lowering the burden of these infections. read more read less

Topics:

Population (54%)54% related to the paper, Gonorrhea (52%)52% related to the paper, Incidence (epidemiology) (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
1,661 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1363/3509403
The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy.

Abstract:

Unintended pregnancy combines two aspects of fertility: unwanted and mistimed pregnancies. The personal partnership social and political realities of these two aspects are different and the use of separate categories may better reflect the way women think about a pregnancy. A better understanding of the multiple dimensions of... Unintended pregnancy combines two aspects of fertility: unwanted and mistimed pregnancies. The personal partnership social and political realities of these two aspects are different and the use of separate categories may better reflect the way women think about a pregnancy. A better understanding of the multiple dimensions of unintended pregnancy also may lead to a better understanding of the consequences of these pregnancies. Likewise better knowledge of the extent of mistiming and perhaps the strength of intentions may be important in understanding health impact. Effective programs to prevent unintended pregnancy must use terms that are familiar to women and must build upon cultural understanding of the problem to be prevented. Research should focus on the meaning of pregnancy intentions to women and the processes women and their partners use in making fertility decisions. It should prospectively address the impact of pregnancy intentions on contraceptive use. Both qualitative and quantitative research have contributed to our understanding of fertility decisionmaking; both will be essential to the creation of more effective prevention programs. (excerpt) read more read less

Topics:

Unintended pregnancy (64%)64% related to the paper, Reproductive health (54%)54% related to the paper, Fertility (50%)50% related to the paper, Population (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
663 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1363/PSRH.12015
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014
Rachel K. Jones1, Jenna Jerman1

Abstract:

CONTEXT National and state-level information about abortion incidence can help inform policies and programs intended to reduce levels of unintended pregnancy. METHODS In 2015–2016, all U.S. facilities known or expected to have provided abortion services in 2013 or 2014 were surveyed. Data on the number of abortions were ... CONTEXT National and state-level information about abortion incidence can help inform policies and programs intended to reduce levels of unintended pregnancy. METHODS In 2015–2016, all U.S. facilities known or expected to have provided abortion services in 2013 or 2014 were surveyed. Data on the number of abortions were combined with population data to estimate national and state-level abortion rates. The number of abortion-providing facilities and changes since a similar 2011 survey were also assessed. The number and type of new abortion restrictions were examined in the states that had experienced the largest proportionate changes in clinics providing abortion services. RESULTS In 2014, an estimated 926,200 abortions were performed in the United States, 12% fewer than in 2011; the 2014 abortion rate was 14.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44, representing a 14% decline over this period. The number of clinics providing abortions declined 6% between 2011 and 2014, and declines were steepest in the Midwest (22%) and the South (13%). Early medication abortions accounted for 31% of nonhospital abortions, up from 24% in 2011. Most states that experienced the largest proportionate declines in the number of clinics providing abortions had enacted one or more new restrictions during the study period, but reductions were not always associated with declines in abortion incidence. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between abortion access, as measured by the number of clinics, and abortion rates is not straightforward. Further research is needed to understand the decline in abortion incidence. read more read less

Topics:

Abortion (67%)67% related to the paper, Unintended pregnancy (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
501 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1363/3601104
The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth, 2000.
Harrell W. Chesson1, John M. Blandford1, Thomas L. Gift1, Guoyu Tao1, Kathleen L. Irwin1

Abstract:

Context: Each year millions of USyouth acquire sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) Estimates of the economic burden of STDs can help to quantify the impact of STDs on the nations youth and on the payers of the cost of their medical care Methods: We synthesized the existing literature on STD costs to estimate the lifetime med... Context: Each year millions of USyouth acquire sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) Estimates of the economic burden of STDs can help to quantify the impact of STDs on the nations youth and on the payers of the cost of their medical care Methods: We synthesized the existing literature on STD costs to estimate the lifetime medical cost per case of eight major STDs-HIV human papillomavirus (HPV) genital herpes simplex virus type 2 hepatitis B chlamydia gonorrhea trichomoniasis and syphilis We then estimated the total burden of disease by multiplying these cost-per-case estimates by the approximate number of new cases of STDs acquired by youth aged 15-24 Results: The total estimated burden of the nine million new cases of these STDs that occurred among 15-24-year-olds in 2000 was $65 billion (in year 2000 dollars) Viral STDs accounted for 94% of the total burden ($62 billion) and nonviral STDs accounted for 6% of the total burden ($04 billion) HIV and HPV were by far the most costly STDs in terms of total estimated direct medical costs accounting for 90% of the total burden ($59 billion) Conclusions: The large number of infections acquired by persons aged 15-24 and the high cost per case of viral STDs particularly HIV create a substantial economic burden (authors) read more read less

Topics:

Population (53%)53% related to the paper
462 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health citation style.

4. Can I use the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.

7. Where can I find the template for the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template