Example of Phytochemical Analysis format
Recent searches

Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format Example of Phytochemical Analysis format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Phytochemical Analysis — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Complementary and Alternative Medicine #14 of 86 down down by 7 ranks
Plant Science #73 of 445 down down by 5 ranks
Food Science #68 of 310 down down by 31 ranks
Analytical Chemistry #46 of 122 down down by 13 ranks
Drug Discovery #66 of 145 down down by 10 ranks
Biochemistry #200 of 415 down down by 26 ranks
Molecular Medicine #101 of 167 down down by 12 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 283 Published Papers | 1286 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 25/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.3
SJR: 0.633
SNIP: 1.433
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

American Chemical Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 0.976
SNIP: 1.593
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Medium
CiteRatio: 2.0
SJR: 0.304
SNIP: 0.571
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 1.045
SNIP: 1.333

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.772

41% from 2018

Impact factor for Phytochemical Analysis from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.772
2018 1.963
2017 2.337
2016 2.292
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.5

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for Phytochemical Analysis from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.5
2019 3.9
2018 3.9
2017 4.5
2016 5.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 41% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.574

6% from 2019

SJR for Phytochemical Analysis from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.574
2019 0.611
2018 0.553
2017 0.841
2016 0.773
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.106

15% from 2019

SNIP for Phytochemical Analysis from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.106
2019 0.963
2018 0.881
2017 1.1
2016 1.189
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Phytochemical Analysis

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Phytochemical Analysis

Phytochemical Analysis is devoted to the publication of original articles concerning the development, improvement, validation and/or extension of application of analytical methodology in the plant sciences. The spectrum of coverage is broad, encompassing methods and techniques...... Read More

Medicine

i
Last updated on
25 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0958-0344
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.253
i
Acceptance Rate
35%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PCA.611
Screening of Plant Extracts for Antioxidant Activity: a Comparative Study on Three Testing Methods
I. Koleva1, Teris A. van Beek1, Jozef P. H. Linssen1, Aede de Groot1, Lyuba N. Evstatieva2
01 Jan 2002 - Phytochemical Analysis

Abstract:

Three methods widely employed in the evaluation of antioxidant activity, namely 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method, static headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) and β-carotene bleaching test (BCBT), have been compared with regard to their application in the screening of plant extracts. The strength... Three methods widely employed in the evaluation of antioxidant activity, namely 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method, static headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) and β-carotene bleaching test (BCBT), have been compared with regard to their application in the screening of plant extracts. The strengths and limitations of each method have been illustrated by testing a number of extracts, of differing polarity, from plants of the genus Sideritis, and two known antioxidants (butylated hydroxytoluene and rosmarinic acid). The sample polarity was important for the exhibited activity in the BCBT and HS-GC methods but not for the DPPH method. The complex composition of the extracts and partition phenomena affected their activity in each assay. The value of the BCBT method appears to be limited to less polar samples. Although slow, the HS-GC method is preferable for assessing the antioxidant inhibitory properties on the formation of unwanted secondary volatile products. Being rapid, simple and independent of sample polarity, the DPPH method is very convenient for the quick screening of many samples for radical scavenging activity. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

DPPH (56%)56% related to the paper
1,640 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PCA.631
Recent extraction techniques for natural products: microwave-assisted extraction and pressurised solvent extraction.
Béatrice Kaufmann1, Philippe Christen1
01 Mar 2002 - Phytochemical Analysis

Abstract:

In the last 10 years there has been an increased interest in using techniques involving microwave-assisted extraction and pressurised solvent extraction in analytical laboratories This review gives a brief overview of both methods, and reports on their application to the extraction of natural products The influence of paramet... In the last 10 years there has been an increased interest in using techniques involving microwave-assisted extraction and pressurised solvent extraction in analytical laboratories This review gives a brief overview of both methods, and reports on their application to the extraction of natural products The influence of parameters such as the nature of the solvent and volume, temperature, time and particle size of the matrix is discussed Through numerous examples, it is demonstrated that both techniques allow reduced solvent consumption and shorter extraction times, while the extraction yields of the analytes are equivalent to or even higher than those obtained with conventional methods read more read less

Topics:

Solid phase extraction (59%)59% related to the paper, Extraction (chemistry) (58%)58% related to the paper, Supercritical fluid extraction (56%)56% related to the paper
669 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PCA.1078
A Rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants
Giorgio Gambino, Irene Perrone1, Ivana Gribaudo
01 Nov 2008 - Phytochemical Analysis

Abstract:

Introduction – RNA quality and integrity are critical for many studies in plant molecular biology. High-quality RNA extraction from grapevine and other woody plants is problematic due to the presence of polysaccharides, polyphenolics and other compounds that bind or co-precipitate with the RNA. Objective – To develop an op... Introduction – RNA quality and integrity are critical for many studies in plant molecular biology. High-quality RNA extraction from grapevine and other woody plants is problematic due to the presence of polysaccharides, polyphenolics and other compounds that bind or co-precipitate with the RNA. Objective – To develop an optimised cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based protocol, to reduce the time and cost of extraction without reducing quality and yield of RNA extracted from polysaccharide-rich tissues of several plants. Methodology – Several changes were introduced to the original CTAB protocol. All centrifugation steps were carried out at 4°C, the sample weight was decreased and the concentrations of PVP-40 and LiCl were increased reducing incubation time prior to RNA precipitation. This rapid CTAB protocol was compared with six different RNA extraction methods from three grapevine tissues, namely, in vitro plantlets, and leaves and mature canes from actively growing field vines. Results – The rapid CTAB method gave high-quality RNA in only 3 h at low cost with efficiency equal to or higher than that obtained with other time-consuming and expensive protocols. The procedure was applied to RNA extraction from other grapevine tissues and other woody species including olive, lemon, poplar, chestnut, apple, pear, peach, cherry, apricot, plum and kiwi fruit. RNA of high quality could be isolated from all tissues and from all species. Conclusion – The study has shown that the improvement of a CTAB-based protocol allows the rapid isolation of high-quality RNA from grapevine and many woody species. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

RNA extraction (57%)57% related to the paper, RNA (53%)53% related to the paper
530 Citations
Testing of antifungal natural products: methodologies, comparability of results and assay choice
Franz Hadacek1, Harald Greger1
01 May 2000 - Phytochemical Analysis

Abstract:

Antifungal testing of filamentous fungi generally suffers from incomparability of results. In order to illustrate this problem, the polyacetylene falcarindiol and the naphthoquinone juglone, two known antifungal natural products, were assayed in various dilution and diffusion bioassays against three selected microfungi, Botry... Antifungal testing of filamentous fungi generally suffers from incomparability of results. In order to illustrate this problem, the polyacetylene falcarindiol and the naphthoquinone juglone, two known antifungal natural products, were assayed in various dilution and diffusion bioassays against three selected microfungi, Botrytis cinerea, Cladosporium herbarum and Fusarium avenaceum. Broth microdilution, based on the 96-well microtitre plate format, can be scored by various direct and biochemical methods. As examples, direct observation with image analysis and the fluorescein diacetate scoring method are compared. Of the other methodologies used, results obtained by thin-layer bioautography and the radial growth rate method clearly deviated. Disk diffusion results, however, matched microdilution. In conclusion, microdilution offers the greatest potential of all bioassays to become the future general standard methodology. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

Broth microdilution (56%)56% related to the paper
377 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PCA.623
A rapid TLC bioautographic method for the detection of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors in plants
Andrew Marston1, Jonathan Kissling1, Kurt Hostettmann1
01 Jan 2002 - Phytochemical Analysis

Abstract:

A simple and rapid bioautographic enzyme assay on TLC plates has been developed for the screening of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibition by plant extracts. Enzyme activity was detected by the conversion of naphthyl acetate into naphthol and the formation of the corresponding purple-coloured diazonium dye... A simple and rapid bioautographic enzyme assay on TLC plates has been developed for the screening of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibition by plant extracts. Enzyme activity was detected by the conversion of naphthyl acetate into naphthol and the formation of the corresponding purple-coloured diazonium dye with Fast Blue B salt. Inhibitors of cholinesterases produced white spots on the dye-coloured background of the TLC plates. The alkaloids galanthamine and physostigmine, which are known inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase, were used to determine the sensitivity of the assay. Various plant extracts were tested using the bioassay. read more read less
332 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Phytochemical Analysis.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Phytochemical Analysis format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Phytochemical Analysis in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Phytochemical Analysis guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Phytochemical Analysis guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Phytochemical Analysis guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Phytochemical Analysis?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Phytochemical Analysis citation style.

4. Can I use the Phytochemical Analysis templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Phytochemical Analysis.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Phytochemical Analysis that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Phytochemical Analysis that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Phytochemical Analysis?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Phytochemical Analysis.

7. Where can I find the template for the Phytochemical Analysis?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Phytochemical Analysis's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Phytochemical Analysis's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Phytochemical Analysis an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Phytochemical Analysis is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Phytochemical Analysis?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Phytochemical Analysis?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Phytochemical Analysis?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Phytochemical Analysis, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Phytochemical Analysis's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Phytochemical Analysis?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Phytochemical Analysis. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Phytochemical Analysis?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Phytochemical Analysis are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Phytochemical Analysis?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Phytochemical Analysis's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Phytochemical Analysis in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Phytochemical Analysis Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Phytochemical Analysis formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template