Example of Process Safety Progress format
Recent searches

Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format Example of Process Safety Progress format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Process Safety Progress — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality #89 of 165 down down by 27 ranks
Chemical Engineering (all) #162 of 279 down down by 42 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 255 Published Papers | 453 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 21/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.9
SJR: 1.173
SNIP: 1.75
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.506
SNIP: 0.822
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Medium
CiteRatio: 1.1
SJR: 0.193
SNIP: 0.503

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.734

17% from 2018

Impact factor for Process Safety Progress from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.734
2018 0.885
2017 0.732
2016 0.812
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.8

CiteRatio for Process Safety Progress from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.8
2019 1.8
2018 1.8
2017 2.0
2016 1.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 17% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.378

8% from 2019

SJR for Process Safety Progress from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.378
2019 0.411
2018 0.662
2017 0.623
2016 0.464
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.913

1% from 2019

SNIP for Process Safety Progress from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.913
2019 0.906
2018 0.995
2017 1.102
2016 0.792
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Process Safety Progress

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Process Safety Progress

Process Safety Progress covers process safety for engineering professionals. It addresses such topics as incident investigations/case histories, hazardous chemicals management, hazardous leaks prevention, risk assessment, process hazards evaluation, industrial hygiene, fire an...... Read More

Engineering

i
Last updated on
21 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1066-8527
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.037
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PRS.10437
A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane
Eric D. Vugrin1, Drake E. Warren1, Mark Andrew Ehlen1
01 Sep 2011 - Process Safety Progress

Abstract:

In recent years, the nation has recognized that critical infrastructure protection should consider not only the prevention of disruptive events but also the processes that infrastructure systems undergo to maintain functionality following disruptions. This more comprehensive approach has been termed critical infrastructure re... In recent years, the nation has recognized that critical infrastructure protection should consider not only the prevention of disruptive events but also the processes that infrastructure systems undergo to maintain functionality following disruptions. This more comprehensive approach has been termed critical infrastructure resilience. Given the occurrence of a particular disruptive event, the resilience of a system to that event is the system's ability to reduce efficiently both the magnitude and duration of the deviation from targeted system performance levels. Under the direction of the U. S. Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate, Sandia National Laboratories has developed a comprehensive resilience assessment framework for evaluating the resilience of infrastructure and economic systems. The framework includes a quantitative methodology that measures resilience costs that result from a disruption to infrastructure function. The framework also includes a qualitative analysis methodology that assesses system characteristics affecting resilience to provide insight and direction for potential improvements. This article describes the resilience assessment framework and demonstrates the utility of the assessment framework through application to two hypothetical scenarios involving the disruption of a petrochemical supply chain by hurricanes. © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2011 read more read less

Topics:

Resilience (network) (68%)68% related to the paper, Critical infrastructure (61%)61% related to the paper, Critical infrastructure protection (59%)59% related to the paper
286 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PRS.680160304
Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problems and the Use of Intermediate Levels of Automation for Improved Control System Functioning and Safety
David B. Kaber1, Mica R. Endsley2
01 Sep 1997 - Process Safety Progress

Abstract:

Human supervisory control and monitoring of automated systems, as well as, passive system(s) information processing can all be classified as forms of out-of-the-loop (OOTL) performance. Whether the operator's task is to decide if process control intervention is necessary, detect a critical system event, or accept or reject th... Human supervisory control and monitoring of automated systems, as well as, passive system(s) information processing can all be classified as forms of out-of-the-loop (OOTL) performance. Whether the operator's task is to decide if process control intervention is necessary, detect a critical system event, or accept or reject the actions of a computer controller, he or she is removed from direct, real-time control of the system. OOTL performance is a critical issue in overall automated systems functioning because it is associated with numerous negative consequences including: (a) operator failure to observe system parameter changes and intervene when necessary (vigilance decrements); (b) human over-trust in computer controllers (complacency); (c) operator loss of system or situation awareness; and (d) operator direct/manual control skill decay. These consequences have been found to impact human performance under both normal operating conditions and system failure modes, with a greater effect on the latter [15] leading to serious problems in operator ability to perform their assigned tasks when working with automated systems. Level of automation (LOA) has been put forth as an approach to ameliorating OOTL performance problems. It is intended to determine the optimal assignment of control between a human operator and computer in order to keep both involved in system operations. LOA considers the capabilities and capacities of both the human and computer controller in determining their optimal coupling. It constitutes a systems approach to resolving OOTL performance problems by minimizing the negative consequences associated with the removal of the operator from active system control, and allows for the strengths of both human decision making and computer processing to be realized. When compared to a technological approach that assesses only the capabilities of the computer in allocating as much responsibility to the machine as possible, and assigning the remaining tasks to the human operator, the advantages can be considerable. A LOA taxonomy will be presented along with research examining its utility in a dynamic control task. Using LOA to identify optimal combinations of human and computer control was found to produce improvements in system performance under intermediate levels. These levels involve joint human and computer control of various system functions, such as monitoring, planning, and option selection and implementation. Results indicated decreases in the number of system processes/tasks overlooked by operators. These improvements may translate into cost reductions due to improved operational safety and are anticipated to be applicable to process control operations. read more read less

Topics:

Supervisory control (59%)59% related to the paper, Automation (54%)54% related to the paper, Situation awareness (53%)53% related to the paper, Control system (52%)52% related to the paper, Loop performance (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
244 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PRS.680170207
Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries
Faisal Khan1, Shahid Abbas Abbasi1
01 Jun 1998 - Process Safety Progress

Abstract:

In the risk assessment parlance, especially with reference to chemical process industries, the term “domino effect” is used to denote “chain of accidents,” or situations when a fire/explosion/missile/toxic load generated by an accident in one unit in an industry causes secondary and higher order accidents in other units. The ... In the risk assessment parlance, especially with reference to chemical process industries, the term “domino effect” is used to denote “chain of accidents,” or situations when a fire/explosion/missile/toxic load generated by an accident in one unit in an industry causes secondary and higher order accidents in other units. The multi-accident catastrophe which occurred in a refinery at Vishakhapatnam, India, on September 14, 1997, claiming 60 lives and causing damages to property worth over Rs 600 million, is the most recent example of the damage potential of domino effect. But, even as the domino effect has been documented since 1947, very little attention has been paid towards modeling this phenomena. In this paper we have provided a conceptual framework based on sets of appropriate models to forecast domino effects, and assess their likely magnitudes and adverse impacts, while conducting risk assessment in a chemical process industry. The utilizability of the framework has been illustrated with a case study. read more read less

Topics:

Domino effect (62%)62% related to the paper, Domino (53%)53% related to the paper
216 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PRS.10015
Integrated inherent safety index (I2SI): A tool for inherent safety evaluation
Faisal Khan1, Paul Amyotte1
01 Jun 2004 - Process Safety Progress

Abstract:

Inherent safety is a proactive approach for loss prevention and risk management. Considering the lifetime costs of a process and its operation, an inherent safety approach can lead to a cost-optimal option. Inherent safety may be achieved at any stage of process design; however, its application at the early stages of process ... Inherent safety is a proactive approach for loss prevention and risk management. Considering the lifetime costs of a process and its operation, an inherent safety approach can lead to a cost-optimal option. Inherent safety may be achieved at any stage of process design; however, its application at the early stages of process design yields the best results. Despite being an attractive and cost-effective approach, the inherent safety methodology is not widely used. Many reasons have been attributed to this lack of widespread use; the nonavailability of systematic tools for the application of inherent safety principles is perhaps the most important reason. This paper presents a conceptual framework of an integrated inherent safety index (I2SI). It is called an integrated index because the procedure, when fully developed, is intended to consider the life cycle of the process with economic evaluation and hazard potential identification for each option. The I2SI is composed of subindices which account for hazard potential, inherent safety potential, and add-on control requirements. An application of the I2SI is also discussed. © 2004 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 23: 136–148, 2004 read more read less

Topics:

Inherent safety (70%)70% related to the paper
170 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PRS.680170303
Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system
Faisal Khan1, Shahid Abbas Abbasi1
01 Sep 1998 - Process Safety Progress

Abstract:

Risk analysis in chemical process industries is an elaborate exercise involving several steps from preliminary hazard identification to development of credible accident scenarios, to preparation of strategies for prevention or control of damage All this requires substantial inputs of time and money In order to get an appro... Risk analysis in chemical process industries is an elaborate exercise involving several steps from preliminary hazard identification to development of credible accident scenarios, to preparation of strategies for prevention or control of damage All this requires substantial inputs of time and money In order to get an approximate yet workable assessment of risk at much lesser costs, indices have been developed which link typical findings of elaborate risk analysis to scales of risk The scales, in turn, provide workable measures of hazards/risks/safety In the past, indices have been reported for swift risk assessment—the noteworthy among them include Dow fire and explosion index, Mond fire, explosion and toxicity index, IFAL index, and mortality index A few rapid ranking techniques have also been proposed This paper presents a new system of methodologies for Hazard Identification and Ranking (HIRA) The system consists of two indices: one for fire and explosion hazards and another for the hazard due to likely release of toxic chemical The magnitudes of these indices indicate the severity of the likely accident; in terms of the size of the impacted area HIRA has been applied to a typical chemical process industry—a sulfolane plant—and its performance has been compared with that of the Dow's and the Mond's indices The study reveals that HIRA is more sensitive and accurate than the other indices read more read less

Topics:

Risk analysis (54%)54% related to the paper, Hazard analysis (54%)54% related to the paper, Hazard (51%)51% related to the paper, Index (economics) (50%)50% related to the paper
156 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Process Safety Progress.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Process Safety Progress format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Process Safety Progress in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Process Safety Progress guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Process Safety Progress guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Process Safety Progress guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Process Safety Progress?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Process Safety Progress citation style.

4. Can I use the Process Safety Progress templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Process Safety Progress.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Process Safety Progress that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Process Safety Progress that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Process Safety Progress?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Process Safety Progress.

7. Where can I find the template for the Process Safety Progress?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Process Safety Progress's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Process Safety Progress's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Process Safety Progress an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Process Safety Progress is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Process Safety Progress?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Process Safety Progress?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Process Safety Progress?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Process Safety Progress, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Process Safety Progress's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Process Safety Progress?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Process Safety Progress. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Process Safety Progress?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Process Safety Progress are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Process Safety Progress?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Process Safety Progress's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Process Safety Progress in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Process Safety Progress Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Process Safety Progress formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template