Example of Review of Development Economics format
Recent searches

Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format Example of Review of Development Economics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Review of Development Economics — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Development #102 of 257 up up by 22 ranks
Geography, Planning and Development #281 of 704 up up by 87 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 336 Published Papers | 637 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 24/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.6
SJR: 1.47
SNIP: 2.37
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 1.499
SNIP: 2.265
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.724
SNIP: 1.366
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.8
SJR: 0.896
SNIP: 4.163

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.841

17% from 2018

Impact factor for Review of Development Economics from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.841
2018 0.716
2017 0.54
2016 0.459
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.9

46% from 2019

CiteRatio for Review of Development Economics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.9
2019 1.3
2018 1.1
2017 0.9
2016 0.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 17% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 46% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.531

42% from 2019

SJR for Review of Development Economics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.531
2019 0.375
2018 0.396
2017 0.304
2016 0.415
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.999

30% from 2019

SNIP for Review of Development Economics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.999
2019 0.766
2018 0.755
2017 0.522
2016 0.566
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 42% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 30% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Review of Development Economics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Review of Development Economics

The Review not only serves as a link between theorists and practitioners, but also builds a bridge between development economists and their colleagues in related fields. While the level of the Review of Development Economics is academic, the materials presented are of value to...... Read More

Geography, Planning and Development

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
23 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1363-6669
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.032
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9361.00045
Income Inequality is not Harmful for Growth: Theory and Evidence
Hongyi Li1, Heng-Fu Zou2

Abstract:

The paper shows that income inequality may theoretically lead to higher economic growth if public consumption enters the utility function. Empirically, baseline estimations and a sensitivity analysis show that income inequality is positively, and most of the time significantly, associated with economic growth. These findings ... The paper shows that income inequality may theoretically lead to higher economic growth if public consumption enters the utility function. Empirically, baseline estimations and a sensitivity analysis show that income inequality is positively, and most of the time significantly, associated with economic growth. These findings stand in sharp contrast to the negative association between inequality and growth propounded by Alesina and Rodrik and by Persson and Tabellini. read more read less

Topics:

Income inequality metrics (68%)68% related to the paper, Income distribution (63%)63% related to the paper, Economic inequality (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
675 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9361.2005.00265.X
Fifty Years of Regional Inequality in China A Journey through Central Planning, Reform, and Openness
Ravi Kanbur1, Xiaobo Zhang2

Abstract:

The paper constructs and analyzes a long-run time series for regional inequality in China from the Communist Revolution to the present. There have been three peaks of inequality in the last fifty years, coinciding with the Great Famine of the late 1950s, the Cultural Revolution of the late 1960s and 1970s, and finally the per... The paper constructs and analyzes a long-run time series for regional inequality in China from the Communist Revolution to the present. There have been three peaks of inequality in the last fifty years, coinciding with the Great Famine of the late 1950s, the Cultural Revolution of the late 1960s and 1970s, and finally the period of openness and global integration in the late 1990s. Econometric analysis establishes that regional inequality is explained in the different phases by three key policy variables—the ratio of heavy industry to gross output value, the degree of decentralization, and the degree of openness. read more read less

Topics:

Income inequality in China (59%)59% related to the paper, Income inequality metrics (57%)57% related to the paper, Famine (51%)51% related to the paper, Openness to experience (51%)51% related to the paper, Regional economics (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
638 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9361.2006.00311.X
Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?
Jean-Claude Berthélemy1

Abstract:

I provide an overall empirical assessment of the motivations of ODA granted by rich countries to developing countries, as revealed by aid allocation behaviors. Aid motives combine self-interested and altruistic objectives. I use a three-dimensional panel dataset, combining the donor, recipient and time dimensions, which shows... I provide an overall empirical assessment of the motivations of ODA granted by rich countries to developing countries, as revealed by aid allocation behaviors. Aid motives combine self-interested and altruistic objectives. I use a three-dimensional panel dataset, combining the donor, recipient and time dimensions, which shows a lot of heterogeneity in donor behavior. Thanks to the width of this dataset, I can test differences of parameters among donors and, in particular, compare their degrees of altruism. Switzerland, Austria, Ireland and most Nordic countries are among the most altruistic. Australia, France, Italy, and to some extent Japan and the United States are among the most egoistic. read more read less
View PDF
540 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9361.00175
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Constraints: the Case of Fertilizer Demand in Ethiopia
André Croppenstedt1, Mulat Demeke, Meloria M. Meschi2

Abstract:

Using a nationally representative dataset, and information on why farmers did not purchase fertilizer, the authors estimate a double-hurdle fertilizer adoption model for Ethiopia. Access is an overriding constraint in four zones. Credit is shown to be a major supply-side constraint, suggesting that household cash resources ar... Using a nationally representative dataset, and information on why farmers did not purchase fertilizer, the authors estimate a double-hurdle fertilizer adoption model for Ethiopia. Access is an overriding constraint in four zones. Credit is shown to be a major supply-side constraint, suggesting that household cash resources are generally insufficient to cover fertilizer purchases. On the demand side, household size, formal education of the farmer, and the value-to-cost ratio have the largest impact on adoption and intensity of fertilizer use. The results underline the importance of increasing the availability of credit, developing labor markets, and reducing the procurement, marketing and distribution costs of fertilizer. The authors conclude that current large-scale transport, health, and education investment programs will positively impact smallholder productivity and household welfare. The price sensitivity of farmers suggests that an urea subsidy could be useful in redressing the nutrient imbalance currently observed in Ethiopia. read more read less

Topics:

Constraint (mathematics) (51%)51% related to the paper
502 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9361.2005.00267.X
Spatial-Horizontal Inequality and the Maoist Insurgency in Nepal
S. Mansoob Murshed, Scott Gates1

Abstract:

The Maoist insurgency in Nepal is one of the highest intensity internal conflicts in recent times. Investigation into the causes of the conflict would suggest that grievance rather than greed is the main motivating force. The concept of horizontal or intergroup inequality, with both an ethnic and caste dimension, is highly re... The Maoist insurgency in Nepal is one of the highest intensity internal conflicts in recent times. Investigation into the causes of the conflict would suggest that grievance rather than greed is the main motivating force. The concept of horizontal or intergroup inequality, with both an ethnic and caste dimension, is highly relevant in explaining the Nepalese civil war. There is also a spatial aspect to the conflict, which is most intense in the most disadvantaged areas in terms of human development indicators and land holdings. Using the intensity of conflict (fatalities) as the dependent variable and HDI indicators and landlessness as explanatory variables, the authors find that the intensity of conflict across the districts of Nepal is significantly explained by the degree of inequalities. read more read less

Topics:

Internal conflict (58%)58% related to the paper, Horizontal inequality (57%)57% related to the paper, Social conflict (51%)51% related to the paper, Insurgency (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
460 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Review of Development Economics.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Review of Development Economics format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Review of Development Economics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Review of Development Economics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Review of Development Economics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Review of Development Economics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Review of Development Economics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Review of Development Economics citation style.

4. Can I use the Review of Development Economics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Review of Development Economics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Review of Development Economics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Review of Development Economics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Review of Development Economics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Review of Development Economics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Review of Development Economics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Review of Development Economics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Review of Development Economics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Review of Development Economics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Review of Development Economics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Review of Development Economics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Review of Development Economics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Review of Development Economics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Review of Development Economics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Review of Development Economics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Review of Development Economics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Review of Development Economics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Review of Development Economics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Review of Development Economics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Review of Development Economics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Review of Development Economics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Review of Development Economics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Review of Development Economics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Review of Development Economics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template