Example of Syntax format
Recent searches

Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format Example of Syntax format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Syntax — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Language and Linguistics #201 of 879 down down by 77 ranks
Linguistics and Language #223 of 935 down down by 85 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 52 Published Papers | 61 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 09/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.832
SNIP: 1.154
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.614
SNIP: 2.163
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.269
SNIP: 1.936
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.947
SNIP: 1.603

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.0

32% from 2018

Impact factor for Syntax from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.0
2018 0.76
2017 0.923
2016 0.885
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.2

20% from 2019

CiteRatio for Syntax from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.2
2019 1.5
2018 1.7
2017 1.5
2016 1.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 32% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 20% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.587

53% from 2019

SJR for Syntax from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.587
2019 1.257
2018 1.361
2017 0.833
2016 0.855
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.572

22% from 2019

SNIP for Syntax from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.572
2019 2.006
2018 1.995
2017 1.119
2016 0.852
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 53% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 22% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Syntax

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Syntax

SYNTAX aims to unite related but often disjointedly represented areas of syntactic inquiry together in one publication. Within a single forum SYNTAX accommodates both the explosive growth and increased specialization in the field of syntax. SYNTAX publishes a wide range of art...... Read More

Language and Linguistics

Linguistics and Language

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
09 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1368-0005
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.714
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9612.2005.00076.X
A smuggling approach to the passive in english
Chris Collins1
01 Aug 2005 - Syntax

Abstract:

. I propose a theory of the passive that combines aspects of the principles and parameters analysis (no specific rules, no downward movement) and Chomsky's (1957) Syntactic Structures analysis (the arguments in the passive are generated in the same positions as they are in the active). . I propose a theory of the passive that combines aspects of the principles and parameters analysis (no specific rules, no downward movement) and Chomsky's (1957) Syntactic Structures analysis (the arguments in the passive are generated in the same positions as they are in the active). read more read less

Topics:

Principles and parameters (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
389 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9612.00006
Overt vs. Covert Movements
Richard S. Kayne1
01 Aug 1998 - Syntax

Abstract:

In a number of cases (involving, e.g., negation, only, reverse scope of some and every, ACD) where covert (LF) phrasal movement has been postulated, it is possible and advantageous to dispense with covert movement (including feature raising) and replace it with a combination of overt movements of phonetically realized phrases... In a number of cases (involving, e.g., negation, only, reverse scope of some and every, ACD) where covert (LF) phrasal movement has been postulated, it is possible and advantageous to dispense with covert movement (including feature raising) and replace it with a combination of overt movements of phonetically realized phrases. The strongest interpretation of this conclusion is that the cases explicitly considered are typical. UG leaves no choice: Scope must be expressed hierarchically, there are no covert LF phrasal movements permitted by UG, and neither can the effect of covert phrasal movement be achieved by feature raising. Scope reflects the interaction of merger and overt movement. read more read less

Topics:

Covert (55%)55% related to the paper
297 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9612.00051
A–movement and the EPP
Željko Bošković1
01 Dec 2002 - Syntax

Abstract:

The article argues that the EPP should be eliminated. It is shown that in a number of constructions the EPP does not hold at all. Where it does appear to hold, its effects follow from independent mechanisms of the grammar. EPP effects concerning the final landing site of A–movement follow from Case theory. Intermediate [Spec,... The article argues that the EPP should be eliminated. It is shown that in a number of constructions the EPP does not hold at all. Where it does appear to hold, its effects follow from independent mechanisms of the grammar. EPP effects concerning the final landing site of A–movement follow from Case theory. Intermediate [Spec,IP]s are filled as a result of the requirement of successive cyclicity (i.e., locality); otherwise they remain empty, which is unexpected if the EPP were to hold. In particular, intermediate [Spec,IP]s remain empty in constructions involving expletive subjects, which I argue do not move at all. It is also argued that the requirement of successive cyclicity should not be tied to a property of intermediate heads, as in the feature–checking/filled–specifier requirement approach to successive cyclicity, but to a property of the movement itself. read more read less

Topics:

Syntactic expletive (52%)52% related to the paper
282 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9612.00003
Two Heads Aren’t Always Better Than One
17 Dec 2002 - Syntax

Abstract:

We propose a novel theory of verb raising in which different surface positions of the finite verb across languages reflect differences in phrase structure in a principled manner. Assuming that the inventory of functional projections dominating VP is not universal (e.g., the presence of Agr-Phrases is a point of parametric var... We propose a novel theory of verb raising in which different surface positions of the finite verb across languages reflect differences in phrase structure in a principled manner. Assuming that the inventory of functional projections dominating VP is not universal (e.g., the presence of Agr-Phrases is a point of parametric variation) current assumptions about locality predict obligatory verb raising in a language with Agr-Phrases, but obligatory V in situ in a simple IP-VP configuration. We predict a correlation with other morpho-syntactic phenomena reflecting the presence/absence of AgrPs: ''extra'' subject and object positions, transitive expletive constructions, multiple infelectional affixes, etc. This prediction is borne out for the VO Germanic languages; for the OV languages we predict the existence of head-final Infl projections. read more read less

Topics:

Finite verb (60%)60% related to the paper, Subject (grammar) (60%)60% related to the paper, Verb (58%)58% related to the paper, Raising (linguistics) (57%)57% related to the paper, Object (grammar) (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
256 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9612.00022
Licensing Wh- in situ
Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng1, Johan Rooryck1
01 Apr 2000 - Syntax

Abstract:

This article examines French wh-in-situ. We argue that wh-in-situ in French is licensed by an intonation morpheme, which also licenses yes/no questions. Movement of a Q-feature of an in-situ wh-word is required to disambiguate the underspecified intonation morpheme. The underspecification nature of this intonation morpheme le... This article examines French wh-in-situ. We argue that wh-in-situ in French is licensed by an intonation morpheme, which also licenses yes/no questions. Movement of a Q-feature of an in-situ wh-word is required to disambiguate the underspecified intonation morpheme. The underspecification nature of this intonation morpheme leads to limited distribution of French wh-in-situ. We further compare French wh-in-situ with Chinese and Portuguese, showing that wh-in-situ in different languages can in fact have different properties. read more read less

Topics:

Morpheme (63%)63% related to the paper, Intonation (linguistics) (58%)58% related to the paper, Underspecification (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
228 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Syntax.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Syntax format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Syntax in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Syntax guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Syntax guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Syntax guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Syntax?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Syntax citation style.

4. Can I use the Syntax templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Syntax.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Syntax that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Syntax that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Syntax?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Syntax.

7. Where can I find the template for the Syntax?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Syntax's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Syntax's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Syntax an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Syntax is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Syntax?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Syntax?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Syntax?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Syntax, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Syntax's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Syntax?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Syntax. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Syntax?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Syntax are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Syntax?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Syntax's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Syntax in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Syntax Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Syntax formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template