Anna Chaimani

TL;DR: The process of developing specific advice for the reporting of systematic reviews that incorporate network meta-analyses is described, and the guidance generated from this process is presented.

TL;DR: This work aimed to update and expand previous work to compare and rank antidepressants for the acute treatment of adults with unipolar major depressive disorder, and found that all antidepressants were more effective than placebo.

TL;DR: This paper provides a set of STATA routines that can be easily employed to present the evidence base, evaluate the assumptions, fit the network meta-analysis model and interpret its results.

TL;DR: An approach to determining confidence in the output of a network meta-analysis is proposed based on methodology developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group for pairwise meta-analyses and applied to a systematic review comparing topical antibiotics without steroids for chronically discharging ears with underlying eardrum perforations.

TL;DR: A methodological framework to evaluate confidence in the results from network meta-analyses, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA), when multiple interventions are compared is presented, which improves transparency and avoids the selective use of evidence when forming judgments, thus limiting subjectivity in the process.