https://www.odontoscan.com.br/imagens/gerais/anexo_562a890d92ee9.pdf

Endodontic Applications of Cone-Beam Volumetric Tomography

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been specifically designed to produce undistorted three-dimensional information of the maxillofacial skeleton, including the teeth and their surrounding tissues with a significantly lower effective radiation dose compared with conventional computed tomography (CT). Periapical disease may be detected sooner using CBCT compared with periapical views and the true size, extent, nature and position of periapical and resorptive lesions can be assessed. Root fractures, root canal anatomy and the nature of the alveolar bone topography around teeth may be assessed. The aim of this paper is to review current literature on the applications and limitations of CBCT in the management of endodontic problems.

https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01531.x

New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography

Cone-beam imaging has gained broad acceptance in dentistry in the last 5 years. The purpose of this review is to describe the use in dentistry and consider issues requiring further development. Cone-beam machines emit an x-ray beam shaped liked a cone rather than a fan as in conventional computed tomography (CT) machines. After this beam passes through the patient the remnant beam is captured on an amorphous silicon flat panel or image intensifier/charge-coupled device (CCD) detector. The beam diameter ranges from 4 to 30 cm and exposes the head in one pass around the patient capturing from 160 to 599 basis images. These images are used to compute a volume from which planar or curved reconstructions can be extracted in any orientation. Voxels are isotropic and can be as small as 0.125 mm. 3-D images of bone or soft tissue surfaces can also be generated. In dentistry the most common indications for cone-beam imaging are assessment of the jaws for placement of dental implants, evaluation of the temporomandibular joints for osseous degenerative changes, examination of teeth and facial structures for orthodontic treatment planning, evaluation of the proximity of lower wisdom teeth to the mandibular nerve prior to extraction, and evaluation of teeth and bone for signs of infections, cysts, or tumors. Cone-beam images have largely replaced conventional tomography for these tasks. The effective dose from cone-beam imaging ranges from 6 to 477 microSv. The cost of the equipment is relatively low, about $150,000 to $300,000. Issues to be considered are the training of individuals making and interpreting cone-beam images, as well as means to further reduce patient exposure.

Cone-beam imaging in dentistry.

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability of cone beam CT (CBCT) values and dimensional measurements of oropharyngeal air spaces as compared with those of multidetector row CT (MDCT). Methods: A soft tissue equivalent phantom with different sized holes was used. The phantom was scanned using CBCT and MDCT. In addition, a volunteer was examined using both methods for clinical comparison. The CT data were retrieved to a personal computer and treated using image processing software for three-dimensional rendering and dimensional measurements. The CT values of air, water and soft tissues were measured experimentally and the CT values of air, fat and muscle were measured in a clinical case. The diameter of each hole drilled in the phantom was measured on CBCT and MDCT images using the software tool and digimatic callipers. Results: The CBCT values were quite different from the Hounsfield units obtained with a typical MDCT system. The standard deviations were almost ten times larger with CBCT. In vivo assessment ...

The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT.

Objective
To evaluate the type and prevalence of incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the maxillofacial region. Findings are divided into those that require (i) intervention/referral, (ii) monitoring, and (iii) no further evaluation.

Methods
Three hundred consecutive CBCT scans conducted in the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Clinic from January 1 to August 31, 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Findings were categorized into airway, soft tissue calcifications, bone, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), endodontic, dental developmental, and pathological findings.

Results
A total of 272 scans revealed 881 incidental findings (3.2 findings/scan). The most prevalent was airway findings (35%) followed by soft tissue calcifications (20%), bone (17.5%), TMJ (15.4%), endodontic (11.3%), dental developmental (0.7%), and pathological (0.1%). 16.1% required intervention/referral, 15.6% required monitoring, and the remainder (68.3%) required neither.

Conclusion
This study underscores the need to thoroughly examine all CBCT volumes for clinically significant findings within and beyond the region of interest.

https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/rv042v04n

Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is making inroads into dental practice worldwide, both in terms of adding the third dimension to diagnosis, and also in terms of enabling image-guided treatment strategies. This article reports trends in the early referral pattern of patients to a CBCT facility in the United States. With institutional review board approval, a retrospective study was made of sequential CBCT radiographic reports made by a specialist oral and maxillofacial radiology service from May 2004 through January 2006 (n = 329). Demographic and referral data were extracted from the reports. Descriptive statistics identified referral patterns, trends, and indications for CBCT. Comparisons were made with the Rogers' Product Innovation Adoption curve. The mean age of referred patients was 45 ± 21 years, and there was a predominance of women (62%). Oral and maxillofacial surgeons (51%) and periodontology specialists (17%) made most patient referrals. The listed reasons for CBCT referrals were dental implant planning (40%), suspected surgical pathology (24%), and temporomandibular joint analysis (16%). Other uses included planning extraction of impacted teeth and orthodontic assessment. Over the period of the study, the numbers of pathology diagnosis cases remained relatively constant, while adoption of CBCT for dental implant planning followed closely the first three stages of the Rogers' Product Innovation Adoption curve. Alongside this increased CBCT adoption for dental implant planning, there was an associated increased demand for use of DICOM image sets for laser modeling and provision of surgical guides. Diagnosis will probably remain a constant source of referral for CBCT examination by oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Nevertheless, more specialized applications such as laser-guided model fabrication and image-guided surgery are expanding indications for CBCT referrals by dentists and also expanding the horizons of clinical dental practice.

Chris Arnheiter

Papers

Trends in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography usage